489 road projects hit slow lane
Union Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari, in a written reply to the Rajya Sabha, said the government is making all efforts to resolve the pending issues in close coordination with state governments and other stakeholders to complete these projects.
Gadkari said cost overrun has been incurred in some of the delayed projects due to various factors like enhanced cost of compensation for land and structures, price escalation, Goods & Services Tax (GST) impact, additional VUPs/PUPs on public demand or otherwise, change in General Arrangement Drawing (GAD)/design for Road Over Bridges/Road Under Bridges (ROBs/RUBs) to meet the Railway standards, etc.
If projects are inordinately delayed due to some reasons and further progress under the ongoing contract is not envisaged, the contract is terminated/foreclosed and re-awarded, with or without modification in the project configuration, he added. Responding to a separate question, Gadkari said national highways are constructed in accordance with specifications of Indian Road Congress (IRC).
'The maximum design speed specified for construction of national highways in different terrains is 120 km/h for expressways and 100 km/h for national highways,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
21 minutes ago
- India Today
At Youth Parliament, young ‘Home Minister' slams Pakistan over cross-border terrorism
A youth-led simulation of parliamentary proceedings in the Rajasthan Assembly on Monday saw a strong intervention from 17-year-old Sonakshi Bhattacharya, a student, who was given the portfolio of Home Minister for the during a session on national security, Bhattacharya addressed cross-border terrorism. Her fiery speech on the issue has attracted nationwide attention, with some saying it reflects a new India taking a firm urged a united approach to tackling the threat and reminded the House of incidents such as Pulwama and Pahalgam, stating that such attacks underline the urgency for collective national resolve. She spoke firmly about how terrorists use religion to kill innocents, saying, 'Agr koi Dharma puchke marga tou hum dharma btake marenge.'Bhattacharya, in her address, said peace could not be sustained without adequate preparedness.'Peace can be built with strength,' she said, emphasising the need for a well-equipped security apparatus backed by technology and operational event, called the Youth Parliament, brought together students from across the country to debate and deliberate on key issues in the format of actual legislative PARLIAMENT DEBATES KEY ISSUESBhattacharya criticised what she described as deliberate attempts by a neighbouring country to destabilise India, noting that the policy of using terrorism as a tool was eroding trust and threatening stability in the Rajasthan Assembly held the 4th Youth Parliament, an initiative of the Indian government, bringing together 168 students from 13 states to debate national and global said the purpose of the Youth Parliament was to familiarise students with the working of democratic institutions, giving them a platform to research, articulate, and debate issues of public programme is modelled on the actual rules and procedures of legislative bodies, with participants taking on roles such as ministers, opposition leaders, and members of the speech stood out for its focus on specific events and its call for a united, non-partisan approach to national intervention underscored that, for the next generation, debates on peace and security are not distant policy matters but questions that will shape their Youth Parliament concluded with resolutions passed on multiple issues, reflecting a range of participants, it was both a lesson in governance and an exercise in understanding the responsibilities that come with leadership.- EndsTrending Reel
News18
31 minutes ago
- News18
Will Govt Staff Get 18-Month Frozen DA Arrears? Here's What the Finance Ministry Says
Last Updated: Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the central government put a hold on three instalments of dearness allowance to reduce financial strain during the economic disruption. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the central government froze three instalments of Dearness Allowance (DA) and Dearness Relief (DR) for its employees and pensioners. This decision came as a result of severe economic disruption and the need to reduce pressure on government finances. The move affected payments due from January 1, 2020, July 1, 2020, and January 1, 2021. The freeze prompted questions in Parliament regarding when the pending arrears would be cleared and the government's fiscal health during and after the pandemic. Member of Parliament Anand Bhadauria asked the government about the DA and DR arrears, seeking clarity on the reasons behind the freeze and the current status of payments. In response, the government explained that the freeze was necessary due to the pandemic's financial impact and the additional welfare measures undertaken to support citizens during that period. What is Dearness Allowance? Dearness Allowance (DA) is extra money given to government employees to help them keep up with rising prices. Dearness Relief (DR) is the same kind of support, but for pensioners, so inflation doesn't reduce their spending power. When asked whether the freeze was due to economic disruption and to ease pressure on finances, the government stated: 'The decision