After wrong-way chase on highway, state police apprehend 21-year-old who stole a U-Haul
State police were notified of a chase Virginia Beach Police Department units were engaged in on Friday afternoon. The driver, later identified as 21-year-old named Ashlynn Nichole Barnes, had reached the Virginia Beach-Norfolk city boundary on Interstate 264 driving westbound in a stolen 2015 GMC U-Haul truck.
In an official statement, state police say Barnes made a U-turn in the roadway, traveling on the eastbound shoulder of the westbound lanes. Barnes drove through a cut-through when approached by an oncoming trooper and back into the eastbound lanes of the I-264.
From there, Barnes headed westbound on Interstate 64, from the interchange, and used the reversible High Occupancy Vehicle lanes to change directions, driving through and striking down the closed gate system and traveled into oncoming traffic, state police say.
Barnes made another U-turn in the reversible HOV lanes and proceeded to I-64, eastbound, and struck a trooper's vehicle attempting to stop her on a flyover while heading eastbound on I-264.
Barnes, in another reversible lane, was stopped by state troopers who intentionally struck the truck.
State police did this 'not only disable the vehicle, but to stop Barnes from hurting herself and endangering others on the roadway,' the statement reads.
Troopers escorted Barnes to Norfolk Sentara General Hospital with non-life-threatening injuries. Troopers were not hurt in the pursuit, state police say, nor were other motorists.
Charges are pending on Barnes' release from the hospital.
This is developing story. Check back later for more details.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
10 hours ago
- Newsweek
How Green Card Holders Can Best Show 'Good Moral Character'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Green card holders applying for U.S. citizenship are required to demonstrate good moral character (GMC), a key eligibility criterion under U.S. immigration law. Recent updates from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) have expanded the factors officials consider when evaluating applicants, emphasizing both past conduct and positive contributions to society. Newsweek spoke to two immigration experts about what it means to have "good moral character." Why It Matters On August 15, USCIS issued a memorandum directing officers to adopt a "totality of circumstances" approach in assessing GMC. Officials are instructed to review not only criminal history but also attributes such as community involvement, family responsibilities, educational achievements, employment history, length of lawful residence, and compliance with tax obligations. A few days later, on August 19, USCIS updated its guidance to include the evaluation of whether applicants have endorsed, promoted, or supported views of terrorist organizations or groups promoting anti-American ideologies. The guidance does not define "anti-American" in detail, which may result in subjective interpretation in individual cases. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty What To Know "This is a game-changer because applicants are now subject to what appears to be a more discretionary test, and applicants lack guidance or certainty as to what constitutes the positive attributes and contributions," Vincent W. Lau, managing partner at immigration firm Clark Lau, told Newsweek. "Among other eligibility factors, aliens applying for naturalization must demonstrate that he or she has been and continues to be an individual of good moral character (GMC)." USCIS policy reads. Immigration experts advised applicants to take a comprehensive and proactive approach to demonstrating GMC. "In the past, the main focus has been on whether applicants had criminal records, particularly in the five years prior to filing a naturalization application. But USCIS is now expecting more of an affirmative case that an applicant has good character, versus simply having an absence of a negative history with law enforcement," Greg Siskind, founding partner at Siskind Susser Immigration Firm, told Newsweek. Siskind emphasized three areas of focus: reviewing immigration history for inconsistencies or errors, explaining non-criminal issues such as unpaid child support or prior tax problems with evidence of resolution, and highlighting positive contributions to family and community through documentation such as affidavits or personal statements. "Even if a charge didn't result in jail or even a conviction, if the court records show that immoral conduct took place – even if it didn't result in a conviction – it could still be a problem at a naturalization interview," Siskind said. Since January, the Trump administration has been revising immigration policy, implementing stricter rules across multiple legal immigration channels and leveraging USCIS, a benefits-focused agency, to curb migration. Experts have raised concerns about how USCIS will evaluate applicants' loyalty, regarding the policy on "anti-American" views. "What does it mean to be anti-American? There are questions on the naturalization application asking whether one would take the oath of allegiance, whether one would bear arms on behalf of the U.S., whether one would perform work of national importance, and whether one would perform noncombatant services," Lau said. "Are affirmative answers to these questions sufficiently 'American? This is also as vague and ambiguous as the 'societal norms' question," he added. Green card holders, who are eligible to apply for U.S. citizenship, may find these new policies affecting their naturalization process. The expanded evaluation criteria mean that applicants will need to provide comprehensive documentation demonstrating the new changes. What People Are Saying Vincent W. Lau, managing partner at Clark Lau, told Newsweek: "The pitfall now would be to file an application with no evidence at all. It is too soon to know whether USCIS will be providing any further guidance. Short of further guidance, applicants are going to find themselves in a guessing game. The bar has been raised. Having GMC is not just about not doing "wrong," but one must also do "right." And, how much "right?" Greg Siskind, founding partner at Siskind Susser, told Newsweek: "Applicants should also now be proactive in demonstrating they are good members of the community. Showing a person is a good family member and volunteers in the community can help, and a person can get affidavits or personal statements to help document this." USCIS spokesman Matthew Tragesser, in a press release: "America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is committed to implementing policies and procedures that root out anti-Americanism and supporting the enforcement of rigorous screening and vetting measures to the fullest extent possible." What Happens Next As these policies are relatively new, applicants are advised to prepare thorough documentation and remain up to date with the latest information.
