As US drops among Chinese study preferences, Singapore beckons with status and culture
'After staying here for some time, I realised that this isn't quite the right place for me in the long run,' said Zheng, who is majoring in economics and statistics in the US and aspires to work outside China after graduating.
She has faced increasing hurdles as an international student in America. Difficulties adjusting to cultural differences coupled with her parents' concerns about safety have prompted her to apply to Singapore's top two universities in the coming application cycle.
'Singapore offers a great environment,' said Zheng, who is drawn to the nation's warm climate, abundance of Chinese cuisine and relatively high economic and diplomatic openness.
Singapore, home to six publicly funded autonomous universities and a handful of private universities, has long been a popular destination for Chinese students seeking an overseas education. In 2023, there were more than 73,000 international students in Singapore, according to local media reports, with a significant proportion believed to be from China.
03:40
Absurd, anxious, concerned: Students react to US revoking Chinese student visas
Absurd, anxious, concerned: Students react to US revoking Chinese student visas
And while the US has historically been the primary draw for Chinese students, industry insiders say Singapore may see an uptick in applications from Chinese students in the short term amid growing uncertainty and instability in the US.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
15 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong seeks new partner to get 11 Skies back on track amid New World's debt: sources
Airport Authority Hong Kong is in talks with New World Development (NWD) to get a massive commercial property project at the heart of Hong Kong's international airport back on track, according to several sources familiar with the matter. Advertisement The authority is considering the option of seeking a new partner to undertake and complete the work at 11 Skies shopping centre, which was awarded in 2018, the sources said. The financial terms of the move are still under negotiation, they said, declining to be identified for discussing a confidential matter. The move, viewed as a win-win solution for both parties, would offer relief to NWD, which is undergoing the biggest debt workout in three generations of ownership by the Cheng family. For the authority, it ensures that the city's status as an aviation and tourism hub is shielded from the developer's debt woes. The major sticking point in the talks is the potential compensation due to the authority for the 40-year contract, one of the sources said. NWD is under contract to pay the authority HK$1.8 billion (US$229.3 million) every year in guaranteed rent, the sources said. The authority's press office and spokespeople at NWD did not respond to requests for comment. The blueprint for Airport City – including 11 Skies – was first unveiled in 2019. Photo: Airport Authority of Hong Kong The project, with 3.8 million sq ft (353,000 square metres) of gross floor area, is part of the airport authority's SkyCity master plan , which combines shopping, entertainment, dining, commercial offices and several hotels in a 25 hectare (61.8 acre) area to undergird Hong Kong's status as Asia's aviation and international travel hub. The talks are focused on the retail, dining and entertainment space of 11 Skies, according to a source. The project also features three office towers that are not within the scope of discussion.
AllAfrica
3 hours ago
- AllAfrica
US and its allies unprepared to repel saturation missile attacks
Between June 13 and 24 Iran launched 574 missiles attacking Israel. Some of them got through, despite Israeli and US efforts to stop them. Until now we have lacked convincing data allowing some cogent analysis of the results of missile defenses. That information is partly supplied by a new study by the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a Washington-based think tank that is pro-US defense and pro-Israel. There are some surprises. The biggest one is the role of THAAD operated by US personnel in Israel and in the Gulf. THAAD is the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense system. It is designed to intercept short-, medium- and long-range ballistic missiles. THAAD interceptors cost $12.7 million each, making them expensive, but not nearly as costly as the AEGIS SM-3 Block 2A interceptor that is priced at just under $28 million per shot. THAAD is a hit-to-kill, or kinetic kill, interceptor that does not use explosives. It has an operational ceiling of around 92 miles, so it is not capable of exoatmospheric intercepts (310 to 620 miles). Israel's high altitude interceptor, Arrow 3, is said to be capable of intercepts in the exoatmosphere. According to the JINSA report, in the June conflict THAAD intercepted 47.7 percent of all the missiles fired at Israel, an unexpectedly high proportion. In doing so, the US expended at least 14% of its total THAAD interceptor stockpile. JINSA says it will take Lockheed, which manufactures the THAAD interceptors, around eight years to replenish the US stockpile, assuming the rate of production is not significantly increased. Take Note: We only know the number of Iranian missiles shot down by THAAD (92). We do not know how many THAAD interceptors were launched to shoot down the Iranian missiles. The 14% figure represents the claimed kills, not the actual number fired. Thus the remaining inventory of THAAD interceptors may be smaller than stated in the report. There are a couple of important caveats. The first is that the US is supplying other countries with THAAD systems. Saudi Arabia has a THAAD system delivered from the United States and 50 interceptors. However, it has ordered 360 interceptors, which will take years to manufacture. Saudi THAAD personnel. Photo: Kingdom's Ministry of Defense The UAE reportedly has 192 THAAD interceptors, although it is not clear all have been delivered. The US also has THAAD systems in South Korea (where there are now reports North Korea is boosting its missile production) and in Hawaii, Guam and Wake Island. Given the Chinese missile threat and regional volatility, the US may have to beef up supplies for the Pacific. The alternative is to reply on AEGIS, a very expensive system that operates at sea and therefore is not capable of fully protecting US and allied bases in the region. The second problem is intercepting hypersonic missiles. Iran reportedly used some of these attacking Israel. China and Russia already have them (e.g., DF-17 with DF-2F hypersonic glide vehicles and Russia's Avangard and Oreshnik ballistic missiles, plus Kinzhal and Zircon). THAAD probably needs to have longer