Reeves rejects ‘Buy British' campaign as a response to US tariffs
The Chancellor dismissed 'inward-looking' calls from MPs for a publicity drive that would urge shoppers to buy more goods and produce grown in the UK.
It comes as Downing Street looks to change procurement rules to give an advantage to British firms bidding for government contracts.
Answering questions in the Commons on Tuesday, Ms Reeves was asked by Daisy Cooper, the Liberal Democrats' Treasury spokesman, to 'commit to a 'Buy British' campaign'.
She replied: 'In terms of buying British, I think everyone will make their own decisions.
'What we don't want to see is a trade war with Britain becoming inward-looking, because if every country in the world decided they only wanted to buy things produced in their country, that is not a good way forward.
'Our country has benefited hugely from access to global markets and we want to continue to be able to do that because that is in our national interest, for working people and businesses in our country.'
Her remarks were later echoed by the Prime Minister's official spokesman, who said Sir Keir Starmer believes it should be up to individual shoppers which products they choose to buy.
Asked if Sir Keir agreed with his Chancellor, the spokesman said: 'Well, of course, we're an open trading nation. That is something the Prime Minister and Chancellor have previously said. We want to see fewer trade barriers around the world.
'At the same time we also continue to prioritise and support British manufacturers, British producers… We can take a two-fold approach, we can be an open trading nation while also supporting British producers and manufacturers.'
Challenged on why the Prime Minister would not launch an official campaign, the spokesman replied: 'It's up to people to decide what they want to buy.
'We're not going to tell people where they buy their stuff, but the Government is always going to back British producers and manufacturers.'
A poll of 2,170 people by Savanta carried out over the weekend, from April 4-6, found almost six in 10 people (59 per cent) would support a campaign to buy more British-made goods.
Exactly half of those surveyed said they were now less likely to buy US goods in the wake of the global tariffs announced by Mr Trump.
Ms Cooper said the Government refusing to back a Buy British campaign was 'an insult to businesses being pushed to the brink'.
'This is completely out of touch with the British people who are rallying behind local businesses in their time of need,' she said.
'Buying British is a powerful way that people can get behind local businesses and show that as a country we won't give in to Donald Trump's bullying.'
Downing Street's approach is a contrast to plans being drawn up that would see major public sector projects instructed to favour British companies bidding for contracts.
This principle could apply to new transport infrastructure, offshore wind or defence investments that will be announced in this year's industrial strategy and spending review.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
19 minutes ago
- The Independent
Donald Trump may finally have the measure of Putin
Donald Trump turned out to be wrong, although it may not be tactful to point it out, because the world still needs him to support Ukraine, however grudgingly. But we told him that Vladimir Putin had no interest in making peace, and so it has proved. President Trump thought he could persuade the Russian leader to cut a deal over Ukraine. That approach might not have been as misconceived as it sometimes seemed. It might have been possible that a combination of appeasement, flattery and strong-man talk would have worked. But Putin has shown that he is not interested in negotiation. His belief in a Greater Russia, and possibly his need to wage a permanent war in order to maintain his grip on power, means that the bloodshed will continue, and even Mr Trump can see where the blame lies. It was encouraging, therefore, that Mr Trump shortened the deadline for Russia to avoid enhanced sanctions over the Ukraine war to '10 to 12 days' a few days ago. Mr Trump's deadlines are notoriously variable, but the president's meaning was clear. Equally, Mr Trump's war of words with Dmitry Medvedev, Putin's associate and the former president of Russia, confirms that there is little common ground left between Washington and Moscow. The social media spat culminated in Mr Trump sending two United States nuclear submarines to patrol 'near Russia' – after Medvedev warned the US against being drawn into direct conflict with a nuclear power. Mr Trump should never have threatened to withdraw the US's support for the Ukrainian people, but we should be grateful that he failed to follow through on that threat, even if the precise level of current US support for Volodymyr Zelensky's war effort is shrouded in secrecy. Maybe it was worth trying to do a deal with Putin, although it besmirched the reputation of American democracy that Mr Trump should have subjected Mr Zelensky – a brave leader fighting for his people in a noble cause – to that disgraceful theatrical display in the White House in February. Maybe it was worth Mr Trump rudely waking the peoples of Europe to their responsibility to meet a greater share of the cost of defending their continent. But it should never have been at the expense of the defence of the right of a free people to resist aggression. The international community bore, and continues to bear, a moral duty to defend democracy, human rights and the right to self-determination. All democracies should stand by the Ukrainian people in their time of need, however long that time shall be. No one wants the war to continue for a moment longer, but Mr Trump is now as clear as the rest of the world has been that Putin is responsible for prolonging the bloodshed. The war could end today if Putin wanted it to. For all the capriciousness of the US president, and for all the bombast of his social media communications, it seems that Mr Trump understands that Putin, and his proxy Medvedev, must not be appeased. Sending US nuclear submarines to patrol 'near Russia' is a symbolic gesture, but if what it symbolises is an increased willingness on the part of Mr Trump to support Ukraine against Putin's aggression, then it is to be welcomed.
