Trump plans executive order on flag burning, NewsNation reports
The Justice Department would review cases involving flag burning to see if charges could be brought that weren't specific to the flag burning itself.
WASHINGTON – US President Donald Trump plans to issue an executive order on flag burning, NewsNation reported, a move that aims to crack down on burning the American flag without running afoul of a 1989 Supreme Court decision that ruled doing so was protected speech.
Under the order, set to be signed on Aug 21, the Justice Department would review cases involving flag burning to see if charges could be brought that weren't specific to the flag burning itself, such as public nuisance or disorderly conduct laws, NewsNation said citing two unnamed administration officials.
Mr Trump has long sought to impose penalties for flag burning, floating punishments including a prison sentence or a loss of citizenship after winning his first presidential election.
He highlighted the issue repeatedly during his last presidential campaign, and in 2024 suggested he could seek a constitutional amendment to ban that form of protest.
He reiterated his call to impose penalties in June while speaking at Fort Bragg in North Carolina, saying that he was working with senators to pass a law giving jail time to flag-burning protesters and suggesting a yearlong sentence.
'People that burn the American flag should go to jail for one year. And we'll see if we can get that done,' Mr Trump said.
Days later, Senator Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, introduced legislation that sought to add an additional year in jail to federal sentences for crimes that involved flag burning.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
World Israel says it has taken first steps of military operation in Gaza City
Singapore 3 Sengkang Green Primary pupils suspended for bullying classmate, with 1 of them caned: MOE
Singapore 18 persons nabbed and 82 vapes seized in HSA ops in Raffles Place and Haji Lane
Business Chinese brands like Pop Mart, BYD, Joocyee expanding into S'pore as gateway to Asean market
Life Why should we bear the burden of budget meals and app discounts, some S'pore hawkers ask
Singapore Religion growing in importance for Singaporeans: IPS study
Asia 'Disastrous, useless': New Zealand to overhaul high school qualification to lift falling standards
World Google unveils latest Pixel 10 phones packed with AI
The US Constitution broadly protects speech and peaceful protest, and courts have long held that political speech is among the most sacrosanct forms of speech.
The US Supreme Court in 1989 ruled in a 5-4 decision that burning a flag itself is a form of political expression protected under the First Amendment and cannot be made illegal.
Congress then passed a new law banning flag burning, which was also overturned in a subsequent Supreme Court case.
Efforts to amend the Constitution to prohibit flag burning have fallen short of the two-thirds majority needed in both chambers of Congress.
Republican Senate Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky provided the crucial vote to stop a 2006 attempt in his chamber.
Flag desecration emerged as a political issue amid the convulsions of the 1960s after some Vietnam War opponents began burning flags as a form of protest.
In the decades that followed, punishment of flag burning became a cultural flash point in tensions over deference to patriotic norms versus protection of the right to expression.
The issue again resurfaced in recent years when flags were burned at pro-Palestinian protests and demonstrations against federal immigration enforcement efforts.
During the last presidential campaign, demonstrators burned a flag at Washington's Union Station to protest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's address to Congress – drawing condemnation from both Mr Trump and Democrat Kamala Harris. BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
18 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Britain expands air defences as Europe wakes up to missile gap
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox LONDON - The United Kingdom is bolstering its air defence capabilities with a new contract for missile systems, as European military planners work to map out a post-peace plan for Ukraine that could see its skies protected by Western allies. In a deal worth £118 million ($204 million), the British government will buy six new Land Ceptor systems from multinational European arms maker MBDA over three years, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) said on Aug 21 in a statement. They comprise so-called anti-air modular missiles capable of hitting a tennis-ball sized object travelling at twice the speed of sound, as well as launchers and support vehicles. The new contract comes as European and US defence chiefs meet to discuss what security guarantees they can offer Ukraine if a peace deal is reached with its Russian invaders. Air defence is seen as a key component under the Coalition of the Willing, a group of nations led by the UK and France that is prepared to station troops and military systems away from the front line in Ukraine under a deal that they hope would combine with a US backstop contributing intelligence sharing, border surveillance, weaponry and possibly air defence. While US President Donald Trump has ruled out putting US troops into Ukraine, he told Fox News earlier this week that he is open to discussing deploying US air defence systems, which can counter advanced threats such as long-range ballistic missiles. 'There's nobody that has the kind of stuff we have,' Mr Trump said. The new missiles for the British Army will form part of the UK's Sky Sabre defence system, which was deployed on Nato's eastern flank in south-east Poland from 2022 to 2024 to help facilitate the delivery of military equipment to Ukraine and ensure the safe movement of Ukrainian recruits in training. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore New ACS special education school to take in 100 pupils with autism in January 2026 Singapore Courier tip-off leads to HSA seizure of Kpods, drugs in Tampines and Grange Road raids Business Changi Travel Services cuts 30 staff amid market shifts Singapore Eavesdropping on monkeys in Singapore to watch out for emerging diseases World Trump gives two weeks to assess Russia-Ukraine peace prospects Opinion A Trumpian game of ping pong over Ukraine's future Opinion Why that hand-wringing over The Projector isn't pointless Business 7 in 10 employers satisfied with their migrant workers: MOM survey It is used to counter various aerial threats, including fighter aircraft, drones and cruise missiles and can be deployed anywhere in the world. The UK's MoD said the system can simultaneously guide 24 missiles to intercept separate targets. 'Doubling our deployable Sky Sabre capability will strengthen the UK's air defences, protect UK forces abroad, and deter our adversaries,' Armed Forces Minister Luke Pollard said in the statement. Bloomberg
