logo
Lucian Leape, whose work spurred patient safety in medicine, dies at 94

Lucian Leape, whose work spurred patient safety in medicine, dies at 94

Boston Globe4 hours ago
He was chief of pediatric surgery at Tufts University in the 1980s when he noticed frequent mistakes leading to significant patient harm, even death.
In a bold move late in his career, Dr. Leape left his full-time surgical practice and began collaborating with colleagues at Harvard University on a study that chronicled for the first time the number of injuries and deaths that resulted from medical error. Known as the Harvard Medical Practice Study, it examined a large population of injured patients in New York state.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
That study led to a landmark report, 'To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System,' published in 1999 by the Institute of Medicine (now the National Academy of Medicine).
Advertisement
In the report, Dr. Leape and his co-authors estimated that 44,000 to 98,000 Americans died each year from medical errors, a majority of which arose from dysfunctional systems -- not flawed individuals, as the medical profession and public had long believed.
The idea of systemic error, though widely accepted in industries such as aviation and nuclear power, was an unfamiliar concept in medicine, and it rubbed against the grain of the dominant medical culture of individual accountability, as well as the malpractice system's tradition of seeking a culpable clinician.
Advertisement
The report, however, galvanized health care regulators and accreditors to enact tighter standards for hospitals, limit work hours by medical residents, and require public reporting of serious errors. As a result of regulations and public pressure, health care systems around the country began to tackle medical mistakes as a system-level problem, launching patient safety departments and hiring patient safety officers.
'He did more than make some critical insights,' Dr. Atul Gawande, a prominent surgeon and author who was assistant administrator for global health at the US Agency for International Development in the Biden administration, said in a 2023 interview for this obituary. 'He took on the entire medical profession.'
Lucian L. Leape (he had no middle name, though the 'L' was included on his birth certificate) was born Nov. 7, 1930, in Bellevue, Pa. His father, Lucian Leroy Leape, was a purchasing agent for a small steel company. His mother, Mildred Grace (West) Leape, was a schoolteacher who later taught piano.
After receiving his undergraduate degree in chemistry from Cornell University in 1952, he served as a lieutenant in the Navy, and in 1955 entered Harvard Medical School.
He met Martha Kinne Palmer in 1951, when both were undergraduates at Cornell, and they married in 1954. Martha Leape, who held master's degrees in guidance counseling and psychology, became a premedical adviser at Harvard University and later ran the university's office of career services. She died this year.
In addition to his son James, Dr. Leape leaves two other sons, Jonathan and Gerald, and seven grandchildren.
Advertisement
After receiving his medical degree in 1959, Dr. Leape trained as a pediatric surgeon at Massachusetts General Hospital and Children's Hospital in Boston. In 1973, he became professor of surgery at Tufts University School of Medicine and chief of pediatric surgery at Tufts-New England Medical Center (now Tufts Medical Center).
'Children are the world's best patients,' he said in an interview for this obituary in 2015. 'They're honest, and they don't have an overlay of neuroses.'
In 1986, at age 56, Dr. Leape grew interested in health policy and spent a year at the Rand Corp. on a midcareer fellowship studying epidemiology, statistics, and health policy.
Following his stint at Rand, he joined the team at Harvard conducting the Medical Practice Study. When Dr. Howard Hiatt, then the dean of the Harvard School of Public Health (now the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health), offered Dr. Leape the opportunity to work on the study, 'I accepted,' Dr. Leape wrote in his 2021 book, 'Making Healthcare Safe: The Story of the Patient Safety Movement,' 'not suspecting it would change my life.'