to freeze three instalments of Dearness Allowance (DA) / Dearness Relief (DR) to Central Government employees/pensioners due from January 1, 2020, July 1, 2020 & January 1, 2021 was taken in the context of COVID-19, which caused economic disruption, to ease pressure on government finances." On the question of the government's fiscal condition, the government clarified: 'The fiscal deficit of the government of India has narrowed from 9.2 per cent in the Financial Year (FY) 2020-21 to 4.4 per cent in the FY 2025-26 (Budget Estimates)." Regarding when the arrears of 18 months' DA/DR would be paid, the government explained that the economic impact of the pandemic, combined with additional welfare spending, left no room in the budget for these payments: 'The adverse financial impact of pandemic in 2020 and the financing of welfare measures taken by the Government had a fiscal spill over beyond FY 2020-21. Therefore, arrears of DA/DR were not considered feasible." This clarification comes amid growing talk about the 8th Pay Commission, which got approval from the Union Cabinet in January this year but hasn't been officially set up yet. Once the commission is formed, it will meet with stakeholders and prepare a detailed report, usually taking over a year. The report will suggest changes to salaries and allowances for central government employees. Typically, when a new pay commission is implemented, the DA is reset to zero. At present, under the 7th Pay Commission, DA is 55 per cent of basic pay. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Resignation only option before Justice Varma to avoid removal by Parliament, rules say
As Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla announced a committee to probe charges of corruption against Justice Yashwant Varma , resignation is the only option left for the Allahabad High Court judge to avoid removal by Parliament . The inquiry committee comprises Supreme Court judge Aravind Kumar, Madras High Court Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and senior Karnataka High Court advocate B V Acharya. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program "The committee will submit its report as early as possible. The proposal (for removal of Justice Varma ) will remain pending till the receipt of the report of the inquiry committee," Birla told Lok Sabha on Tuesday. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Brain tumor has left my son feeling miserable; please help! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo Birla said he had received a proposal from 146 Lok Sabha members, including BJP's Ravi Shankar Prasad and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, seeking removal of Justice Varma on July 21. Officials aware of the procedure to appoint and remove Supreme Court and high court judges pointed out that while defending his case before lawmakers in any of the House, Justice Varma can announce that he is quitting and his verbal statement will be considered as his resignation. Live Events Should he decide to resign, he will get pension and other benefits entitled to a retired high court judge. But if he is removed by Parliament, he will be deprived of pension and other benefits, they noted. According to Article 217 of the Constitution, a high court judge "may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office". A judge's resignation does not require any approval. A simple resignation letter is sufficient. A judge may give a prospective date to step down. In such cases, the judge can withdraw the resignation before the date he or she has mentioned as the last day in office. Removal by Parliament is the other way a judge can vacate office. Then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna had written to the president and the prime minister to remove Justice Varma, mired in the cash discovery row. Justice Khanna's report was based on the findings of a three-judge in-house panel which investigated the case. Justice Khanna had prodded Varma to resign but he had refused, sources had earlier said. According to the Judges (Inquiry) Act of 1968, once a motion to remove a judge is admitted in any of the Houses, the speaker or the chairman, as the case may be, will constitute a three-member committee to investigate the grounds on which the removal (or, in popular term, impeachment) has been sought. The committee consists of the chief justice of India (CJI) or a Supreme Court judge, the chief justice of one of the 25 high courts and a " distinguished jurist". According to the rule, a committee has to be constituted and then the committee has to submit a report and the report will be tabled in the House and discussions will start to impeach. A fire incident at Justice Varma's residence in the national capital in March, when he was a judge at the Delhi High Court , had led to the discovery of several burnt sacks of cash at the outhouse. Though the judge claimed ignorance about the cash, the Supreme Court-appointed committee indicted him after speaking to a number of witnesses and recording his statement. The apex court has since repatriated him to his parent high court, the Allahabad High Court, where he has not been assigned any judicial work. Supreme Court judge V Ramaswami and Calcutta High Court judge Soumitra Sen had earlier faced impeachment proceedings but they resigned. Justice Varma's will be the first ever impeachment proceeding to be taken up in the new Parliament building.
