logo
Now we know why Nicola Sturgeon focused on non-binary and trans issues

Now we know why Nicola Sturgeon focused on non-binary and trans issues

Politics is among the poorest rewarded professions for those in senior leadership positions and few waste much time in cashing in while the public still remembers their name.
Fewer have done it with quite the unalloyed sense of purpose as Nicola Sturgeon, who has dominated the news schedules and front pages over recent days in a way that Kim Jong Un would be proud.
Read More:
For a self-confessed 'painfully shy' introvert, uncomfortable in the public spotlight, the former First Minister appears to have subdued her demons, at least temporarily, in the cause of promoting her new memoir, Frankly.
For anyone who has been in a coma this past week – well you haven't missed much. Selected passages published before the launch are, we have to assume, the most interesting bits, which hardly bodes well for the rest of the book.
It's not that Ms Sturgeon doesn't have anything useful to say, it's that she imparts it in such a lacklustre way, as though she has a nosebleed whenever she feels what she's writing might be too engaging.
The revelations, such as they are, will be familiar to anyone who follows Scottish politics closely.
Alex Salmond's claim that he was a victim of a criminal conspiracy that saw him charged – and cleared – of 13 counts of sexual assault, was preposterous. 'He impugned the integrity of the institutions at the heart of Scottish democracy.'
Ms Sturgeon suffered a panic attack during the 2014 independence referendum campaign due to media bias and because Salmond left her to do most of the heavy lifting. He flew to China without having read the white paper setting out the case for independence, she claims.
Being arrested – and later cleared – during Operation Branchform was the worst day of her life when she felt like she had 'fallen into the plot of a dystopian novel'.
While giving evidence to the Covid inquiry last year, she 'came perilously close to a breakdown' and later had to seek professional help.
What is missing is the contemporaneous, insider detail that makes reading political memoirs worthwhile – snatches of candid conversation with colleagues, disagreements, colourful observations that give the reader a sense that they're getting a privileged glimpse behind the scenes.
The problem with Ms Sturgeon's writing is that she remains, by her nature, a politician, which makes everything sound like a prepared statement.
In media interviews about her book, she has come across as cautious, obstructive even, as though she's still defending government policy rather than her own words, offered voluntarily. None more so than over the issue which has got the redtops in a tizzy – her sexuality.
Many of us had heard the rumours of supposed lesbian trysts with the former French ambassador to the UK, and the alleged purchase of a 'love nest' from Judy Murray to facilitate said trysts. All denied and laughed off by the parties themselves as well as by anyone who has more worthwhile things to think about.
Rather than leave it at that, Ms Sturgeon has chosen to address the issue of her sexuality head-on, albeit in a single sentence that she has since, stubbornly refused to elaborate on.
"Long-term relationships with men have accounted for more than thirty years of my life, but I have never considered sexuality, my own included, to be binary,' she wrote. 'Moreover, sexual relationships should be private matters."
We can probably all agree on the latter sentence, which begs the question, why include the former?
I would guess that there are vanishingly few people who give two hoots about who Ms Sturgeon goes to bed with, but there is a bigger and more profound issue at the heart of her admission.
It is that she appears perfectly content to discuss her sexual orientation when she has a book to sell, but not when she was First Minister, ushering in one of the most contentious and divisive programmes around sexual identity and sexual politics in the history of this country.
Did she not think that, if she is to make her own sexuality public property, it might have been more germane – to her colleagues and politicians from other parties, as well as to the voting public – to have known about it during the passage of the Gender Recognition Reform Act?
Does she not regard it at all significant that she now reveals her sexuality to be 'non-binary', given the centrality of the non-binary community to the purpose of her government's gender equality programme.
A working group on non-binary equality was established in 2019 and, two years later, it published a draft non-binary equality action plan that included 35 recommendations, 24 of which have since been accepted by the Scottish Government.
Among the recommendations was an assurance that 'non-binary people have equal access to transition-related healthcare, regardless of gender identity, gender presentation, race, disability, neurodiversity, financial resources, postcode, or other characteristics'.
The working group document stated: 'All trans and non-binary people should have equal access to treatment pathways. A large proportion of trans people identify as non-binary, but medical practitioners still often consider non-binary patients to be inherently more complex, meaning that they experience greater difficulties and delays in accessing treatment.'
Irrespective of what you think about the Scottish Government's gender recognition programme, we can all accept that it is a complex and highly charged policy area that should require full transparency from all of those involved.
The cases of Isla Bryson – a rapist who, after transitioning was remanded in a women's prison – and Sandie Peggie, a nurse who complained about sharing a changing room with a transgender doctor, demonstrate how the lived experience of people can quickly undermine the most well intentioned policy.
I'm not suggesting that every politician should be obliged to declare their sexuality before working or voting on sensitive sexual rights policies but I come back to the question around Ms Sturgeon: why now and not then?
Carlos Alba is a journalist, author, and PR consultant at Carlos Alba Media. His latest novel, There's a Problem with Dad, explores the issue of undiagnosed autism among older people
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mystery as bodies of FOUR men are pulled from Seine in Paris after train passenger spotted floating corpse
Mystery as bodies of FOUR men are pulled from Seine in Paris after train passenger spotted floating corpse

