Toyota Faces Biggest Hit From Trump Tariffs Among Automakers
(Bloomberg) -- Supply Lines is a daily newsletter that tracks global trade. Sign up here.
A New Central Park Amenity, Tailored to Its East Harlem Neighbors
As Trump Reshapes Housing Policy, Renters Face Rollback of Rights
Is Trump's Plan to Reopen the Notorious Alcatraz Prison Realistic?
What's Behind the Rise in Serious Injuries on New York City's Streets?
NYC Warns of 17% Drop in Foreign Tourists Due to Trump Policies
Toyota Motor Corp. is the biggest carmaker in the world — and also the auto industry's biggest loser when it comes to projected losses from US President Donald Trump's trade war.
Duties on imported cars and auto parts forced General Motors Co. to slash its full-year profit guidance by as much as $5 billion, while Ford Motor Co. is bracing for a $1.5 billion annual hit. Toyota sees a $1.2 billion profit drop in just two months. While the Japanese automaker didn't provide a tally for all of 2025, it did project operating income of ¥3.8 trillion ($26.1 billion) for the fiscal year ending March 2026 — far below the ¥4.7 trillion expected by analysts.
While Toyota has increased local production in the US to more than half of sales in the country, it still relies on imports of key vehicle parts and models — to the tune of some 1.2 million cars a year. The White House has noticed, with Trump calling out the Toyota City-based automaker by name during his contentious Liberation Day speech in the Rose Garden on April 2. He complained about Toyota's 'one million foreign made automobiles' sold in the US.
The huge tariff hit reflects the company's decision to hold the line on sticker prices at US dealers and production volumes at its 11 American factories amid the start of bilateral trade negotiations between the US and Japan. Those talks started in February and it's unclear when they will conclude with a deal.
'When it comes to tariffs, the details are still incredibly fluid,' Toyota's Chief Executive Officer, Koji Sato, said last week after releasing the latest financial results. 'It's difficult to take steps or measure the impact.'
Japan's chief trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, said on April 30 that one unnamed Japanese automaker is currently losing around $1 million per hour from the tariffs, citing a calculation made by an unidentified corporate executive. A Japanese government official on Friday declined to provide more specifics. But that rate of loss isn't too far off the mark from the $1.2 billion hit Toyota is projecting based on 730 hours per month. Representatives for Toyota also didn't respond to a request for comment.
Akazawa has expressed hope that an agreement could be reached in June with the next round of negotiations taking place in late May.
Most imported vehicles became subject to a 25% US duty on April 3, while most auto parts become subject to that levy as of May 3. There are some executive orders that prevent duties from doubling up, but considering the US is the biggest market for Japan's five largest carmakers, even a moderately increase in tariffs will have an outsized impact on their bottom lines.
The Trump administration reached its first trade deal on May 8 with the UK. But the US had a $11.9 billion goods trade surplus with the UK last year, whereas it ran a $68.5 billion deficit with Japan. That may make it more difficult to secure an agreement without significant concessions by one side.
'The hurdle is high for Japan to get auto tariffs lowered' on exports to the US, said Hiroshi Namioka, chief strategist at T&D Asset Management Co. 'At the same time, the auto industry is too important for Japan to simply go along with what the US wants.'
Some Japanese automakers have responded to the tough new trade environment by making changes to their global manufacturing footprints. Nissan Motor Co. halted US orders for SUVs built in Mexico while Honda Motor Co. is shifting production of the hybrid version of its Civic from Japan to the US. Due to retaliatory tariffs against the US, Mazda Motor Co. is stopping exports to Canada of one model that's manufactured at an Alabama factory that's a joint venture with Toyota.
'We will maintain our current operations while continuing to focus on reducing fixed costs, all while keeping a close eye on the movements by U.S. authorities, including customs duties,' a spokesperson for Toyota said in a statement.
Japan Production Pledge
Toyota has already invested heavily to build out its US operations — including spending $13.9 billion on a new battery plant in North Carolina. But it also remains committed to maintaining its extensive domestic production base. Chairman Akio Toyoda has repeatedly pledged to keep making at least three million vehicles a year in Japan. Last year, the company built 3.1 million cars in its home country, about a third of its worldwide production total.
Globally, Toyota sold 10.8 million cars in 2024, with the US accounting for a little less than a quarter of those. While half were made locally and another 30% came from neighboring Canada and Mexico, some 281,000 vehicles were imported from Japan. That includes popular models such as the 4Runner mid-sized SUV, Prius hybrid and several upscale Lexus vehicles.
