Trump and Putin arrive in Alaska for high-stakes summit
Trump, instead of a previously planned one-on-one meeting, will be joined by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy Steve Witkoff before a larger meeting over lunch that will include other officials, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Air Force One.
Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov will join Putin for his talks, broadcaster CNN reported, after Washington announced last minute that the leaders would not be meeting alone.
Both leaders voiced hopes of a productive meeting. But while Trump warned he could judge it a failure after just a few minutes if Putin does not budge, the Kremlin said the two would speak for at least six or seven hours.
For the Russian president, the summit marks his first foray onto Western soil since he ordered the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, triggering a relentless conflict that has killed tens of thousands of people.
In recent days, Russia has made significant battlefield gains that could strengthen Putin's hand in any ceasefire negotiations. However, a Ukrainian unit fighting in the area said Friday that they had retaken some villages Moscow captured in a recent push.
Every word and gesture will be closely watched by European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was not included and has refused pressure from Trump to surrender territory seized by Russia. Zelensky: Moscow still killing people Zelensky said Friday that Moscow was still killing people and not showing that it wanted to end the war, hours before the start of the summit.
"There is no order, nor any signals from Moscow that it is preparing to end this war... they are also killing on the day of the negotiations," Zelensky said in a video address posted on social media.
Trump has called the summit a "feel-out meeting" to test Putin, whom he last saw in 2019, and said Friday he was not going to Alaska to negotiate.
"I'm here to get them at the table," he said of the Russian and Ukrainian leaders.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said Moscow would not forecast the outcome of the meeting.
"We never make any predictions ahead of time," Lavrov told Russian state TV after he reached Alaska, wearing what appeared to be a shirt with "USSR" written across it in Cyrillic script.
Russia's "position is clear and unambiguous," he said.
Trump has promised to consult with European leaders and Zelensky, saying that any final agreement would come in a three-way meeting with Putin and the Ukrainian president to "divvy up" territory.
Severe' consequences
Trump has boasted of his relationship with Putin, blamed predecessor Joe Biden for the war, and had vowed before his return to the White House in January that he would be able to bring peace within 24 hours.
But despite repeated calls to Putin, and a February 28 White House meeting in which Trump publicly berated Zelensky, the Russian leader has shown no signs of compromise.
Trump has acknowledged his frustration with Putin and warned again on Friday of "very severe" consequences if he does not accept a ceasefire.
Saying he "would walk" from the table if the meeting didn't go well, Trump told reporters he "wouldn't be happy" if a ceasefire could not be secured immediately.
(bms)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
3 hours ago
- Euractiv
Europe's top politicians to join Zelenskyy for tense talks with Trump
EU chief von der Leyen and other European top politicians will attend a crucial meeting in Washington on Monday between US President Trump and Ukrainian leader Zelenskyy, which is expected to shape the future of the war in Ukraine. In a post on X, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she would meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy this afternoon in Brussels, and that both will participate in a meeting of the Coalition of the Willing - a group of countries backing Kyiv. 'At the request of President Zelenskyy, I will join the meeting with President Trump and other European leaders at the White House tomorrow,' von der Leyen said. NATO chief Mark Rutte, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Finnish President Alexander Stubb will also attend the meeting. The German government said that the European leaders would try to emphasise 'interest in a swift peace agreement in Ukraine'. Meanwhile, media reports in the US suggest that President Donald Trump has informed European heads of state and government that he aims to arrange a trilateral summit between himself, Zelenskyy, and Russian President Vladimir Putin by next Friday. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz suggested that the European venue for the potential summit could be a place where discussions take place on a permanent basis. This is a developing story that will be updated. (sm, bms)
Euractiv
6 hours ago
- Euractiv
Europeans face tough questions ahead of Zelenskyy-Trump meeting
