Why did council vote to tear down historic hotel against advice?
East Lothian councillors were split over the decision to approve plans to tear down the Golf Hotel in North Berwick – with the local authority leader given the casting vote.
The hotel closed commercially in 2006 and was used by its owners as staff accommodation until it was bought by its current owners during the pandemic.
Caledonian Heritable bought the building in 2021 and applied for permission to demolish it and build 14 luxury flats on the site on Dirleton Avenue.
However, the proposals were recommended for refusal by planning officers who said it had not been proven that the hotel could not continue to operate as a commercial venture.
Historic Environment Scotland (HES) objected to its demolition after describing the building as having historic and architectural significance in the town.
During a planning committee meeting on July 25, the controversial proposal was voted on.
Councillors were split evenly: four approved the proposal, and four rejected it.
Council leader Norman Hampshire had the deciding vote and opted to approve the plans, citing that the current building is 'nothing like' what it was.
The Labour councillor said: 'The building is in really poor condition and it has been for some considerable time.
'I don't think it has any enhancement to the conservation area, and I'm really surprised that Historic Environment Scotland seem to only come in to applications when certain influential people come in to notify them of things.
'There is no consistency in how they respond to this planning authority.'
However, the representative for the North Berwick coastal ward, SNP councillor Liz Allan, believes the plans to demolish the building are an act of 'cultural vandalism.'
She said: 'We are replacing something that is quite beautiful and could be changed into something, that I wouldn't say is hideous, but it is certainly dull.
'I think it is really going to be a blight on the landscape, so I don't think I can make myself any clearer, I am definitely against this.'
In a letter to the local authority, Scottish ministers have confirmed they will consider the application themselves and issue a decision.
It comes after the Architectural Heritage Society of Scotland (AHSS) also called for Government intervention. The AHSS described the unlisted building as 'architecturally distinguished' and added that it occupies a 'key position in the North Berwick conservation area.'
Objectors to the demolition said the building should be given listed status and was an important part of the town's conservation area.
A spokesperson for Historic Environment Scotland (HES), said: 'We were consulted by East Lothian Council on an application for the total demolition of 34 Dirleton Avenue, a former Golf Hotel in North Berwick, which is within the North Berwick Conservation Area.
'We objected to the application in October 2024 as the building contributes to the character of the Conservation Area and the application did not justify the loss of this building against relevant national policy and guidance.'
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
23 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Revealed: 13,000 Scots oil and gas jobs disappear in a year
The UK government has been standing firm on the denial of future oil and gas exploration licences which it was felt was required to meet global warming targets - while it has emerged that Scotland has been losing on average 37 oil and gas jobs every day. According to the trade association, Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) the number of jobs both directly and in the broader supply chain in North Sea oil and gas in Scotland has dropped by nearly half since 2013 from 117,900 to just 60,700 in 2023. And in the last full year tracked there was a loss of 13,400 jobs with hundreds more expected to be shed with the closure of Scotland's only oil refinery. And the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) analysis for the first quarter of this year shows that net energy import dependency - which measures how much the UK needs to buy in after accounting for exports is at 47%. That's nearly 10% more than in 2019 - when net import dependency was at 38.7%. Overall, energy production in the first three months of this year is 25% lower than in the pre-pandemic year of 2019. And production of petroleum products dropped by 7.1% in a year. The department has put that down in part to winding down operations at the Grangemouth oil refinery which stopped processing crude oil after a century of operations in April. READ MORE: Enough is enough: 50 Scots councils seek ministers summit on green energy 'wild west' 'Justice in the dock': UN probes Scots judge-led body's 'breach' of international law 'National shame': Scots firms get nothing from £350m of SNP-backed ferry deals Owners Petroineos is planning a transition of the site to become an import terminal for finished fuels. It is being closed down with the loss of 430 of the 2,000 jobs based at the sprawling 1,700-acre industrial complex with around 100 currently remaining. Unions fought to save Scotland's last oil refinery (Image: Andrew Milligan) OEUK has told the UK Government, which is discussing the future of the [[North Sea]], that issuing no new oil and gas licences for the exploration of new