The most significant finding, he said in the 2015 interview, was that two-thirds of the injuries to patients were caused by errors that appeared to be preventable. 'The implications were profound,' he said.
In 1994, he submitted a paper to The New England Journal of Medicine, laying out the extent to which preventable medical injury occurred and arguing for a shift of focus away from individuals and toward systems. But the paper was rejected. 'I was told it didn't meet their standards,' he recalled.
Dr. Leape sent the paper out again, this time to The Journal of the American Medical Association. Dr. George Lundberg, then the editor of JAMA, immediately recognized the importance of the topic, Dr. Leape said. 'But he also knew it could offend many doctors. We didn't talk about mistakes.'
Advertisement
Dr. Donald M. Berwick, president emeritus at the Institute for Healthcare Improvement in Boston and a longtime colleague of Dr. Leape's, agreed. 'To talk about error in medicine back then was considered rude,' he said in an interview in 2020. 'Errors were what we call normalized. Bad things happen, and that's just the way it is.
'But then you had Lucian,' he added, 'this quite different voice in the room saying, 'No, this isn't normal. And we can do something about it.''
Dr. Leape's paper, 'Error in Medicine,' was the first major article on the topic in the general medical literature. The timing of publication, just before Christmas in 1994, Dr. Leape wrote in his 2021 book, was intentional. Lundberg knew it would receive little attention and therefore wouldn't upset colleagues.
On Dec. 3, 1994, however, three weeks before the JAMA piece appeared, Betsy Lehman, a 39-year-old health care reporter for The Boston Globe, died after mistakenly receiving a fatal overdose of chemotherapy at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.
'Betsy's death was a watershed event,' Dr. Leape said in a 2020 interview for a short documentary about Lehman.
The case drew national attention. An investigation into the death revealed that it wasn't caused by one individual clinician, but by a series of errors involving multiple physicians and nurses who had misinterpreted a four-day regimen as a single dose, administering quadruple the prescribed amount.
The case made Dr. Leape's point with tragic clarity: Lehman's death, like so many others, resulted from a system that lacked sufficient safeguards to prevent the error.
Advertisement
The report 'To Err is Human' was released in 1999, noting that the 44,000 to 98,000 annual deaths from medical mistakes were the equivalent of a jumbo jet crashing every day.
That alarming comparison drew significant media attention, and the report led to substantial new federal funding to address the problem of medical errors, along with efforts to educate providers and administrators about the new systems approach to errors.
'There might have developed a patient safety movement in health care without Lucian, but he made it happen years before it otherwise would have,' Berwick said. 'He was probably the first pedigreed specialist from the mainstream of health care to give this problem a name.'
Gawande said he believed it was the confidence Dr. Leape had acquired as a surgeon that girded him in the face of strong resistance from colleagues.
'He had enough arrogance to believe in himself and in what he was saying,' Gawande said. 'He knew he was onto something important, and that he could bring the profession along, partly by goading the profession as much as anything.'
In 2007, the National Patient Safety Foundation, which Dr. Leape had helped found in 1997 to support the growth of the nascent field, created a patient safety think tank, the Lucian Leape Institute, which is now part of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement.
This article originally appeared in
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Healthy" Habit Could Decrease Lifespan, Experts Say
"Healthy" Habit Could Decrease Lifespan, Experts Say