The company's best-sellers in the US — the RAV4 hybrid crossover and Corolla compact sedan — are assembled at factories in Kentucky and Mississippi. But gas-only RAV4s are imported from Canada and the plug-in hybrid comes from Japan. Corolla models variants like the sporty GR, practical hatchback and gas-electric hybrid also carry made-in-Japan labels.
That exposure puts Toyota in the crosshairs of the Trump administration and means the automaker has a lot riding on the outcome of the US-Japan trade negotiations.
The carmaker has quietly pushed back on the White House's critique, noting through a spokesman that it's committed to spend almost $21 billion in the US just since 2020. That's nearly double the pledge it made during Trump's first administration — after similarly coming under attack by the US president. Toyota also said has increased direct manufacturing employment in the US to 31,000 workers, up from 25,000 in 2016.
One issue it faces: A severe restraint on flexibility at existing manufacturing facilities in the US, which could affect its ability to shift vehicles from overseas plants. Toyota's factory in Georgetown, Kentucky — the oldest and largest of its US vehicle-assembly operations — has no slack for new models. It was running full-tilt at nearly 100% of its maximum capacity as of late April, according to a US-based representative for the company.
--With assistance from Tsuyoshi Inajima, Toru Fujioka, Erica Yokoyama and Chester Dawson.
(Adds Toyota commet in 12th paragraph.)
US Border Towns Are Being Ravaged by Canada's Furious Boycott
How the Lizard King Built a Reptile Empire Selling $50,000 Geckos
Maybe AI Slop Is Killing the Internet, After All
With the New York Liberty, Clara Wu Tsai Aims for the First $1 Billion Women's Sports Franchise
Pre-Tariff Car Buying Frenzy Leaves Americans With a Big Debt Problem
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Individual investors invested in International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. (LON:IAG) copped the brunt of last week's UK£724m market cap decline
The considerable ownership by individual investors in International Consolidated Airlines Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy 42% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders 15% of International Consolidated Airlines Group is held by Institutions Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. A look at the shareholders of International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A. (LON:IAG) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 59% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn). And following last week's 4.5% decline in share price, individual investors suffered the most losses. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of International Consolidated Airlines Group, beginning with the chart below. Check out our latest analysis for International Consolidated Airlines Group Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. International Consolidated Airlines Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at International Consolidated Airlines Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in International Consolidated Airlines Group. Qatar Airways Limited is currently the largest shareholder, with 27% of shares outstanding. With 3.6% and 3.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Capital Research and Management Company are the second and third largest shareholders. On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of International Consolidated Airlines Group S.A.. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own UK£4.3m of stock. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling. The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 59% of International Consolidated Airlines Group shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability. We can see that Private Companies own 27%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand International Consolidated Airlines Group better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for International Consolidated Airlines Group that you should be aware of. If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Carney's first foreign policy test begins at G7 — amid Middle East crisis and Trump's trade war
Prime Minister Mark Carney will welcome leaders of the world's most powerful democratic countries Sunday for the start of a three-day meeting in the Rocky Mountains — a high-stakes summit that longtime G7 observers say could be one of the most consequential in years. Carney's priorities for this gathering in Kananaskis, Alta., reflect the challenges of our time: war and peace, energy security with a focus on critical minerals and artificial intelligence and "securing the partnerships of the future," according to the Prime Minister's Office. This will include talk about U.S. President Donald Trump's aggressive trade actions against Canada and other G7 countries. And as parts of Western Canada go up in flames, Carney has also put wildfires on the agenda. The leaders will discuss bolstering joint responses to climate disasters and some sort of "wildfire charter" is expected. Israel's strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities and military sites, which began Friday, could overshadow the discussions on the official agenda. The guest list for the summit, which includes India's Narendra Modi, has drawn some domestic criticism but Carney has argued that big global challenges should be addressed by the world's big players — even if there are some lingering