Daily Mirror
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump made a major change to the White House and people are furious
During his first Presidency, Trump was reported to have complained that the White House is not to his taste - allegedly branding it "a real dump". Now he's decided to make some changes People are venting their fury at a major change Donald Trump has made to the White House. During his first Presidency, Trump was reported to have complained that the White House is not to his taste - allegedly branding it "a real dump". So this time around he's decided to make some changes. The first and most obvious change was the lashings of gold he applied to the Oval Office. He also added a pair of enormous mirrors to the walls of the most famous office in the world. But he's long threatened to make more permanent changes to the 'People's House'. And the first step of that renovation has been unveiled. He's paved over the world famous White House Rose Garden. The garden has remained more or less the same since 1961 when it was redesigned by Rachel Lambert Mellon during John F Kennedy's administration. Melania Trump made some tweaks to it in 2020, but nothing huge. But this time round it's a different story. Trump has replaced the entire lawn with a long, grey patio of paving stones. The corners of the patio are decorated with the Seal of the President. And someone thought it would be appropriate to make the drain holes in the shape of the American flag. It's fair to say the change has not been warmly received. Four Seasons Total Landscaping - where Rudy Giuliani held a deeply weird press conference by mistake the day Trump lost the 2020 election - is particularly unimpressed. The Republicans Against Trump Twitter account was similarly fuming. But Trump isn't going to stop there. New images have emerged of his plan to tack an enormous, gaudy ballroom onto the East Wing. And it looks remarkably like the one in his Mar A Lago club in Florida. Funny thing, Mar A Lago also has a patio, where Trump is very fond of holding court with guests and hangers on. Trump for months has been promising to build a ballroom, saying the White House doesn't have space big enough for large events and scoffing at the notion of hosting heads of state and other guests in tents on the lawn as past administrations have done for state dinners attended by hundreds of guests. The East Room, the largest room in the White House, can accommodate about 200 people. Trump said he's been planning the construction for some time. "They've wanted a ballroom at the White House for more than 150 years but there's never been a president that was good at ballrooms," Trump told reporters Thursday. "I'm good at building things and we're going to build quickly and on time. It'll be beautiful, top, top of the line." He said the new ballroom would not interfere with the mansion itself. "It'll be near it but not touching it and pays total respect to the existing building, which I'm the biggest fan of," he said of the White House. "It's my favorite. It's my favorite place. I love it." Trump said the ballroom will serve administrations to come. "It'll be a great legacy project," he said. "I think it will be really beautiful." The 90,000-square-foot ballroom will be built where the East Wing sits with a seated capacity of 650 people. The East Wing houses several offices, including the first lady's. Those offices will be temporarily relocated during construction and that wing of the building will be modernized and renovated, said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. "Nothing will be torn down," she said. White House chief of staff Susie Wiles said the president and his White House are "fully committed" to working with the appropriate organizations to preserve the mansion's "special history." "President Trump is a builder at heart and has an extraordinary eye for detail," Wiles said in a statement. Get Donald Trump updates straight to your WhatsApp! As the world attempts to keep up with Trump's antics, the Mirror has launched its very own US Politics WhatsApp community where you'll get all the latest news from across the pond. We'll send you the latest breaking updates and exclusives all directly to your phone. Users must download or already have WhatsApp on their phones to join in. All you have to do to join is click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! We may also send you stories from other titles across the Reach group. We will also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose Exit group. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Leavitt said at her briefing Thursday that Trump and other donors have committed to raising the approximately $200 million in construction costs. She did not name any of the other donors. The president chose McCrery Architects, based in Washington, as lead architect on the project. The construction team will be led by Clark Construction. Engineering will be provided by AECOM. Trump also has another project in mind. He told NBC News in an interview that he intends to replace what he said was a "terribly" remodelled bathroom in the famous Lincoln Bedroom with one that is closer in style to the 19th century.