Scottish Sun

time23 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

Mystery as bodies of FOUR men are pulled from Seine in Paris after train passenger spotted floating corpse

DEATH RIDDLE Mystery as bodies of FOUR men are pulled from Seine in Paris after train passenger spotted floating corpse FOUR people have been found dead in the Seine River in Paris after a horrified train passenger spotted a floating corpse. Police rushed to the harrowing scene before recovering the bodies from the river in Choisy-le-Roi, Val-de-Marne, in the French capital on Wednesday. Advertisement 1 Police found four dead bodies in the Seine River in Paris (stock) Credit: Reuters Cops were joined by river brigade authorities who helped to bring the bodies out of the water, Actu17 reported. More to follow... For the latest news on this story keep checking back at The Sun Online is your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures and must-see video. Advertisement Like us on Facebook at and follow us from our main Twitter account at @TheSun.

Nicholas Rossi found guilty in US rape trial
Nicholas Rossi found guilty in US rape trial

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Nicholas Rossi found guilty in US rape trial

A jury in Salt Lake County found Nicholas Rossi guilty of a 2008 rape after a three-day trial in which his accuser and her parents took the stand. The verdict came hours after Rossi, 38, declined to testify on his own behalf. He will be sentenced in the case on October 20 and is set to stand trial in September for another rape charge in Utah County. READ MORE: Pro-Palestine protesters greet JD Vance as he lands in Scotland First-degree felony rape carries a punishment in Utah of five years to life in prison, said Salt Lake County District Attorney Sim Gill. Gill said: 'We are grateful to the survivor in this case for her willingness to come forward, years after this attack took place. 'We appreciate her patience as we worked to bring the defendant back to Salt Lake County so that this trial could take place and she could get justice. 'It took courage and bravery to take the stand and confront her attacker to hold him accountable.' Utah authorities began searching for Rossi, whose legal name is Nicholas Alahverdian, when he was identified through a decade-old DNA rape kit in 2018. He was among thousands of rape suspects identified and later charged when the state made a push to clear its rape kit backlog. Months after he was charged in Utah County, an online obituary claimed Rossi had died on February 29 2020, of late-stage non-Hodgkin lymphoma. But police in his home state of Rhode Island, along with his former lawyer and a former foster family, cast doubt on whether he was dead. He was arrested in Scotland the following year while receiving treatment for Covid-19 after hospital staff in Glasgow recognised his distinctive tattoos from an Interpol notice. Rossi said he was the victim of mistaken identity, claiming to be an Irish orphan named Arthur Knight who was being framed. Months of court proceedings in Edinburgh followed but in November 2022, Sheriff Norman McFadyen determined the man claiming to be Knight was indeed Rossi. A hearing took place in June 2023, with Sheriff McFadyen ruling there was no barrier to Rossi's extradition. An extradition warrant was signed in September 2023 and Rossi was finally sent to the US in January 2024. Investigators say they identified at least a dozen aliases Rossi used over the years to evade capture. He appeared in court this week in a wheelchair, wearing a suit and tie and using an oxygen tank. Throughout the trial, prosecutors painted a picture of an intelligent man who used his charm to take advantage of a vulnerable young woman. She was living with her parents and recovering from a traumatic brain injury when she responded to a personal ad Rossi posted on Craigslist. They began dating and were engaged within about two weeks. On Monday, the woman described being asked to pay for their dates, cover Rossi's car repairs, lend him 1000 dollars so he wouldn't be evicted from his apartment and take on debt to buy their engagement rings. He grew hostile soon after their engagement and raped her in his bedroom one night after she drove him home, she testified. The woman