fuels will result in the UK being more reliant on imports of oil and gas to meet energy demands. They warned in a briefing: "This is not in the national interest and undermines UK energy security and climate goals." Their analysis says that UK Government advisers, The Climate Change Committee (CCC), estimate the UK will require 13-15 billion barrels of oil and gas equivalent (boe) in the period 2025 to 2050 to meet its energy needs. But they say the North Sea Transition Authority forecasts the UK to produce only 4 billion barrels of oil and gas in the period 2025 to 2050 less than one third of the balanced path. They warn that importing energy takes away support for production at home to support the Scottish and UK economy with the spin off on endangering jobs and therefore less tax to the Treasury. But it also says that relying on imported energy instead of domestic North Sea supplies can increase the carbon footprint by up to four times because it has to be transported. "OEUK do not support the premise that no longer awarding future oil and gas licences is climate leadership," they said. "The award of new licences is part of managing the UK basin and support for this provides a clear signal that investment in future oil and gas is welcomed by this government. Without access to new licences, investment in the basin will fall and the life of existing fields and assets will be shortened." It comes as oil and gas business leaders discovered they had an ally in US president Donald Trump who has supported more [[North Sea]] oil and gas production. During his visit to Scotland he called the North Sea a 'treasure chest' and attacked the UK's tax regime for oil and gas companies. Donald Trump walks onto the first tee for the official opening of the New Course, the second championship course at Trump International Golf Links on the Menie Estate in Balmedie, Aberdeenshire.(Image: Jane Barlow) He wrote on his Truth Social account during his visit: "They have essentially told drillers and oil companies that 'we don't want you'. Incentivize the drillers, FAST. A VAST FORTUNE TO BE MADE for the UK, and far lower energy costs for the people!' The oil and gas industry has repeatedly criticised the windfall tax, which was introduced in May 2022 and subsequently extended and increased. OEUK has called on Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to remove it by 2026. Mike Tholen OEUK policy director told the Herald that the skills and expertise of workers was "driving innovation in cleaner energy production". He said the UK oil and gas industry has more than halved methane emissions since 2018 and reduced overall emissions associated with the production of oil and gas by 28% in the same time frame. And he said this means the UK will achieve targets agreed with government for methane reduction seven years ahead of the 2030 deadline and exceed the 25% reduction target for production emissions four years ahead of schedule. And in a warning to UK ministers the body added: "The North Sea is a strategic national asset that has powered the UK economy and homes through oil and gas for the past 50 years and it is only right that it is managed as such. "The North Sea is uniquely placed to support our energy future boasting the second largest offshore wind capacity in the world and the geology to store over 78 gigatons of carbon dioxide in our reservoirs to decarbonise hard to abate sectors in the UK and beyond whilst responsibly producing oil and gas. "With supportive policy, the North Sea will continue to power the country through responsible production of oil and gas alongside the build out of the renewable energy. The successful path for the UK is one that recognises the role of both oil and gas plus renewables; and not one versus the other, to deliver an integrated energy system that can respond to the UK's needs. Homegrown energy production must be prioritised over imported energy." They say without issuing new licences to explore new fields there and to supplement a cut in UK energy production reduction, there will have to be an increase in "carbon intensive" liquefied natural gas imports to meet demand. And they warn that in the past any rise in LNG imports has led to a rise in the wholesale price of gas and that action would be needed to ensure consumers do not pay significantly more on energy bills. There have been protests over plans for the Rosebank oil and gas development "The UK will continue to need oil and gas as part of an integrated energy mix for decades to come and this decision [to no longer award future oil and gas licences] will mean UK demand will be increasingly filled with carbon intensive LNG imports. For those working in the UK oil and gas sector, and more widely in industrial Britain, this is not a definition of climate leadership that is recognised," the OEUK warned. A court has rule that consent for two new major Scottish oil and gas fields was granted unlawfully and their owners must seek fresh approval from the UK government before production can begin. A judgment on the Rosebank and Jackdaw fields came after a case brought by environmental campaigners, Uplift and Greenpeace, at the Court of Session in Edinburgh found that a more detailed assessment of the fields' environmental impact was required, taking into account the effect on the climate of burning any