logo
Trump's Tariffs Drive Up Consumer Costs As Political Strategy Takes Center Stage

Trump's Tariffs Drive Up Consumer Costs As Political Strategy Takes Center Stage

The latest wave of tariffs imposed by the Trump administration took effect this week, raising taxes on imports from more than 60 countries and sending prices higher for everyday American consumers. While the White House frames these measures as a bold move to protect U.S. industries and jobs, economists warn that the costs will be borne largely by households, fueling inflation and straining budgets.
According to AP News, the United States now levies tariffs ranging from 10% to 50% on key imports from major trading partners, including Canada (35%), Brazil (50%), South Korea (15%), India (25%), and the UK (10%). Overall, the average tariff rate stands at 18.6%, the highest since 1933, per Reuters.
Economic models from Yale's Budget Lab project that the average U.S. household will face approximately $2,400 in increased annual costs as tariffs drive up prices on consumer goods such as electronics, clothing, and auto parts, an AP report says.
A recent survey by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, reported by Fox Business, reveals that nearly 75% of businesses affected by the tariffs are passing increased costs to consumers. This immediate price inflation impacts household budgets, especially among lower and middle-income Americans.
While economists express concern about inflation and consumer strain, political analysts observe that the tariffs may be intended more as a messaging tool than an economic fix.
Support for tariffs has increased among Republican voters. A recent CNN/ORC poll cited by The Guardian shows 62% of Republicans favor tariffs, even if they cause higher prices. Among independents, support rises when tariffs are described as retaliation against unfair trade practices.
Analysis from JPMorgan's geopolitical risk team warns that these tariffs may persist beyond the Trump administration, highlighting the rise of protectionist policies as a longer-term trend, reported Reuters.
International partners including Canada, the European Union, and Switzerland have protested the tariffs, describing them as excessive and harmful to global trade.
Reuters reports Switzerland has requested urgent consultations with U.S. trade officials. The EU is considering retaliatory tariffs on American agricultural exports, while the World Trade Organization braces for formal complaints.
Despite tensions, U.S. stock markets showed resilience. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.8% Thursday, buoyed by exemptions granted to companies investing in U.S. semiconductor manufacturing.
Semiconductor firms such as TSMC and Samsung saw their stock prices climb following tariff exemptions, according to Business Insider.
Congressional leaders from both parties are considering legislation to introduce transparency and sunset provisions for future tariffs, aiming to mitigate unintended consequences for consumers.
However, with inflation slowing in other areas and voter support holding steady, the political momentum behind tariffs appears likely to continue through the 2026 election cycle.
The administration's tariff strategy is already raising prices for U.S. consumers, but the political calculus behind the policy could outweigh short-term economic pain. As tariffs become entrenched, households, businesses, and global partners brace for ongoing adjustment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Deploys National Guard To Tackle Washington Crime
Trump Deploys National Guard To Tackle Washington Crime

Int'l Business Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Trump Deploys National Guard To Tackle Washington Crime

US President Donald Trump said Monday he will deploy military and federal law enforcement in Washington as he seeks to curb violent crime in the nation's capital. The Republican leader told a White House news conference he plans to place the DC Metropolitan Police under the direct control of the federal government while sending in the National Guard. The overwhelmingly Democratic city faces allegations from Republican politicians that it is overrun by crime, plagued by homelessness and financially mismanaged -- although violent offenses are down. "This is Liberation Day in DC, and we're going to take our capital back," Trump said. Trump -- a convicted felon who has pardoned around 1,500 people involved in the 2021 US Capitol riot in Washington -- has complained that local police and prosecutors aren't tough enough. He has repeatedly threatened a federal takeover of the city of 700,000, saying crime in Washington was "totally out of control." The new approach echoes Trump's immigration policies that have effectively sealed the southern border amid mass deportations while deploying active-duty troops against protesters in Los Angeles. The president told reporters he planned to roll out the policy to other cities, spotlighting problems in New York and Chicago. Unlike the 50 states, Washington operates under a unique relationship with the federal government that limits its autonomy and grants Congress extraordinary control over local matters. Since the mid-1970s, the Home Rule Act has allowed residents to elect a mayor and a city council, although Congress still controls the city's budget. "There's absolutely no need for the National Guard here," Elizabeth Critchley, 62, said at a protest outside the White House. "It's all for show. It's just a big theater." Data from Washington police show significant drops in violent crime between 2023 and 2024, although that was coming off the back of a post-pandemic surge. Trump posted on social media ahead of the news conference that he also wants to tackle homeless encampments, after signing an order last month making it easier to arrest homeless people. Trump ordered homeless people to "move out" of the city in a Truth Social post on Sunday, vowing to "make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before." He promised individuals "places to stay," but "FAR from the Capital." Trump said criminals would be jailed and that it would all happen "very fast." Federal law enforcement have already increased their presence after a former Department of Government Efficiency staffer was beaten during an attempted carjacking. "Last week my administration surged 500 federal agents into the district including from the FBI, ATF, DEA, Park Police, the US Marshals Service, the Secret Service, and the Department of Homeland Security," Trump said. "You know a lot of nations, they don't have anything like that... They made dozens of arrests." A Gallup poll in October found that 64 percent of Americans believed crime had risen in 2024, although FBI data shows the lowest levels of violent crime nationwide in more than half a century. "Let me be crystal clear -- crime in DC is ending, and it's ending today," said Attorney General Pam Bondi, who was among several cabinet members flanking Trump. Trump called Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser a "good person who has tried" at the weekend but added that she had been given "many chances" to improve living standards. Bowser has not criticized Trump over his threats to stage a federal takeover, insisting instead that she plans to focus on their "shared priorities." Washington residents rally against US President Donald Trump AFP

