Bears CB Jaylon Johnson shares personal goals for 2025
Bears CB Jaylon Johnson shares personal goals for 2025
The expectations for the Chicago Bears have risen this offseason, from a team standpoint and a player standpoint, especially the leaders on both offense and defense. Pro Bowl cornerback Jaylon Johnson is ready to elevate his game to an even higher level with this new coaching staff, led on defense by veteran defensive coordinator Dennis Allen.
The Bears have made considerable upgrades on both offense and defense, but Johnson has been a mainstay for Chicago, even through the rough years. Now, with hype and expectations rising around the team, Johnson is hoping to elevate his game to the next level.
In a recent interview, Johnson detailed his personal goals for the season, which were quite detailed and lofty -- but nothing Johnson isn't capable of.
"My expectations for this year, I just wrote my numbers down, I want to have seven interceptions, three forced fumbles, ten turnovers at least," Johnson told FOX Sports' Speak show. "I want to have no touchdowns given up, no games over 50 receiving yards allowed. First-team All-Pro, Pro Bowl, and I want to get in the end zone three times, that's for sure."
Johnson's career high in interceptions in a single season is four (2023), and he's had one forced fumble in each season since 2021. One of the league's best coverage corners in the game, Johnson clearly wants to become more of a ballhawk and a playmaker under his new defensive coordinator.
There is going to be many reasons to watch the Bears this year, but Johnson setting his sights even higher is definitely something to keep an eye on this season.
Follow Bears Wire on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
25 minutes ago
- New York Times
Steelers finally get their quarterback in Aaron Rodgers, but buyer beware
It feels like we just watched Aaron Rodgers on a weird, man-on-the-streets version of a reality TV dating show, one in which our dapper dude begrudgingly committed to someone after a far more arduous saga than anyone ever imagined. Resigned to the belief that a third-best option was better than no option at all, our bachelor talked himself into awarding the rose to the only partner left standing. Together, they awkwardly begin their new union, ignoring the signs that suggest this won't end well. Advertisement That's basically what happened between Rodgers and the Pittsburgh Steelers on Thursday. Some 85 days after the revamping New York Jets released him, after the Minnesota Vikings pledged loyalty to second-year pro J.J. McCarthy, and after the New York Giants signed Jameis Winston and Russell Wilson in free agency and drafted Jaxson Dart for good measure, Rodgers is officially a Steeler. Contingency plan Mason Rudolph led the Steelers' first-team offense through its sixth and final voluntary offseason practice session. But the plan now calls for Rodgers to fly to Pittsburgh, where on Tuesday he'll take the field for his new team's three-day mandatory minicamp, catch his breath for six weeks and then report for training camp No. 21 and begin his quest for one last shot at football glory. Their patience — or desperation — rewarded, the Steelers got their guy. They're rolling the dice on yet another long-in-the-tooth quarterback, viewing him as better suited to lead their roster into battle than any journeyman, project quarterback or unproven rookie. This is a buyer-beware situation, however. The Steelers signed a sure-fire Hall of Famer with a Super Bowl ring, four MVPs and 10 Pro Bowl selections on his resume. But Rodgers, who turns 42 in December, is a shell of himself. Coach Mike Tomlin and general manager Omar Khan envision Rodgers replicating what Tom Brady did with Tampa Bay and leading the Steelers on a storybook championship march. But Rodgers is no Brady — who was a robot of a professional, even at 43, with no agenda beyond winning — and this Steelers roster is not on par with those 2020 Buccaneers. To be clear, Rodgers is better than any other quarterback the Steelers have on their roster. Rudolph, on his second stint with the team, is 9-8-1 with 28 touchdowns, 20 interceptions and 13 fumbles in five seasons. Skylar Thompson has three starts and 10 total appearances to his name, with just one touchdown pass and three interceptions. Sixth-round rookie Will Howard is a project quarterback. Advertisement So, Rodgers, who has seen every blitz package and coverage scheme known to man, will prove more proficient in directing a Steelers offense that this offseason swapped out wide receiver George Pickens for DK Metcalf and replaced running back Najee Harris with third-round pick Kaleb Johnson. But this is the same Rodgers who is coming off the most disappointing showing of his career after struggling to effectively direct a Jets offense that featured Pro Bowl-caliber wide receivers Davante Adams and Garrett Wilson and potent running back Breece Hall. Pittsburgh does have a consistently reliable defense. But will Rodgers fare much better with the Steelers, who have fielded pedestrian offenses for years? It's not like team officials made