logo
Pakistan Slashes Port Qasim Export Fees 50% in Bid to Revive Trade, Lure Ocean Carriers

Pakistan Slashes Port Qasim Export Fees 50% in Bid to Revive Trade, Lure Ocean Carriers

Yahoo30-06-2025
Pakistan's Port Qasim Authority has cut port charges for exporters by 50 percent as the country's government seeks to boost trade and economic development.
The announcement was made at a meeting of Pakistan's Maritime Affairs Ministry on Monday, as the federal government implements a broader reform agenda aimed at strengthening the country's maritime sector and facilitating economic growth via improved port operations.
More from Sourcing Journal
Maersk Resumes Haifa Imports; Strait of Hormuz Shipping Normalizes
China Port Volumes Hit Record Highs on US Tariff Truce
WTO to Intervene in Trade Disputes Between Canada and China
'The government's reform agenda in the maritime sector, including the charge reduction at Port Qasim, signals a strong commitment to supporting the business community, enhancing trade facilitation and promoting economic development across coastal regions,' said Muhammad Junaid Anwar Chaudhry, Pakistan's federal minister of maritime affairs, during the meeting.
Chaudhry said the cuts are vital to 'empowering exporters and encouraging local industry.'
Pakistan is a significant apparel exporting nation, with both finished apparel and textiles representing a combined 55.2 percent of the country's total exports from July 2024 to April 2025. In that stretch, apparel and textiles increased by 8.4 percent to $14.8 billion over the first 10 months of the year prior.
But more recently, these exports appear to have slowed. In April, Pakistan's exports across the category dipped 1.3 percent to $1.2 billion in the month.
Port Qasim is the second busiest port in Pakistan after the Port of Karachi, servicing 52 percent of all imports and exports for the country. Port Qasim has 15 terminals, including two container terminals owned by DP World.
Citing a DP World report, Dubai-based newspaper Gulf News indicated that a 40-foot container exported from Port Qasim typically has an extra fee of 14,430 Pakistani rupees ($50).
The decision also comes more than a month after Pakistan and India cut off trade and transit with one another in the wake of a terrorist attack in the bordering south Asian countries' Kashmir region.
Both countries closed their airspace to each other, and recently extended their suspensions to July 24. But out on the ocean, both countries have banned imports of goods that have transited through the other country's ports as well.
The reciprocal restrictions to seaport access have posed a hindrance for ocean carriers that resulted in increased freight rates for exporters, as well as shipping delays.
Vessels looking to make direct calls at Port Qasim or the Port of Karachi would be turned away from Indian ports like Mundra or Nhava Sheva, effectively forcing the carriers to choose one country over the other.
This became more of a problem for Pakistan than India, as large container ships visiting Pakistan carry up to 70 percent Indian goods, according to the Pakistan Ship's Agents Association—incentivizing carriers to instead prioritize India's ports on their regular routes.
As a result, many container shipping companies have since left the Pakistani ports including Qasim outside their own service routes. They have adjusted by redirecting cargo to transshipment hubs like Colombo Port in Sri Lanka or the UAE's Jebel Ali Port, and establishing feeder service lines from those ports to Pakistan.
The ocean carriers accompanied these adjustments with additional surcharges, with companies like Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) and CMA CGM tacking on hundreds extra in fees to pick up and handle containers out of Pakistani ports.
Such charges are costly for exporters throughout the country, making the 50-percent cut a decision that could incentivize more businesses to export cargo out of the gateway, while enticing the carriers to pull back on their extra fees.
Even before the drama with India started, Pakistan's ports had operated at only 50 percent of their capacity, according to the Maritime Affairs Ministry.
In February, the ministry approved a national maritime policy for 2025 that will stay in effect until 2047. The policy includes the introduction of the Pakistan Maritime Port Act, aimed at standardizing regulations across all ports, as well as a plan to establish a national dredging company to oversee the expansion of the country's ports.
Like India, Pakistan is seeking to become a more influential maritime power with the modernization of its national ocean carrier, the Pakistan National Shipping Corporation.
For 2025, the ministry set a target for the sector to generate 100 billion Pakistani rupees ($352.6 million) in profit.
During Monday's meeting, officials briefed the participants that the ship recycling industry had generated a revenue of 6 billion Pakistani rupees ($21.1 million), reflecting the growing potential of maritime industries in the country.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tariffs are driving up the cost of saying ‘I do'
Tariffs are driving up the cost of saying ‘I do'