NBC News
18 hours ago
- NBC News
Influencer killed after gunman fires randomly during argument on Arizona road
An online content creator was killed in Arizona on Friday after a gunman fired in a random direction during an argument between the drivers of two other vehicles, Glendale police said. Yarely Ashley Hermosillo, 27, who described herself as a reels creator online and has 144,000 followers on Instagram, was not the intended target of the gunfire at around 11:45 p.m., police said. She was a passenger in a vehicle and was struck after a driver "fired a shot in a random direction" after people in two cars exchanged words on eastbound Camelback Road, police said. Jesus Preciado Dousten, 33, was arrested Saturday and is charged with second-degree murder, aggravated assault, misconduct involving weapons and endangerment. Police said in an affidavit that Dousten, driving a GMC pickup, pulled out a black handgun, said "You want some of this?" in Spanish during the argument and fired. Hermosillo was shot in the right eye, police wrote in the document. She was pronounced dead at 1 a.m. Saturday, police said. Witnesses reported that Dousten seemed obviously intoxicated, police said in the report. Family members tearfully recalled the pain of losing a loved one who was shot in front of them. 'I will never forget my mom's screams when I arrived at the hospital,' sister Cryshan Lopez said at a news conference Wednesday. Hermosillo was a mother to a 3-year-old son and her social media career, which involved cooking, was starting to take off, her family said. 'She was full of dreams, plans and goals for her future — all of which were taken from her in such a cruel and senseless way,' Lopez said. 'Our family is heartbroken beyond words.' Dousten has what police described in a report as an extensive criminal history, including a road-rage incident in Phoenix in June in which he was accused of punching another driver in the face. He has a 2016 and 2024 conviction for attempted theft of means of transportation, a 2022 conviction of unlawful flight from law enforcement, and a 2022 conviction of resisting arrest and criminal trespass, according to court documents. Dousten was being held in lieu of $1 million bail, police said. Online court records did not list an attorney for him Wednesday evening. Police said that nothing that occurred in the argument between drivers was itself criminal and that it was "a brief verbal exchange." "Why the suspect chose to fire the weapon remains unknown," police spokesman Jose Miguel Santiago said.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Mercedes driver banned for four years after SEVEN drugs found in system
An Isle of Wight man has been banned from driving for four years after he was caught behind the wheel under the influence of a cocktail of drugs. Andrew Barnes, 50, of Sandcove Rise in Seaview, appeared before IW Magistrates' Court on Friday, August 8, for sentencing, having previously admitted driving a vehicle while unfit through drugs. Prosecutor Rhys Evans said police were called on November 12 last year after a company fitting tyres on a vehicle in Watery Lane, Newchurch, reported concerns about the driver, Barnes. The firm had already replaced two tyres on the Mercedes A-Class earlier in the day, the court heard. Recommended reading: Voyeur sought 'sexual gratification' by filming victim without consent Drug driver who smokes 'mostly for medicinal purposes' was picking up a puppy Mr Evans said a police roadside DrugWipe test proved negative for cocaine and cannabis, but Barnes was arrested on suspicion of drug driving. Magistrates were told that, at the police station, a urine sample revealed he was over the legal limit for morphine, codeine, EDDP (a methadone derivative), and other substances, including a breakdown product of heroin. Mr Evans told the court Barnes had a 'poor criminal record for driving.' Bridget O'Hagan, defending, said Barnes's mother had driven the car earlier that day, and he had only moved the vehicle about 100 yards up the road, but accepted he should have left it where it was. Magistrates heard that the matter had been dealt with very 'tardily,' as although Barnes had been disqualified at the time of the offence, police ran out of time to charge him with that offence, leaving him to be sentenced only for drug driving. Ms O'Hagan noted that two of the seven substances detected were prescription medications. 'He knows he messed up, and he wants to do whatever it takes to make it right,' she added. Magistrates handed Barnes a four-year driving ban and an 18-month community order, which includes 20 rehabilitation days. Barnes must also pay a £180 fine, a £114 surcharge, and £85 in costs.