Buzz Feed

time22 minutes ago

  • Buzz Feed

"Healthy" Habit Could Decrease Lifespan, Experts Say

Getting 10,000 steps a day. Improving your VO2 max. Putting berries on your breakfast. What are the habits you embrace in an effort to live a long, healthy life? Certainly it's the routines we do regularly that impact our health the most. But there's one well-intentioned habit in particular that longevity experts say can actually take years off your life instead of adding more to it: eating too much animal-based protein. Thought a high-protein diet was a good thing? As doctors explain here, getting too much can backfire. Why Overemphasizing Protein Isn't Actually Healthy Before we get into why too much protein isn't good for longevity, it's important to note that the nutrient is absolutely important. Dr. Suzanne J. Ferree, who is double-board-certified in family medicine and anti-aging and regenerative medicine, told HuffPost that it's especially important to get enough as we age. 'The common theory is that we need to cut protein-rich foods as we age, but the research actually only supports this in younger people, not in those of us over 50,' Ferree said. Scientific research backs this up, showing that older adults need more protein than younger adults because our bodies naturally lose muscle as we age. So yes, protein is absolutely important. How much protein a person needs each day varies based on one's individual health and needs, but the Food and Drug Administration recommends aiming for 50 grams of protein a day as part of a 2,000-calorie diet. The problem is that many people are eating more protein than they need. On top of that, Americans are overconsuming a specific type of protein that isn't all that healthy. In general, there are two types of proteins: animal-based proteins and plant-based proteins. Research has shown that plant-based proteins are healthier than animal-based proteins. Unfortunately, Americans are consuming more of the latter than the former. 'A common mistake is the overemphasis on consuming a high-protein diet, particularly one rich in animal-based proteins, with the belief that it is essential for longevity and muscle preservation. Many people assume that the more protein they consume, the healthier they will be, leading to an overconsumption of animal products like meat, dairy and eggs,' said Dr. Monisha Bhanote, a quintuple-board-certified physician and longevity expert. Most Americans are eating about 100 grams of protein a day, double the recommended amount. According to a Dietary Guidelines for Americans report, 75% of Americans meet or exceed the recommendation for meat, poultry and eggs. Bhanote says this is exactly what can take years off one's life. 'Excessive consumption of animal-based proteins can actually accelerate aging and undermine cellular health, contrary to popular belief,' she said. She explained that the biggest reasons for this come down to two harmful compounds: advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO). 'AGEs are harmful compounds that form when proteins or fats combine with sugar in the bloodstream,' Bhanote said. She explained that animal-based foods — especially if they are grilled, fried or roasted — are high in AGEs. Research shows that these compounds can accumulate in your tissues and, over time, can lead to oxidative stress and inflammation, which are key drivers of cellular aging. 'AGEs damage proteins, DNA and other vital cellular structures, accelerating the aging process and contributing to chronic diseases like diabetes, cardiovascular disease and Alzheimer's,' Bhanote said. What about TMAO? Bhanote explained that elevated levels of TMAO have been linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, including atherosclerosis, heart attack and stroke — all of which obviously are not good for longevity. 'TMAO promotes the accumulation of cholesterol in the arteries and impairs the body's ability to remove it, leading to inflammation and further damage to the cardiovascular system. This not only compromises heart health but also affects overall cellular function and longevity,' Bhanote said. Related to the mistake many people make of overemphasizing protein in their diet, Raghav Sehgal, a Ph.D. student and Gruber fellow at Yale University whose research focuses on human aging, told HuffPost that one common mistake people make when it comes to longevity is focusing on 'miracle diets' promising fast results. The biggie that's relevant here: the ketogenic diet, which prioritizes fat and protein while minimizing carbohydrates. For many people doing keto, meat and eggs are hero foods; however, as previously explained, eating too many animal products can take years off your life. So, how should we approach protein with an eye toward longevity? Bhanote and Sehgal are of the same mind about this: Eat more protein-rich plants and fish. While fish certainly isn't a plant, it is thought of differently than animal-based proteins because it has a completely different nutritional makeup than meat, and scientific research has repeatedly shown benefits to human health when consumed regularly. Eating fish regularly has been associated with reducing the risk of premature death by 12%. Sehgal explained that plant-based proteins (such as beans, lentils, chickpeas, soy, nuts and seeds) are loaded with antioxidants, fiber and nutrients that keep our hearts healthy, reduce inflammation and lower the risk of chronic diseases. 'These foods are naturally low in AGEs and do not contribute to TMAO production, making them much gentler on your cells and overall health,' Bhanote added. Scientific studies show that having a diet that prioritizes plant-based proteins lowers the risk of mortality associated with cardiovascular disease and other causes. In other words, replacing animal proteins with plant proteins can add years to your life. While most Americans meet or exceed the protein recommendation for meat, poultry and eggs, 90% of Americans aren't meeting the recommended guidelines for seafood. Sehgal told HuffPost that seafood high in protein and unsaturated fats supports brain health, promotes hormone balance and helps fight inflammation — all of which contribute to longevity. Again, no one is disputing that protein is important. It's crucial to get enough and, as Ferree pointed out, it's especially important to get enough as we age. But other nutrients are important too, which is why Sehgal said the best diet for longevity is a balanced one that includes a wide variety of nutrient-rich foods. The benefit of eating a balanced diet full of plants certainly isn't revolutionary news, but it is backed up by many scientific studies. When it comes to longevity — and health in general — science-backed wins out over trendy and new. HuffPost.

This Oil May Help Lower Cholesterol—Here's What a New Study Says
This Oil May Help Lower Cholesterol—Here's What a New Study Says

