Miss World organisers accused of being ‘vindictive and bitter' towards ex-contestant
Their mantra is 'beauty with a purpose'. But the organisers of the Miss World pageant have been accused of something altogether uglier: being 'vindictive and very bitter' towards a contestant who left over claims she had been used as window dressing.
The reigning Miss England, Milla Magee, said she agreed to take part in the 2025 Miss World pageant because she believed it would be a platform to promote her campaign to have CPR included in the school curriculum. But she said the reality was very different.
She left before the grand final in India on Saturday, saying she felt she was being exploited and claiming she and the other women felt they had been provided as entertainment for investors as a 'thank you'.
Miss World organisers responded with a statement in which they referred to 'false and defamatory statements' that they said were 'completely unfounded and inconsistent with the reality of her time with us'.
The organisation's chief executive, Julia Morley, went further in an interview with the Hindu newspaper, in which she accused Magee of leaving because she 'believed she didn't stand a chance in the competition'.
On Saturday, Magee said: 'What Julia said was vindictive and very bitter. And it was a ridiculous statement. I did not leave because I thought I was not going to win. I left because I wanted to stand for what I believe in and it didn't align with my values. And I would hate for another young girl to go into this system after watching me this past year and have to experience the same.'
Magee said there were a 'lot of tears behind the smiles' at the Miss World event in Hyderabad and she was unwilling to 'promote a lie'. She said that while the pageant purported to be about 'beauty with purpose', she found it to be about 'wearing different ballgowns every day and what you look like'.
She said: 'I felt like I've been fed a false narrative of this system that promotes 'beauty with a purpose', that's supposed to be about advocacy and what you champion for. And I thought, right, this is a real good opportunity for me on a global stage to be able to talk about [my campaign] Go Far with CPR. This isn't about me standing on the stage, this isn't about what I wear. It's not about what I look like.'
Instead, Magee claimed she found she and the other contestants were there more to look pretty and to entertain guests, with only limited opportunity given to promote their causes. In one instance, she alleged, a man she could not identify walked up to her and said: 'Next time I'm in London or England, hook me up,' leaving her feeling uncomfortable.
Magee also said she felt Miss World had exposed her to anger from its backers by posting its statement on social media for them to comment on – failing, she said, in its duty of care to her.
Nevertheless, she said, she had been 'inundated' with messages from women who had taken part in pageants 'saying how they felt the exact same'.
She called on the organisation to modernise, saying: 'They have a big responsibility to acknowledge what I've said, acknowledge and listen to the reasons of why I left, to not just so quickly and irresponsibly put out a statement to say it's because I didn't think I was going to win.'
Miss World has been contacted for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Bihar: Minor rape victim's death due to alleged delay in treatment sparks anger
The death of a 10-year-old rape victim in the eastern Indian state of Bihar after an alleged delay in medical treatment has sparked outrage in the girl died on Sunday morning at the state government-run Patna Medical College and Hospital (PMCH) in the capital Patna. Her uncle has alleged that the child's condition worsened as she was kept waiting in an ambulance for around four hours on Saturday before being admitted to the authorities have denied this, saying that claims of a delay in admission are "baseless". The girl's death has made national headlines, with opposition leaders accusing the Bihar government - a coalition led by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and Janata Dal United (JD(U)) - of gross mismanagement. The government has denied any girl is from the Dalit community, which is at the bottom of the Hindu caste hierarchy. Dalits face widespread mistreatment in India despite laws in place to protect the outrage, the National Human Rights Commission and National Commission for Women have criticised the incident and asked for the hospital's role to be investigated. Rape victims cannot be named under Indian law. The girl was raped on 26 May, allegedly by a man who lived near her aunt's house in Muzaffarpur. Police have arrested the man and are investigating the girl went missing while she was playing outside her house. Her family members later found her lying injured near a road. Police officials have told reporters that she had several knife was first taken to a local hospital and then to the Sri Krishna Medical College and Hospital (SKMCH), around 85km (53 miles) from Vibha, the superintendent of SKMCH, told BBC Hindi that the child had several injuries, including wounds on her chest and neck, but that her condition had stabilised. She was referred to PMCH as she needed reconstruction surgery on her windpipe, Ms Vibha at PMCH, the child's uncle said, they faced a delay in admission while the child waited in the ambulance."They [the hospital staff] made us run around for four hours from one hospital department to another one," he alleged. She was later admitted to the gynaecology department, he hospital has denied the allegations. IS Thakur, a top hospital official, said that the child's family had initially admitted her to the paediatrics department but that she was sent to the Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) department because