British steelmakers boosted by change to EU tariffs
At May's UK-EU summit, Sir Keir and European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen agreed to restore Britain's steel quotas to historic levels after they were slashed in March.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said the announcement was 'yet another positive step forward for the UK steel sector' that would give producers 'certainty'.
The agreement comes at a difficult time for the industry, which continues to face 25% tariffs on exports to the US.
An agreement with President Donald Trump to effectively reduce those tariffs to zero is yet to come into effect, but Britain has been protected from the 50% tariff Mr Trump imposed on steel from the rest of the world last month.
UK Steel director general Gareth Stace said Friday's change was 'excellent news' for the sector that had been 'plagued by problems' in exporting steel to the EU.
He added: 'The quota will restore historic trade flows and is good news for both UK steelmakers and their EU customers.'
The decision means the UK can export 27,000 tonnes of 'category 17' steel – which includes angles and sections of steel – to the EU each quarter without paying tariffs.
The figure had been cut to 10,000 tonnes after the EU introduced a cap intended to prevent a single exporter dominating the market.
In total, the UK exports around 2.4 million tonnes of steel to the EU, worth nearly £3 billion and accounting for 75% of British steel exports.
Ministers expect the change to help protect jobs in the industry, which has been a priority for the Labour Government since coming to power.
In April, the Government used an almost unprecedented weekend recall of Parliament to take control of British Steel to prevent the shutdown of its blast furnaces and maintain the UK's primary steel-making capacity.
British Steel's interim chief operating officer Lisa Coulson said: 'The removal of EU tariffs on British-made steel is a significant boost to our business.
'The EU is an important market to us, particularly for the products our highly skilled colleagues manufacture in Scunthorpe, Teesside, and Skinningrove.'
But Conservative shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith described the quota as 'tiny' and 'embarrassing from a Government which has nothing to show on removing the US tariffs on steel which the PM claimed to have delivered back in May'.
He added: 'It's a paltry return for giving up 12 years of fishing rights and tying the energy costs of every business to a higher cost EU emissions regime over which the UK will have no say.
'When Labour nationalised British Steel we said they had no plan. This government by press release shows we were right.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Car loans: Why could drivers still get compensation after court ruling?
Millions of UK motorists could be eligible for payouts worth hundreds of pounds after regulators announced an industry-wide compensation scheme. It came after a landmark Supreme Court ruling over whether motor finance firms complied with rules related to commission paid by lenders to dealers selling car loans. The ruling on Friday was widely considered a victory for finance firms potentially affected, after it was judged that two key cases were did not break the law. Here the PA news agency looks at why consumers could still be able to make claims for compensation payments. What was the court case and why was it important? The UK's highest court was considering an appeal against a Court of Appeal ruling made in October last year, relating to three claimants who had each bought cars on credit. In each case, the car dealer made a profit on the sale of the car but also received a commission from the lender for introducing the business to them, which the three claimants argued they did not know about. The Court of Appeal originally found that 'secret' commission payments, as part of finance arrangements made before 2021 without the motorist's fully informed consent, were unlawful. The lenders, FirstRand Bank and Close Brothers, challenged the decision. If the case confirmed that these three cases were all still unlawful, then consumers who bought cars with similar finance deals could make claims to potentially secure compensation. What was the result? On Friday, Lords Reed, Hodge, Lloyd-Jones, Briggs and Hamblen ruled that car dealers did not have a relationship with their customers that would require them to act only in the customers' interest, and that the Court of Appeal was wrong. But they said that some customers could still receive payouts by bringing claims under the Consumer Credit Act (CCA). It upheld one of the three claims and stressed that it was still broadly considered 'unfair'. What does it mean for consumers? Consumers who are concerned that they were not told about commission and think they may have paid too much could therefore still be eligible for compensation. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) watchdog said not all claims will receive payouts however. The FCA had launched its own process to look at discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) on motor finance deals in 2024 but had put this on hold until the outcome of the Supreme Court case. Some 80,000 open cases on this issue were effectively paused for the ruling. Who is eligible for compensation? The case specifically relates to people who took out car loans between 2007 and 2021. Consumer champion Martin Lewis said in a video posted to X that millions of people are still likely to be due payments. He told Sky News the consultation is 'likely to mean 40% of people who got a car finance deal between 2007 and 2021 will be due some form of redress'. How much could I receive? The FCA said it is consulting on a redress scheme which is expected to cost between £9 billion and £18 billion. This is expected to mean victims could receive up to £950 in compensation. The regulator stressed that it was 'hard to estimate precisely at this stage the total cost to industry of the scheme'. What will the compensation process be? Currently, a lot is still not known about who exactly is eligible and how it will take place. The FCA has said that those who have already complained do not need to do anything and advised that others with potential claims contact their car loan provider, rather than use a claims management company. The regulator added that its consultation will be launched by early October. If the compensation scheme goes ahead, the first payments should be made in 2026. What does that mean for car finance firms? The motor finance industry is expected to cover the costs of the compensation, including administrative costs. Over the past few years, lenders and motor finance firms have been setting aside money to cover potential compensation payments. Why has the sector reacted positively to this? On Monday, shares in lender Lloyds and Close Brothers moved firmly higher after the ruling appeared to be more favourable than expected. Lloyds told shareholders on Monday morning that further financial provisions are 'unlikely to be material' in order to cover likely redress payments. While there is still some uncertainty over the cost of redress for the industry, positive outcomes in two of the cases mean they are likely to face fewer claims than previously expected. AJ Bell investment director Russ Mould said: 'While this issue could still cause some damage, it looks unlikely to be a repeat of the PPI scandal which blighted the banking industry in the 2010s.'
Daily Mirror
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'We felt like UK had let us down so bought £23,400 house in Bulgaria'
Amy Smerdon, 35, and her husband, Jerry, 53, were fed up with renting in the UK, and realising they couldn't afford a mortgage A family of six has "escaped" the UK's financial pressures by snapping up a £23,400 house in Bulgaria, allowing them to live mortgage-free and save a staggering £21,600 annually on household expenses. Amy Smerdon, 35, along with her husband Jerry, 53, had long harboured ambitions of an off-grid lifestyle and were weary of renting, yet found UK property prices beyond their reach. The couple, parents to two boys aged eight and six, as well as five-year-old twins, initially purchased a three-bedroom fixer-upper in Bulgaria for £7,000 in 2024, intending it to be a holiday retreat. However, following an inheritance from Amy's late grandfather, the Smerdons opted to relocate permanently, acquiring a three-bed property with a vast plot and a sizeable warehouse in Popovo, Bulgaria. Jerry, who operates a vape shop and ice cream parlour back in the UK, transformed the warehouse into a habitable space earlier this year. Amy, a full-time mum, made the move from Wincanton, Somerset, with the children in March 2025. They are now refurbishing their new home on a £10,000 budget and relish the sense of liberation, managing to put aside £1,801 each month. Jerry, also a father to four older sons from previous relationships, shared his motivation: "A big part of this was to give this freedom. I've been let down by my own country. We couldn't get any help with paying council tax - and then you get a bailiff turning up at the door. "We've got two homes - done in six to eight months together. We were struggling to survive in the UK." Amy had initially considered off-grid living - transforming a shipping container into a dwelling - but discovered the expenses would remain steep in Britain. She explained: "With the age gap - I'm never going to be able to get a mortgage as I don't have very good credit. Jerry is older - he'd never be able to get one because of his age. "We didn't want to rent somewhere for the rest of our lives. You can't paint that wall, or put something up on one wall." The family had holidayed in Bulgaria multiple times and considered it a "lovely" nation. After witnessing others purchasing properties overseas, Amy and Jerry began exploring available options and took a chance on a fixer-upper in Bulgaria. Amy said: "It was always meant to be a holiday home. It was £7,000 - the price of what you'd pay for a