logo
Sam to hike, cycle and kayak series of rivers over five years

Sam to hike, cycle and kayak series of rivers over five years

Yahoo11-04-2025

A WORCESTER man is taking on a grand series of challenges to support the charity which has helped his family.
Sam Perrett's wife Nikki, 37, was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic disease that affects the central nervous system, in January 2023.
Since then the MS Society has been 'invaluable' to the couple and their two young daughters so Sam has decided to raise as much money as possible by tackling Source2Sea.
It is a series of five solo adventure challenges over the next five years, starting with 368 kilometres of the River Severn in September going from the source to the sea via a combination of hiking, cycling and kayaking.
Sam, 35, said: 'The diagnosis hit us hard as a family, not really knowing what it meant for the future for Nikki's health and what kind of deterioration we might see over what time period.
'It drove me into a health and fitness kick to make sure I'm as healthy as I possibly can be and I am around for as long as possible for our two young daughters.
'I've always loved the outdoors and I am the adventurous type having hiked a lot of the American south and mid-west.
'Six months ago I started a complete change to my lifestyle with exercise, fitness and diet.
'At this point I needed a goal, something to aim for, to keep me going and so Source2Sea was born.
'It is a series of five solo adventure challenges — planned and routed by me, not existing — over the next five years.
'Each challenge is to complete a journey from the source of a river all the way through to the sea.
'Using a combination of hiking, cycling and kayaking, each of the successive journeys get longer.'
Sam's plans so far involve the Severn mission, starting on September 21 from the Cambrian Mountains in Wales to Portishead, followed by the River Rhône in France and Switzerland covering 825km in September 2026.
He is targeting the River Tagus in Spain and Portugal over around 1,100km in 2027, the River Rhine over about 1,380km from Switzerland to the Netherlands in 2028 and possibly the Mississippi in the USA in year five.
Sam continued: 'This is not only as a goal to myself to keep me on point but also to raise vital awareness and fundraising for the MS Society.
'It is an incredible charity whose resources and support have been invaluable to us during this time. The more money raised the better.
'I also plan to fully document this training and completing the journeys on socials and YouTube.'
More than £1,000 has been raised so far at www.justgiving.com/page/source2sea.
There are more details on Sam's challenge at source2sea.uk and across social media on Facebook and Instagram.
To get in touch email info@source2sea.uk.
The MS Society funds world-leading research, shares the latest information and campaigns for everyone's rights.
There are more details at www.mssociety.org.uk.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

My 5-year-old survived cancer – twice. Don't put politics before medical research.
My 5-year-old survived cancer – twice. Don't put politics before medical research.

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

My 5-year-old survived cancer – twice. Don't put politics before medical research.

Few issues in American politics have consistently united both parties like the fight against cancer. While funding levels and strategies may differ, Democrats and Republicans alike recognize that cancer doesn't discriminate – and neither should our commitment to defeat it. Under the Biden administration, the Cancer Moonshot was relaunched to accelerate progress toward a cure. More recently, President Donald Trump announced his 'Stargate' initiative, which aims to harness artificial intelligence in detecting and treating cancer, including through personalized mRNA vaccines. In the United States, cancer is the leading cause of death by disease for children after infancy. Across the political spectrum, there remains a shared hope: that no one should have to endure the pain of losing a loved one or fight this deadly disease. Yet today, that consensus is showing signs of strain. State legislatures across the country are advancing bills to ban or severely restrict the use of – and further research into – breakthrough technologies like mRNA, a technology that is driving promising advancements in cancer. What should be a story of American scientific innovation is being twisted into a political talking point. And it's putting lives at risk. Opinion: Biden's diagnosis shows two things. Cancer hits everyone and some forgot that. If the politicians pushing these bans spent even a few minutes inside a pediatric oncology unit, maybe they'd understand. They'd see floors filled with sick children on small bicycles, pulling IV poles behind them. Children in hospital beds, brave beyond measure. And parents clinging to hope. I've seen it firsthand. I'm a mother whose 5-year-old daughter has survived cancer – twice. My daughter Charlie is one of a small percentage of pediatric cancer patients whose tumors don't show up on standard blood tests. Her cancer went undetected for more than a year. By the time doctors found it, it had already spread to her liver. She was just 3 years old and had Stage 4 cancer. Once Charlie's cancer was detected, we rushed into treatment: high-dose chemotherapy, stem cell transplants and multiple surgeries. After months of treatment, we got the news every parent prays for: Charlie was cancer-free. But just a few months later, scans revealed a relapse. Two small nodules were found on her lung. Her baby brother was only two months old when we learned her cancer had returned. Relapse treatment was grueling. Charlie lost weight and muscle mass. She needed a feeding tube to stay nourished, hydrated and medicated. But through it all, she never lost her smile. Her strength became ours. And while we juggled caring for a newborn and two other children, we held onto hope, because science gave us a reason to. Thanks to expert care at Seattle Children's and research-backed protocols, she's once again cancer-free. She started preschool this year. She's coloring, laughing and chasing her siblings again. Every option we had was made possible by decades of public investment in research. Families who came before us joined clinical trials. Lawmakers chose to fund pediatric science and cancer research. That is the same kind of work mRNA research builds on today. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. Researchers are developing an mRNA-based diagnostic test that could catch cancers like hers earlier, when they're more treatable. The test uses mRNA from her original tumor to detect any circulating cancer cells through a simple blood draw. Catching a relapse early could be lifesaving. We first learned about this test in 2023, and knowing it's almost within reach brings us, and families like ours, so much hope. Beyond mRNA-based diagnostic tests, mRNA has also shown early promise as a therapy for cancer patients, enabling personalized treatment that could more effectively target one's tumor. That kind of innovation is exactly what's under threat right now. The role of mRNA technology in oncology has been studied for decades, and yet some lawmakers want to roll this progress back, arguing it is untested and unsafe. This technology, along with many innovations that come from federally supported medical research, is a critical source of hope for families around the world. I'm a doctor. So is my mother. When she got cancer, I realized how little that mattered. | Opinion When you're watching your child battle cancer, every advancement matters. I know firsthand how critical it is to catch cancer early and have access to every possible treatment option. When politicians politicize science – when they ban or restrict it based on misinformation and politics – they aren't protecting families like mine. They're limiting our options. They're slowing down the breakthroughs that could save lives. We can't afford to let misinformation and polarized politics dictate the future of lifesaving research. Thanks to innovation in medical research, Charlie is thriving today, but far too many kids are still fighting. Let's ensure science continues to move forward for all of our children. Emily Stenson is a childhood cancer advocate and the mother of 5-year-old two-time cancer survivor Charlie Stenson. She lives in Seattle. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Cancer research saved my child's life. Fund mRNA innovation | Opinion