Trump's new executive order threatens US scientific freedom  – DW – 08/11/2025
Trump's new executive order threatens US scientific freedom  – DW – 08/11/2025

DW

time2 hours ago

  • DW

Trump's new executive order threatens US scientific freedom – DW – 08/11/2025

A new executive order grants Trump appointees authority over all US federal research funding. Critics say the order is an authoritarian assault on science. The US position as a global leader in science has long hinged on its research freedom and independence from political interference. A new executive order signed by US President Donald Trump on August 7 now threatens to overturn this paradigm. The executive order, titled "", grants political appointees sweeping authority over all federal grant funding. If implemented, political appointees — not scientists — would take control over decisions about research grants. It would, among other changes, allow political appointees to overrule advice from scientists on award decisions, and let them terminate ongoing grants based on political criteria. Scientists and research advocates have slammed the executive order, saying it enhances Trump's control over scientific research and universities. They warn it will replace scientific merit with ideological loyalty to the Trump administration. Victor Ambros, who won the 2024 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for the discovery of microRNA, called the order "unpatriotic in the extreme." "[The order is] a shameless, full-bore Soviet-style politicization of American science that will smother what until now has been the world's preeminent scientific enterprise. Until this administration, the single overarching priority for public funding of research has been scientific excellence. That is why our country has been so successful in delivering life-saving and life-enriching discoveries," Ambros said in a statement. In the last decade, the US Congress awarded ~$200 billion (€172 billion) in research grants annually to advance critical research on diseases, new technologies like AI and life-saving medicines. US-based researchers have applied for research grants from federal science agencies like the National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health (NIH). Whether scientists are awarded grants they've applied for depends on independent peer review. Panels of experts evaluate research proposals based on evidence, methodology and potential impact. The August 7 executive order changes that. Peer review from scientific experts is now only advisory — final grant-making decisions have been placed in the hands of political appointees. Those appointees can refuse to fund new grants that don't align with Donald Trump's political agenda. "[Funding] awards must, where applicable, demonstrably advance the President's policy priorities," the paper states. The order cites critical race theory, transgender sexual education programs and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) research as "far-left initiatives" that are an "offensive waste of tax dollars." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video This executive order is the latest attack on scientific research and US universities by the Trump administration. "Much of this executive order is predicated on misinformation," Jeremy Berg, a former director of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences at NIH and member of Stand Up For Science's advisory board, said in a statement. Trump froze all US federal science funding in February, then again in July, and has cut top science roles at NASA. Funding has also been cut in climate science , gender-related topics and research on potentially life-saving mRNA vaccine technologies. Kenneth Evans, an expert in science and technology public policy at Rice University in Texas told DW in February that the Trump administration has made the US "a hostile place for researchers." Medical associations warn that the President's ongoing assault on science is derailing the US' reputation as a scientific powerhouse and crippling vital research. "Grant review by political appointees will further impede the work of the scientific community to provide solutions and fight public health threats," said American Society for Microbiology CEO Stefano Bertuzzi. "With strong and responsible oversight, we need to harness — not suppress — all perspectives and approaches in the effort to solve these problems," said Bertuzzi in a statement. Given that the executive order faces such strong criticism, it will almost certainly also face legal challenges. Opponents are likely to argue that the order violates safeguards designed to keep scientific research free from political oversight. Science advocates are hoping Congress will act to block or modify its provisions, much like it did to protect the NIH's federal budget in view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

Widespread Job Losses Across US Industries Raise Recession Concerns
Widespread Job Losses Across US Industries Raise Recession Concerns

Int'l Business Times

time3 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Widespread Job Losses Across US Industries Raise Recession Concerns

More than half of all U.S. industries reported job cuts in July, a pattern that economists say has historically preceded economic downturns. According to Fortune, , with healthcare being the only major sector still adding jobs. Zandi described the figure as a "telling" warning sign, noting that such broad-based declines often appear in the early stages of recessions. The U.S. jobs report for July showed the economy added only 73,000 positions, far below expectations. Employment growth in May and June was also revised downward by a combined 258,000 jobs, signaling that earlier labor market strength was overstated. The unemployment rate rose to 4.2 percent, while the labor force participation rate fell for the third straight month to 62.2 percent, according to Reuters. In a post on X, Zandi cautioned that the economy is "on the precipice of recession" but not yet in one, adding that a policy shift could still help reverse the trend. He emphasized that sustained weakness across multiple sectors, rather than a single month's data, is the more reliable indicator of an oncoming downturn, as reported by Business Insider. Signs of strain are also emerging in unemployment benefit data. Nearly two million Americans are currently receiving unemployment assistance—the highest number since late 2021—indicating that more job seekers are struggling to find new work, according to The Washington Post. Economists point to a combination of factors behind the slowdown. Tariffs on a wide range of imports and tighter immigration restrictions have been weighing on both consumer demand and the labor supply, particularly in manufacturing and construction. These policy-driven headwinds, combined with slowing hiring momentum, are heightening the risk of a broader economic contraction, as reported by Business Insider.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store