logo
Ohio protest, riot laws to know ahead of June 14 'No Kings' protests, other rallies

Ohio protest, riot laws to know ahead of June 14 'No Kings' protests, other rallies

Yahoo11-06-2025
Protests in Columbus this week mirror those in Los Angeles and San Francisco rallying against the Trump administration's recent immigration raids on workplaces.
Rallies in Columbus include an "ICE Out!" protest against the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, defying the Washington, D.C., military parade, and much more.
Ohio's laws for protests have changed since the Black Lives Matter rallies after the death of George Floyd. Here's what to know.
House Bill 109 passed in February 2022 created new felony offenses, including "riot assault,' 'riot vandalism,' and 'bias-motivated intimidation," according to the Columbus Dispatch. The law also increased penalties for existing offenses, including:
Rioting
Aggravated rioting
Disorderly conduct
Vandalism
Additionally, House Bill 109 permits police officers to file civil lawsuits if they are injured during a riot, if their civil rights are violated while on duty, or if a false complaint is made against them.
Groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio took issue with House Bill 109, arguing its definition of a riot was too broad and discretionary, the Dispatch reported.
A second bill also passed in 2022 allows the top police officer in a jurisdiction to cordon off the area and block through traffic when attempting to suppress a riot, according to Ohio Capital Journal. That bill also allows law enforcement to prevent or prohibit the sale, dispensing or transportation of:
Firearms
Ammo
Dynamite
Other explosives
Both 2022 bills passed largely along party lines.
This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: Ohio protest laws have changed since George Floyd. What to know
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prof G says tariff ‘nonsense' gives away auto industry dominance to other countries — is Trump's protectionism failing?
Prof G says tariff ‘nonsense' gives away auto industry dominance to other countries — is Trump's protectionism failing?

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Prof G says tariff ‘nonsense' gives away auto industry dominance to other countries — is Trump's protectionism failing?

America's trillion-dollar auto sector may be past its prime. That's according to New York University Stern School of Business professor and media entrepreneur Scott Galloway, who claimed in a recent YouTube video that 2025 marks 'the beginning of the end of the U.S. automobile industry.' Galloway argues that U.S. automakers are struggling to compete with rising Chinese manufacturers and that President Donald Trump's ongoing trade war and 'tariff nonsense' are having a counterproductive effect, further undermining the industry's global competitiveness. He is not alone in sounding the alarm. A growing number of experts — including some U.S. auto executives — have raised concerns about the Trump administration's unpredictable trade policies and their long-term impact on the sector. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Ceding advantage to Japan Although the Trump administration's tariff policy remains fluid, as of August it appears to favor some foreign automakers over domestic ones. For example, Japan currently faces a flat 15% tariff on all exports to the U.S., including vehicles from its globally dominant brands. Meanwhile, most other countries face a 25% tariff on auto imports. As a result, an American carmaker that manufactures domestically but imports car parts from Mexico or Canada may incur higher production costs than Japanese rivals. According to the American Automotive Policy Council — a group representing G.M., Ford, and Stellantis — this creates a significant advantage for brands like Toyota or Honda at the expense of U.S.-based manufacturers. 'We just struck a deal with Japan that made it easier for Americans to buy, quite frankly, their superior cars,' Galloway explains in the recent YouTube video. The global auto supply chain is so complex that even the most 'American' vehicles rely on imported components. Tesla's Model 3 Long Range, for example, contains '40% Chinese content,' according to Frank DuBois, associate professor at American University's Kogod School of Business. As domestic automakers struggle, emerging challengers are rapidly gaining global market share in the industry's fastest-growing segment: electric vehicles (EVs). Read more: Nervous about the stock market? Gain potential quarterly income through this $1B private real estate fund — even if you're not a millionaire. Losing the EV race In addition to tariff challenges, legacy U.S. automakers are also struggling to compete in the rapidly expanding global EV market. As of 2024, only one U.S. brand — Tesla — ranked among the top 10 global EV manufacturers by market share, according to JD Power's AutoVista Group. However, Tesla has been losing ground, with reports from Reuters and Le Monde attributing the decline in part to CEO Elon Musk's controversial political behavior and growing foreign competition. In contrast, Chinese rival BYD has taken a commanding lead. As of 2024, BYD held 22.2% of the global EV market — more than double Tesla's share — according to AutoVista. Galloway sees little chance for a turnaround. 'My sense is the EV race has been lost now, because Tesla has lost it to BYD,' he says. What does this mean for consumers? If 2025 is indeed the beginning of the end for the American auto industry, as Galloway predicts, the economic and consumer implications could be significant. The auto sector contributes $1.2 trillion to national output and supports 10.1 million jobs — about 4.9% of the total U.S. workforce — according to the Alliance for Automotive Innovation. A slowdown in the industry could mean widespread job losses and reduced income for working families across the country. Consumers are already feeling the effects of the ongoing trade battle. Vehicles priced under $40,000 could see price increases of up to $6,000, while higher-end models may face even steeper hikes, according to Kelley Blue Book. While the full economic impact of Trump's trade policies remains uncertain, the effects on car prices and American households are already taking shape — and they're not encouraging. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

A big question about Alligator Alcatraz keeps coming up: Who's in charge?
A big question about Alligator Alcatraz keeps coming up: Who's in charge?

