Man breached sexual harm order by downloading TikTok
James Ward, 27, was described as having acted in a 'manipulative way' by breaching the terms of the court order.
In 2017, when Ward was 19, he was made the subject of a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO), put in place to protect children.
Ward, of Dol Glas, Brecon, was charged with 12 breaches of that order earlier this year.
He created social media accounts with apps such as Tinder, Match.com, Snapchat, Tiktok and YouTube using different names and then deleted his profiles – both of which he was barred from doing by the SHPO – between September 2, 2022, and August 8, 2023.
Ward previously pleaded guilty to four of the charges, entering not guilty pleas to eight others.
Prosecutor Alycia Carpanini said previously that the prosecution was satisfied with the defendant's guilty pleas and offered no evidence in relation to the other eight charges.
At his sentencing hearing at Merthyr Tydfil Crown Court on Thursday, July 17, Ms Carpanini said Ward tried to delete his internet history when police called at his address.
She said he also initially refuted an interest in children, before ultimately being honest with a probation officer in the process of conducting a pre-sentence report. She asked for £1,000 in costs.
Kathryn Lane, representing Ward, described her client as 'someone who needs help'.
'His brother has recently moved to a care home in Merthyr Tydfil, he suffers with psychosis and autism, he is very unwell," she said.
'The defendant assists his mother in getting back and forth to that care home. It would be very difficult for her to visit him without the assistance of Mr Ward.
'There has also been a lengthy delay in bringing this to court, which was not his fault. He has been out of trouble until the present day, so he has demonstrated he can comply.'
Judge Shomon Khan told Ward the SHPO had been put in place eight years ago in order to protect children
'You acted in a manipulative way,' he told Ward.
'You downloaded various apps and created accounts using different names. It was clear, when police came to enforce the order, that you tried to delete history and avoid criminal responsibility.
'You refuted an interest in children at the start, but then were very honest. These offences have raised the risks to children. There are real risks of harm to children, due to your intentions.
'However, it gives me hope that there's scope for rehabilitation. I am satisfied that what you said to probation, while it raises alarm, work can be done to break the risks of future offending."
Judge Khan jailed Ward for 12 months, but suspended the custodial term for 2 years.
As part of that he must complete 30 rehabilitation activity days, as well as 26 sessions of programme requirements.
Judge Khan made a deprivation order for the device used by Ward, and ordered him to pay £400 towards costs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
'I'll make 9/11 look like The Teletubbies' said accused man
The 24 year-old had been arrested after posting online a clip of him blowing up two gas canisters near the River Leven in Methil, Fife. Ross's home was raided and police discovered a drawing marked "Project Payback". Read More: A phone and tablet device were also examined which included the voice message about the 2001 Twin Towers atrocity and him discussing with others "murdering all the people who wronged you". Ross appeared in the dock this week at the High Court in Glasgow. He pled guilty to a charge of behaving in a threatening and abusive manner which included sending the concerning messages and voice notes on Snapchat and Facebook causing an explosion, filming it and putting the footage on social media between June 25 and July 31 2024. He had a not guilty plea to a charge under the Terrorism Act accepted. Ross was remanded in custody and will be sentenced at a later date. A Facebook friend of Ross had spotted the explosion video in late July 2024. He showed it to a young woman who was so "alarmed" she contacted police. Ross was held that day after being spotted in Methil. Detectives - along with Counter Terrorism officers - searched his home in the town. They found the "Project Payback" drawing along with a sketch of what was described as a "homemade explosive device". Inside a desk were various items including a roll of wire, mobile phone batteries, nails, screws and a watch. There were also initial fears about a package in the property which led to homes in the area being evacuated, but it did not contain an explosive. Prosecutor Greg Farrell said Ross "laughed" when first quizzed about what he had filmed claiming it was an "attempt at satire comedy". But, he confirmed that he had blew up two butane gas canisters and had posted it on his Facebook page under the name of a Batman comic villain. Mr Farrell: "He made reference to social media corrupting his decisions." Ross was asked about his interest in Kaczynski - captured in 1996 - and said he was "apparently some kind of mail bomber" that he had learned more about by going down a "rabbit