Chicago Tribune

time5 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Tariffs are driving up the cost of saying ‘I do'

As engaged couples plan their dream weddings this summer, an unforeseen economic force is increasingly impacting their decisions and budgets: the intricate and fluctuating world of global trade. President Donald Trump's tariffs — and the accompanying rate changes, moratoriums and trade deals — are translating into higher costs for traditional wedding components, from floral arrangements to designer gowns and even the celebratory spirits that toast a new union. Small business owners like Brandi Kenison at Lee Floral Design, a small Livonia, Michigan-based floral company that mostly supplies arrangements for luxury weddings, say this year's peak nuptials season has been more financially challenging than the COVID-19 pandemic, when curbs on indoor gatherings crippled many businesses. 'Obviously, during COVID, that made sense. (Now) it's very hard to put into words,' Kenison said. 'Will it (a new tariff) go through? How much will it go through? … It's really difficult for us to be transparent with our clients because we truly don't know. 'What's even harder is when prices on our end jump 25%, but we're contractually only able to raise the price by 10%. That means we absorb the difference, which quickly eats into our margins,' she said. 'It's definitely been a struggle.' According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, 80% of all cut flowers sold in the United States are imported, with the primary sources being South American countries, notably Colombia and Ecuador. With current tariffs of 10% on Colombia and 15% on Ecuador, wholesalers, florists and ultimately, engaged couples face higher costs. 'When tariffs are placed on these imports, it inevitably drives up costs — not just for wholesalers and florists, but ultimately for the customer as well,' Kenison said. 'And it's not limited to just flowers. A lot of our day-to-day supplies, like vases, candles, and other staples, are sourced from countries like China, which means those items are also affected by tariffs, further increasing our overall expenses.' Wedding planners say brides are also experiencing higher prices for dresses and facing shipping delays. Meagan McPhail, owner of Mitten Weddings, said in an email that 'prices are up and timelines are longer' for dresses due to rising fabric costs. About 12.2 million wedding gowns are produced each year in China, and 70% of them are exported, according to Deep Wear. 'Even some U.S. designers still source their fabrics internationally, so it all adds up,' McPhail said. Tariffs are adding to already pricey wedding costs that average $300 to $600 per person, according to wedding planners Emma and Rebecca Targett of Meriwether Social. The Ann Arbor, Michigan-based mother-daughter duo planned Sophie Partington and Nicholas Kuchar's Aug. 2 wedding at the Michigan League Ballroom. 'Now, more than ever, that conversation is a part of our everyday planning process with clients,' Emma Targett said. 'Things just cost more right now: food, floral, specifically. Anything that's really commodity-based like that, things that are very supply chain dependent. 'So much of our day-to-day now is explaining to clients that food costs more so these catering bills are higher, a lot of times venue minimums have gone up because they have to account for their increased food cost as well,' she said. According to a survey conducted by The Knot of 741 engaged couples planning 2025 or 2026 wedding receptions, over half of the couples, or 53%, reported that tariffs had already impacted decisions about their celebrations. The survey also found that instead of reducing their overall budget, many couples are hiring professionals to navigate cost challenges, including booking well ahead of time to avoid paying more. Take couple Lydia Karpack, 23, of Plymouth and Alex Winnie, 24, of Belleville, Michigan, who will tie the knot at Detroit's Book Tower on Aug. 30. The high school sweethearts got engaged in downtown Plymouth in May 2024 and sought out Meriwether Social to plan their downtown Detroit wedding that is expected to include 145 guests and cost over $75,000. 'There's definitely things that you see that number that a vendor gives you, it's a big number, you're a little shocked about it. Weddings are becoming such this big thing,' Karpack said. 'You really have to evaluate what you really want to splurge on and what's going to be worth it and what you can find alternative ways to get the same look you're going for. It's about balance.' Since Karpack had the venue, photographer and DJ booked in early 2025, she effectively sidestepped some of the tariff-related price increases from vendors. Still, she was sticker-shocked by the prices of hydrangeas and tulips. 'A lot of florists have minimums. You have to start out at $5,000 or $10,000 for flowers and that doesn't include tax or the design fee,' she said. 'It's like that number, I think, scares people. It's a lot of money to spend on flowers. That was something we realized, 'let's find a different solution here and scale back a bit.'' She said 'no' to a huge arched floral wall but yes to the dress and veil she would wear from Magnolia Laine Bridal – Detroit. Cost for those: More than $3,000. 'My veil was pretty expensive,' Karpack said. 'I had no idea how much veils cost — for a couple yards of fabric, it's like $600. I was very shocked about that. I was going to do an Etsy veil for like $100, but matching the color up to a dress and you're looking at the color on a screen … it just gets way too stressful.' Karpack said trimming the flower budget helped the couple afford their preferred reception site, the Book Tower. 'That was something we really wanted to splurge on and then find other ways to save around,' she said, 'so that we could still have the venue that we wanted.'

