The Big Picture: The US is in economic strife and investors should look further afield
In our new regular series honing in on macroeconomics and other matters of pertinence for investors, we bring you perspectives from respected investment advisor Jason Coggins.
The US has lost its status as the world's go-to economy and investors should look to Europe in particular
While the US (rightly) will try to reign in its rampant budget deficit, Europe is on a fiscal expansion drive and that will spur growth
When it comes to tariffs, Trump has overplayed his hand with China
No matter how the Trump revolution pans out, the US has lost its status as the leading world economy and financial epicentre.
For investors, that means that returns there won't stack up relative to the elevated risks they need to take – and better geographies beckon.
That's the view of respected investment adviser Jason Coggins, who holds multiple high-level advisory roles at leading private boutique firms.
These include head of product strategy at Ellerston Capital, chair of Intium Capital's investment committee and an advisory board member at the Denver, Colorado-based Ibex Investors.
He has also held senior roles at Koda Capital and the ANZ Bank's wealth division.
Typically, Coggins says, Australians are overexposed to the US market and 'massively short' of a presence in Europe and Asia.
Not surprisingly, his clients are keen for his views on the new world order.
That's the new regime that has transformed the US from a safe harbour, to one where interest rate gyrations sometimes have resembled those in emerging markets.
'You would be taking a big risk to double down on the US,' he says.
'You really are not being compensated for the risks right now.
'US valuations are still expensive historically and if there's bad news is vulnerable to a further fall.'
Europe is no longer a PIIG with lipstick
The Trump ascendancy – notable the declaration of a tariff war and a geopolitical reversion to isolationism – has been well examined.
But Coggins says the flipside – how the rest of the world is responding – has gone under the radar.
He notes the dichotomy between US and Europe on fiscal and monetary policy, with both geographies departing from their historic norms.
In the US, the Trump mantra is about raising revenue (from tariffs) to reign in the crippling budget deficit, which has been allowed to balloon by successive administrations.
'Spending was way too high and Trump is embarking on a fiscal detox to reduce the deficit,' he says.
'While that measure is understandable, it will affect growth.'
In contrast, Europe has embarked on fiscal loosening – led by the historically austere Germany, the Continent's most powerful economy.
'Germany has very low growth, with an inherent fear of hyperinflation dating back to the 1930s ,' Coggins says.
Post its recent federal election, Germany has committed to ramping up spending on infrastructure and defence – and its European peers are in lockstep with this strategy.
'Germany is going to spend money and even if they have ridiculous deficit for the next five to 10 years.'
He adds that Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain bear little resemblance to their poor shape during the 2009-1014 European banking and debt crisis, when they were dubbed the PIIGs (this derogatory acronym included Ireland).
'Even low-growth Italy has a reformist government,' Coggins says.
'Europe now is efficient and working. In fact, the amount of economic reform they have done puts Australia to shame.'
Therefore, Europe's hitherto sluggish growth could surprise the pundits.
Don't forget me, old China
China, meanwhile, is not without levers of its own in terms of inducing economic growth and negotiating the impact of Trump's tariffs, no matter where they settle.
This month, the People's Bank of China cuts its benchmark seven-day rate from 1.5% to 1.4% and reduced the level of reserves commercial banks are required to carry.
Combined, the measures should boost the availability of money to stimulate the economy.
Auspiciously, Chinese president Xi Jinping has not exactly rushed to Washington to beg for a trade deal and kiss the ring of 'Pope Trump', as portrayed in a president-endorsed meme.
'It would be very risky to dismiss China,' he says.
'For all the fuss over trade wars, only 16% of Chinese exports go to the US. China is not going to be bullied, that's not the way to negotiate with them.'
Courting the tech giants
Coggins adds that China is now courting the tech companies, having earlier put local exemplars such as Alibaba and Tencent Holdings in the freezer for espousing bourgeois values.
'There's been a big move to reinstate the tech sector as the primary growth driver,' he says.
'The Chinese are now good – if not better – than the US when it comes to tech.'
Remember the shock waves in February when China's Deep Seek revealed it could produce artificial intelligence at a fraction of the cost of US leader Nvidia?
'The top 1% of Chinese scientists engineers and innovators are superior to the top 1% in the US.'
Using its heft in centralised economy, Beijing should also be expected to implement other policies to foster growth on the back of the nation's domestic consumption.
US market 'over loved and over loaned'
As for the US, Coggins sees a prevalence of markets volatility and currency 'noise' until around February next year, ahead of November's Congressional mid-term elections.
With the Republicans holding a slender three-seat majority in the Senate, Congress expects increasing pressure on the White House to temper radical policies on tariffs and cutting public spending.
Coggins describes the US market as 'massively over loved and over loaned'.
Last year US stocks accounted for 75% of the MSCI world index – dominance not seen since Japan's economic emergence in the 1980.
'People were buying the US dollar and US equities, especially high-growth tech stocks,' Coggins says.
'The problem is, Trump has spurred the biggest move in 30-year bond yields since the 1980s and the biggest move in 10-year yields since the tech wreck.'
In other words: the market isn't betting on lower interest rates, despite the spectre of inflation or even stagflation (high inflation and unemployment) in a recession.
'If Trump does put massive tariffs on, US inflation will rise rapidly,' Coggins says. 'China will redirect exports bound to the US to places like Australia, Europe and the rest of Asia.
'This will reduce inflation elsewhere, while creating inflation in the US.'
Ultimately, Coggins' call is to be underweight the US dollar and US equities, notably the mega caps such as the Magnificent Seven tech stocks.
'In the next five years, the US will be one of the worst performing markets globally.'
