logo
Huge jump in rejections for vital benefit worth £340 a year that unlocks full state pension payments – how to avoid it

Huge jump in rejections for vital benefit worth £340 a year that unlocks full state pension payments – how to avoid it

The Suna day ago
HUNDREDS of people could be missing out getting their full state pension in retirement because they're not receiving a vital benefit.
New figures obtained by wealth management company Quilter have revealed the number of Carer's Credit claims being rejected has risen to the highest level in over a decade.
1
The benefit can be claimed by people who have taken time out of work to care for someone else.
The benefit doesn't pay you any money directly but it's a National Insurance credit that makes sure you can still get the full state pension while you're not working.
You usually need 35 years of National Insurance contributions to get the full state pension, which currently sits at £11,973 per year.
If you only have 10 qualifying years, for example, you would get just £3,420.86 a year.
That means you would lose out on £342 for every year that you're not making National Insurance contributions.
If you claim Carer's Credit, it fills in the gaps in your National Insurance record to help you get the full amount.
The latest figures, which come from a Freedom of Information request to the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), show the number of rejected Carer's Credit claims rose to 990 in 2024/25.
A total of 6,773 claims were submitted over the year.
This means nearly 15% of claims were rejected.
It's also a sharp increase on the 164 claims that were rejected out of the total 7,105 claims made in 2023/24.
In 2022/23, a total of 4,209 claims were made with only 67 rejected.
The DWP said the most common reasons for refusal were missing qualifying benefit links or missing health or social care certificates.
Other factors included being over the state pension age, applying late, not living in the UK, or submitting duplicate or future-dated claims.
Almost 5.7million people in the UK provide unpaid care, including 1.7million people who deliver 50 hours or more of care per week.
The DWP said it didn't hold any data on how many carers may be entitled to but not applying for Carer's Credit.
But it appears a large number of people could be eligible.
Jon Greer, head of retirement policy at Quilter, said: "The rise in disallowed claims is a clear warning sign that many people are still unaware of the criteria or are being tripped up by administrative complexities...
"Too many carers are missing out either because they don't know the credit exists or because they face hurdles in proving eligibility.
"With millions of unpaid carers across the UK, it feels like this is a potentially largely underutilised benefit for carers and we should be doing much more to ensure that their future retirement income is not being quietly eroded."
Are you eligible for Carer's Credit?
To claim you'll need to be aged 16 or over but under the state pension age, which is currently 66.
You could claim the benefit if you're in one of these situations:
You care for one or more people for 20 hours or more a week but miss out on Carer's Allowance because you don't care for any one of them for 35 hours or more a week
Where there is more than one of you caring for someone, and someone else is getting the Carer's Allowance for that person
You care for someone who can't or refuses to claim disability benefits, or if the disability benefits of the person you are caring for have stopped due to them being in hospital or residential care
You are within 12 weeks of claiming Carer's Allowance and/or within 12 weeks of your claim for Carer's Allowance stopping.
The person you're looking after must normally be getting one of the following:
The middle or the higher rate of the care component of Disability Living Allowance (DLA)
The daily living component of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) (at either rate)
Attendance Allowance (at either rate) or Constant Attendance Allowance
Armed Forces Independence Payment (AFIP)
You may still be able to claim Carer's Credit even if the person you're caring for doesn't get one of these benefits.
When you apply, you should fill in the Care Certificate part of the application form and ask a healthcare professional to sign it.
You don't need to apply for Carer's Credit if you get Carer's Allowance or Carer Support Payment because you'll automatically get credits.
You'll also automatically get credits if you claim Child Benefit for a child under the age of 12.
If you're a foster carer, you can apply for National Insurance credits instead.
How can you claim?
You can download a claim form online through the Government website here.
You can also get the form by calling the Carer's Allowance Unit.
The phone number is 0800 731 0297.
You should then send off the form to Freepost DWP Carers Allowance Unit.
Do not write anything except the freepost address on the envelope. You do not need a postcode or a stamp.
Can you challenge the decision if your claim is rejected?
If your claim is rejected you can still challenge the decision.
This is called mandatory reconsideration and it's free to ask for.
You can ask for mandatory reconsideration if any of the following apply:
You think the office dealing with your claim has made an error or missed important evidence
You disagree with the reasons for the decision
You want to have the decision looked at again.
You should contact the DWP if you disagree with the decision.
You will need to ask for mandatory reconsideration within one month of the date of your decision letter.
You'll need to give the date of your original benefit decision, your name and address, your date of birth and your National Insurance number.
.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Arsenal closing in on Eberechi Eze transfer as midfielder left out of Crystal Palace Conference League squad
Arsenal closing in on Eberechi Eze transfer as midfielder left out of Crystal Palace Conference League squad

