Abortions in the US are on the rise three years after Roe v Wade was overturned
US abortion providers performed 1.14m abortions in 2024, according to new data released on Monday by #WeCount, a Society of Family Planning project that has tracked abortion provision since 2022. That's the highest number on record in recent years.
'We were really surprised to see the numbers go up over time,' said Ushma Upadhyay, a University of California, San Francisco professor who serves as co-chair of the #WeCount steering committee. 'Abortion bans haven't really stopped people from needing abortion care. It's just made it harder for them to be able to get it.'
Although most of the abortions documented in #WeCount's report took place in person, a growing number of abortions are occurring through telehealth, including among patients living in one of the dozen-plus states that ban virtually all abortions. In a telehealth abortion, patients generally meet virtually with a provider before receiving abortion pills through the mail. By December 2023, 19% of abortions took place through telehealth – but by December 2024, that share had risen to 25%.
In the last three months of 2024 alone, more than 70,000 abortions were performed through telehealth. These abortions are particularly popular in states with large rural regions, such as Montana, Nevada and Hawaii.
Much of the increase in telehealth abortions can be attributed to the spread of 'shield laws'. Enacted by at least eight states since Roe's fall, these controversial laws are designed to protect abortion providers who treat women in states with bans from prosecution by those states.
Demand for shield-law abortions has soared over the last two years. In July 2023, when the first shield-law abortion providers started operating, they facilitated fewer than 6,000 abortions for people living in states that ban almost all abortions or that restrict telehealth abortions. In December 2024, these providers performed almost 14,000 abortions.
'There's more abortion taking place in Mississippi today than there was prior to Dobbs,' said Dr Angel Foster, a co-founder of the Massachusetts Medication Abortion Access Project (Map), which uses shield laws to ship abortion pills out to about 2,500 patients a month. 'That really speaks to how little access some folks had to in-clinic abortion care prior to Dobbs and how shield law provision and telemedicine has really stepped into that space.'
#WeCount also collected information on how many abortions were reported to government authorities in states with abortion bans in 2024. On average, states where abortion is totally banned saw just 30 in-person abortions a month, #WeCount found.
All abortion bans permit abortions in emergency situations, but activists have long contended that that bans' exceptions are written so narrowly and vaguely that they are unworkable in practice. Since Roe fell, dozens of women have come forward to say they were denied emergency abortions.
In Upadhyay's view, the #WeCount data backs up the claim that exceptions don't work.
'That seems very low,' Upadhyay said. 'That is something that I think states with abortion bans should be paying attention to and be concerned about.'
The future of shield laws is now in doubt, as anti-abortion activists are trying to test their durability in court. Texas has sued a New York doctor over accusations that she mailed abortion pills to a woman in Texas, while Louisiana has indicted the same doctor for allegedly mailing a pill to that state.
Access to the common abortion drug mifepristone is also under assault. Martin Makary, the FDA commissioner, and Robert F Kennedy Jr, the US health secretary, have called for a 'review' of mifepristone, which is typically used in telehealth abortions – and which has been deemed safe by more than 100 studies conducted across dozens of countries. Kennedy specifically cited the results of a flawed analysis pushed by anti-abortion groups that claimed the complication rates from taking mifepristone are higher than previously known.
'Clearly, it indicates that, at very least, the label should be changed,' Kennedy told the Missouri senator Josh Hawley, a Republican, during a congressional hearing.
For now, however, Foster remains optimistic about the future of her work.