dramatic upgrades to that side of the ball. Metcalf, for whom the Steelers traded before awarding him a $132 million contract, may have Pickens beat in the maturity department. But statistically, the differences are negligible. And that raises the question of why, if Pittsburgh was so intent on this Rodgers fling, it didn't hang onto Pickens for one more season to ensure this over-the-hill legend at least had a dynamic receiver tandem with which to work. Just as Metcalf may not be a legit upgrade over Pickens, Rodgers might not be any better than Russell Wilson. Compare the aging former NFC rivals' last three seasons. The numbers are eerily similar. Rodgers completed 63.7 percent of his passes; Wilson 63.4 percent. Rodgers had 54 touchdown passes and 23 interceptions. Wilson had 58 touchdown passes and 24 interceptions. Rodgers went 14-21; Wilson 17-24. But an eight-year playoff win drought and a refusal to do what it takes to acquire a top-flight rookie quarterback and endure the development stages have clouded the Steelers' judgment. Did they forget that Father Time remains undefeated? Sure, Brady and Peyton Manning managed to deliver Super Bowls to new teams as the sun set on their careers. But those occurrences are rare. Just ask Joe Montana and the Chiefs, Joe Namath and the Rams, Johnny Unitas and the Chargers, Warren Moon and the Vikings and Seahawks and Cam Newton and the Patriots. Advertisement Eventually, the magic fades. But it's not the physical decline that should concern the Steelers the most. A team that prides itself on professionalism and discipline, led by the ultimate culture guy in Tomlin, needs only to examine Rodgers' off-field behavior the last three years to realize this is not an ideal fit. Tomlin always preaches, 'The standard is the standard. We're going to do things the Steeler way.' He's all about accountability and team above self — yet he hitched himself to a quarterback notorious for finger-pointing when things go south. Did Pittsburgh forget how Rodgers' time in Green Bay ended? Unhappy with the way team president Mark Murphy and general manager Brian Gutekunst were running the team and his lack of input, Rodgers was publicly critical of both and wanted Gutekunst fired. Fatigued by his antics and growing non-football interests, the Packers moved on with Rodgers in the dark. Did the Steelers forget how Rodgers criticized the dysfunctional ways of the Jets organization, eventually leading to head coach Robert Saleh and general manager Joe Douglas getting fired? Rather than accept accountability for New York's shortcomings during last year's 5-12 debacle, Rodgers regularly used his buddy Pat McAfee's show as a platform to call out teammates and Jets leadership. Pittsburgh officials are guilty of arrogance, viewing themselves as a far superior franchise to the Jets and immune to such a debacle. Perhaps they see more similarities to Green Bay and believe Rodgers will embrace a return to structure and simply play his role. But that would require Rodgers to possess a keen focus and unquenchable thirst for winning at all costs and the humility necessary to adapt and alter his approach. If Tomlin thinks he's getting a laser-focused Rodgers who's all about sacrificing for the greater good, he should think again. Sure, Rodgers may have expressed respect during this drawn-out courtship, which seemingly even included Tomlin cutting a deal that let the quarterback skip all but three days of the offseason program. But as he welcomes Rodgers aboard, Tomlin is putting himself and the franchise at great risk. Advertisement League insiders have long regarded Tomlin as a strong leader of men with a knack for managing complicated personalities and getting his charges to exceed expectations and overcome adversity. He draws praise for having never experienced a losing season in 18 years as head coach. However, he'll have to use every management and relationship-massaging trick he's got to prevent Rodgers from taking a stick of dynamite to the Steelers' near pristine culture if things play out poorly. Critics have long said that while Tomlin's avoidance of losing records is remarkable, his unwillingness to evolve in the areas of team operations, staff construction and talent evaluation actually holds the Steelers back. If losses mount and Rodgers makes the same observations about an antiquated approach, he'll certainly pull back the curtain on this boss, as he has on others, and subject a proud franchise to embarrassment. Speaking of relationships, one of the most important ones will be that of the quarterback and offensive coordinator Arthur Smith. Many league insiders believe that to avoid a combustible situation, Tomlin will give Rodgers freedom to operate as he pleases. It will take work for Smith to align his conservative, run-first philosophies with those of Rodgers, who still views himself as a gunslinger. The two have never worked together. Smith worked under Matt LaFleur, Rodgers' head coach in Green Bay, when LaFleur was the offensive coordinator in Tennessee. And Steelers quarterbacks coach Tom Arth had a brief stint as an offseason teammate