The coalition of countries supporting Ukraine will hold a video call today with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy ahead of his critical meeting on Monday with US President Donald Trump in Washington. The call - jointly coordinated by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz - will take place today at 15:00 CET, the Élysée said on Saturday. During the Alaska meeting, Russian President Vladimir Putin made it clear that he wants the Europeans excluded from the talks. He specifically warned them not to 'make attempts to disrupt this emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigues.' However, Europeans are still expected to play a role in post-war Ukraine. Trump said in an interview with Fox News right after the summit that the European nations 'have to get involved a little bit,' even if the onus was on Zelenskyy. According to the New York Times , he has apparently invited leading European politicians to the meeting with Zelenskyy in Washington. First, though, they will need to address several pressing issues in their video call. Hot topic I: Peace Deal without a ceasefire? Donald Trump on Saturday dropped his push for a ceasefire in Ukraine in favor of pursuing a full peace accord – a major shift announced hours after the summit. Prior to the high-stakes meeting in Alaska, securing an immediate cessation of hostilities had been a core demand of Trump and European leaders including Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The shift away from an urgent ceasefire would seem to favor Putin, who has long argued for negotiations on a final peace deal - a strategy that Ukraine and its European allies have criticised as a way to buy time and press home Russia's battlefield advances. Zelenskyy said on Saturday after a 'substantive' conversation with Trump about the Alaska summit that he looked forward to his Washington visit and discussing 'all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war.' He posted on X: 'A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions.' However, he later emphasised that Russia's refusal to accept a ceasefire was complicating efforts to end Moscow's more than three-year-long conflict. 'We see that Russia rebuffs numerous calls for a ceasefire and has not yet determined when it will stop the killing. This complicates the situation,' he said. 'If they lack the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater - peaceful coexistence with its neighbors for decades,' he added. According to The New York Times , Trump is expected to raise the issue of Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory on Monday. The topic was not mentioned during a press conference between Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin. The Financial Times and AFP reported that Putin has demanded Ukraine withdraw from the partially occupied eastern provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk as a condition for ending Russia's war. However, he told Trump that he could agree to freeze the remaining front lines if his basic demands are met. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, on the other hand, told German television station ARD that Trump had not made any concessions to Putin with regard to Ukrainian territory. Russia currently occupies 20% of Ukraine's territory, not including Crimea, which was annexed by Russia in 2014. Zelenskyy, who fears that Russia will escalate its attacks in the coming days, has refused to give up any of its land. A statement by EU leaders suggested that it will be up to Ukraine to decide on matters concerning its territory, but emphasised that 'international borders must not be changed by force.' Hot topic III: Security guarantees Meanwhile, Trump raised the idea of security guarantees inspired by NATO's Article 5. Practically, this would mean that Ukraine would benefit from a collective security clause in case it is attacked, but it would not join the Transatlantic Alliance, thus satisfying Moscow's demand. France, the UK, and Germany have said they would send peacekeeping forces to guarantee peace in Ukraine, but not on the front line. Klaus Welle, former Secretary General of the European Parliament from 2009 to 2022, said earlier this year that a peacekeeping model for Ukraine could be similar to that of West Germany during the Cold War. 'You know, the pressure from the Soviet Union coming from East Germany was very strong. And we were able to resist for 40 years because we had foreign troops. We had American troops, British troops, French troops, and by the way, we still have American troops in Germany,' he said. 'In Germany, on the front line we had German troops, but in the second line, a little further back, the Allied troops. So, I think we need that,' he added, noting that American logistical and air support would also be necessary. (bms, sm)
Euractiv
10 hours ago
- Euractiv
Only through principled partnership can Europe and Libya turn the tide on irregular migration