CNN

time22 minutes ago

  • CNN

A big question about Alligator Alcatraz keeps coming up: Who's in charge?

Who's in charge of Alligator Alcatraz? Since the controversial detention facility opened in the Florida Everglades earlier this summer, immigrants held there, advocacy groups and two federal judges have asked this question repeatedly. The answer could play a key role in a legal battle over the facility's fate. And it has bigger implications, too. State and federal authorities have described Alligator Alcatraz as a partnership aimed at strengthening the Trump administration's efforts to crack down on illegal immigration. Florida says it's operating the temporary detention camp under agreements between state and local agencies and ICE. But when it comes to day-to-day operations at the facility, and to decisions about who's detained there, federal officials have said the state is in charge. Critics say confusion over who's ultimately responsible for the facility isn't simply a bureaucratic matter. They argue it raises concerns about accountability and oversight as detainees' lives hang in the balance. Here's a look at three key reasons the question of who's in charge is so significant. In a federal lawsuit, environmental groups are asking a judge to block operations and construction at the site until environmental laws are followed. That case hinges on the question of whether Alligator Alcatraz is a federal project. The groups and a Native American tribe argue the National Environmental Policy Act should apply to the facility. That law requires a detailed environmental impact analysis for any proposed 'major federal action.' Plaintiffs argue none of that happened before Alligator Alcatraz was built. 'They just circumvented that completely by saying this is state-run,' says Thomas Kennedy, a consultant for the Florida Immigrant Coalition, which opposes the detention facility. Attorneys representing Florida and the federal government argue the detention center, which was built in a matter of days this summer, never had to follow those regulations because construction and operation of the facility are under state control. 'ICE did not and has not ordered, supervised, or directed construction of the facility. ICE did not and has not weighed in on the number of detainees held in the facility. The State of Florida has complete discretion in deciding who is detained at this facility,' ICE Assistant Field Office Director Santiago Fuentes says in a signed declaration included in the court records. According to the Associated Press, an attorney representing the environmental group has argued that the facility's purpose is immigration enforcement, a federal function. Questions about who's doing what at the facility have also come up in connection with another federal lawsuit, which focuses on detainees' access to counsel. There is 'confusion of who exactly is running the show at Alligator Alcatraz,' US District Judge Rodolfo A. Ruiz II said in a July hearing. 'Who is doing what in this facility?' In response to his questions, officials filed paperwork showing agreements between multiple Florida agencies and ICE. Ruiz dismissed part of that lawsuit late Monday and also moved the case to a different jurisdiction, making it likely legal battles over the facility will continue. In the environmental case, US District Judge Kathleen Williams is expected to issue an order this week. And she's already temporarily blocked additional construction at the site. If she sides with the plaintiffs and issues a preliminary injunction this week, Alligator Alcatraz's days could be numbered. Among the options Williams is considering: a full operational shutdown of the facility. When complaints come up about conditions at an immigrant detention facility, or when issues arise in individual detainees' cases, it's important for lawmakers, members of the public and detainees' family members and legal representatives to know who to contact. Typically, Immigration and Customs Enforcement's website will list basic information about its detention facilities, including a detainee locator and details about family and attorney visitations, according to Claire Trickler-McNulty, a former ICE and DHS official who helped craft detention policies in previous administrations. She notes that Alligator Alcatraz isn't listed there. 'Because it's not really, officially an ICE facility, a lot of the infrastructure that's been built is not applicable. So it's sort of like floating in the dark,' she says. 'It's very concerning. … It's confusing and also frustrating, because it's so murky.' Family members of detainees told CNN they've struggled to find out if their loved ones are even being held at Alligator Alcatraz. And critics have raised numerous concerns about the facility since it opened, with reports of hundreds of migrants confined in cages amid sweltering heat, bug infestations and meager meals. The state of Florida has pushed back, saying conditions at the camp are in 'good working order' and that claims to the contrary are false. The Department of Homeland Security has decried what it calls 'hoaxes' about the facility. 'The media is desperate for allegations of inhumane conditions at this facility to be true, so they can slow down President Trump's partnerships with States to turbocharge efforts to remove the worst of the worst,' DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a recent statement. But immigrant rights groups argue the confusion over who's in charge at the facility has very real consequences. 'It raises a lot of red flags, because we want to make sure that everybody's held accountable,' says Nery Lopez, a senior organizer at the Detention Watch Network. 'We don't know who to hold accountable. There's no number (to call) … to have someone go in there and verify' when allegations are made about conditions inside. Kennedy describes the facility as a 'black site.' 'The detainees and their family members feel like they're just in complete legal limbo while they're inside,' he says. McLaughlin disputed that characterization. 'More Alligator Alcatraz hoaxes. It is not a 'black site,'' she told CNN in a written statement. 'The facility is managed by the State of Florida through the Division of Emergency Management. Detainees have access to phones they can use to contact their family and lawyers. Additionally, Alligator Alcatraz meets federal detention standards.' Debates and legal battles over Alligator Alcatraz could have implications far beyond the Florida immigrant detention facility. 'It's seen as a testing ground,' Trickler-McNulty says. That's because officials have repeatedly pointed to the facility as a model they hope other states will follow. 'Florida was unique in what they presented to us, and I would ask every other governor to do the exact same thing,' DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said after visiting the facility in July. 'This is a model, but we need other states to step up,' Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis added. Less than two weeks later, Noem told reporters she was in talks with multiple states who want to build similar facilities. 'I'm having ongoing conversations with five other governors,' Noem said. Just over a month after Alligator Alcatraz began operating, Noem announced a similar facility would open in Indiana. Officials said the facility, dubbed the 'Speedway Slammer' for the famed Indianapolis Motor Speedway to the south, would provide 1,000 immigrant detention beds. And on Tuesday, the Department of Homeland Security announced plans for a 280-bed expansion of ICE detention space at the Work Ethic Camp in McCook, Nebraska, describing the move as its third state partnership. Last week, DeSantis also announced Florida would open another facility at a former prison in the northern part of the state, 'building on the success the state has had with Alligator Alcatraz.' The rapid expansion of detention facilities makes confusion over who's in charge at Alligator Alcatraz all the more concerning, Lopez says. 'Then it flags the alarm of, is this what's going to happen in other areas, too? There's going to be more questions in the air, and it's just truly very dangerous,' she says. Even if legal challenges to Alligator Alcatraz are successful and a judge blocks the facility from operating, Kennedy says, it's clear authorities intend to use this approach elsewhere. 'It's a scary model,' he says. CNN's Devon M. Sayers, Allison Gordon and Isabel Rosales contributed to this report.