of Rodgers' in 2006. But there are no pre-existing ties to ensure this thing remains on track. Blending existing concepts with those of a veteran quarterback isn't easy. Just ask Bruce Arians and Byron Leftwich, who spent half of the 2020 season trying to do so for Brady before finding the perfect mix late in that season. And that was while working with the laser-focused Brady and not a quarterback like Rodgers with meandering interests and a strong sense of entitlement. Ideally, Smith would have had all offseason to cultivate a relationship with his quarterback and integrate his favorite concepts and plays into the Steelers' playbook. The two could have experimented, massaged and tweaked throughout the offseason. But instead, they will receive one three-day on-field stretch together before reconvening for training camp. Advertisement How will Rodgers respond if the offense sputters, should he and Smith clash? Will he eventually go rogue and get into on-field trouble while overestimating his declining physical gifts? And then there's chemistry with teammates. Unlike the Jets' experiment, Pittsburgh isn't going out to get as many hand-picked former Packers for Rodgers. Instead, he will have to start from scratch on Tuesday and continue throughout training camp. And even then, will it be enough? If he threw Jets teammates he'd known for nearly two years under the bus, what will he do to Pittsburgh players he hardly knows? Will Tomlin and Steelers owner Dan Rooney be able to stomach weekly outlandish comments from their quarterback on McAfee's show? Pittsburgh's desperation for a deep playoff run is real — so real it feels like the usually conservative Tomlin and Steelers were willing to ignore a dozen red flags, including that they were nowhere close to his first choice. But maybe things will not go as disastrously as they could. Maybe Rodgers will change his stripes and be the model teammate and ultimate professional — a big maybe. He doesn't make the Steelers better than the AFC North rival Baltimore Ravens. He might not even have the capability to carry Pittsburgh past Joe Burrow and the Cincinnati Bengals. We won't even talk about the Kansas City Chiefs. So, is this soul-selling dance worth it? There's no Super Bowl run left in this version of Aaron Rodgers. If we're being honest, the best realistic scenario involves this experiment going woefully wrong, and at last, the Steelers find themselves in position to draft a top-flight quarterback. At worst, Rodgers and the Steelers labor through another season and finish a tick above .500 — as is customary — only to remain stuck in football purgatory with no clear path out.
Chicago Tribune
32 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
David Greising: The conversation about new sports stadiums in Chicago just got simpler
What an unusual and pleasant surprise it was to wake up Tuesday and learn that Joe Mansueto, owner of the Chicago Fire soccer team, has committed to build a new stadium at The 78. There was no begging or badgering for billions in public funds. No threats to move the franchise to Nashville, Tennessee, or Tampa, Florida, or some other city desperate to lure a migratory sports team. No hand-wringing over downtown versus suburban stadium sites. No demand that the public pay up, for the benefit of the wealthy sports team owner. None of that came from Mansueto. Instead, the Calumet City native and billionaire founder of the Morningstar research and financial services firm simply published a notice in local newspapers. Mansueto's full-page advertisement gracefully broke the news, stirring the spirits of a city that's bone tired of sports team owners asking taxpayers to lay out billions so the owners can get even richer. Mansueto's low-key move is simple: He'll plunk down $650 million to build a 22,000-seat soccer venue in time to open the 2028 MLS season. And the knock-on effect is that the civic conversation about what government owes to sports owners who want to move their teams just got a lot simpler. When asked by those owners, a firm 'no' from city and state is definitely an option. The burden of proof for any kind of need should firmly lie with the owners; the public figures who give anything away should make a detailed and persuasive financial case to the public, and we hold elected officials accountable for any concessions they do make. The Halas-McCaskey family, owners of the Chicago Bears, and Jerry Reinsdorf, lead owner of the White Sox, both have banked on public funding to help them build new stadiums. Reinsdorf on Thursday revealed he has agreed to sell the White Sox to investor Justin Ishbia beginning in 2029 — with capital infusions to come from Ishbia during the intervening years. Chances weren't good for either team even before the Fire announcement. Gov. JB Pritzker, in particular, has been steadfast in his refusal to help the Bears or the White Sox build new playgrounds for their teams. He allowed staff to meet with the Bears toward the spring legislative session, but nothing so far has come of what appeared to be a courteous gesture on the governor's part. Reinsdorf