range and speed to counter hypersonic missiles, something that has been proposed (THAAD-ER) but not yet approved. Israel has Arrow 2 and Arrow 3, the latter able to operate in the exoatmosphere. In the recent conflict, Israel says it intercepted more than 200 Iranian missiles, Another 258 missiles were not intercepted because Israel determined they were not going to hit populated areas or critical infrastructure. THAAD intercepted 92 Iranian missiles. According to Israeli reports, that left 57 Iranian missiles that got through and did damage. What the information tells us is that more than half of Iran's missiles were inaccurate (for one reason or another). It tells us that Israel does not have an adequate missile intercept inventory or launcher capability. Apparently Israel recognizes this shortcoming, but it depends on US manufacturing to help fill the gaps. It also tells us that Israel cannot defend its territory without the United States. The great importance of THAAD for defending Israel is critical. The JINSA report does not take into account Iranian and other drones fired at Israel. However, that threat will also multiply in future. (Israel has Iron Dome and Iron Beam, and can also use its air force to shoot down drones,) Patriot also played a role in the conflict, mainly to defend al Udeid air base in Qatar. The Iranians fired 14 short and medium range missiles at the air base on the last day of the conflict, and the US was warned about the attack ahead of time by Iran. In response the US launched 30 Patriots and intercepted 13 out of 14 Iran's missiles. One missile got through and damaged a communications dome on the base. Before and after photos of damage at Al Udeid Air Base last month. Photo: Planet Labs In practice this means it takes at least two Patriot interceptors for every enemy missile fired. As is well known, the US is in short supply of Patriot, which the US, its allies and friends rely on for air defense. This has caused significant controversy in connection with supplies of Patriots for Ukraine. The Pentagon has made clear that stockpiles are at a critical level and it does not want to deplete them further in support of Ukraine. Instead, at President Donald Trump's initiative, Germany has agreed to supply Patriot interceptors (model unclear, as there are different Patriot interceptors, the most important PAC-3), but Germany does not have enough. The German Defense Minister, Boris Pistorius, is negotiating with his European counterparts, to 'find' the missiles Ukraine needs. Allegedly, Germany will pick up the bill for replacing them later., but the Germans now want US guarantees. The JINSA paper also points out that Israel destroyed some 250 Iranian missile launchers (only after they fired their missiles). This is a luxury that Ukraine, for example, does not have and it is a challenge for the US and its Pacific allies, because finding and destroying adversary launchers (e.g., potentially China's or Russia's) is a far bigger challenge than Iran. The US and Israeli ability to manufacture air defense missiles is inadequate against Russian, Chinese, Iranian and maybe North Korean factories' ability to produce ballistic missiles. What is true for the defense of Israel, supplementation of Israel's local air defenses with US assets, also is true for Europe and Asia. NATO has very limited air defenses, well below what Israel has but a need to protect a massively bigger territory. The United States' Asian allies Japan and South Korea also have limited air defenses, mainly relying on their own Patriot systems or on Patriot plus AEGIS in the case of Japan. Taiwan has Patriot PAC-3, but not enough systems or missiles. The US, at present, would find it extremely difficult to backstop NATO against a massive attack by Russia, or to support Japan and South Korea, let alone Taiwan, with de minimis stockpiles and too few systems. There is THAAD in Korea, but not in Japan or Taiwan. Japan even rejected AEGIS Ashore to protect its territory, although it does have four AEGIS-equipped ships. Taiwan publicly rejected THAAD, an incredibly foolish move. To make a long story short, the US and its allies are not well prepared against saturation missile attacks and don't have enough coverage to protect military installations, command and control centers, airfields, naval ports or even logistic centers and factories (putting aside attacks focused on critical infrastructure, as we see on a daily basis in Ukraine). It should be obvious that the US industrial base is not ready for the challenge, that there are not enough factories and that efficiency (understood in terms of output) is low. The Pentagon is still relying on ordering missile production from existing factories rather than really trying to reform the manufacturing infrastructure so we can match the output of Russia, China or even Iran. Stephen Bryen, a special correspondent to Asia Times and a former US deputy undersecretary of defense for policy, also previously served as executive director of the JINSA think tank. This article, which originally appeared in his Substack newsletter Weapons and Strategy, is republished with permission.
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China, EU must show mutual respect in more complicated world
The 25th China-European Union summit fell in the 50th anniversary year of diplomatic relations. The double milestone set the stage for guiding strained ties between the two trading giants towards less troubled waters. Economic tensions compounded by the Ukraine war could not be mended overnight. But President Xi Jinping set the tone and pointed the way forward ahead of the summit chaired by Premier Li Qiang, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa. In a meeting with the European leaders, Xi described China and the EU as 'two big guys' in the world. That is a compelling reminder the world is facing huge complexity, and the more complicated it is, the more imperative it is for China and Europe to show mutual respect, find common ground and keep open minds in the search for win-win outcomes to economic and security concerns. Xi said that amid accelerating transformation and an international landscape fraught with turbulence, China and Europe must demonstrate vision and responsibility by making the right strategic choices 'that meet people's expectations and stand the test of history'. The strategic situation is fluid, with Europe facing steep tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump. Xi said the two sides should reinforce their partnership as a cornerstone in bilateral ties, adding that the challenges Europe is facing 'were not from China'. Beijing hoped Europe would likewise respect its chosen development path and political system, acknowledge its core interests and major concerns.
