France is banning activist groups as presidential rivals jockey for position ahead of 2027 poll
And like much of French politics right now, the latest moves are intertwined with jockeying by political rivals ahead of 2027 presidential elections.
Emmanuel Macron won't be able to stand for re-election in 2027 after serving as president for the maximum two terms, and presidential hopefuls are trying to make the most of a highly inflammatory political context, both on the domestic and international stages.
As extreme political forces made significant gains in recent parliamentary elections, leaving a fractured legislature, Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau — a senior member of the government who is eager to succeed Macron — is hitting out at various groups to show his credentials.
On Wednesday, Retailleau confirmed plans for the dissolution of the Urgence Palestine group, a collective calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza which has accused Israel of genocide. During an interview with Europe 1-CNews, Retailleau said that banning the group was a blow to ' Islamism.'
'Islamism is an ideology that tries to use a religion as a tool," he said. "We need to hit Islamism so that we can protect our Muslim compatriots.'
The planned dissolution of Urgence Palestine is the latest move in the French government's strategy to bring down groups deemed as extremists. Retailleau told the lower house of the Parliament this week that he started a similar procedure against a left-wing movement called the antifascist Young Guard.
That group, which is supported by political figures from the hard left, was created in Lyon in response to the growing presence of far-right activists in the city. Retailleau said he is also seeking the dissolution of a group close to the "ultra-right" movement called Lyon Populaire.
The interior minister is a hardline conservative working within the centrist government of Prime Minister Francois Bayrou. Retailleau is bidding to become the leader of Les Républicains and represent his party at the 2027 presidential election.
Racist and antisemitic acts
Retailleau's announcements came on the eve of the May Day celebrations, which are often marred by violence on the sidelines of events marking International Workers' Day, and amid a surge in antisemitic and islamophobic incidents in Europe against the backdrop of the Israel-Hamas war.
France's National Consultative Commission on Human Rights last year reported a 32% spike in racist incidents in 2023, and an 'unprecedented' surge in antisemitic acts, up 284% from 2022. The report said the numbers were likely an undercount, given that many victims of racism don't file complaints.
In this context, presidential contenders, including leftist challenger Jean-Luc Melenchon and far-right stalwarts Marine Le Pen and Jordan Bardella, are all playing their cards.
Melenchon attended a rally in Paris last week after a man suspected of killing a Muslim worshipper in a French mosque in an attack that was described by Bayrou as described by Bayrou as Islamophobic. Melenchon was moved to tears after a woman told him how Muslims no longer feel safe in France and that a red line had been crossed.
'That's for sure,' replied Melenchon, who accused Retailleau of nurturing 'a climate of Islamophobia.'
Melenchon in recent years has taken a clear stance in defense of Muslims, with many political rivals accusing him and his hard-left France Unbowed party of antisemitism. He strongly denies the accusations.
Siphoning off far-right voters
On the other side of the spectrum, fearing that the current government's hardline stance on immigration and the fight against extremism could lead to a siphoning off of its voters, far-right leaders have accused Retailleau of just pretending to be tough.
In February, after one person was killed and police officers injured in a knife attack in the eastern French city of Mulhouse conducted by a 37-year-old Algerian man, Bardella said Retailleau should either 'act or step down.'
The suspect had arrived in France without papers and was arrested and convicted of glorifying terrorism in the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attack on Israel. After several months in prison for that conviction, the suspect was confined to house arrest as authorities sought to expel him to Algeria.
'Perhaps in order to please the National Rally electorate and right-wing voters, (Retailleau) is making more and more statements, except that the same things are happening over and over again,' Bardella said.
Retailleau, who will likely face stiff competition from rivals including former Prime Minister Edouard Philippe and Justice Minister Gerald Darmanin in his 2027 bid, has clearly made the fight against Islamism his rallying cry.