You heard it here first.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
26 minutes ago
- ABC News
Trump: "we're looking for better than a ceasefire"
US President Donald Trump says hes 'looking for better than a ceasefire' in regards to escalating conflict in the Middle East.

News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Uranium stocks surge following announcement of $US100m deal
Sky News Business Editor Ross Greenwood says the uranium sector has been on a tear this week – thanks to the launch of a new uranium investment fund. The fund called Sprott has pledged to spend $US100 million on uranium. The share price of uranium companies reacted by gains of up to 11 per cent in some cases.

ABC News
6 hours ago
- ABC News
The Trump family's next venture, a gold smartphone and mobile phone service
Donald Trump's family business is launching a new Trump-branded phone service in its latest plan to monetise the US president's name, though even his son admits manufacturing phones in America will be a challenge. The Trump Organization, which is run by Mr Trump's sons Donald Jr and Eric Trump, said it planned to license a third party to sell a gold smartphone with Mr Trump's name that will be "proudly" built in the United States. It joins Trump-branded watches, sneakers, fragrances and Bibles as products capitalising on his political brand, the licensing of which has made millions for his family. But industry experts say the pitch to manufacture the phones in the US at a cheaper price point isn't possible, at least in the near future. In announcing its plans, the executive vice-president of the Trump Organization, Eric Trump, said consumers deserve a phone that aligns with their values. A website for the project advertises a $US47.45 monthly plan, an apparent nod to Mr Trump's two terms as the 47th and 45th president of the United States. The mobile phone service also pitched a policy of "discounted" international calls for families with members serving in the military outside the US. It's not the first time Mr Trump has ventured into the telecommunication industry. He once gave speeches and promoted a multi-level marketing company called ACN. It was eventually sued for fraud and misleading customers. The Trump Organization has also had a string of business failures tied to licensing, including Trump Vodka, Trump Steaks and Trump Mattresses. According to the announcement, the $US499 ($765) T1 "sleek, gold smartphone" will be "proudly designed and built in the United States". For comparison, Apple's iPhone 16 Pro Max — which is mainly made in China — costs $US1,199. A mock-up of the planned phone on the company's website shows Mr Trump's slogan Make America Great Again on the front and an etched American flag on the back. Tingling Dai, a Johns Hopkins University business professor, told the Wall Street Journal "there's absolutely no way you could make the screen, get the same memory, camera and battery" in the US. He estimated it would take "at least five years" to build the infrastructure needed for domestic smartphone production. High labour costs, supply chain complexity and reliance on overseas component sourcing are also key pain points. In fact, the US only has one company that makes smartphones domestically, California-based Purism which makes Liberty phones that retail for $US1,999. The Trump family hasn't disclosed which company would manufacture the phone, or which suppliers will provide the components. Even the president's son, Eric Trump, suggested that the first delivery of phones in August might not be made in the US. "Eventually, all the phones can be built in America," he claimed on the Benny Show podcast. "If the Trump Phone is promising a $US499 price tag with domestic manufacturing, this announcement looks to be classic vapourware," said Todd Weaver, CEO of Purism, referring to the unlikelihood of a US-manufactured phone being available at that price. Vapourware refers to software or hardware that has been advertised to the public but has not and may never become available. Currently, only Chinese makers like Xiaomi and Oppo have hardware to match at the $US499 price point. Speaking to Fox Business, Eric Trump said call centres supporting the phone service would also be based in the US. "You're not calling up call centres in Bangladesh. "You're doing it right out of St Louis, Missouri." In April, Mr Trump told reporters on Air Force One he would be announcing tariff rates for imported semiconductors. One of the main aims of these tariffs was to encourage firms to manufacture more products in the US. "We want to make our chips and semiconductors and other things in our country," Mr Trump said. According to the Semiconductor Industry Association (SIA), the US is projected to more than triple its semiconductor manufacturing capacity in the decade following the CHIPS and Science Act. But a shortage of skilled workers may present a challenge to reinforcing chip supply chains on US shores. The SIA says there would be a shortfall of 67,000 technicians, computer scientists, and engineers in the semiconductor industry by 2030, and a gap of 1.4 million such workers throughout the broader US economy. When Mr Trump announced the tariffs, experts also investigated what it would take to make an iPhone in the US. Dan Ives, an analyst at US financial firm Wedbush Securities, said the US would need years and $US30 billion to establish factories needed to match China's output. At the time, Mr Ives said the concept of making iPhones in the US is a "non-starter" if Apple were to begin assembling iPhones in the US, a Chinese or Indian-made device that previously sold for $US1,000 would cost more than $US3,000. Currently, the US, UK, Europe and China rely heavily on Taiwan for semiconductors. The country's Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company provides over half the world's supply. The Trump Organization's latest venture has raised ethical concerns and conflicts of interest for mobile carriers who would be contracted to the president. The mobile service is partnering with existing cellular carriers with access to a 5G network, raising questions about how they will be treated by federal regulators now that they have partnered with his company. The Trump Organization said those companies are America's three biggest mobile network providers, an apparent reference to Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile, the latter with a trademarked name that is very similar to Trump's T1 Mobile. The Federal Communications Commission, the primary regulatory body overseeing mobile phone companies, has already launched investigations of media outlets Mr Trump dislikes and, in some cases, is personally suing. The phone deal comes as a mandatory financial disclosure report provided a glimpse into the vast business holdings of the billionaire president. Mr Trump reported making more than $US600 million last year, including millions from items such as Trump-branded bibles, watches, sneakers and fragrances. Forbes estimated in March that his net worth was $US5.1 billion, more than double that a year earlier. It said the surge was due in part to the president's social media company, which runs the Truth Social platform.