of her injuries."Since we do not have an ICU in ENT, the child was shifted to the ICU of the gynaecology department," he said, adding that the child was brought in an Advance Life Support ambulance, which is equipped to offer critical care."The allegations of a delay in getting a hospital bed are baseless," Mr Thakur said. The child's plight began making news after a viral video showed members of the opposition Congress party arguing with hospital staff, demanding that she be parties in the state have held several protests since the leader Rahul Gandhi said that the girl's death was "extremely shameful" and demanded that strict action be taken against negligent officers."The rape victim waited for hours outside PMCH to be admitted... what is the use of the big buildings being built in the name of hospitals when there is chaos, corruption, misbehaviour, lack of resources and insensitivity all around?" the state's main opposition party Rashtriya Janata Dal said on of the BJP and JD(U) have denied any negligence. Anamika Singh Patel, a BJP spokesperson, called the girl's death "unfortunate"."But I myself run a hospital and I know that getting a bed in a hospital is a process which takes time. People in our government are working responsibly," she incident has also brought attention to the condition of Bihar's medical infrastructure, months before the state assembly election is due to be month, a patient at another government hospital in Patna said that a rat bit his toe while he was asleep. Hospital authorities had launched an investigation into the Tuesday, in a scathing editorial titled Bihar's Shame, the Times of India newspaper highlighted the sorry state of hospitals in the state. It referenced a recent report that found that only half of all ventilators in government hospitals were functional and that capital Patna had just one government doctor for 11,541 people. That ratio is much worse in rural BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, X and Facebook.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
IPL final – Royal Challengers Bengaluru vs Punjab Kings: Get £30 in free bets with bet365
Sponsored WINNER Commercial content notice: Taking one of the betting offers featured in this article may result in a payment to The Sun. 18+. T&Cs apply. James Anderson , Betting & Gaming Writer Published : 9:07, 3 Jun 2025 Updated : 9:07, 3 Jun 2025 A new champion will be crowned on Tuesday as Punjab Kings take on Royal Challengers Bengaluru in the IPL final at the colossal 132,000-capacity Narendra Modi Stadium in Ahmedabad. And bet365 are celebrating the grand finale by offering brand new customers a fabulous £30 in free bets when you sign-up and stake a tenner on cricket! Find The Sun's betting publishing principles here How to claim bet365 welcome offer Visit the bet365 website HERE* Register an account, no promo code needed! Deposit between £5 and £10 and claim the offer to receive three times your first bet as bet credits Place your first bet equal to the qualifying deposit amount of between £5 and £10 on any qualifying Sportsbook markets Once that bet has settled, bet365 will credit your account with 3x the qualifying bet amount as bet credits - up to a max of £30 RCB vs Punjab Kings: Get your £30 in free bets HERE* No bet365 account? No problem! We'll get you set up in no time! To claim bet365's amazing welcome bonus, simply visit the website HERE* Register an account, and deposit between £5 and £10 to claim the offer and receive three times your first bet as bet credits. Place your first bet equal to the qualifying deposit amount of between £5 and £10 on any qualifying Sportsbook markets. Your Free Bets will be available shortly after your qualifying bets have settled. You can then place your Free Bets, just select 'Use Bet Credits' in the bet slip. RCB vs Punjab Kings: Get your £30 in free bets HERE* *18+. Min deposit requirement. Free Bets are paid as Bet Credits and are available for use upon settlement of qualifying bets. Min odds, bet and payment method exclusions apply. Returns exclude Bet Credits stake. Time limits and T&Cs apply. A responsible gambler is someone who: Establishes time and monetary limits before playing Only gambles with money they can afford to lose Never chase their losses Doesn't gamble if they're upset, angry or depressed Gamcare – GambleAware – Read our guide on responsible gambling practices. For help with a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline on 0808 8020 133 or go to to be excluded from all UK-regulated gambling websites.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Deep sea diver wins nearly £1million compensation after losing his leg to a giant underwater hammer
A deep sea diver who lost his leg after he was crushed by a giant underwater hammer has won a £915,000 compensation payout. Veteran diver Allan Peacock, 55, suffered devastating injuries when he was crushed by heavy equipment while working from a cargo barge in pipe laying operations off the coast of India in 2011. A heavy pile - acting like a 'hammer' to nail another pile into the seabed - unexpectedly moved, sucking him between the two pieces of equipment and crushing his foot. Mr Peacock was able to hop and drag himself away and was treated in India before flying home to be treated in Newcastle. Despite the surgeon's 'exceptional' efforts, he ended up having to have a below-knee amputation. He miraculously returned to work on the seabed just 18 months later with the help of a special prosthetic leg, however, the mountain biking enthusiast fears becoming more disabled in later life and believes it is 'likely' he will be wheelchair-bound. Following the incident, Mr Peacock sued his former employer, Indian company Del Seatek India Private Limited, as well as the barge's operator, South Korean company Hyundai heavy Industries Company