
You were never meant to know about the court service IT bug
The problem itself was bad enough: Britain's state IT capacity is very poor, worse than many comparable nations. Things get deleted or disappear; vital information is stolen or hacked. The administrators of these systems are so often simply not up to it. But how this disaster was handled appears to be even worse.
This particular software error, found in 'case-management software' variously called Judicial Case Manager, MyHMCTS or CCD, according to the BBC, meant that some data was not visible – including medial information, contact details and evidence at issue – in case files used in court.
The report seen by the BBC said that the tribunal dealing with child support and benefits appears to have been the most affected. But the problem went further, including the family courts, employment tribunals, civil claims and probate – essentially most of the legal system to do with the trials of ordinary life.
This is all scandalous and dreadful enough. It's not surprising, because the gears of state always stick and scream and things in the public sector are rarely done efficiently and well. But there's one thing that's even more damaging than the routine ineptitude of the state: all of this appears to have been hidden from view until the BBC happened to get its hands on secret internal documents.
You were never meant to hear about any of this.
The IT problem itself was concealed; the lawyers and judges who likely lost access to vital information – who argued and decided cases on incomplete information – were never told about it. The people whose cases were affected were not informed.
Even the eventual report assessing the damages of this error was also concealed. This is the dire nature of justice and life in Britain.
The software was in use for years, sources within the HMCTS told the BBC, but if objections to its problems were ever raised, they were ignored. The internal report seen by the BBC said that data problems were discussed from 2019 onwards and definitively discovered in 2023.
Higher-ups just didn't want to know, let alone to fix things. And when the problems grew so large as to be unignorable, the whole thing was hidden from the public and from everyone remotely affected. Internal emails seen by the BBC seemed more interested in the 'severe reputational impact to HMCTS' than anything else.
This is what the British state looks like; this is how it operates. It's a culture of ineptitude with the bureaucracy protecting itself against all transparency, against every attempt to hold the system and its people to account.
The primary purpose of the British state is waging a continual campaign to conceal from the public how badly we are governed. How many more stories like this one are there? There's no way for you to know – they've all been well covered up.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
At least one woman killed as 6.1 magnitude earthquake rocks Turkey
People had to be pulled from the rubble of destroyed buildings as a huge earthquake struck Turkey. The magnitude 6.1 earthquake struck Turkey's northwestern province of Balikesir on Sunday, killing at least one person and injuring at least 29. The earthquake, with an epicenter in the town of Sindirgi, sent shocks that were felt some 125 miles to the north of the capital Istanbul – a city of more than 16 million people. An elderly woman died shortly after being pulled out alive from the debris of a collapsed building in Sindirgi, Interior Minister Ali Yerlikaya told reporters. Four other people were rescued from the building. Television footage showed rescue teams asking for silence so they can listen for signs of life beneath the rubble. Yerlikaya said a total of 16 buildings collapsed in the region – most of them derelict and unused. Two mosque minarets also tumbled down, he said. Turkey's disaster and emergency management agency said the earthquake was followed by several aftershocks, including one measuring 4.6, and urged citizens not to enter damaged buildings. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan issued a statement wishing all the victims a speedy recovery. More Trending 'May God protect our country from any kind of disaster,' he wrote on X. Turkey sits on top of major fault lines and earthquakes are frequent. In 2023, a magnitude 7.8 earthquake killed more than 53,000 people in Turkey and destroyed or damaged hundreds of thousands of buildings in 11 southern and south-eastern provinces. Another 6,000 people were killed in the northern parts of neighbouring Syria. MORE: Map of France wildfires shows where the Aude region is as blaze intensifies MORE: British man killed after hair transplant in Turkey was 'inspiring teacher' MORE: British man dies in Turkey after hair transplant goes wrong


The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on attacking the ECHR: the real target is judicial independence and the rule of law
