logo
Only through principled partnership can Europe and Libya turn the tide on irregular migration

Only through principled partnership can Europe and Libya turn the tide on irregular migration

Euractiva day ago
Yusuf Kablan is Foreign Policy Advisor to the Prime Minister of the Libya Government of National Unity.
For too long Europe's approach to irregular migration has been driven by quick fixes and hollow rhetoric rather than by strategic insight and a genuine commitment to democratic values.
This pattern has nourished the populist slogans now echoing in Brussels, Berlin, and Paris – calls to 'stop the boats' that exploit the very rupture in Europe's own narrative on democracy and the rule of law. Yet even as such rhetoric gains traction, Europe remains unable to curb chaotic flows because its foreign policy simultaneously proclaims liberal ideals and quietly props up the very autocrats whose misrule drives displacement.
This incoherence came into stark relief last month when departures from North Africa surged so dramatically that Athens dispatched warships to turn back vessels off Crete – even as crossings of the English Channel reached unprecedented levels. These drastic measures portray mere symptoms: the real illness lies in Europe's transactional bargains with regional strongmen, whose consolidation of power deepens instability and propels desperate journeys across the Mediterranean.
Indeed, the breakdown of rights and opportunity under autocratic rule will continue to generate new waves of migrants. The international community may aim to stem these flows but any containment strategy that glosses over the underlying drivers – state fragility, authoritarian repression, and predatory smuggling networks – cannot succeed in the long term.
Nowhere is this dynamic clearer than along Libya's coast, where sophisticated smuggling rings – backed by foreign sponsors and sheltered by de facto authorities – flourish in the shadows. Under General Khalifa Haftar's parallel administration in the east, a grim calculus has emerged: a veneer of security enforced by brutal repression in exchange for tacit international acquiescence.
MP Ibrahim al-Drisi's recent footage – chained by the neck and pleading with Haftar for his life in a video first released on 5 May 2025 – illustrates how such repression masks its own brutality. Equally alarming is the unresolved disappearance of MP Siham Sergiwa, abducted from her Benghazi home on 17 July 2019 after denouncing Haftar's assault on Libya's legitimate government. These abuses not only expose the hollow pretense of stability but also deepen the humanitarian catastrophe.
Europe's muted response to these atrocities speaks volumes. By publicly decrying abuses in some quarters while quietly engaging in others, European capitals have unwittingly empowered human traffickers to wield migration as a leverage tool. This double standard has fractured Libya's unity, eroded its sovereignty, and chipped away at Europe's own moral authority.
To reverse this trajectory, Europe must set a clear red line: no cooperation with actors who traffic in human lives, and no support for parallel power structures that flout human-rights norms. Any partnership must be strictly conditional on verifiable respect for human rights, transparent governance, and a return to a civilian-led political process.
Confronted with these challenges, Libya's Government of National Unity has taken decisive action. In collaboration with European law-enforcement and intelligence services, the GNU launched a comprehensive security campaign targeting smuggling hubs along the entire coast. Simultaneously, it has intensified regional dialogue, culminating in last week's trilateral summit in Istanbul with Turkey and Italy and laying the groundwork for further cooperation with Qatar.
Through shared maritime patrols, real-time intelligence sharing, the establishment of humane reception centres, enhanced medical screening, and embedded legal advisors within Libyan courts, this multilateral effort demonstrates that migration management demands a balanced fusion of security, justice, and humanitarian care – and that all stakeholders must shoulder both responsibility and accountability.
Building on Istanbul's momentum, Europe and Libya should enshrine their cooperation in a strategic framework that unites investment in governance reforms and economic development in origin countries with integrated coastal-surveillance systems and expedited, transparent asylum procedures. Such a framework would also bolster Libya's institutional capacity – strengthening the coast guard, judiciary, and migration services under international supervision – while conditioning further assistance on verifiable progress in human rights, transparency, and national reconciliation.
Sustained political commitment and transparent oversight are indispensable: Europe's credibility and Libya's future depend on the robustness of this alliance.
Irregular migration is not a standalone crisis but a symptom of wider policy failings. Europe's transactional deals with dictators have weakened democratic values, emboldened extremist rhetoric, and eroded trust in international norms, both abroad and at home. A lasting solution demands a broader strategic vision that rejects short-sighted, realist compromises in favour of human-rights leadership, bolsters legitimate governments, and strengthens state sovereignty to enforce the law impartially. Libya's recent efforts – demonstrating how principled multilateralism and robust institution-building can restore stability – offer a clear path forward.
Only by marrying high-principle diplomacy with comprehensive security and legal cooperation can Europe and Libya transform a shared crisis into an opportunity for lasting stability and prosperity.
True sovereignty entails responsibility, not merely control; and only together – through unwavering cooperation and principled engagement – can we turn the tide on irregular migration and uphold the democratic values and human rights that bind our futures.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Europeans to ask Trump how far he will back Ukraine security guarantees
Europeans to ask Trump how far he will back Ukraine security guarantees