Palestinian journalists killed by Israel mourned in Gaza funeral
Palestinian journalists killed by Israel mourned in Gaza funeral

UPI

time6 minutes ago

  • UPI

Palestinian journalists killed by Israel mourned in Gaza funeral

1 of 4 | Mourners attend the funeral of Al Jazeera journalists Anas Al Sharif, Mohammed Qreiqeh, Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa, who were killed in an Israeli strike, in Gaza City, on Monday. An Israeli drone strike hit a tent sheltering Al Jazeera journalists near Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza, killing seven members of the press. Photo by Mahmoud Issa/UPI | License Photo Aug. 11 (UPI) -- Hundreds of mourners in Gaza gathered for the funerals of five Al Jazeera journalists killed by an Israeli strike on a press tent. The strike killed five reporters working for Al Jazeera, a Qatar-based news organization. The five were reporter Anas al-Sharif, correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh, and video journalists Ibrahim Zaher, Moamen Aliwa, and Mohammed Noufal. Freelance reporter Mohammed al-Khaldi was also among those killed. There were seven journalists in total killed. Al-Sharif, 28, was a popular reporter in Gaza. Israel alleged Sunday that Al-Sharif was a member of Hamas. Al Jazeera called that allegation false. Al Jazeera condemned the "targeted assassination" by Israeli forces, and accused the Israeli Defense Forces of deliberately striking the journalists. "The Israeli military admitted to their crimes," the network said, describing the attack as "another blatant and premeditated assault on press freedom." Footage verified by Al Jazeera showed mourners chanting slogans against the killings, saying, "With our soul and blood, we sacrifice for you, Anas." They carried the bodies of the journalists, covered in flags and press flak jackets, on their shoulders from al-Shifa Hospital to Sheikh Radwan Cemetery in central Gaza. The press tent where the attack happened was outside the al-Shifa Hospital. The Committee to Protect Journalists said it was "appalled" by the killings. "Israel's pattern of labeling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for press freedom," CPJ's regional director, Sara Qudah, said in a statement. "Those responsible for these killings must be held accountable." The United Nations Human Rights Office has condemned the killing of journalists in Gaza, calling it a "grave breach of international humanitarian law," CNN reported. "We condemn the killing by Israeli military of six Palestinian journalists by targeting their tent, in grave breach of international humanitarian law," the United Nations said on X, adding that "Israel must respect & protect all civilians, including journalists." At least 242 Palestinian journalists have been killed in Gaza since Oct. 7, 2023, the U.N. said, calling for immediate and safe access for all journalists to Gaza. The Committee to Protect Journalists says the number is 178.