reportedly was prepared to seek $1 billion in taxpayer backing early this year to help move the White Sox from Rate Field to The 78. He may yet try to make The 78 site work for his ballclub. Never mind that taxpayers, through the good offices of the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority (ISFA), have paid off only about one-third of the $150 million in bonds sold in 1989 to build The Rate so Reinsdorf's team could play there. Ishbia's commitment to make investments is welcome news for taxpayers, in that Reinsdorf's case for government support just got weaker as a result. The Bears had hoped to persuade Pritzker to kick in as much as $2.4 billion in taxpayer money to build a new stadium south of Soldier Field. When that went nowhere, they switched to Arlington Heights, claiming they could build there without direct taxpayer support. But watch that space: An ask is coming; we just know it in our bones. Already, the Bears have wrangled tax breaks from Arlington Heights and local school districts. Editorial: Soccer-loving Joe Mansueto comes through for Chicago and its FireAnd if the Bears do leave Soldier Field any time soon, taxpayers will be on the hook for their vacated but recently remodeled home. ISFA still owes more than $400 million from the remodeling of Soldier Field — a project so tasteless that Soldier Field lost its national landmark status as a result. Mansueto is not the only area billionaire funding a new stadium from his own bank account. Up in Evanston, Northwestern University is building a new $850 million football stadium, courtesy of a contribution by billionaire alumni Patrick G. and Shirley W. Ryan. What's the difference between Mansueto and the Ryans on the one hand and Reinsdorf and the Halas-McCaskey families on the other? Unlike Mansueto and Ryan, it's altogether possible that the Halas-McCaskeys and Reinsdorf simply cannot cover the cost of the new stadiums they covet. And both owners understandably believe their teams need new arenas in order to compete in their leagues, given the stadium-building boom that has beset professional sports. There are options available that would enable both ownership groups to build new stadiums, maintain control of their teams and proceed without drawing from public funds. The Bears franchise last year was valued at $6.4 billion by Forbes magazine — nearly double the estimated value in 2020. The White Sox are worth more than $2 billion, according to Forbes. Private equity firms are eager to buy minority stakes in sports teams. Nearly half of all MLB teams already have sold ownership shares to private-equity investors, and Reinsdorf just joined the group with the planned capital infusions and eventual sale to Ishbia, a private equity investor. The NFL last year began allowing private-equity investments for the first time. This opened up a new source of capital for owners and helped turbocharge an unprecedented boom in franchise valuations. Reinsdorf's deal with Ishbia shows one way this can be done: But Halas-McCaskeys please note: An outright sale isn't necessary; a significant capital infusion can happen without requiring a change of control. Selling chunks of the franchises could raise the capital the Bears and Sox owners want in order to help them afford new ballparks. Ryan already owns nearly 20% of the Bears and is considered likely to want a bigger stake. The owners also could borrow against the value of their franchises. This would affect their cash flow, true, but also could enable the owners to avoid diluting their ownership stake. Holding onto equity is particularly important in the NFL, where franchise valuations have increased at double-digit rates over the last five years. Finally, the Bears just might qualify for public support if they would open their minds to the possibility of building a stadium at the former Michael Reese Hospital site. Public incentives would be defensible, given the economic impact that would result from a major investment on the outskirts of Bronzeville. But the Bears just don't want to go there — which is their right, so long as they keep their paws out of the public till. David Greising is president and CEO of the Better Government Association.
Fast Company
an hour ago
- Fast Company
Tom Brady explains how the best entrepreneurs make things look simple
Tom Brady's post-football career has been as methodical as his two-minute drill, and arguably more lucrative. The seven-time Super Bowl champion has systematically built a business empire spanning wellness (TB12), apparel (Brady Brand), and media (Religion of Sports), among other things, along with ownership stakes in the Las Vegas Raiders and Birmingham City FC. And then, of course, there's the 10-year, $375 million deal he signed in 2024 to serve as lead NFL analyst for Fox Sports. Now he's adding another vertical to his portfolio: organic snacks. GOAT Gummies, Brady's latest venture, launched this week exclusively with instant-delivery company Gopuff. The organic, vegan gummies represent Brady's characteristic obsession with optimization—this time applied to what he calls 'better for you' indulgences.