Here's the status of Russia's meat-grinder offensive in Donetsk — as fate of the region hangs on peace deal
Here's the status of Russia's meat-grinder offensive in Donetsk — as fate of the region hangs on peace deal

New York Post

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Here's the status of Russia's meat-grinder offensive in Donetsk — as fate of the region hangs on peace deal

Russia is expected to conquer a tactically important city in Donetsk that has held out for more than a year-and-a-half — but Moscow is struggling to make any other advancements on the frontlines, according to the latest analysis of the conflict. The border region is at the center of President Trump's attempts to negotiate a peace deal — with Russian strongman Vladimir Putin demanding Ukraine give up the entire mineral and coal-rich oblast, despite failing to capture the entire thing during the war. The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based think tank that has been monitoring the Ukraine war daily, concluded that Russian soldiers advanced a few hundred yards further into Pokrovsk, a key city inside the Donetsk region. Advertisement 5 Russian troops are struggling to take the city of Dobropillya after Moscow claimed its soldiers were making headway last week. Getty Images 5 The fighting remains intense in Donetsk as Russian President Vladimir Putin demanded the region be surrendered to him. REUTERS The city is expected to fall within the year following Moscow's summertime push, but the duration and cost of the campaign to conquer Pokrovsk has been emblematic of Russia's struggle to make meaningful gains in the fourth year of the war, said George Barros, the ISW's Russia Team head. 'It took Russia about 18 months to make its way to the city, but Pokrovsk has already outlived its usefulness,' Barros told The Post. 'So it isn't too much of a loss compared to what it took Moscow to get.' Advertisement But as Ukraine continues to hold the key strategic cities of Sloviansk and Kramatorsk, Russia has found it increasingly difficult to make any headway against Kyiv's 'fortress belt.' 5 The Donetsk region is at the forefront of Trump's attempts in negotiating a peace deal. Institute for the Study of War and AEI's Critical Threats Project During Monday's meeting with European leaders at the White House, Finnish President Alexander Stubb reportedly referred to the cities as 'a bastion against the Huns,' according to the Wall Street Journal. Advertisement Russian troops were spotted making offensive pushes in Siversk, located just northeast of Kramatorsk, on Tuesday, with no headway made, according to the ISW analysis. A similar attempt was reported over in Chasiv Yar, about 18 miles southeast of Kramatorsk, with Russia deploying a number of troops, artillery brigades and airborne division fighters, all of whom found no success in pushing the frontline, the ISW said. 5 Russia occupies about 70% of the Donetsk border region. And while Pokrovsk continues to face seige, Russia has been struggling to capitalize on the infiltrations it recently made in the town of Dobropillya, located just north of the hub city. Advertisement Ukrainian military observer Kostyantyn Mashovets reported Tuesday that Kyiv's forces have liberated the villages around Dobropillya, raising up the Ukrainian flag and pushing back the Moscow invaders. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Russian war bloggers, who have become a vital source on the happenings along the frontline, also criticized Moscow's failures in Dobropillya, saying the recent push around the city was 'too narrow relative to its depth and therefore vulnerable to Ukrainian counterattacks,' the ISW found. 5 Residents evacuated from the villages near Pokrovsk as Russia's forces continue to advance on Tuesday. Getty Images Moscow has also found its forces being pushed back around Toretsk, a city that took more than 14 months to conquer before it fell under Russian occupation on Aug. 1. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has vowed that he would not give up the Donetsk region, saying Russia cannot claim land that its forces have failed to conquer.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store