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Corbyn has a big ego and his new party will fail, claims Reeves
Rachel Reeves has accused Jeremy Corbyn of having a 'big ego' and insists his new Left-wing party does not present a threat to Labour. The Chancellor said voters had resoundingly rejected the veteran socialist twice and 'will have the same reaction' again at the next election. At the Edinburgh Fringe Festival on Saturday, she also acknowledged a 'risk' voters would turn to Reform because of anger with the two main parties. Mr Corbyn, who led Labour to election defeats in 2017 and 2019, is setting up a new populist movement to challenge his old party from the Left. It is also being fronted by Zarah Sultana, a fellow former Labour MP, and is set to campaign heavily on Gaza and calls for more wealth taxes. Ms Reeves, who was interviewed by Iain Dale, the radio presenter, was asked whether she was worried that the new party represented a threat to Labour akin to the problem the Tories face with Reform. She said: 'Jeremy Corbyn had two chances to be prime minister and the country gave their verdict, most recently in 2019 when Labour had its worst result since 1935. 'If he wants to give it another go, be my guest. I think the voters will have the same reaction.' Asked by Dale if she was being complacent, she replied: 'It's not being complacent. He tried to destroy my party, he can have himself his own party. 'The country has rejected him twice. The bloke's got a big ego. He can have another go but I think the country will give the same verdict.' Her remarks came a day after Labour lost its first councillor to the new Corbyn party, which does not yet have a name or official leadership. Grace Lewis, a 22-year-old who sits on Coventry city council, resigned from Labour on Friday to join the rival Left-wing political movement. It has a placeholder name of Your Party, and is expected to hold its founding conference, at which a formal leadership contest could happen, in November. Last month, a YouGov poll found that almost one in three Labour supporters would consider voting for Mr Corbyn's new movement at the next election. Ms Reeves also admitted during the interview that Labour has 'disappointed' people so far and will not 'deserve' to win re-election if it does not improve. She insisted she had the balance right between tax, spending and borrowing but said achieving that had forced her to make unpopular decisions. 'Our job is to deliver on promises' She added: 'Of course you're going to disappoint people. No one wants to pay more taxes. 'Everyone wants more money... and borrowing is not a free option, because you've got to pay for it. 'I think people know those sort of constraints, but no one really likes them and I'm the one that has to sort the sums.' She admitted that there was a possibility that voters who were fed up with both Labour and the Tories would turn to Reform as an alternative. 'That is the risk and so our job is to deliver on the promises we made in our manifesto but also to show when we're making decisions who we're prioritising,' she said. 'That we're always prioritising the ordinary, working person on a modest and middle income who have been battered by cost of living challenges the last few years. 'Who haven't found their wages keeping up with inflation, when they want to see a doctor they can't get an appointment, when they're on a hospital waiting list they're on it for months. 'We need to show that things can be different, and if we don't address those things not only will we not win again, we won't deserve to win again. 'Because people voted for change and it's our job to deliver it.'