fossil fuels extracted. It said work on both fields could continue while the new information was gathered but no oil and gas could be extracted unless fresh approval was granted. Shell's Jackdaw gas field in the North Sea was originally approved by the previous UK Conservative government, and the industry regulator, in summer 2022. Permission for the Rosebank oil development, 80 miles west of Shetland in the North Atlantic, was granted in autumn 2023. Uplift, the campaign group that campaigns for a rapid and fair transition away from oil and gas said that the reliance on foreign gas was going to rise unless there is a shift to renewable energy, like wind. Tessa Khan, executive director, said: "It's a bit rich of the industry to turn round and blame job losses on this government's future plans, when the last couple of years have seen the highest industry profits but the lowest level of industry investment in the basin in five decades. These aren't being invested in the UK's shift to clean energy – the majority of North Sea operators invest nothing in UK renewable energy with some ruling it out altogether – they are going to shareholders. 'The fact is, as the basin declines, so have the number of jobs supported by the industry... in the past decade... even though the government has issued hundreds of new licences in this period. "The industry knows all this. That it is using the very serious issue of job losses to lobby against taxes on its profits and an end to licensing, is unedifying if unsurprising. "This government must put the needs of workers for secure jobs with a future – and the public for affordable, clean energy – ahead of the self-interested lobbying of oil and gas companies." A DESNZ spokesperson said: 'We have taken rapid steps to deliver the next generation of good jobs for North Sea workers in a fair and orderly transition as part of our Plan for Change, including by making the biggest investment in offshore wind and two first-of-a-kind carbon capture storage clusters. 'This comes alongside Great British Energy, which has already announced £1 billion in investment in British supply chains, unlocking significant investment and helping to create thousands of skilled jobs, progressing our mission to make the UK a clean energy superpower.'
The Herald Scotland
38 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Where is the vision to provide jobs from green energy projects?
Both Westminster and Holyrood focus on the production of green energy but fail to provide the major benefits of manufacturing the components that would provide work for thousands. There is no ambition, vision or plan for our manufacturing industry but they will be providing millions in funding for rich energy companies while manufacturing is bereft of work. Robert Buirds, Port Glasgow. The public will be sickened The decision in principle by the Scottish Government to grant planning permission for a completely unnecessary massive offshore wind farm, Berwick Bank, to be constructed in an environmentally sensitive location beggars belief, especially given the scale of the well-judged opposition which has simply been ignored. We note that "SSE Renewables will have to provide a plan to counter any impact the wind farm may have on seabirds to be approved by ministers", but this is thin gruel, especially as SSE is quoted as admitting in its own environmental impact assessment that more than 31,000 bird collisions are estimated during its lifespan. What will its proposed "mitigation" provide? It is to be hoped that it will be something better than the farcically inappropriate plans that Equinor has put in place to construct an inappropriately sited nesting habitat for Arctic terns hundreds of miles from its proposed massive wind farm extension off the coast of Norfolk. Whatever it is, it is difficult to see how it can provide more than a small sticking plaster for a deliberate act of ecocide that should never have been granted permission The Scottish Government may well have shot itself in the foot. Even people who would not normally object to a wind farm are sickened by this decision. The sleeping giant in the name of Joe Public has awakened. Aileen Jackson, Scotland Against Spin, Uplawmoor. Read more letters Energy transition is a farce The energy transition of Scotland (and the UK) is veering from ambition to farce. Most people acknowledge climate change's reality and support action, but current policies are incoherent and self-defeating. Shutting down North Sea oil and gas while obsessing over intermittent wind energy leaves us all paying a steep price. That price is staggering. Our energy costs, the highest in Europe and roughly four times those in the US, strangle industry, export our carbon footprint to high coal-burning nations, deter investment, and undermine ambitions to lead in high-tech sectors like artificial intelligence. Data centres, vital for AI, demand vast electricity and water supplies – ambitions that will vanish without secure, affordable power. Wind power has a role, but its limitations are stark. Intermittent turbines require 100% backup like costly, potentially hazardous battery parks, idling gas plants, and nearly doubled transmission lines scarring the Highlands. We must also confront the 'green' components' toxic waste and China's dominance of the supply chain, leaving