Border traffic freefall jeopardizes duty free shop
Border traffic freefall jeopardizes duty free shop

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Border traffic freefall jeopardizes duty free shop

Mayor, MP joins national call to help border stores survive John Slipp says 'traveller anxiety' is not how the Woodstock business owner wanted to celebrate the 40th anniversary of the Woodstock Duty Free Shop Inc. Canadian reaction to President Donald Trump's annexation threats, chaotic tariff announcements, and increased border scrutiny add up to a dearth of visitors driving by his Woodstock Duty Free Shop en route to the Houlton, Maine border crossing and an uncertain future for his store. 'We have no plans for our anniversary. Given the conditions we are in, there's not much to celebrate at the moment. It's kind of bittersweet. It was a very special time 40 years go when Dad opened the business…. It's sad to see it all come to an end,' Slipp said. No traffic means no business for The Woodstock Duty Free Shop, a dilemma repeated at 32 land border duty free stores across Canada. The Frontier Duty Free Association, a national association of land border duty free shops, conducted a March survey of owners on how long they could remain open under the current climate. Slipp and one-third of the other store owners said three to six months. 'I have been talking to other colleagues at other crossings with stores that are similar in size and have similar concerns… Canadians are not looking to travel to the United States… We are also finding that Americans are experiencing border anxiety as well because of the immigration enforcement in the United States. A lot of Americans don't want to be anywhere near a border,' Slipp said. 'This is not just this border crossing, it's nationwide.' Woodstock Mayor Trina Jones said the Woodstock Duty Free Shop 'offers a critical role' for local tourism, offering visitors a tax-free way to buy Canadian and locally made goods and products that promote Woodstock, New Brunswick, and Canada. 'It's especially important since there is no longer a (provincial) tourist bureau operating at our border location. John Slipp and his staff offer that one last chance for those visiting our area, or passing through, to purchase goods that promote us and boost our economy,' Mayor Jones said in an emailed statement. When the Liberal government announced counter-tariffs on U.S. imports to combat the American tariffs placed on Canadian exports, Prime Minister Mark Carney said the Canadian tariff revenue would help businesses affected by the trade war. Richard Bragdon, Tobique-Mactaquac Conservative MP, said counter-tariffs should support duty free shops. 'Our duty free shops like the one in Woodstock, have taken a big hit over the last several years. They just started to recover coming out of the challenges they faced during COVID, to then be affected by the tariff situation with the United States,' Bragdon said in an emailed statement. 'Funds received through counter-tariffs should be used to support affected industries which includes duty free shops.' Four decades at the border Slipp's father, George, opened the store on June 1, 1985, after the Canadian government announced licensing land border locations for duty free stores to sell goods tax and duty free to travellers leaving the country. John Slipp started working at the family business 31 years ago. 'It's been a good business most of the time. But between COVID and the tariffs, it's a different world here.' Slipp once employed 15 people at the store, which was open seven days a week, selling alcohol and tobacco products, local arts and crafts, local maple syrup, clothing, perfume and other products. The store also offers currency exchange for visitors. Now, the business owner mans the store himself, which is closed on Mondays. Slipp isn't alone. CBC reports that duty-free shops across the country have experienced massive drops in business in recent months. United States Customs and Border Protection data shows travellers entering the United States from Canada dropped almost 850,000 visitors in April. 'These businesses are not in this position because of bad management or poor decisions—this is a crisis not of their making,' said Barbara Barrett, Frontier Duty Free Association (FDFA) executive director, a national organization representing the land border shops. 'From the pandemic border closure to the current impacts of U.S. tariffs and travel disruptions, duty free stores have been disproportionately impacted at every turn. The government has committed to supporting businesses hurt by these challenges, and we are simply asking for targeted, reasonable support to prevent the permanent loss of these local employers. Our ask is modest, but the need is urgent.' Recent FDFA data shows 60 to 80 percent revenue losses at many stores. On June 3, the association joined with mayors from border communities to release an open letter to Prime Minister Carney and Minister François-Philippe Champagne asking the federal government to act now to prevent the permanent closure of Canada's land border duty free stores. 'These are not multinational chains—these are our independently-owned, family-run stores, and in many small border communities, we are the main employer,' said Tania Lee, FDFA president and owner/operator of Bluewater Bridge Duty Free. 'Our stores are an integral part of Canada's tourism fabric and border community economies, sustaining jobs and supporting the towns we call home. Today, many of us are just weeks away from closing our doors for good.' Both federal and provincial politicians have told Slipp they want to help, but he's worried about how long it will take to develop an assistance plan. 