'There will be a point where growth stops. There's a finite number of people who have an abortion each year,' Foster said. 'But I do think within our practice and within the shield law space we are anticipating that there will continue to be growth in demand.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
20 hours ago
- Newsweek
VA Plans Major Change to Healthcare Benefits
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has announced it plans to scale back abortion access under its healthcare programs. Why It Matters The decision would reverse a policy put in place in September 2022, following the U.S. Supreme Court's June ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that protected a pregnant woman's right to choose to have an abortion. The 2022 policy allowed federal funds to be used to pay for abortion care for veterans and eligible dependents in cases of rape, incest, and danger to the life or health of the mother. Critics argue the VA move could leave veterans without reproductive care options, especially in states with strict abortion bans. What To Know In a notice published Monday in the Federal Register, the department said it would reinstate a pre-2022 rule that excludes abortion services from coverage except when a pregnancy poses a threat to the life of the mother. It would apply to medical benefits packages for veterans and their dependents. At the time of the 2022 change, then-VA Secretary Denis McDonough said the decision had been made to protect patient safety. The change also made it possible for abortion care to be provided in states which had limited access to reproductive care following the overturn. The change garnered scrutiny from conservative lawmakers, who argued it exceeded the limits set by the Hyde Amendment—a federal provision that restricts the use of government funds for abortions unless the life of the mother is in danger. Stock image/file photo: Signboard of United States Department of Veterans Affairs in Washington DC. Stock image/file photo: Signboard of United States Department of Veterans Affairs in Washington DC. GETTY The department said in its proposal that it wanted to ensure it "provides only needed medical services to our nation's heroes and their families." It will continue to provide coverage for Veterans experiencing miscarriages or ectopic pregnancies. Anti-abortion Republicans have praised the rollback as a victory for taxpayers and the sanctity of life, while abortion-rights advocates condemned it as a dangerous denial of care, arguing it strips veterans of bodily autonomy and puts their health and dignity at risk. What People Are Saying Republicans on the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs said in a statement: "It was wrong that the Biden administration violated settled law in 2022 and began offering abortion services through VA. We pushed back hard on this disastrous policy over the last two years to hold the Biden-Harris administration accountable and protect the lives of the unborn. It's simple–taxpayers do not want their hard-earned money spent on paying for abortions—and VA's sole focus should always be providing service-connected health care and benefits to the veterans they serve. House Republicans, alongside President Trump, will always stand up for the sanctity of life—today's decision by Secretary Collins makes that message perfectly clear." Alexis McGill Johnson, the president and CEO of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said in a statement on Monday: "Those who fight for all our freedom must have the most basic freedom to control their own bodies and futures—and this rule robs them of it. Taking away access to heath care shows us that the Trump administration will always put politics and retribution over people's lives." Nancy Northup, president and CEO at the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement: "After veterans put their lives on the line to protect our freedoms, the Trump administration is trying to rob them of their own freedoms and putting their health at risk. This administration is sending a clear message to veterans—that their health and dignity aren't worth defending. To devalue veterans in this way and take away life-changing health care would be unconscionable. This shows you just how extreme this administration's anti-abortion stance is—they would rather a veteran suffer severely than receive an abortion." What's Next The proposal will be open for a 30-day public comment period until September 3.
Chicago Tribune
a day ago
- Chicago Tribune
Got the sniffles? Here's what to know about summer colds, COVID-19 and more
Summer heat, outdoor fun … and cold and flu symptoms? The three may not go together in many people's minds: partly owing to common myths about germs and partly because many viruses really do have lower activity levels in the summer. But it is possible to get the sniffles — or worse — in the summer. Federal data released Friday, for example, shows COVID-19 is trending up in many parts of the country, with emergency department visits up among people of all ages. Here's what to know about summer viruses. The number of people seeking medical care for three key illnesses — COVID-19, flu and respiratory syncytial virus, or RSV — is currently low, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Flu is trending down and RSV was steady this week. But COVID-19 is trending up in many mid-Atlantic, southeast, Southern and West Coast states. The expectation is that COVID-19 will eventually settle into a winter seasonal pattern like other coronaviruses, but the past few years have brought a late summer surge, said