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Arsenal closing in on Eberechi Eze transfer as midfielder left out of Crystal Palace Conference League squad

Eberechi Eze 's £60million transfer from Crystal Palace to Arsenal could be confirmed as early as this weekend. Eze is set to become Arsenal 's seventh signing of the summer after they moved to hijack Tottenham's bid for the England international. It is believed the finishing touches on a deal to sign the 27-year-old, which catapults Arsenal's spending to beyond £250m, are all but completed. Eze's stunning move to the Emirates accelerated this week following a knee injury sustained by Kai Havertz. The Germany international came on as a second-half substitute in Arsenal's 1-0 win at Manchester United, and completed the game, but he did not participate in the club's open training session at the Emirates on Wednesday. It is unclear how long Havertz, who is still being assessed, will face on the sidelines. But the hastiness to swoop for Eze is evidence Arsenal did not want to take any chances as Mikel Arteta – backed by sporting director Andrea Berta – bids to lead the north Londoners to their first Premier League title in 22 years. Eze is now poised to follow striker Viktor Gyokeres (£55m), defender Cristhian Mosquera (£13m), midfielder Martin Zubimendi (£60m), goalkeeper Kepa Arrizabalaga (£5m), midfielder Christian Norgaard (£10m) and forward Noni Madueke (£48.5m) in making the switch to the Emirates. Arteta will face the media at the club's training ground on Friday to preview his side's second match of the campaign, at home to Leeds on Saturday evening. Eze was left out of Palace's Conference League qualifier against Norwegian outfit Fredrikstad at Selhurst Park, which is the Eagles' first ever European tie.

DWP launches independent review into Post Office staff prosecutions
DWP launches independent review into Post Office staff prosecutions

The Independent

time7 minutes ago

  • The Independent

DWP launches independent review into Post Office staff prosecutions

The Department for Work and Pensions is launching an independent review into its handling of prosecutions against Post Office staff. There were around 100 prosecutions by the DWP between 2001 and 2006, during the Horizon IT scandal. The decision to review the work on the cases comes after it was revealed the Post Office investigation team shared information with the DWP. The investigation will look at the period of time covered by the Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Act 2024, from 1996 to 2018. This was the legislation that effectively gave a blanket exoneration to Post Office staff convicted in that time, but it did not include DWP-related convictions. It was uncovered that the DWP and Post Office had conducted joint investigations during the scandal by Sky News last May. Responding to the findings at the time, lawyer and then-chair of the Justice Select Committee, Sir Robert Neill KC said the DWP convictions need to be 'looked at'. "I think that's the area they need to look at if we are saying their approach was tainted from the beginning - in the way the investigators adopted things - then joint operations I suspect would be just as tainted arguably as something where it has been the Post Office on its own." A DWP spokesperson said: 'We have committed to commissioning an independent assurance review where Post Office members of staff were prosecuted by the Department for welfare-related fraud. 'These cases involved complex investigations and were backed by evidence including filmed surveillance, stolen benefit books and witness statements – to date, no documentation has been identified showing that Horizon data was essential to these prosecutions.' Lawyer Neil Hudgell, who represented several victims of the Post Office scandal, said the review was 'wholly inadequate', adding that the DWP "should not be marking its own homework.' "Any involvement in the process of appointing reviewers undermines all confidence in the independence of the process," he said. The Horizon IT scandal saw approximately 1,000 individuals wrongfully prosecuted and convicted. Around £1 billion has been paid to victims so far according to the Department for Business and Trade, after a legal act which came into effect on 25 January 2024 authorised automatic compensation. The inquiry into the scandal is still ongoing, having published the first volume of its final report in July.