tensions."It's a landmark summit because never before have these leaders had to confront so many strong, simultaneously interconnected crises," said John Kirton, director of the G7 Research Group at the University of Toronto. Kirton is pleased with the guest list Carney has assembled, saying there are more leaders of consequence coming to Kananaskis than perhaps any other such meeting in recent memory. In addition to the G7 members and India, Brazil, South Africa, United Arab Emirates, South Korea, Ukraine, Mexico and Australia — the secretaries general of the UN, NATO and EU along with the head of the World Bank will be there for at least part of the proceedings. When Trudeau hosted in 2018, Canada's guest list included leaders from "overwhelmingly little countries" with a focus on those facing endangered by rising shorelines like Jamaica, the Marshall Islands and the Seychelles, Kirton said. "Carney's list — it's a great one," Kirton told CBC News. "If you really want to lead the world, and not just the G7 part of the world, then you want the next tier of the biggest leaders there at the table." Leaders will begin to arrive Sunday and then be ferried by helicopter to the summit site. Monday's session will be broadly focused on the economy and "economic peace," and then security matters, government officials said in a background briefing. The second day will be when the non-G7 leaders will be brought in. It's also when Ukraine will be a major focus. Carney personally invited Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to discuss a path forward for that war-torn country. Trump has been hostile to Ukraine at times as he pushes for a swift resolution to the war Russia started — but he has largely maintained U.S. military support and anti-Russia sanctions despite some of his tough talk. On trade and Ukraine, the summit's success will depend on what Trump does or does not do, said Fen Hampson, a professor of international relations and the co-chair of the expert group on Canada-U.S. relations at Carleton University. "Even when it comes to his tech bro buddies, things can go sideways pretty quickly," Hampson said. "That's really the big risk here — does the president arrive in a good mood willing to do business, or is he in a bad mood?" While he's not expecting Trump to drop all of his tariffs after a few days in the mountains, Hampson said a U.S. "commitment to work together in a positive way" and revisit trade actions could be spun as a win by Carney. A commitment from Trump to stay the course in Ukraine would also be well-received by Carney and the Europeans in the room, Hampson said. To secure that sort of shift, Europe may commit to dropping policies that irritate Trump, including its digital services tax, while Canada could play up its newfound commitment to a stronger military and more defence spending, longtime U.S. demands, Hampson said. But depending on Trump to play nice is a risky proposition, he said. "Carney is more than just the head waiter at this meeting," Hampson said. "This is going to be a real test of his own negotiating skills." Increasing tensions in the Middle East after Israel launched airstrikes in Iran will further test Carney. Iran fired dozens of missiles toward Israel hours later. "With Israel's attack on Iran, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Iran-Israel dynamics have to be at least informally on the agenda," University of Ottawa political science professor Thomas Juneau said. "It makes Prime Minister Carney's job way more complicated than it already was." No joint communique Unlike at past G7 summits, Canada is not planning to get all leaders to agree to a joint communique — a sometimes unwieldy list of priorities and accomplishments that all countries agree to sign. Instead, Canada has been working with the other countries ahead of time to secure leaders' approval on a series of short, joint statements focused on concrete actions and outcomes in key areas, a senior government official said ahead of the summit. This strategy could be interpreted as a way to avoid what befell the 2018 G7 meeting Canada hosted in Charlevoix, Que. Trump did not want to sign on to a series of climate change-focused measures — something former prime minister Justin Trudeau made a priority at those talks despite Trump's well-known hostility to environmentalism. The president ultimately agreed to the joint communique while withholding U.S. support for some green measures — but then torpedoed G7 unity entirely in a series of post-summit tweets, saying he was offended by what Trudeau said at a closing news conference. Rather than squabble over policy measures Trump will never support, Carney is focused on getting G7 leaders to coalesce around things that have a reasonable chance of garnering a consensus, a senior government official said. The government is framing this agenda as a more streamlined, focused document than the last one. Trudeau, by comparison, tried to get G7 support for 28 areas of agreement in Charlevoix. Trump may be the sticking point on trade and Ukraine, but Kirton said Carney's program suggests Canada is setting up this meeting to be a success on other issues. "If you're going to hit home runs, you really need the U.S. to go along with you. On many of Mark Carney's priorities, it's easy to see Donald Trump agreeing," he said, referring to defence spending, AI and a move to crack down on deadly drugs like fentanyl. "Carney has said he wants Canada to be a global leader. This is the way to make that happen — if he can pull it all together on the spot."