Dr. Dean Blumberg, chief of pediatric infectious diseases at University of California Davis Children's Hospital. Other viruses circulating this time of year include the one that causes 'hand, foot and mouth' disease — which has symptoms similar to a cold, plus sores and rashes — and norovirus, sometimes called the stomach flu. Many viruses circulate seasonally, picking up as the weather cools in the fall and winter. So it's true that fewer people get stuffy noses and coughs in the summer — but cold weather itself does not cause colds. It's not just about seasonality. The other factor is our behavior, experts say. Nice weather means people are opening windows and gathering outside where it's harder for germs to spread. But respiratory viruses are still around. When the weather gets too hot and everyone heads inside for the air conditioning, doctors say they start seeing more sickness. In places where it gets really hot for a long time, summer can be cold season in its own right. 'I grew up on the East Coast and everybody gets sick in the winter,' said Dr. Frank LoVecchio, an emergency room doctor and Arizona State University researcher. 'A lot of people get sick in the summer here. Why is that? Because you spend more time indoors.' For people who are otherwise healthy, timing is a key consideration to getting any vaccine. You want to get it a few weeks before that big trip or wedding, if that's the reason for getting boosted, doctors say. But, for most people, it may be worth waiting until the fall in anticipation of winter cases of COVID-19 really tick up. 'You want to be fully protected at the time that it's most important for you,' said Dr. Costi Sifri, of the University of Virginia Health System. People at higher risk of complications should always talk with their doctor about what is best for them, Sifri added. Older adults and those with weak immune systems may need more boosters than others, he said. Last week, the CDC noted emergency room visits among children younger than 4 were rising. That makes sense, Blumberg said, because many young kids are getting it for the first time or are unvaccinated. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in May that the shots would no longer be recommended for healthy kids, a decision that health experts have said lacks scientific basis. The American Academy of Pediatrics still endorses COVID-19 shots for children older than 6 months. The same things that help prevent colds, flu and COVID any other time of the year work in the summer, doctors say. Spend time outside when you can, wash your hands, wear a mask. And if you're sick, stay home.
UPI
2 days ago
- UPI
Study suggests more effective treatment for binge eating than CBT
A new University of California-San Diego study suggests a method known as "regulation of cues" could be more effective than cognitive behavioral therapy in treating binge eating disorder. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo There's a better way of treating binge eating disorder, a new study argues. The method, called "regulation of cues," reduced patients' odds of binge eating by 20% compared to those who got standard cognitive-behavioral therapy, researchers reported Aug. 4 in JAMA Network Open. "The study showed that our treatment could reduce binge eating more than standard therapy even after the six-month follow up," researcher Kerri Boutelle, a professor of pediatrics at the University of California-San Diego Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, said in a news release. Regulation of cues helps people by teaching them to become more attuned to the signals sent by their body when they are naturally hungry or full, researchers said in background notes. Many people with eating disorders have lost touch with these signals or tend to ignore them. The therapy also helps people learn to distinguish between true physical hunger and cravings driven by emotions, and also to resist the temptation posed by foods that can trigger overeating. For this new study, researchers recruited 129 overweight or obese veterans being treated by the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System. All the vets either had binge eating disorder or were at high risk. Binge eating -- uncontrollably consuming large amounts of food -- is common among military veterans, affecting 65% of female and 45% of male vets, researchers said. Military service frequently requires people to eat on the run or go without food, putting veterans at greater risk for binge eating. The first-line treatment for binge eating is cognitive-behavioral therapy, in which people normalize their eating habits and address thoughts and behaviors that contribute to binging, researchers said. But CBT doesn't result in meaningful or lasting weight loss, researchers noted. Researchers randomly assigned 63 of the patients to undergo regulation-of-cues therapy alongside a weight-loss program that included calorie monitoring and exercise. The rest received standard CBT. Those who received regulation-of-cues therapy had a lower risk of binge eating, and also lost a greater amount of weight after five months, results show. However, the weight differences did not last longer. "These findings suggest that targeting how individuals respond to food cues, rather than just focusing on eating behaviors or thoughts, may offer a more effective and lasting treatment for binge eating," Boutelle said. "But more research is needed on the effects on weight." More information The University of California-San Diego has more on regulation-of-cues therapy. Copyright © 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.