His strategy of overtaking the far-right on its themes bears many similarities to Nicolas Sarkozy's successful presidential campaign in 2007, when he beat a Socialist rival in the second round of ballot to succeed Jacques Chirac after the far-right candidate Jean-Marie Le Pen was eliminated in the first round with just 10% of votes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Emmanuel Macron admits French colonial 'repression' in Cameroon independence struggle
French President Emmanuel Macron has acknowledged the violence committed by his country's forces in Cameroon during and after the Central African nation's struggle for followed a joint report by Cameroonian and French historians examining France's suppression of independence movements from 1945 to a letter to Cameroon's President Paul Biya made public on Tuesday, Macron said the report made clear "a war had taken place in Cameroon, during which the colonial authorities and the French army exercised repressive violence of several kinds in certain regions of the country"."It is up to me today to assume the role and responsibility of France in these events," he said. However, Macron fell short of offering a clear apology for the atrocities committed by French troops in its former colony, which gained independence in French leader cited four independence icons who were killed during military operations led by French forces, including Ruben Um Nyobe, the firebrand leader of the anti-colonialist UPC admits colonial 'massacre', says Senegal's leaderThe decision to investigate and publish findings on France's role in Cameroon's independence struggle was made in 2022, during Macron's visit to Yaoundé.It followed pressure from within the country for France to acknowledge its atrocities in its former colony and pay also expressed willingness to work with Cameroon to promote further research on the matter, while highlighting the need for both countries to make the findings available to universities and scientific BBC has reached out to Cameroon's government for comment on the French president's Macron did not address calls for reparations, it is likely to be a key talking-point in Cameroon going Macron, France has attempted to confront its brutal colonial year, it acknowledged for the first time that its soldiers had carried out a "massacre" in Senegal in which West African troops were killed in has previously acknowledged France's role in the Rwandan genocide, in which about 800,000 ethnic Tutsis and moderate Hutus died, and sought forgiveness. In 2021, he said France had not heeded warnings of impending carnage and had for too long "valued silence over examination of the truth". You may also be interested in: Is the world's oldest leader set for an eighth term?Macron asks Rwanda to forgive France over 1994 genocide role'Nowhere is safe' - Cameroonians trapped between separatists and soldiers Go to for more news from the African us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
ITV News
5 hours ago
- ITV News
UK to co-chair talks with European and US leaders over ending war in Ukraine
Pro-Ukraine allies - including the UK and Europe - will meet virtually with US President Donald Trump on Wednesday about ending the war in Ukraine ahead of the US and Russian leaders summit. US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are expected to meet in Alaska on Friday in a bid to secure a peace deal. But Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has not been invited to the summit, and European leaders have been rallying around Kyiv insisting that Ukraine must determine its own future. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is co-chairing a separate meeting with Zelensky, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Wednesday afternoon. The leaders will then be joined by Trump and US Vice President JD Vance, where the European leaders will be hoping to convince the US to advance Ukraine's and Europe's interests. Trump has said a peace deal with Russia would require Ukraine to give up some Russian-held territory and could include some "land swapping" with Ukraine. But Zelenskyy said he would not give eastern Ukraine to Russia or withdraw from the territories that it controls, warning it would act as a "springboard for a future new offensive." Ahead of Wednesday's call, a Downing Street spokesperson said Starmer was focused on a solution to the conflict "in Ukraine's national interests". 'He is determined to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine, backed by robust and credible security guarantees that will deter Russia from threatening Ukraine in the future," the spokesperson said. After the call, Starmer will co-chair a Coalition of the Willing meeting to provide an update on what occurred. The coalition is an international effort to support Ukraine towards lasting peace, led by the UK, France and Ukraine. It is made up of 31 countries that have pledged strengthened support for Kyiv, including 27 European countries, as well as Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Japan.
