S&P 500 could push even higher by end of year: Chart of the Day
The S&P 500 (^GSPC) is inching closer to record highs after recovering losses tied to tariff fears. Yahoo Finance anchor Julie Hyman joins Asking for a Trend in today's Chart of the Day to go over different analysts' year-end targets for the index and to explain why investors are eyeing 6,144 as the next key level for the S&P 500.
To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend here.
In today's chart of the day, we are keeping it straightforward. We are once again approaching the record high for the S&P 500 to see just how close. That's what I wanted to illustrate here today. So here we're just looking at a very straightforward uh year-to-date chart of the S&P 500. We're up a little bit on the year, but really not much changed. What's important here is the clawback that we have seen from the depths here uh where we saw tariff related losses. And because, as many investors have said to us, the worst case scenario of the most onerous, the highest tariffs on our trading partners, seems as though that worst case has been removed, at least for now. That is what has allowed stocks to rally from here. So here was the record high for the S&P 500 that was back on February 19th specifically. Since then to today, we see about a 2 and a quarter percent decline. So we're about 2 and a quarter percent from that record high level. Um and many of the investors, strategists that we've been speaking with, even as recently as today, have said they are optimistic. We could push higher from here. It's going to depend on things like getting those trade deals further down the line, seeing what happens with the tax bill that is making its way through Congress, and what does the Fed do next? Is it indeed going to cut rates once or twice before the end of the year? So those are the various things that investors are watching most closely here. In terms of where strategists are for year end for the S&P 500, there is a wide, wide dispersion that has remained in place really throughout the year. Wells Fargo at 7,000, I don't even know where that would be on this chart somewhere up there. And then the lowest uh estimate on the street is with Stifel Nicholas. That's at 5,500, so around here or so. So very broad range of outcomes. If you look at the median of those outcomes, you get 6,100, which is just a little bit above where we are today, and obviously would imply a new record for the average. So what's interesting about that 6,100, that median, is that since we saw the sort of tariff pause with China, many of those uh forecasts have been increased. The likes of Ed Yardeni at Yardeni Research, Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, City and Barclays have been raising their forecasts. Remember, they many of them cut as we saw those worst case scenarios being baked in, and then they raised when it looked like that that was removed. But when we're talking what to watch here, 614415, that was the closing record on February 19th. That is the next number to watch, Josh.
Thank you, Julie.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Falling Australian Iron Ore Quality Sparks Grade Benchmark Tweak
The iron ore industry's key pricing benchmark for seaborne cargoes will be lowered as the quality of supplies from biggest exporter Australia worsens. Platts, part of S&P Global Commodity Insights, will in January change its IODEX iron ore benchmark to 61% iron content from the current 62%, according to a notice to members on Tuesday. It also plans to update its 62.5% China iron ore spot lump premium benchmark to 62%.