Ltd. His lawyers claimed that the work had been done in 'hazardously strong tides and with poor visibility' and that the piles were 'not sufficiently secured together.' After winning his case at the High Court, Mr Peacock has been awarded £765,866 in compensation from Del Seatek India Private Limited, having already received about £169,000 from Hyundai. The court heard Mr Peacock qualified in 1998 and was working as a saturation diver for Del Seatek when he was injured while working from a cargo barge in pipe laying operations in the Paradip area of India in November 2011. His barrister, Mark Chapman KC, said conditions were difficult, with poor visibility of only about a metre and a strong tide when he descended underwater in a dive basket to work at a depth of up to 30 metres. His task was to disconnect two chains which were holding vertical piles together, one on top of the other, with the top driving the other into the seabed and 'acting like a hammer on a nail.' As he began to work, the top pile parted from the other and the barge began to roll due to the tide, also causing the piles to move, the barrister continued. 'They parted because they were insecurely attached,' he said. 'There was too much slack in the chains holding them together. 'The claimant's right foot was sucked in between the parted piles before the top pile fell back on top of the bottom pile and, in doing so, crushed the claimant's foot. 'The claimant's foot was stuck for a few seconds before the piles moved again and the claimant was able to remove the foot. 'The claimant detached his umbilical and hopped and dragged himself back to the dive basket after informing the dive supervisor of the accident. The basket had been removed to the surface and so the claimant had to await its return.' He was initially treated in India, before being moved to the Royal Victoria Infirmary, in Newcastle, where he had to have his below-knee amputation due to the lack of blood flow to the foot. Mr Chapman said the extent of his injury had been 'graphically revealed' to him and he was told without warning that amputation was required, which left him 'extremely shocked and quite emotional.' 'Following the accident, the claimant was absent from all/any work for a period of around 18 months,' he continued. 'However, he is a stoical, resourceful and determined individual. He was resolute in his ambition to return to his pre-accident work, having independently researched the regulatory position applicable to amputees and commercial diving operations. 'The claimant has managed to return to work in a field which is very demanding with the use of prostheses provided by the NHS.' In his written evidence put before the court, Mr Peacock himself described the problems he faced in getting back to work after the accident. 'One of the things raised was what would happen if my prosthetic leg came off in the water,' he said. 'In order to deal with this issue I came up with the idea of having climbing harnesses attached to my prosthetic leg. 'This was approved by health and safety and now it is something that I use all of the time when at work.' Although he is now slower in the water, he continues working as a diver, but fears becoming more disabled in later life, the court heard. 'I am fully aware that it is likely that I will be wheelchair-bound at some later stage in my life and to be honest this scares me,' he said. 'I try not to think about it too much and concentrate on keeping myself fit and healthy. I watch what I eat, I exercise and I try to keep myself in the best possible shape.' Addressing the judge, Mr Chapman described Mr Peacock as an 'impressive' man, who, because he can no longer run, has taken up kayaking and is still a keen mountain biker. Mr Peacock initially sued his former employer Del Seatek and also the barge's operator, South Korean company Hyundai heavy Industries Company Ltd. His lawyers claimed that the work had been done in 'hazardously strong tides and with poor visibility' and that the piles were 'not sufficiently secured together.' Hyundai settled his claim with a payment of £169,000, but Mr Chapman said Del Seatek had since 2016 'taken zero interest in this matter and had no involvement since 2016,' leaving the judge to simply decide the amount in damages he is due from them. Ruling on the case after a half-day trial at the High Court, Deputy Admiralty Registrar Simon Brown awarded Mr Peacock £915,871 damages, to be reduced by the amount already received from Hyundai. The sum includes awards of £150,000 for lost earnings and £681,000 to pay for prostheses and equipment, as well as smaller sums to cover the extra cost of first class seats while flying back and forth to work and to mark the care he received from his wife, Samantha Vincent. Speaking afterwards, Mr Peacock's solicitor Simon O'Loughlin, of Irwin Mitchell, said: 'What Allan went through was very traumatic, but he's shown such bravery and resilience to get to where he is today. To see him get back out working as a professional diver after such a serious injury is nothing short of incredible. He's truly an inspiration. 'It's been a privilege to get to know him and I hope that the settlement will be able to provide him with some closure as well as help fund any future treatment and support he requires and deserves.' Mr Peacock added: 'Not for one minute did I ever expect to be back doing what I love after what happened to me. However I knew that my only options were to sit back and let my injury define me or take back my life – I chose the latter and I'm so glad I did. 'It took me a while to regain my confidence in the water, but I'm so proud of how far I've come. I've also had amazing support which I'm very grateful for. 'I wouldn't wish what I've been through on anyone, but I hope that I can show that there is life after such serious injury.'