Straits Times
18 minutes ago
- Straits Times
21 countries sign joint statement condemning Israel's West Bank settlement project
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Israel approved the plans for the roughly 12sq km parcel of land known as E1 just east of Jerusalem on Aug 20. LONDON - Britain and France were among 21 countries to sign a joint statement on Aug 21 calling Israel's approval of a major settlement project in the West Bank 'unacceptable and a violation of international law'. Israel approved the plans for the roughly 12sq km parcel of land known as E1 just east of Jerusalem on Aug 20. 'We condemn this decision and call for its immediate reversal in the strongest terms,' said the statement of foreign ministers, whose signatories also included Australia, Canada and Italy. Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Ireland, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden also signed the statement, as did the European Commission's foreign affairs chief. The statement noted that Israel's far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said the plan 'will make a two-state solution impossible by dividing any Palestinian state and restricting Palestinian access to Jerusalem'. 'This brings no benefits to the Israeli people,' the foreign ministers said. 'Instead, it risks undermining security and fuels further violence and instability, taking us further away from peace. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore New ACS special education school to take in 100 pupils with autism in January 2026 Singapore Courier tip-off leads to HSA seizure of Kpods, drugs in Tampines and Grange Road raids Business Changi Travel Services cuts 30 staff amid market shifts Singapore Eavesdropping on monkeys in Singapore to watch out for emerging diseases World Trump gives two weeks to assess Russia-Ukraine peace prospects Opinion A Trumpian game of ping pong over Ukraine's future Opinion Why that hand-wringing over The Projector isn't pointless Business 7 in 10 employers satisfied with their migrant workers: MOM survey 'The government of Israel still has an opportunity to stop the E1 plan going any further. We encourage them to urgently retract this plan,' they added. The plan seeks to build around 3,400 homes on the ultra-sensitive tract of land, which lies between Jerusalem and the Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim. All of Israel's settlements in the West Bank, occupied since 1967, are considered illegal under international law, regardless of whether they have Israeli planning permission. The Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority (PA) has slammed the latest move, which has also been criticised by UN chief Antonio Guterres and the head of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, Philippe Lazzarini. The project would 'completely cut off the northern and central West Bank from the southern West Bank – meaning that there would no longer be any territorial contiguity', said Mr Lazzarini. He said Israel was taking decisions that would make the creation of two states 'increasingly impossible'. Britain on Aug 21 summoned Israeli ambassador to the UK Tzipi Hotovely to the foreign ministry to protest the decision. 'If implemented, these settlement plans would be a flagrant breach of international law and would divide a future Palestinian state in two, critically undermining a two-state solution,' the foreign office said in a statement. AFP
Straits Times
18 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump to tap Airbnb co-founder as first government design chief
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The move would give Mr Gebbia a leading role in redesigning government forms and processes through a new National Design Studio to be housed at the White House. WASHINGTON – US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Aug 21 creating a new post for the government's chief design officer and is tapping Airbnb Inc co-founder Joe Gebbia to fill the position, according to people familiar with the matter. The move would give Mr Gebbia a leading role in redesigning government forms and processes through a new National Design Studio to be housed at the White House. The people familiar spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the selection before it is publicly announced. Mr Gebbia, 44, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. His mission as the nation's first chief design officer will be to 'prioritise improving websites and physical sites that have a major impact on Americans' everyday lives,' according to the text of the executive order released by the White House. That mandate could include income tax filings, Social Security applications, Medicare enrolment, immigration services, and other high-volume government services. Mr Gebbia, a holdover from Tesla Inc CEO Elon Musk's largely dismantled Department of Government Efficiency, has already led an effort to overhaul the government's cumbersome retirement process. Until recently, the Office of Personnel Management relied mostly on papers kept in an abandoned limestone mine in Pennsylvania to calculate retirement benefits for federal employees. In an interview with Bloomberg News in June, Mr Gebbia described much of the federal bureaucracy as a 'design desert.' Earlier in 2025, Mr Trump abolished an Obama-era office known as 18F that worked on digital design projects across the federal government. The new group will report directly to the White House chief of staff and have a deadline of July 4, 2026 to deliver initial results. BLOOMBERG