us strategically vulnerable. Meanwhile, a gold rush mentality prevails. Landowners and foreign developers reap fortunes, communities receive scant 'shiny beads', and massive infrastructure rises despite local objections. This mishmash of ideas, driven by political vanity rather than strategy, lacks joined-up thinking. In the First World War, people spoke of 'lions led by donkeys'. Today, we have citizens and businesses led by donkey politicians, stumbling through an energy policy that is economically ruinous and strategically reckless. The solution is obvious: a balanced energy mix: renewables, nuclear for baseload, and domestic hydrocarbons (including 'clean' cheap coal for specific industries like steel and AI) to bridge intermittent failures and the high cost of renewables. Without this, net zero risks collapsing under its own absurdities. Ian Lakin, Aberdeen. Labour's brass neck Surely a special brass neck award is due to the Labour Party on its gaslighting of Scotland? In June Rachel Reeves informed Equinor, the Norwegian energy giant, that the extra tax on Scotland's oil and gas industry would be spent on carbon capture; £22 billion is to go to carbon capture in England while Scotland has been promised a miserly £200 million. The utterly useless Scottish Secretary Ian Murray is bragging of a 'massive jobs opportunity for Scotland' over defence spending, when the bulk of any new money will go to building submarines in England. Typically Scotland has received only about half of its per capita spend (4% for 8.2% of the population) due over decades (Whitehall even stopped publishing the stats because they were so bad) and the money usually goes to big corporations rather than local companies. Isn't it time that these pronouncements were fact-checked by the media, and the political operators making them were put on the spot, because they are so out of line with the truth? GR Weir, Ochiltree. Disgraceful Festival bans Speaking on Sky News, well-known actor Brian Cox has once again criticised Donald Trump and reiterated his desire for Scottish independence. He might be in Edinburgh right now but normally he resides in does not help. Additionally he has waded in to say he abhors "cancel culture" but the very festival he is appearing at has done just that by banning two comedians because they were Jewish. It has allowed actors in favour of Palestine without a problem. Mr Cox can perhaps see the dilemma here? Can we expect him to speak out over these cancellations and, in fact, can we expect his beloved SNP Government to speak out too? It is not a good look for the [[Edinburgh]] Festival which ought to be promoting Scottish values including fairness. Dr Gerald Edwards, Glasgow. Why heed Netanyahu? Benjamin Netanyahu continues to enact his policy of ethnic cleansing unabated in Gaza using starvation and a variety of other methods. It beggars belief that Rebecca McCurdy obviously considers such an individual's opinion on the future of [[Gaza]] of some worth ("Why PM missed mark on recognising state of [[Palestine]]", [[The Herald]], July 31), citing that the recognition of a Palestinian state would be rewarding Hamas. We have surely arrived at a dangerous and surreal place when we are asked to heed the advice of someone indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court, regarding the very people he is killing. Khalida Rasul, Glasgow. Terror does have its rewards With spectacular irony, the Israeli regime describes the recognition of a Palestinian state as a reward for terrorism. They should know! For 80 years they have inflicted terror on the Palestinian people, culminating now in the murder of 60,000 people. If that is not an act of terror, what is? This piece of nonsense is repeatedly echoed by the BBC and our print Israel has been richly rewarded for it in the form of land acquisition and military support from the United States and the United Kingdom. Clearly, terror has its rewards. David Currie, Tarland. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Image: PA) Why change UK policy? For whatever good reason, the UK Government's policy for years has been that it doesn't recognise the existence of a state of [[Palestine]]. What has changed to persuade it that its previous justification for that policy no longer exists? Trying to influence [[Israel]] to do something is a different matter unrelated to that justification which surely remains in place? Prime Minister Starmer therefore needs to explain precisely what he believes allows him now, all of a sudden, to dismiss the previous justification for the long standing non-recognition policy. It would be helpful also if at the same time he clarified the borders of such a state he intends to recognise and his intention to maintain the current UK proscription of Hamas. Finally, he needs to address the intervention by 40 peers (including seven KCs) questioning the legitimacy of his intentions. All in all, it is beginning to look like another u-turn is likely in September. Even if recognition actually does happen, it will be pointless as Keir Starmer must know [[Israel]] will simply ignore it. History will judge it as no more than an ill-thought-out party political stunt in an attempt to placate his backbenchers and shore up Labour's Muslim vote on which the election of some of them depends. Alan Fitzpatrick, Dunlop.