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

This Oil May Help Lower Cholesterol—Here's What a New Study Says

Reviewed by Dietitian Mandy Enright, M.S., RDN, RYTKey Points Having high blood lipids, which includes LDL cholesterol, is a risk factor for heart disease. This study suggests that ingesting extra-virgin olive oil daily may improve cholesterol levels. EVOO with higher antioxidant levels seemed to be most heart disease is the No. 1 killer of Americans, it is also possible to prevent it. The American Heart Association promotes tips for prevention with its Life's Essential 8, eight areas that influence heart health—four of them health behaviors and four of them measurable health factors. The behaviors include eating a heart-healthy diet, engaging in regular physical activity, quitting tobacco and getting healthy sleep. The other factors include managing weight, cholesterol, blood sugar and blood pressure. Many studies have indicated that olive oil may help promote a healthy cardiovascular system. This is partly due to its heart-healthy monounsaturated fats. But there's another component of olive oil that may also play a heart-healthy role: polyphenols. Polyphenols are powerful plant compounds that exhibit antioxidant properties. Scientists in Greece wanted to take a closer look at the polyphenols in extra-virgin olive oil (EVOO), comparing the benefits of two EVOOs with different levels of polyphenols. Their results were published in Nutrients. Let's break down what they found. How Was This Study Conducted? Researchers recruited two groups of people—one group had hyperlipidemia (high blood lipids, including LDL cholesterol), and the other was a 'healthy' group without hyperlipidemia. The hyperlipidemia group had 24 men and 26 women with an average age of 52; the healthy group had 8 men and 12 women with an average age of 49. Researchers split the hyperlipidemia group in half, with one half receiving an extra-virgin olive oil with high phenolic content and the other using an extra-virgin olive oil with lower phenolic content. Still, the group taking the extra-virgin olive oil with lower phenolic content took a higher dose of it so that each group's total daily phenolic content from extra-virgin olive oil was equal. The healthy group consisted of 20 individuals who were gender-matched to participants in the other two groups. This group also took either the high- or low-phenolic EVOOs in the same dosages as the hyperlipidemia participants. The reason for this 'healthy' group was to see if there were any differences in their blood lipids at the end of the study period, which lasted for four weeks, and to compare the healthy group's changes in bloodwork to the hyperlipidemia groups' changes, including differences between genders. All participants were instructed to take the olive oil on an empty stomach for faster absorption of the polyphenols, and to continue with their regular diet and activities. They were also asked to not add any supplements or foods high in polyphenols that were not already a part of their normal routine. What Did This Study Show? At the end of the four weeks, 22 participants in the lower-phenolic group and 28 in the higher-phenolic group had made it to the end of the study period with a 100% adherence rate. Researchers found that the hyperlipidemia group had greater improvements in blood lipids compared to the healthy group. Specifically, they found that HDL cholesterol—which is the beneficial type of cholesterol—increased, and lipoprotein (a), also called Lp(a) and similar to LDL cholesterol, decreased slightly in the hyperlipidemia group, but not in the healthy group. Even though both groups had equal daily phenolic content from olive oil, the group that ingested the higher-phenolic EVOO showed significant improvements in total blood cholesterol compared to the group that consumed the lower-phenolic EVOO at higher doses. This study does have several limitations, including the small sample size and short study duration. The participants were also from the region in Greece that grows the specific type of olive that was used to make these extra-virgin olive oils, so it is unknown whether these results can be generalized to other populations in other parts of the world. Additionally, researchers did not gather dietary information from participants, so it's unknown what other foods rich in polyphenols they were consuming. Researchers also cannot be confident that the healthy fats in the olive oil didn't contribute to these results. How Does This Apply to Real Life? Olive oil is one of the staples of the Mediterranean diet. That's because it's been shown time and time again to support overall health and lower the risk of certain diseases, including heart disease. Research also suggests that it may lower the risk of dementia-related death. Some folks even take a shot of the heart- and brain-healthy oil every morning, touting extra-virgin olive oil's anti-inflammatory properties. And while you certainly could do a shot of straight up EVOO each morning, cooking meals and snacks with olive oil throughout the day might be a more palatable option. We love using olive oil in dressings, like our Citrus Vinaigrette or Basil Vinaigrette. You can create a flavorful dipping oil for your favorite bread by adding herbs and spices to extra-virgin olive oil—or use it to drizzle over veggies. And if you have a bounty of yellow squash or zucchini, you'll want to try our Olive Oil-Braised Summer Squash. It's important to note that this study used extra-virgin olive oil, not regular olive oil, which is lighter in color and flavor. EVOO is a higher quality oil, while regular olive oil is more refined and neutral in flavor (kind of like canola or vegetable oil). EVOO has to meet more rigorous standards and has more polyphenols—so if you want to up your intake of those, go for the EVOO. Following a Mediterranean diet eating style makes it easy to incorporate more extra-virgin olive oil into your life. We have several Mediterranean diet meal plans to choose from, depending on your goals. So whether you want more energy, healthier blood pressure or just want to age gracefully and healthfully, we've got a plan for you. Our Expert Take This study suggests that taking extra-virgin olive oil on an empty stomach in the morning may help improve blood lipids. While it's not harmful to ingest EVOO straight with no food, it might not be palatable to some. Find ways to incorporate this healthy oil into your recipes—like we do with our simple Pesto Scrambled Eggs or Pasta al Limone. You can even add a shot of it to your morning smoothie, or simply drizzle it over bread, veggies and pasta. Read the original article on EATINGWELL