Most British citizens have little contact with human rights law, which is as it should be in a mature democracy. Widespread anxiety about basic freedoms is a feature of more repressive regimes. Many people will only have heard of the European convention on human rights (ECHR) in the context of the last Conservative government's failed attempts to dispatch asylum seekers to Rwanda, or in a handful of incidents where convicted criminals or terrorist suspects have avoided deportation to jurisdictions where they might face inhumane treatment. Such cases are amplified by politicians who are hostile to the whole apparatus of human rights law. The Strasbourg court that adjudicates on breaches of the ECHR is denounced as an enemy of British sovereignty. Those attacks will continue for as long as asylum, and small-boats traffic on the Channel in particular, are salient political issues – for the foreseeable future, in other words. Labour's new 'one-in, one-out' scheme for returning seaborne refugees is more robust in legal and humanitarian terms than the failed Tory method. France is a safe country. That won't stop critics accusing the government of failing to control the border and citing international human rights conventions as the main impediment to the restoration of law and order. Nigel Farage has said he would 'get rid of the ECHR' as a day-one priority should Reform UK ever form a government. Kemi Badenoch is drifting to the same position, albeit with circumspection. The Conservative leader acknowledges that peremptory rupture is not straightforward, especially for Northern Ireland since European convention rights are woven into the Good Friday agreement. Mrs Badenoch has commissioned a report to consider how an ECHR exit might be achieved but expressed her personal view that Britain 'will likely need to leave' because human rights are wielded as a 'sword … to attack democratic decisions and common sense.' The core argument, for both Mrs Badenoch and Mr Farage, is that voters want politicians to expel undesirable elements from society but the popular will is being thwarted by unelected judges. Human rights, in this conception, are a loophole through which criminals and foreign interlopers evade justice. Ideas codified after the second world war as foundational principles of a new democratic settlement for Europe are recast as attacks on the law-abiding majority. This rhetorical subterfuge gets a purchase on public discourse through channels previously opened by Brexit. The ECHR is not an EU institution, but the fact of it being European in name stirs suspicion that it is an alien imposition. Dispensing with human rights obligations would be a necessary step for any government seeking to emulate Donald Trump's programme of detaining and deporting migrants without regard for due process. It is not far-fetched to envisage a Reform government recreating that model, given Mr Farage's record of admiration for Mr Trump. ECHR rulings are not infallible. A 71-year-old institution can reasonably be scrutinised with a view to reform. But that is not what its noisiest UK antagonists have in mind. They target the convention not because it is a big part of public life, but because it is a minor one and poorly understood. It is a soft target in a longer campaign to undermine judicial independence, discredit liberal principle and, ultimately, degrade the rule of law to the benefit of unaccountable executive power.


Metro
6 hours ago
- Metro
Biggins claims he wants to 'grab women' in bizarre defence of Gregg Wallace
Christopher Biggins has spoken out in defence of Gregg Wallace following his axing from the BBC. The MasterChef host was sacked earlier this year, with the Beeb vowing never to work with him again after several allegations of sexually inappropriate behaviour were made. After an investigation was carried out, 45 out of the 83 accusations against Wallace were upheld, with one including unwanted physical contact', while co-presenter John Torode was also found to have used racist language, of which he claims to have no recollection. Consequently, both hosts were let go, sending MasterChef's latest series into carnage. Now, in the aftermath of the scandal, fellow TV personality Biggins has reflected on his own past behaviour, admitting that some of it would likely 'land him in prison' today. The 76-year-old pantomime star, who is gay, claims that 25 years ago, 'everyone' was doing things they shouldn't. He told The Sun: 'Years ago, I would approach a woman from behind and grab her t***ies from the front. Well, I'm gay, so it didn't matter. And I'd like to still be doing it, but I don't think I can anymore.' Biggins, who appeared on Celebrity MasterChef in 2014, added: 'If I were to do that now, I'd be put into prison. 25 years ago, we were all doing it. It was a thing of affection.' The I'm A Celebrity campmate proceeded to declare solidarity with Wallace, 60, who has been married to Anne-Marie Sterpini since 2016. 'I love Gregg, and I love his wife. I've tried to get hold of her because they must be going through a terrible time, because suddenly careers are vanishing; it's so wrong.' Throughout his lengthy career in showbiz, Biggins has had his own fair share of controversies, most notably during his Celebrity Big Brother stint. In 2016, he entered the house alongside the likes of Stephen Bear, Frankie Grande, James Whale, and Samantha Fox. He was ultimately removed from the house, having received warnings on several occasions for offensive language. The final incident involved Biggins calling AIDS a 'bisexual disease'. Upon his ejection, he said he was 'very sorry and very sad', but his £100,000 fee was reportedly still slashed. These days, Biggins continues his theatre and comedy work and maintains an active social media presence. As for Wallace, he has continued to pledge his innocence since the allegations against him surfaced, insisting that the most serious claims were unproven in the legal review. The TV chef has also alleged that the BBC's production team discriminated against him due to his autism, having been formally diagnosed only recently. Friends of Wallace have also said that his 'autistic hypersensitivity' meant that he had an 'oddity