The Herald Scotland
38 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scots activists speak out as Palestine Action ban reviewed
Davidson, who is a senior figure in the Scottish [[Palestine]] Solidarity Campaign (SPSC), said: 'There is a very clear approach that has been taken by police up and down the UK. People have been arrested for wearing t-shirts and others have been challenged by police over [[Palestine]] flags and anti-Israel placards. 'Some of our members are more at risk when it comes to anti-terror legislation, and we've informed them of this. Of course, any risk we might take is nothing in comparison to what Palestinians are going through.' Protestors gathered in London ahead of the ban. (Image: Lucy North / PA) Davidson was one of several high-profile activists who were surveilled by police during US President Donald Trump's visit to Scotland last week. According to video evidence viewed by The National the force carried out daily bail checks at Davidson's address, as well as those of others. She told The Herald: 'It was a bit scary. I have a young daughter at home. I feel like I've disassociated at times, this isn't the country and the values people say they hold.' Davidson also hit out at Keir Starmer's plan to recognise the State of [[Palestine]] in September if [[Israel]] does not take steps to provide humanitarian aid and end the war in Gaza. She said: 'It's consistent with Keir Starmer's approach to this. He seems to believe that the inalienable rights of Palestinians, such as food, water, and self-determination, are dependent on Israel. That is not the case. 'An entire classroom of Palestinian children have been killed every day since the start of the war. If a classroom of Israeli children were being killed every day, there's no way Starmer would have given Israel a month's notice. 'The two-state solution only maintains the status quo. Meanwhile, Israel is taking more land and killing more people. Palestinians need the killing to stop.' Keir Starmer has said the UK will recognise a Palestinian state if Israel does not end the war in Gaza by September. (Image: Toby Melville/PA Wire) Last month, Palestine Action was proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000 after causing £7m of damage to two jet planes at RAF Brize Norton. This means that expressing support for or being a member of the group is a criminal offence, punishable by up to 14 years in prison. During the TRSNMT festival last month, a 55-year-old man was charged under anti-terror legislation for allegedly wearing a t-shirt bearing the message "Genocide in Palestine Time to Take Action,' which had been produced by the SPSC. According to reports, the words 'Palestine' and 'Action' were in a larger font than the other text. SPSC spokesperson Mick Napier said: 'We put this T-shirt out because we wanted to use the furore around the ban to draw attention to the genocide. The T-shirt is not about Palestine Action, it's about genocide.' 'We're getting a substantially different response from the public even than two months ago. The atrocious actions in Gaza are burning deep into the national and international psyche.' On July 18, a 64-year-old man was arrested in Glasgow under the legislation for allegedly holding a sign bearing the same words. Police officers had asked the man to put the sign away, but he is alleged to have refused. And three men were arrested in Edinburgh for 'showing support for a proscribed organisation' in two separate incidents on July 19 and July 21. Leading charities have raised the alarm over the risk of famine in Gaza. (Image: AP) More than 200 people have been arrested across the UK on suspicion of expressing support for Palestine Action since the ban came into force. Davidson told The Herald: '[The proscription] is having a knock-on effect. It doesn't happen in a vacuum. 'The Scottish Government needs to do more. They released a statement calling for a ceasefire very early on, but have yet to call the conflict a genocide. Not to mention, they continue to fund arms companies through Scottish Enterprise.' Meanwhile, a High Court judge has ruled that [[Palestine]] Action will be allowed to challenge their proscription at a full judicial review of the Home Office's decision in November. Mr Justice Chamberlain rejected calls by the group to lift the proscription order ahead of the review, which means Palestine Action remains a banned organisation. Read more: Court bid to block Palestine Action being designated as terror group fails Glasgow man arrested over 'Palestine Action poster in window' Home Office welcomes Palestine Action ban as it comes into force A Police Scotland spokesperson said: 'We have a legal duty to protect the rights of people who wish to peacefully protest or counter-protest. 'It is an offence under the Terrorism Act 2000 to be a member of a proscribed organisation or to invite or express support for them. 'This includes wearing clothing or carrying any item in public in such a way as to arouse suspicion that they are a member of, or a supporter of a proscribed organisation. 'We are working closely with the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. Where police consider there is a sufficiency of evidence, they submit reports to the Procurator Fiscal. 'The fiscal will then consider whether there is enough evidence in law and decides what action, if any, to take in the public interest.'