'Newly-elected cabinet minsters and members are just trying to find their way… It takes a while to get things approved. We're happy that the talking points are positive.' Slipp said the federal government introduced a lease deferral program when the duty-free stores were weathering the COVID travel ban. Slipp owns the store building, but the land is leased from the Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA). Allowing duty free store owners to delay lease payments would be helpful. He suggested allowing duty free shops to close temporarily without any penalties and assisting with employees' wages and benefits to keep the business afloat. Slipp is worried the trained employees he had to lay off won't be available to return to work if the slowdown continues. He said using counter-tariff revenues to pay for the assistance makes sense. 'We have reminded the government that was one of their pledges and we would like to participate. The politicians speak positively and provide hope, but it is just taking too long.' 'Local tourism boost' Slipp said that when the federal government created the duty free program, licenses were awarded to local, independent, and private Canadian businesspeople. The shops had to be local stores, not large national corporations or franchises. 'The stores would capture some of the money Canadians would be spending in the United States but also capture American money from Americans returning home buying gifts or souvenirs,' he said. 'The duty-free shops are designed to promote local tourism and capture the money that would otherwise be spent in the United States to support our local economy.' Federal rules require that anything sold at a duty-free shop immediately leaves the country of origin. 'We are an exporter, because everything we sell is exported. We are not allowed to compete with local domestic retailers… Local Woodstock residents cannot come here to purchase goods and return to Canada without paying tax. That wouldn't be fair,' Slipp said. 'Americans visiting our shop have a $200 (U.S.) daily tax exemption. We encourage them to shop here and the local area.' Jones is a member of the Mayor's Border Alliance for Canada. She said border mayors are advocating with the Frontier Duty Free Association for proper federal and provincial support. 'Duty free shops have a unique challenge in that federal regulations prohibit them from selling their products here locally… I would encourage anyone in Woodstock, and all Canadians, who are still choosing to travel to the U.S. to consider stopping at the Woodstock Duty Free Shop on their way to the states to purchase goods to help them get through this tough period,' Jones said. 'We encourage the federal and provincial governments to provide financial assistance to the duty-free shops, similar to the supports provided during the pandemic, to help keep them going during this time.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Trump's new travel ban takes effect as tensions escalate over immigration enforcement
Trump's new travel ban takes effect as tensions escalate over immigration enforcement

Boston Globe

time2 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Trump's new travel ban takes effect as tensions escalate over immigration enforcement

Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up During Trump's first term, a hastily written executive order ordering the denial of entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries created chaos at numerous airports and other ports of entry, prompting successful legal challenges and major revisions to the policy. Advertisement No such disruption was immediately discernible at Los Angeles International Airport in the hours after the new ban took effect. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport earlier Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the US are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest. 'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' Advertisement Many immigration experts say the new ban is more carefully crafted and appears designed to beat court challenges that hampered the first by focusing on the visa application process. Trump said this time that some countries had 'deficient' screening for passports and other public documents or have historically refused to take back their own citizens. He relied extensively on an annual Homeland Security report of people who remain in the US after their visas expired. Measuring overstay rates has challenged experts for decades, but the government has made a limited attempt annually since 2016. Trump's proclamation cites overstay rates for eight of the 12 banned countries. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. US officials say the man charged in the attack overstayed a tourist visa. He is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. 'This policy is not about national security — it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization. The inclusion of Afghanistan angered some supporters who have worked to resettle its people. The ban does make exceptions for Afghans on Special Immigrant Visas, generally people who worked most closely with the US government during the two-decade-long war there. Advertisement Afghanistan had been one of the largest sources of resettled refugees, with about 14,000 arrivals in a 12-month period through September 2024. Trump suspended refugee resettlement his first day in office.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store