A salty twist: Diabetes risk study says french fries are a culprit
A salty twist: Diabetes risk study says french fries are a culprit

NBC News

time2 hours ago

  • NBC News

A salty twist: Diabetes risk study says french fries are a culprit

Craving french fries? Dunking your spuds in a deep fryer might be a recipe for elevating your risk of Type 2 diabetes. According to a study published Wednesday in the journal BMJ, swapping out your weekly dose of frites for boiled, baked or mashed potatoes could lower your risk of this chronic condition. The authors examined the diets of more than 205,000 adults in the U.S. who responded to questionnaires about what they ate over nearly four decades. Among those who consumed potatoes, the authors looked at which people developed Type 2 diabetes, a disease that leads to persistently high blood sugar levels. Eating three weekly servings of french fries, they found, was associated with a 20% increased risk of Type 2 diabetes. But consuming the same amount of boiled, baked or mashed potatoes did not appear to be linked to the disease. The vast majority of the 1 in 10 people with diabetes in the U.S. have Type 2. The condition can increase the risk of heart attacks, strokes or kidney damage. The findings underscore that the way foods are prepared is key to their overall health risks or benefits, said Seyed Mohammad Mousavi, the study's lead author and a postdoctoral research fellow at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. 'Not all potatoes are created equal,' he said. 'Even a small amount of french fries, less than one serving in the week, is associated with a higher risk of Type 2 diabetes.' Unlike boiled or baked potatoes, french fries are deep-fried in oils that usually contain trans or saturated fats. The way the body metabolizes those fats can contribute to insulin resistance — when cells don't respond properly to insulin, a hormone that helps regulate blood sugar. Regular consumption of fried foods can also lead to obesity and inflammation, both of which raise the risk of Type 2 diabetes. 'When you fry the potatoes, the energy content — calories — increases because of the fat they absorb. If you eat many servings of french fries, it predisposes [people] to weight gain,' said Candida Rebello, the director of the nutrition and chronic disease program at Louisiana State University, who wasn't involved in the study. The study relied on data collected between 1984 and 2021, when several different frying methods were popular. Most fast-food chains today prepare fries using vegetable oils like canola, sunflower, soybean or peanut oil. But during the 1980s, beef tallow was common. And in the early 1990s, restaurants shifted to partially hydrogenated oils. (The oils were a major source of trans fat in the U.S. diet and were largely phased out of the food industry by 2018.) Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has said the seed oils used today are 'poisoning' Americans and contributing to high levels of obesity in children. He has advocated for restaurants to switch back to beef tallow, a recommendation that isn't backed by scientific research. 'Beef tallow is high in saturated fats and other harmful fats. We definitely don't recommend that,' Mousavi said. One limitation of Mousavi's study is that it did not account for people adding unhealthy ingredients to their boiled, baked or mashed potatoes. 'What do people add to baked potatoes? Butter, bacon, cheese, sour cream,' said Shannon Galyean, an assistant professor of nutritional sciences at Texas Tech University, who wasn't part of the research. 'Then we also don't know, did they eat it with the skins?' Galyean said potato skins contain nutrients such as fiber, which helps with blood sugar control. And potatoes, when they aren't deep-fried or slathered in butter, can be a useful source of potassium, which helps regulate blood pressure. 'Definitely, potatoes can be considered a healthy food when you don't fry it, or when you don't add lots of fat to it,' Galyean said. Mousavi said baking french fries at home with a healthier oil, such as olive or avocado oil, could help lower one's diabetes risk compared to eating them from fast-food restaurants. Swapping out potatoes with whole grains, such as farro or whole-grain bread or pasta, could make an even bigger difference. These foods have a lower glycemic index, meaning they're less likely to spike blood sugar levels. His study found that whole grains, when compared to all types of potatoes, were less likely to elevate one's diabetes risk. White rice, on the other hand, had a stronger association with Type 2 diabetes than either of these foods. Megan Mulcahy, the director of communications at Potatoes USA, a marketing and research organization that supports potato consumption, said fries can 'absolutely be part of a healthy eating pattern when enjoyed in moderation.' Galyean said it's important to consider a person's overall diet, which has a greater impact on their health than any individual food. Nutritionists generally recommend a colorful plate with a variety of fruits, vegetables, whole grains and healthy proteins such as fish, beans or nuts. 'People don't eat just one thing, they eat meals,' Galyean said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store