of filters and boundaries', leading to his 'inability to wear underwear'. Such statements have repeatedly been shot down by autistic charities and campaigners, with a spokesperson for the National Autistic Society telling Metro last month: 'Every autistic person is different, just like every non-autistic person is different, so it is important not to generalise or make judgements based on the actions, words, or behaviour of any one individual.' The latest series of MasterChef, which was recorded before the scandals emerged, is currently on air but has been dealt a huge blow in loss of viewers due to Wallace and Torode, 59, hosting. More Trending Just under two million people tuned in to the first episode, which is a significant drop from last year's premiere, which saw 2.7m watch overnight. It remains to be seen whether the Torode Celebrity MasterChef series, alongside Grace Dent, or the two festival specials he is set to feature in, will still be released. The BBC has yet to announce who will be replacing Wallace and Torode, who have fronted the cooking programme since 2005. Currently, the favourites are Saturday Kitchen's Matt Tebbutt and Great British Menu's Andi Oliver. A report by law firm Lewis Silkin found there were 27 substantiated claims against Wallace relating to alleged incidents during this period, most of which related to sexually explicit comments. One allegation of unwanted physical contact during this timeframe was also substantiated. The report found that when concerns were reported to the production company during this period, there was a failure to retain records of any action taken. The report found that 17 upheld allegations relate to this period. In 2015, the production company behind MasterChef investigated an allegation about Wallace's behaviour, but he was not made aware of the complaint. The following year, the production company merged with Endemol, and more formal policies, regular training, and anonymous reporting lines were introduced. The BBC intervened in response to a complaint in 2017, following which Wallace was warned of the need to change his behaviour. One substantiated complaint about an inappropriate comment fell into this period. Wallace faced allegations of inappropriate sexual comments from 13 people across a range of shows over 17 years, BBC News reported. The TV star stepped away from presenting MasterChef while Banijay, the show's production company, announced that it was conducting an external review to 'fully and impartially investigate' the claims. BBC News said allegations include the presenter 'talking openly about his sex life, taking his top off in front of a female worker saying he wanted to "give her a fashion show", and telling a junior female colleague he was not wearing any boxer shorts under his jeans'. The charity Ambitious About Autism said it had dropped Wallace as an ambassador, citing the 'recent allegations'. Banijay UK confirmed it appointed law firm Lewis Silkin to lead the investigation into Wallace's alleged behaviour. Wallace said in a video posted to Instagram that accusations about him making sexual comments towards staff and guests have come from 'middle-class women of a certain age'. Downing Street said Wallace's response to the accusations being made against him was 'inappropriate and misogynistic'. A spokesperson added that Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy had held talks with BBC bosses in the wake of the Wallace row. Following the backlash, Wallace apologised for any 'offence' or 'upset' he caused with his remarks and said he would 'take some time out'. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said politicians should be ready to put in place 'mechanisms' that would instil 'confidence' that women will be taken seriously in reports of inappropriate behaviour after a Labour MP asked him about 'women of a certain age', reflecting comments Wallace apologised for. MasterChef co-presenter John Torode said in a social media post that he 'loves being part of' the programme and 'will continue to be a part of it'. Wallace told the Daily Mail he 'thought about suicide all the time' after allegations of misconduct were made against him. Wallace was sacked as MasterChef presenter following the inquiry into his alleged misconduct by production company Banijay. BBC News said it had not seen the final review from Banijay but understood the presenter had been sacked. In an Instagram post, the former greengrocer claimed he had been cleared of the 'most serious and sensational accusations' ahead of the published review. He also said he recognised that some of his humour and language were inappropriate 'at times' and apologised for this. The report by law firm Lewis Silkin for Banijay is published. It says that a total of 45 out of the 83 allegations made against Wallace during his time on the show were substantiated, including one allegation of 'unwelcome physical contact'. It concludes that the 'majority of the substantiated allegations against Mr Wallace related to inappropriate sexual language and humour', adding that 'a smaller number of allegations of other inappropriate language and being in a state of undress were also substantiated'. In the wake of the report's findings, Banijay say that 'Wallace's return to MasterChef (is) untenable'. View More » MORE: Comedian reveals he 'got cameraman sacked for filming up female colleague's skirt' MORE: Strictly in fresh scandal after staffer claims they were 'offered cocaine by show star' MORE: Gladiators star Steel reveals medical procedure contributed to newborn son's death