Yusuf Kablan is Foreign Policy Advisor to the Prime Minister of the Libya Government of National Unity. For too long Europe's approach to irregular migration has been driven by quick fixes and hollow rhetoric rather than by strategic insight and a genuine commitment to democratic values. This pattern has nourished the populist slogans now echoing in Brussels, Berlin, and Paris – calls to 'stop the boats' that exploit the very rupture in Europe's own narrative on democracy and the rule of law. Yet even as such rhetoric gains traction, Europe remains unable to curb chaotic flows because its foreign policy simultaneously proclaims liberal ideals and quietly props up the very autocrats whose misrule drives displacement. This incoherence came into stark relief last month when departures from North Africa surged so dramatically that Athens dispatched warships to turn back vessels off Crete – even as crossings of the English Channel reached unprecedented levels. These drastic measures portray mere symptoms: the real illness lies in Europe's transactional bargains with regional strongmen, whose consolidation of power deepens instability and propels desperate journeys across the Mediterranean. Indeed, the breakdown of rights and opportunity under autocratic rule will continue to generate new waves of migrants. The international community may aim to stem these flows but any containment strategy that glosses over the underlying drivers – state fragility, authoritarian repression, and predatory smuggling networks – cannot succeed in the long term. Nowhere is this dynamic clearer than along Libya's coast, where sophisticated smuggling rings – backed by foreign sponsors and sheltered by de facto authorities – flourish in the shadows. Under General Khalifa Haftar's parallel administration in the east, a grim calculus has emerged: a veneer of security enforced by brutal repression in exchange for tacit international acquiescence. MP Ibrahim al-Drisi's recent footage – chained by the neck and pleading with Haftar for his life in a video first released on 5 May 2025 – illustrates how such repression masks its own brutality. Equally alarming is the unresolved disappearance of MP Siham Sergiwa, abducted from her Benghazi home on 17 July 2019 after denouncing Haftar's assault on Libya's legitimate government. These abuses not only expose the hollow pretense of stability but also deepen the humanitarian catastrophe. Europe's muted response to these atrocities speaks volumes. By publicly decrying abuses in some quarters while quietly engaging in others, European capitals have unwittingly empowered human traffickers to wield migration as a leverage tool. This double standard has fractured Libya's unity, eroded its sovereignty, and chipped away at Europe's own moral authority. To reverse this trajectory, Europe must set a clear red line: no cooperation with actors who traffic in human lives, and no support for parallel power structures that flout human-rights norms. Any partnership must be strictly conditional on verifiable respect for human rights, transparent governance, and a return to a civilian-led political process. Confronted with these challenges, Libya's Government of National Unity has taken decisive action. In collaboration with European law-enforcement and intelligence services, the GNU launched a comprehensive security campaign targeting smuggling hubs along the entire coast. Simultaneously, it has intensified regional dialogue, culminating in last week's trilateral summit in Istanbul with Turkey and Italy and laying the groundwork for further cooperation with Qatar. Through shared maritime patrols, real-time intelligence sharing, the establishment of humane reception centres, enhanced medical screening, and embedded legal advisors within Libyan courts, this multilateral effort demonstrates that migration management demands a balanced fusion of security, justice, and humanitarian care – and that all stakeholders must shoulder both responsibility and accountability. Building on Istanbul's momentum, Europe and Libya should enshrine their cooperation in a strategic framework that unites investment in governance reforms and economic development in origin countries with integrated coastal-surveillance systems and expedited, transparent asylum procedures. Such a framework would also bolster Libya's institutional capacity – strengthening the coast guard, judiciary, and migration services under international supervision – while conditioning further assistance on verifiable progress in human rights, transparency, and national reconciliation. Sustained political commitment and transparent oversight are indispensable: Europe's credibility and Libya's future depend on the robustness of this alliance. Irregular migration is not a standalone crisis but a symptom of wider policy failings. Europe's transactional deals with dictators have weakened democratic values, emboldened extremist rhetoric, and eroded trust in international norms, both abroad and at home. A lasting solution demands a broader strategic vision that rejects short-sighted, realist compromises in favour of human-rights leadership, bolsters legitimate governments, and strengthens state sovereignty to enforce the law impartially. Libya's recent efforts – demonstrating how principled multilateralism and robust institution-building can restore stability – offer a clear path forward. Only by marrying high-principle diplomacy with comprehensive security and legal cooperation can Europe and Libya transform a shared crisis into an opportunity for lasting stability and prosperity. True sovereignty entails responsibility, not merely control; and only together – through unwavering cooperation and principled engagement – can we turn the tide on irregular migration and uphold the democratic values and human rights that bind our futures.