Euractiv

time16 hours ago

  • Euractiv

Europeans to ask Trump how far he will back Ukraine security guarantees

In preparation for a meeting with Zelenskyy and Trump to discuss ways of ending Russia's war against Ukraine, European leaders have already made notes on security guarantees for Kyiv and other pressing issues. European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on a Monday visit to Washington to see President Donald Trump in a collective bid to find a way to end Moscow's invasion, with the US offering security guarantees for Kyiv. The meeting follows a summit in Alaska between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin that failed to yield any breakthrough on an immediate ceasefire that the US leader had been pushing for. The leaders heading to Washington on Monday to appear alongside Zelensky call themselves the 'coalition of the willing'. They include British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen. Also heading to Washington will be Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Finnish President Alexander Stubb, who get on well with Trump. Macron said on Sunday that the European leaders would ask Trump how far he would back security guarantees for Ukraine, adding he did not think Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted peace. The French leader emphasised Europe's will to present a united front with Ukrainians and ask the Americans 'to what extent' they are ready to contribute to the security guarantees that would be offered to Ukraine in a peace agreement. 'No country can accept the loss of territories unless it has security guarantees for its remaining territory,' Macron said, adding that if Europe appears weak today 'we will pay a heavy price tomorrow." Macron was speaking from his summer residence after joining a video conference with other European leaders to coordinate their joint position before the meeting with Trump in Washington on Monday. On Moscow's position, he commented: 'There is only one state proposing a peace that would be a capitulation: Russia.' Peace deal without a ceasefire? After the Alaska meeting, Trump pivoted to say that he was now seeking a peace deal, even without a ceasefire. On Sunday, he posted 'BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA. Stay tuned!' on his Truth Social platform but did not elaborate. Trump's Russia envoy Steve Witkoff said on Sunday on CNN that Trump and Putin had agreed in their summit on 'robust security guarantees' for Ukraine. But Zelenskyy, on a Brussels visit on Sunday hosted by European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, rejected the idea of Russia offering his country security guarantees. 'What President Trump said about security guarantees is much more important to me than Putin's thoughts, because Putin will not give any security guarantees,' he said. Von der Leyen hailed the US offer to provide security guarantees modelled on - but separate from - NATO's collective security arrangement, known as Article 5. 'We welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine, and the coalition of the willing, including the European Union, is ready to do its share,' von der Leyen said. Territorial concessions? Trump's pivot to looking for a peace deal, not a ceasefire, aligns with the stance long taken by Putin, and which Ukraine and its European allies have criticised as Putin's way to buy time with the intent of making battlefield gains. Witkoff, in his CNN interview, elaborated that the United States was prepared to provide their 'game-changing' security guarantees as part of a process that would involve territorial "concessions". Zelenskyy reiterated that the Ukrainian constitution makes it impossible to cede any territory. 'We need real negotiations, which means they can start where the front line is now [...] Russia is still unsuccessful in the Donetsk region. Putin has been unable to take it for twelve years,' the Ukrainian leader said. However, he added that since the territorial issue is so important, 'it should be discussed only by the leaders of Ukraine and Russia at the trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the United States, and Russia.' 'So far, Russia has given no sign that such a trilateral meeting will happen', he said. According to an official briefed on a call Trump held with Zelenskyy and European leaders as he flew back from Alaska, the US leader supported a Putin proposal that Russia take full control of two eastern Ukrainian regions in exchange for freezing the frontline in two others. Putin 'de facto demands that Ukraine leave Donbas,' an area consisting of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions in eastern Ukraine, which Russia currently only partly controls, the source said. In exchange, Russian forces would halt their offensive in the Black Sea port region of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia in southern Ukraine, where the main cities are still under Ukrainian control. Several months into its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Russia in September 2022 claimed to have annexed all four Ukrainian regions even though its troops still do not fully control any of them. 'The Ukrainian president refused to leave Donbas,' the source said. What sort of consequences? US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking to NBC on Sunday, warned of 'consequences' - including the potential imposition of new sanctions on Russia - if no peace deal is reached on Ukraine. Von der Leyen also emphasised that 'this peace must be achieved through strength' and Europe was preparing one more sanction package: 'We have adopted 18 packages so far, and we are advancing preparation for the nineteenth. This package will be forthcoming in early September'. (bms, sm)

Europe's top politicians to join Zelenskyy for tense talks with Trump
Europe's top politicians to join Zelenskyy for tense talks with Trump