This AI Stock Just Crushed Palantir's Rule of 40 Score. Is It a Buy Now?
This AI Stock Just Crushed Palantir's Rule of 40 Score. Is It a Buy Now?

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This AI Stock Just Crushed Palantir's Rule of 40 Score. Is It a Buy Now?

Key Points Palantir has delivered impressive growth on the top and bottom lines. Upstart's revenue more than doubled on strong loan origination growth. Some investors had concerns about the company's take rate. 10 stocks we like better than Upstart › Followers of Palantir (NASDAQ: PLTR) will know that the company likes to use the Rule of 40 as a performance benchmark. This standard in the software industry means that a company should have a combined revenue growth rate and free cash flow margin, or a similar profitability measure, of at least 40 in order to be investable. Palantir Chief Executive Officer Alex Karp hasn't been shy about touting the company's strong performance based on the Rule of 40, noting that it had a Rule of 40 score of 94 in its second-quarter report. That was made up of 48% revenue growth and 46% adjusted operating margin. There's no doubt that that's an impressive result and helps show why Palantir stock continues to soar. However, Palantir didn't have the best Rule of 40 score in the software sector this quarter. Upstart (NASDAQ: UPST), the artificial intelligence-based lending platform, beat Palantir in the Rule of 40. With revenue growth of 102% and an adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) margin of 21%, giving it a Rule of 40 score of 123. Unlike Palantir, which rose after its earnings report, Upstart actually tumbled despite that blowout Rule of 40 score. Should investors buy the dip on Upstart? Let's take a closer look. About Upstart's quarter A year after Upstart unveiled its improved screening model, Model 18, the company is delivering blistering growth, and that model has improved its conversion rates as the company predicted. Transaction volume jumped 159% to 372,599 loans approved, with a 23.9% conversion rate, meaning applications that became loans, up from 15.2% in the quarter a year ago. Revenue from fees, its core business, rose 84% to $241 million, and total revenue of $257.3 million was well ahead of the average analyst estimate at $225.4 million. Upstart impressed on the bottom line as well, as it flipped an adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) loss of $9.3 million to a profit of $53.1 million. It also reported a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) profit of $5.6 million, or $0.40 per share on an adjusted basis, up from a loss of $0.17, and better than the estimate of $0.25. Upstart's outlook was strong as well, as it raised its full-year forecast and third-quarter projection was ahead of expectations. However, the reason the stock fell, according to analyst commentary, was that Upstart's take rate shrank, a sign that it could be getting harder for the company to convert origination volume into revenue. In the second quarter, originations reached $2.8 billion, and revenue was $257 million, giving it a take rate of 9%, which was down from 12% in the quarter a year ago. Is Upstart a buy? Although the critique about the take rate may be valid, that seems to be a result of Upstart moving into the super prime loan market, where risk and default rates are typically lower, so it's worth the trade-off. Additionally, Upstart is just starting to tap the vast home and auto loan markets. Auto loan originations jumped more than sixfold from a year ago to $114 million, and home loans reached $68 million, up ninefold from the same quarter a year ago. Those categories are still small and contribute just a fraction of total revenue, but they have the potential to be huge in the future. Furthermore, Upstart's surge in revenue and return to profitability has come without any help from lower interest rates. If interest rates fall, demand for loans through its platform could soar even faster. Overall, the sell-off in Upstart looks worth taking advantage of given the rapid growth, improving profitability, and its opportunity in the home and auto markets. If you've been impressed with Palantir's recent results, Upstart is worth taking a look at. Should you invest $1,000 in Upstart right now? Before you buy stock in Upstart, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Upstart wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 4, 2025 Jeremy Bowman has positions in Upstart. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Palantir Technologies and Upstart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. This AI Stock Just Crushed Palantir's Rule of 40 Score. Is It a Buy Now? was originally published by The Motley Fool

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store