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Grab your cooler, pack the car: The road trip calls this summer as gas prices fall and economic fears linger
Country roads, take me to vacation. The open road is a preferable getaway this summer for Americans who discovered a love for road trips during the pandemic, are feeling economic uncertainty, or want to take advantage of tumbling gas prices. Road trips also offer a degree of certainty — you won't find yourself abroad as tariffs or border policies change, or the latest flight chaos strikes. James Willamor, 45, is setting out on a 4,500-mile road trip to kick off summer. It's become a passion for him; he estimates he spends between 30 and 40 nights a year camping on both short and long trips. Depending on the length of the trip and gas prices, he spends an estimated $500 to $800 on gas, and he tries to optimize by always using a points credit card and other gas rewards programs. He also plans out meals where he can and carries a small portable refrigerator filled with meats, cheeses, fruits, and vegetables. His favorite part of hitting the road is watching the landscape gradually change, going from rivers to rolling hills to mountains. "It's a lot different than in times when I've flown somewhere and you get on the plane and you get off and you're in a totally different biome," he said. "But spending three or four days driving across and seeing the gradual change is probably my favorite part." Cheaper gas and more driving this summer Already, record numbers of Americans hit the road for the first big vacation weekend of the year, per AAA. It projected that over 1 million more Americans would be traveling by car Memorial Day Weekend compared to last year — an increase from 38.2 million auto travelers in 2024 to 39.4 million this year. The urge to stay domestic seems like it'll continue through the Fourth of July: Airbnb said that bookings within 300 miles of vacationers' origin spots are up 32% over the Fourth of July weekend compared to 2024. Enterprise Mobility, whose brands include Enterprise Rent-A-Car, National Car Rental, and Alamo, told BI that the company is seeing a year-over-year increase in expected leisure travel from their non-airport locations in both June and July — what Enterprise deemed a signal of customers leaning into road trips this summer. "People are continuing to prioritize travel, and our research shows an increased interest in road trips this summer," Bridget Long, senior vice president of North American operations at Enterprise Mobility, said in a statement. At the same time, gas prices have come down from 2022-era highs, making it more affordable to hit the road. Lillian Rafson, CEO of travel agency Pack Up + Go, which plans US-based surprise vacations — where destinations are unknown and travelers give an overview of what they're interested in — said that the last few months have seen a surge of interest in road trip packages, compared to last year. Already, 47% of vacations booked through the agency in June were road trips, compared to 27% last year. Rafson said that during times of perceived economic uncertainty, more travelers opt for her firm's minimum budget bookings rather than their more expensive offerings. She said that during last November's election season, minimum-cost bookings surged; that happened yet again in April and May. "Anecdotally, our team mentioned that we've had a few trips cancelled due to layoffs or fear of layoffs, but not a statistically significant number," Rafson said. "Overall, I think people are quietly opting for a lower-budget road trip instead of a major summer trip. But they're still traveling! Just slightly differently." Saying no to flying For some, flying might not be worth it right now, given recent stories of safety and timing concerns. "Right now, I live very close to Newark Airport, and the craziest delays are happening with the air traffic control and stuff — I mean, that alone is making people iffy about traveling," Dan Pieraccini, an avid domestic traveler and road tripper based in New Jersey, said. Some travelers are opting for road trips just because they want to; Scott Reing, 37, is planning a 2,500-mile-long road trip for his family to the Grand Canyon to commemorate his wedding anniversary. His family alternates between bigger vacations abroad and domestic trips to national parks. This year happened to be a national parks year. In theory, he said, some of the appeal of the domestic trip this time around is price, although the cost will still be hefty with the amount of time they're spending on the road. "You kind of have more control over what you're spending when you're doing a road trip versus going to an all-inclusive or going on a cruise or flying abroad," Reing said. "You really have the choice to stay in a motel or a campsite one night or two nights or 10 nights versus something else." Even so, Reing said he isn't broadly rethinking travel or travel spending; next year, he could end up somewhere abroad, like Japan. Indeed, many Americans are still opting for European or international travel this summer, with some powering through uncertainties and deciding it's worth it. But the road is still calling. Cathy Keibler, a 65-year-old retiree in Indiana, is eagerly planning her first major road trip across the country. She wants to see the country, but has no desire to fly anymore. She and her husband have a new Prius, so they're not too concerned about gas expenses and are planning to bring a cooler to mitigate food costs. Keibler also wants to get a closer view of what's happening in her own country; with unrest and uncertainty, a road trip offers an opportunity to see firsthand how that's reflected in different corners of the nation. "Part of the more idealistic reason for making this road trip is to maybe try to get in touch a little bit with really what's happening out there in the country in a way that we can't really do when we're just driving on the interstates and maybe pulling over at a McDonald's," she said.