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Trump's actions in Los Angeles spur debate over deportation funds in his ‘big, beautiful' bill
'All you have to do is look at what's happening in Los Angeles to realize that our law enforcement needs all the support that we can possibly give them,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The focus on some $350 billion in national security funding comes as action on the massive package is lumbering along in Congress at a critical moment. Trump wants the bill on his desk by the Fourth of July. But Senate Republicans trying to heave it to passage without Democrats are also running up against objections from within their GOP ranks over the details. Advertisement At the same time, Democrats are warning that Trump's executive reach into California — sending in the National Guard over the governor's objections and calling up the Marines — is inflaming tensions in what had been isolated protests in pockets of LA. They warned the president's heavy-handed approach has the potential to spread, if unchecked, to other communities nationwide. Advertisement 'We are at a dangerous inflection point in our country,' said Rep. Jimmy Gomez, who represents the Los Angeles area. 'Trump created this political distraction to divide us and keep our focus away from his policies that are wreaking havoc on our economy and hurting working families,' he said. 'It's a deliberate attempt by Trump to incite unrest, test the limits of executive power and distract from the lawlessness of his administration.' At its core, the bill extends some $4.5 trillion in existing tax breaks that would otherwise expire at the end of the year without action in Congress, cutting some $1.4 trillion in spending over the decade to help offset costs. The Congressional Budget Office found the bill's changes to Medicaid and other programs would leave an estimated 10.9 million more people without health insurance and at least 3 million each month without food stamps from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. At the same time, CBO said the package will add some $2.4 trillion to deficits over the decade. One emerging area of concern for Republican leaders has been the bill's status before the Senate parliamentarian's office, which assesses whether the package complies with the strict rules used for legislation under the so-called budget reconciliation process. Late Monday, Republicans acknowledged potential 'red flags' coming from the parliamentarian's office that will require changes in the House bill before it can be sent to the Senate. Leaders are using the reconciliation process because it allows for simple majority passage in both chambers, were GOP majorities are razor-thin. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise said Republicans are preparing to address the concerns with a vote in the House, possibly as soon as this week, to change the package. Advertisement Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer seized on the House's upcoming do-over vote as a chance for Republicans who are dissatisfied with the package to reassert their leverage and 'force the bill back to the drawing board.' 'They say they don't like parts of the bill — now is their opportunity to change it,' Schumer said. On Tuesday, Vice President JD Vance was dispatched to speak with one GOP holdout, Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who has pushed for deeper spending reductions in the bill to prevent skyrocketing deficits from adding to the nation's $36 trillion debt load. Other Republican senators have raised concerns about the health care cuts. But Republicans are in agreement on border security, deportation and military funding, over the objections of Democrats who fought vigorously during the committee process to strip those provisions from the bill. The package includes about $150 billion for border security and deportation operations, including funding for hiring 10,000 new ICE officers — with what Johnson said are $10,000 hiring bonuses — as well as 3,000 new Border Patrol agents and other field operations and support staff. There's also funding for a daily detention capacity for 100,000 migrants and for flights for 1 million deportations annually. The package includes $46 billion for construction of Trump's long promised wall between the U.S.-Mexico border. Additionally, the bill includes $150 billion for the Pentagon, with $5 billion for the military deployment in support of border security, along with nearly $25 billion for Trump's 'Golden Dome' defense system over the U.S. Separately, the bill adds another $21 billion for the Coast Guard. Advertisement Democrats have argued against the deportations, and warned that Trump appears to be stirring up protests so he can clamp down on migrant communities. Rep. Nanette Barragan — whose district represents the suburban city of Paramount, where the weekend Home Depot raid touched off protests — implored Americans: 'Listen to the words of this administration: They're using words like insurrection. They're using words like invasion.' She warned the administration is laying the groundwork for even steeper actions. 'That's a concern,' she said. 'That is dangerous. It's wrong.' Associated Press writer Michelle L. Price contributed to this report.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump tariffs to remain in place pending appeal, court rules
A federal appeals court on Tuesday agreed to let many of President Trump's sweeping tariffs on United States trade partners remain in effect for now, extending a pause issued late last month after a separate court ruled the tariffs were illegal. The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Trump administration's request for a longer pause after issuing a temporary stay of the lower court ruling last month. The court put the case on a fast track to be resolved by the end of this summer, noting that 'these cases present issues of exceptional importance warranting expedited en banc consideration of the merits in the first instance.' The decision comes after the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled on May 28 that Congress did not delegate 'unbounded' tariff authority to the president in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 (IEEPA), the linchpin of Trump's legal defense. Trump appealed the ruling and, hours later, the appeals court granted the temporary stay and agreed to hear arguments in the case on June 9, when the court said it would decide on a longer pause. 'Both sides have made substantial arguments on the merits. Having considered the traditional stay factors… the court concludes a stay is warranted under the circumstances,' the order read on Tuesday. Trump has sought to impose tariffs on almost all U.S. trading partners since taking office, creating whiplash in financial markets as he repeatedly delayed or adjusted the announcements.