Sacked executive who slept in sauna wins disability claim over ADHD
Sacked executive who slept in sauna wins disability claim over ADHD

Times

time8 minutes ago

  • Times

Sacked executive who slept in sauna wins disability claim over ADHD

A female executive who was sacked for allegedly becoming so drunk at a work event that she slept in a sauna was discriminated against due to her ADHD, an employment tribunal has ruled. Shannon Burns, who earned £220,000 a year as vice-president of engineering at German firm Gitpod, was dismissed for her behaviour at an off-site event in Lofer, Austria, in 2023. She was told her behaviour had 'eroded trust and confidence' and she should 'lead by example' as a senior employee of the software development company. Burns, who used to work at US technology giant Slack before she was headhunted for the role at Gitpod in the UK, said her male colleagues were 'far more intoxicated' and faced no punishment. She also claimed there was a 'tech bro' culture at the company. • 'Tech bros' sued by woman who slept in sauna after drunken night Burns, who was diagnosed with ADHD in 2015, claimed she was discriminated against by her former company for both her sex and disability. Employment judge Rachel Wedderspoon dismissed Burns's claim of sexual discrimination, noting her 'lack of professionalism' had nothing to do with her gender. However, the judge backed the former executive's disability claim, saying Burns's ADHD had contributed to a 'great deal of forgetfulness', including losing the keys to her hotel room on the night of the off-site function. Burns is now eligible for compensation. The tribunal was told that Burns, who was hired in late 2002, had requested an ADHD coach in February 2023 after feeling 'deeply overwhelmed' with her workload and experiencing a high level of anxiety. Concerns were raised in March 2023 about Burns's performance, with Johannes Landgraf, the Gitpod chief executive, telling a colleague that Burns was 'not a superstar' and that he would not hire her again. Landgraf was not aware of her disability at the time, the tribunal was told. At the team-building event in Austria in April 2023, Burns and other staff, including Landgraf, had been drinking. It was noted Burns, who had been experiencing a 'very difficult period' in her life at the time, had cried and appeared drunk at the event, including 'slurring her words'. Later that evening Burns went back to her room but could not find her key and was unable to wake her roommate to be let in. The tech executive eventually gave up and went to sleep in the sauna. The tribunal was told Burns later received a message from a senior male executive who said she must 'lead the team by example' and 'stay in control'. He went on to say that he had heard comments that Burns had 'got too drunk and fallen asleep in the sauna room'. • 'Day-one' employment rights spark business backlash After the event Landgraf had concerns about Burns's 'lack of professional accountability' and behaviours which were 'incompatible with executive responsibility'. In June, Burns was invited to a meeting where she was dismissed. In her witness statement, Burns said: 'My male colleagues were drinking alcohol/drunk at the off-site but I was the one who was dismissed.' The judge said Burns had accepted her 'impairments were exacerbated by the consumption of alcohol'. Upholding her disability discrimination claims, Wedderspoon admitted Burns had consumed 'quite a lot' of alcohol on the night she was locked out of her room. 'However, being disorganised and forgetful may be features of ADHD,' she said. 'Insofar as [Burns] was criticised for being locked out in the evening the tribunal finds that this was likely in part to be as a result of the combination of her alcohol consumption and her forgetfulness which is something arising from her disability of ADHD.' The tribunal dismissed her claims of sex discrimination. 'She displayed a lack of professionalism, namely lack of executive presence as vice president. That had nothing whatsoever to do with the fact that [Burns] is woman,' Wedderspoon said. A hearing to decide Burns's compensation will take place at a later date.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store