holiday. Then we had no intention of emigrating." However, as the family began reassessing their British lifestyle, they investigated how straightforward relocating might prove. Amy grew increasingly frustrated with Britain's condition, parenting judgements, and escalating living costs and house prices. She added: "We weren't living. We were surviving. I just feel the UK had become this rat race. It was like Groundhog Day for me." Amy started researching Bulgarian properties, and when her grandfather's inheritance came through, they managed to purchase their present home in December 2024 for 27,000 Euros. The family now live without a mortgage and have set aside £10,000 for home renovations, hoping to move in by the year's end. Amy relishes the freedom her children have to play outdoors. She said: "In the UK we see eight-year-olds walking around with iPhones. We wanted to escape all of that. "Here they can scream and shout. They can do whatever without someone twitching at the window or knocking and asking for the kids to be quiet. That's really important for me." Amy also explained that the cost of living was significantly lower - she used to pay £1,300 in rent per month and her bills amounted to £670 in the UK. Now their monthly bills are only £198.50. While admitting that settling in Bulgaria hasn't been "easy" and they still don't feel completely "settled", Amy has no regrets about their relocation. Amy said: "It's been our saviour. Everything is so simple and relaxed. "It's like going back in time. There is no limit - if you want to do something you're able to achieve anything you want. No one can tell you that you can't." The family's monthly expenses in the UK Rent - £1,300 Council tax - £238 Internet - £40 Electric - £198 Gas - £129 Water - £95 Total - £2,000 Their current monthly expenses in Bulgaria Mortgage - £0 Council tax - £18 a year Internet - £40 Electric - £154 Water - £3 Total - £198.50 Article continues below They said they save £1,801 monthly compared to their previous costs in the UK, which amounts to an annual saving of £21,618.
The Guardian
12 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Police planning to arrest anyone supporting Palestine Action at London protest
Police are planning to arrest anyone demonstrating in support of Palestine Action this weekend. The group has been banned under terrorism laws and this weekend a large event protesting against its proscription has been organised by the group Defend Our Juries. A source with knowledge of the police's early planning for this Saturday's event said: 'If they think that by turning up with significant numbers that we can't arrest them for breaking terrorism laws, they need to think again. 'They will be arrested. However we have to do it, they will be arrested for breaking terrorism laws.' The Met is aware of the planned protest this Saturday and is sceptical of claims that thousands could turn up. The force believes that a total in the low hundreds is more likely. Anyone arrested risks a terrorism conviction. At other events that led to mass arrests, the Met has arrested people, confirmed their identities and home addresses and then quickly released them on bail so they can be dealt with later. That tactic was used for an anti-immigration protest in Whitehall last summer and for past Extinction Rebellion protests where scores of people were arrested. Police will be stretched at the weekend as a large separate pro-Palestinian march is also scheduled for Saturday and anti-immigration protests are also expected. The Met's plans will evolve throughout the week, and police chiefs will consider whether the force – Britain's largest – may need to call on mutual aid from others to manage. For the Met, they face dangers from both sides of the debate. Supporters of Palestine Action may accuse them of being heavy handed if they make mass arrests, while those on the right may accuse the Met of going soft if people openly break terrorism laws and are not arrested. A spokesperson for Defend Our Juries denied any plot to overwhelm the police and the courts system, as was reported in the Telegraph on Monday, saying: 'It's great the Telegraph is helping us to spread the word but there are serious inaccuracies in their story: 'First, it's not a 'Palestine Action' campaign. Defend Our Juries is organising the campaign, as they must know since they've seen the briefing document. Given that PA is currently a proscribed organisation that's an important distinction. 'Secondly it's not a 'plot'. Plot implies something underhand and secretive. This is an open and transparent campaign against an unjust law, which violates basic democratic freedoms. All materials, including the action briefing document are available on the website. 'Third, we're not planning to overwhelm the system. The police have a choice whether to arrest people or not. If the police show respect for the law and basic democratic rights, they will leave peaceful protesters be. It's only if they choose to arrest peaceful protestors that they've got a problem, which is on them, not us.'