said dismissive comments from her parents convinced her not to go to the police at the time. She came forward a decade later after she saw him in the news and learned he was accused of another rape from the same year. Rossi's lawyers sought to convince the jury that his accuser built up years of resentment after he made her foot the bill for everything in their month-long relationship. They argued she accused him of rape to get back at him years later, when he was getting media attention. Lawyers for Rossi did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment after the verdict. Rossi's accuser in the Utah County case did, however, go to the police at the time. She gave evidence on Tuesday about her own experiences with Rossi, though he will not stand trial for that rape charge until next month. Rossi is accused of attacking the second woman, another former girlfriend, at his apartment in Orem in September 2008 after she came to collect money she said he stole from her to buy a computer. When police initially interviewed Rossi, he claimed she had raped him and threatened to have him killed. Rossi grew up in foster homes in Rhode Island and had returned there before allegedly faking his death. He was previously wanted in the state for failing to register as a sex offender. The FBI has said he also faces fraud charges in Ohio, where he was convicted of sex-related charges in 2008.

Here's everything we can expect when Starmer and Zelensky meet today
Here's everything we can expect when Starmer and Zelensky meet today

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

Here's everything we can expect when Starmer and Zelensky meet today

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has had more than his fair share of 'very big weeks' since Russia's invasion in 2022. But this week may prove to be among the most important. Tomorrow, Donald Trump will meet Vladimir Putin in Alaska for what's being described by the White House as a 'listening exercise' with the aim of laying groundwork for peace in Ukraine. Leaders from across Europe were able to press the US President with their arguments for what terms would and would not be acceptable in a virtual call yesterday afternoon. And this morning, Prime Minister Keir Starmer will welcome Zelensky to Downing Street for private talks. They will likely focus on strategies for responding to whatever emerges from the high-stakes Alaska summit – whether it's a solid ceasefire proposal, or something less substantial. Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here. No press conference is planned from the pair, so we may end up having to rely on a short description of the meeting from No 10 to learn what was discussed. Both leaders are likely to be in a good mood after the Teams chat yesterday was described in glowing terms by both Europe and the US. Immediately afterwards, Trump rated the meeting as 'a ten' and came out with strong words for Putin, saying the consequences would be 'very severe' if no ceasefire is agreed. During the call, Starmer had praised the US President for his work in creating a 'chance' for a 'viable way of bringing [the conflict] to a ceasefire'. More Trending Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron described it as an 'excellent meeting', and said there was 'strong alignment' on priorities like ensuring no decisions about Ukraine should be taken without the Ukrainians. Friedrich Merz, the German Chancellor, said the Europeans 'are doing everything to set the course for this [Alaska] meeting in the right direction'. When announcing his intention to meet with Putin last week, Trump also mooted a potential subsequent trilateral meeting where Zelensky would join them. In his press conference following the call yesterday, Trump once again raised this possibility, saying: 'We'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelensky and myself, if they'd like to have me there.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: South Park's latest savage Donald Trump takedown scores 6,200,000 viewers in 3 days MORE: Trump's honours list includes a British 70s sitcom actor you may have forgotten MORE: Home of 'Alligator Alcatraz' says human rights in the UK have worsened

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store