Euractiv

timea day ago

  • Euractiv

Europe's top politicians to join Zelenskyy for tense talks with Trump

EU chief von der Leyen and other European top politicians will attend a crucial meeting in Washington on Monday between US President Trump and Ukrainian leader Zelenskyy, which is expected to shape the future of the war in Ukraine. In a post on X, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she would meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy this afternoon in Brussels, and that both will participate in a meeting of the Coalition of the Willing - a group of countries backing Kyiv. 'At the request of President Zelenskyy, I will join the meeting with President Trump and other European leaders at the White House tomorrow,' von der Leyen said. NATO chief Mark Rutte, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and Finnish President Alexander Stubb will also attend the meeting. The German government said that the European leaders would try to emphasise 'interest in a swift peace agreement in Ukraine'. Meanwhile, media reports in the US suggest that President Donald Trump has informed European heads of state and government that he aims to arrange a trilateral summit between himself, Zelenskyy, and Russian President Vladimir Putin by next Friday. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz suggested that the European venue for the potential summit could be a place where discussions take place on a permanent basis. This is a developing story that will be updated. (sm, bms)

Europeans face tough questions ahead of Zelenskyy-Trump meeting
Europeans face tough questions ahead of Zelenskyy-Trump meeting

Euractiv

timea day ago

  • Euractiv

Europeans face tough questions ahead of Zelenskyy-Trump meeting

The coalition of countries supporting Ukraine will hold a video call today with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy ahead of his critical meeting on Monday with US President Donald Trump in Washington. The call - jointly coordinated by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron, and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz - will take place today at 15:00 CET, the Élysée said on Saturday. During the Alaska meeting, Russian President Vladimir Putin made it clear that he wants the Europeans excluded from the talks. He specifically warned them not to 'make attempts to disrupt this emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigues.' However, Europeans are still expected to play a role in post-war Ukraine. Trump said in an interview with Fox News right after the summit that the European nations 'have to get involved a little bit,' even if the onus was on Zelenskyy. According to the New York Times , he has apparently invited leading European politicians to the meeting with Zelenskyy in Washington. First, though, they will need to address several pressing issues in their video call. Hot topic I: Peace Deal without a ceasefire? Donald Trump on Saturday dropped his push for a ceasefire in Ukraine in favor of pursuing a full peace accord – a major shift announced hours after the summit. Prior to the high-stakes meeting in Alaska, securing an immediate cessation of hostilities had been a core demand of Trump and European leaders including Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The shift away from an urgent ceasefire would seem to favor Putin, who has long argued for negotiations on a final peace deal - a strategy that Ukraine and its European allies have criticised as a way to buy time and press home Russia's battlefield advances. Zelenskyy said on Saturday after a 'substantive' conversation with Trump about the Alaska summit that he looked forward to his Washington visit and discussing 'all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war.' He posted on X: 'A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions.' However, he later emphasised that Russia's refusal to accept a ceasefire was complicating efforts to end Moscow's more than three-year-long conflict. 'We see that Russia rebuffs numerous calls for a ceasefire and has not yet determined when it will stop the killing. This complicates the situation,' he said. 'If they lack the will to carry out a simple order to stop the strikes, it may take a lot of effort to get Russia to have the will to implement far greater - peaceful coexistence with its neighbors for decades,' he added. According to The New York Times , Trump is expected to raise the issue of Russian-occupied Ukrainian territory on Monday. The topic was not mentioned during a press conference between Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin. The Financial Times and AFP reported that Putin has demanded Ukraine withdraw from the partially occupied eastern provinces of Donetsk and Luhansk as a condition for ending Russia's war. However, he told Trump that he could agree to freeze the remaining front lines if his basic demands are met. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, on the other hand, told German television station ARD that Trump had not made any concessions to Putin with regard to Ukrainian territory. Russia currently occupies 20% of Ukraine's territory, not including Crimea, which was annexed by Russia in 2014. Zelenskyy, who fears that Russia will escalate its attacks in the coming days, has refused to give up any of its land. A statement by EU leaders suggested that it will be up to Ukraine to decide on matters concerning its territory, but emphasised that 'international borders must not be changed by force.' Hot topic III: Security guarantees Meanwhile, Trump raised the idea of security guarantees inspired by NATO's Article 5. Practically, this would mean that Ukraine would benefit from a collective security clause in case it is attacked, but it would not join the Transatlantic Alliance, thus satisfying Moscow's demand. France, the UK, and Germany have said they would send peacekeeping forces to guarantee peace in Ukraine, but not on the front line. Klaus Welle, former Secretary General of the European Parliament from 2009 to 2022, said earlier this year that a peacekeeping model for Ukraine could be similar to that of West Germany during the Cold War. 'You know, the pressure from the Soviet Union coming from East Germany was very strong. And we were able to resist for 40 years because we had foreign troops. We had American troops, British troops, French troops, and by the way, we still have American troops in Germany,' he said. 'In Germany, on the front line we had German troops, but in the second line, a little further back, the Allied troops. So, I think we need that,' he added, noting that American logistical and air support would also be necessary. (bms, sm)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store