hole" online. Ross went on to insist that he himself was "not a terrorist" as he had "made peace with everything in his life". But, police found a series of concerning messages during checks of his phone and black tablet. In late June 2024, he wrote to 15 users on Facebook Messenger: "Here guys, I am just here to inform you that the only thing stopping you from murdering all of the people who wronged you is just a box. "That is only if you cannot do it correctly and make sure enough evidence is gone so that the charges do not stick." He referred to "instructions on how to make a pipe bomb" adding: "Hope this comes in handy for you one day x". In messages on the day of the River Leven explosion, a social media contact called Ross "a human". Mr Farrell then told the court of a Snapchat conversation with a friend shortly before. Ross stated at one stage: "I am going to make 9/11 look like an episode of the Teletubbies, f*** sake." He then backtracked again claiming it was "satire comedy" and that he was "only joking". The friend replied: "F*** Islam, f*** them all." During further rants, Ross said he had been let down by the "justice system" moaning he had been treated differently because he is a man. In messages to another contact, he said: "I have realised that I simply cannot allow what is happening to humanity and our world to continue. "I can and will have an impact on preventing the worst from happening xx." The court heard there were also photos, videos and sketches of the "Unabomber" on the devices as well as images of a pipe bomb and firearms together with "various other clips which suggest violence". Lord Colbeck deferred sentencing for reports.
Daily Mail
10 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Cricket star jokes about sexual assault trial he faced in Sydney as he goes Instagram official with his new love
An international cricketer who was found not guilty of sexually assaulting his Tinder date in Sydney has poked fun at the case while going Instagram official with his new partner. Sri Lankan star Danushka Gunathilaka was arrested in Sydney in November 2022 and charged with sexual assault without consent. Police alleged he had removed a condom without consent, also known as 'stealthing', during a sexual encounter with a woman he met on Tinder while he was in Sydney for the Cricket World Cup. Gunathilaka was found not guilty in a judge-only trial that finished in September 2023 and allowed to leave the country, with police pushing for an apprehended violence order to be taken out against him despite the verdict. On Saturday, the 34-year-old joked about needing a lawyer for a possible return to court as he debuted his new, unnamed girlfriend. 'I'm not sure what's more terrifying, the wedding or the potential for a future court date. Send wine... and maybe a lawyer referral,' he wrote alongside a series of photos of him with his new partner. His followers celebrated the news with comments like 'looking beautiful together' and 'glad to see you like this again'. The post appears to make it official that Gunathilaka has broken up with Celine, the woman who supported him during his trial in Sydney. In her verdict, Judge Sarah Huggett found that while Gunathilaka told the woman he preferred not to wear a condom, he used one during the encounter and had consensual sex with the woman. She also found that police who attempted to prosecute the cricket star acted 'unreasonably' and revealed she had 'significant concerns' about the prosecution case. 'I'm firmly of the opinion that if the prosecution had - before the proceedings were instituted - been in possession of evidence and all the relevant facts, it would not have been reasonable to institute the proceedings,' she said. The top-order T20 batter was arrested and charged with four counts of sexual assault in November 2022 after the woman reported the matter to Bondi police. The court was told the woman told Mr Gunathilaka she would only agree to sex if he wore a condom, which he 'grumbled' about but ultimately agreed to. Notes from the woman's first police interview indicate she told officers the condom was taken off 'against her will', allegations Mr Gunathilaka denied. During that interview, Judge Huggett said the woman failed to include 'critical' evidence she later provided to police in a statement some six months later. Ultimately, police only proceeded to trial on a single charge, that of stealthing, with charges relating to the alleged roughness of the sex being dropped. 'The deficiencies in the prosecution case of stealthing, remembering that the prosecution case was not one of rough or aggressive sexual intercourse, were apparent,' Judge Huggett said. 'They were not the result of the factual findings made at trial ... Nor were the deficiencies related simply to the credibility of the complainant. 'There were so many inherent issues and difficulties with the prosecution case that should have been obvious to the prosecution at the outset.' Judge Huggett ordered a certificate be issued to Mr Gunathilaka so he could be awarded costs.
Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Liverpool boss banished £18m star after mysterious falling out – 'I can't accept the lie'
Jurgen Klopp put down a marker ahead of his first full season as Liverpool head coach by kicking a Reds player off a pre-season tour to the United States for tardiness Jurgen Klopp once froze out an international defender following a mysterious falling out ahead of his first full season as Liverpool boss. Mamadou Sakho, an £18million signing from Paris Saint-Germain, had become a key member of the squad during the 2015/16 campaign, which saw the sacked Brendan Rodgers replaced by Klopp. However, the Frenchman was sidelined amid a doping investigation - from which he was later exonerated and awarded compensation - resulting in him missing the Europa League final defeat by Sevilla and Euro 2016, hosted by France. Sakho was cleared to resume his career that summer and travelled with the Reds squad to the United States for a pre-season tour. However, that proved to be the beginning of the end of his Liverpool career after he was accused of being late for a flight, a team meal and a treatment session. Klopp explained: 'I thought maybe it made sense for him to fly home to Liverpool and after eight or 10 days, when we come back, we can talk about it. It's not that serious. 'He nearly missed the departure of the plane, he missed a session and was late for a meal. We have some rules and we have to respect them. If somebody doesn't respect it or somebody gives me the feeling he is not respecting it, then I have to react, that's all. 'It is private how he reacted. But we had no argument. You cannot argue when only one person is speaking. That's all. I think missed a session is missed a session. Even injured players have sessions.' As the season began, Sakho remained banished from the first team, training instead with the under-23 squad. Frustrated at his situation, Sakho took to his Snapchat account at 3am one morning to insist he was fit to play. He posted: 'Now it's three weeks I am fit to play games. They don't want me to play with segonde (segondo, U23s) team lol. Still working hard like Scouse Soldier! Still not talking cos I want to speak on the pitch....I will speak soon for the people who support me and don't understand the situation (emoji). 'Still happy to live in my Liverpool Country (emoji) with my family, hope to have chance to play soon to give my best like I try to always do! I accept my situation but I can't accept the fans deserve to know the true! Thanks for your support (emoji) 6 six months stay quiet. Have good night everybody! You'll never walk alone! (emoji).' Speaking in France, Sakho acknowledged his tardiness to Canal Football Club, saying: 'It is true that I turned up late. There was a rule that I should have observed. I do not at all see myself as above the rules, I respect everyone. 'I paid my fine, I was sanctioned, I apologised to my team-mates and my manager. Aside from that… I do not want to go into the controversies.' Sakho, now 35 and playing his football in Georgia, would eventually leave Liverpool, initially on loan, for Crystal Palace in 2017. Speaking earlier this summer, nine years after his spat with Klopp, Sakho spoke of his respect for the German but insisted all was not as it seemed. He told the Liverpool Echo: 'Good relationship because I'm not a negative man. I always respect. I like his type of football.' Addressing the lateness he was sent home for and his subsequent Snapchat message, Sakho added: 'Seriously, because a player is late to eat, the time's 7.15 and he comes at 7.18, now he leaves the club? Come on. 'What I wrote (on Snapchat) was the truth. But the truth always takes the stairs and the lie takes the elevator. You have football that people see, and you have few things inside but they cannot talk about it. So I always keep it for me as a man and that's it. 'I never talk and I would not speak for the moment because it's not important. I really enjoy my time in Liverpool. I will speak about it one day, of course. Of course one day I will speak. But not now, it is not the right moment.'