The Herald Scotland
7 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Now we know why Nicola Sturgeon focused on non-binary and trans issues
Politics is among the poorest rewarded professions for those in senior leadership positions and few waste much time in cashing in while the public still remembers their name. Fewer have done it with quite the unalloyed sense of purpose as Nicola Sturgeon, who has dominated the news schedules and front pages over recent days in a way that Kim Jong Un would be proud. Read More: For a self-confessed 'painfully shy' introvert, uncomfortable in the public spotlight, the former First Minister appears to have subdued her demons, at least temporarily, in the cause of promoting her new memoir, Frankly. For anyone who has been in a coma this past week – well you haven't missed much. Selected passages published before the launch are, we have to assume, the most interesting bits, which hardly bodes well for the rest of the book. It's not that Ms Sturgeon doesn't have anything useful to say, it's that she imparts it in such a lacklustre way, as though she has a nosebleed whenever she feels what she's writing might be too engaging. The revelations, such as they are, will be familiar to anyone who follows Scottish politics closely. Alex Salmond's claim that he was a victim of a criminal conspiracy that saw him charged – and cleared – of 13 counts of sexual assault, was preposterous. 'He impugned the integrity of the institutions at the heart of Scottish democracy.' Ms Sturgeon suffered a panic attack during the 2014 independence referendum campaign due to media bias and because Salmond left her to do most of the heavy lifting. He flew to China without having read the white paper setting out the case for independence, she claims. Being arrested – and later cleared – during Operation Branchform was the worst day of her life when she felt like she had 'fallen into the plot of a dystopian novel'. While giving evidence to the Covid inquiry last year, she 'came perilously close to a breakdown' and later had to seek professional help. What is missing is the contemporaneous, insider detail that makes reading political memoirs worthwhile – snatches of candid conversation with colleagues, disagreements, colourful observations that give the reader a sense that they're getting a privileged glimpse behind the scenes. The problem with Ms Sturgeon's writing is that she remains, by her nature, a politician, which makes everything sound like a prepared statement. In media interviews about her book, she has come across as cautious, obstructive even, as though she's still defending government policy rather than her own words, offered voluntarily. None more so than over the issue which has got the redtops in a tizzy – her sexuality. Many of us had heard the rumours of supposed lesbian trysts with the former French ambassador to the UK, and the alleged purchase of a 'love nest' from Judy Murray to facilitate said trysts. All denied and laughed off by the parties themselves as well as by anyone who has more worthwhile things to think about. Rather than leave it at that, Ms Sturgeon has chosen to address the issue of her sexuality head-on, albeit in a single sentence that she has since, stubbornly refused to elaborate on. "Long-term relationships with men have accounted for more than thirty years of my life, but I have never considered sexuality, my own included, to be binary,' she wrote. 'Moreover, sexual relationships should be private matters." We can probably all agree on the latter sentence, which begs the question, why include the former? I would guess that there are vanishingly few people who give two hoots about who Ms Sturgeon goes to bed with, but there is a bigger and more profound issue at the heart of her admission. It is that she appears perfectly content to discuss her sexual orientation when she has a book to sell, but not when she was First Minister, ushering in one of the most contentious and divisive programmes around sexual identity and sexual politics in the history of this country. Did she not think that, if she is to make her own sexuality public property, it might have been more germane – to her colleagues and politicians from other parties, as well as to the voting public – to have known about it during the passage of the Gender Recognition Reform Act? Does she not regard it at all significant that she now reveals her sexuality to be 'non-binary', given the centrality of the non-binary community to the purpose of her government's gender equality programme. A working group on non-binary equality was established in 2019 and, two years later, it published a draft non-binary equality action plan that included 35 recommendations, 24 of which have since been accepted by the Scottish Government. Among the recommendations was an assurance that 'non-binary people have equal access to transition-related healthcare, regardless of gender identity, gender presentation, race, disability, neurodiversity, financial resources, postcode, or other characteristics'. The working group document stated: 'All trans and non-binary people should have equal access to treatment pathways. A large proportion of trans people identify as non-binary, but medical practitioners still often consider non-binary patients to be inherently more complex, meaning that they experience greater difficulties and delays in accessing treatment.' Irrespective of what you think about the Scottish Government's gender recognition programme, we can all accept that it is a complex and highly charged policy area that should require full transparency from all of those involved. The cases of Isla Bryson – a rapist who, after transitioning was remanded in a women's prison – and Sandie Peggie, a nurse who complained about sharing a changing room with a transgender doctor, demonstrate how the lived experience of people can quickly undermine the most well intentioned policy. I'm not suggesting that every politician should be obliged to declare their sexuality before working or voting on sensitive sexual rights policies but I come back to the question around Ms Sturgeon: why now and not then? Carlos Alba is a journalist, author, and PR consultant at Carlos Alba Media. His latest novel, There's a Problem with Dad, explores the issue of undiagnosed autism among older people
