'Once-in-a-generation' National Infrastructure Plan sets vision for next 30 years
The strategy has been developed by the infrastructure commission, Te Waihanga, laying out the key areas in need of attention over the next three decades.
Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop acknowledged the invocation and said the recommendations aligned with the government's priorities.
Bishop cited the proposed shift towards user-pays, spatial planning, and better asset management and maintenance.
"The government is determined to improve New Zealand's infrastructure system and to work alongside the industry and other political parties to establish a broad consensus about what needs to change," he said.
The commission's chief executive Geoff Cooper said New Zealand spent a greater percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) on infrastructure compared to other high-income countries, but was in the bottom 10 percent for the value from that spend.
"To ensure New Zealanders are getting the infrastructure services they need, it's critical that we get smarter about how we invest," he said.
"A National Infrastructure Plan can help, showing where our infrastructure dollar will have the greatest impact in meeting New Zealand's future needs."
The plan contains a "Priorities Programme List" of 17 projects, six of which relate to the Defence Force. As well, it endorses the upgrade of the Reserve Bank's cash centre and vault, and the redevelopment of Hawke's Bay Regional Prison.
The commission said more investment would be needed over the next three decades in hospitals and electricity, while changes would be required in land transport investment.
The draft plan laid out a litany of problems with the existing approach, including that infrastructure projects were announced before establishing whether they were affordable or achievable.
"Half of the large projects seeking funding through central government's annual Budget lack business cases to demonstrate that they're ready to fund.
"Maintenance funds, which should provide a steady, ongoing stream of work, may get diverted to new builds. Consequently, efforts to recruit, develop, and retain a skilled workforce are stretched"
It said New Zealand needed to get smarter about infrastructure planning, and suggested easing the regulatory environment or taking a "more commercial approach".
"It's time to start fixing up our essential infrastructure assets, rather than seeing them breaking under our feet because we didn't set aside money for maintenance.
"It's time to invest in infrastructure that will lift our productivity and cut our carbon emissions.
"It's time to do new projects right, rather than dreaming big and seeing them constantly delayed, rescoped, and cancelled because they're too big for us to afford."
The plan will now go out for consultation with a final version to be published by the end of the year.
Speaking at a symposium at Parliament on Wednesday morning, Bishop said the independent plan would succeed only if it was accepted and adopted by successive governments.
"This is not the... coalition government's plan, this is New Zealand's plan. We will all be better off if we follow its recommendations," Bishop said.
He also use his speech to take a whack at "14 laggard councils" which had not yet lodged bids with the infrastructure pipeline.
"I'm going to be writing to them, saying that they need to get on board," Bishop said.
"My own view is we do need to get away from the rhetoric of needing a bipartisan pipeline, and instead we need to start talking about building bipartisan consensus on the idea that governments of all flavours should use best-practice to plan, select, fund and finance, deliver, and look after our infrastructure."
Infrastructure New Zealand chief executive Nick Leggett described the plan as a "once-in-a-generation" opportunity.
"The draft Plan is a clear-eyed assessment of the infrastructure challenges facing New Zealand, our historic under-performance and provides a solid pathway for improvement, particularly from our government agencies," he said.
"If we don't face up to this now, there will be real pain for our future generations."
Leggett said the association particularly supported the design of a "steady project pipeline" to allow providers to invest in their workforce.
Labour leader Chris Hipkins said the plan was a welcome contribution.
"If we can agree some shared priorities, we can avoid this flip-flopping cycle where everything just takes too long and costs too much."
Hipkins expected there were some assumptions in the plan that would be tested over the consultation process, and there would still be some debate over who pays for what.
"Even in transport, we have partial user-pays for public transport at the moment. There's probably going to be some differences between Labour and National, in particular about where we think the balance of that should rest."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Why Has Trust In News Fallen? The Answer Is More Complicated Than We Thought
We live in an age of declining trust in public institutions: parliament, the health and education systems, courts and police have all suffered over the past decade, both in New Zealand and internationally. And, of course, trust in the news has declined precipitously, according to regular surveys, including our own research. So, it might be tempting to roll declining trust in news media into this wider decline of trust in public institutions in general. But this is where our research disagrees. News isn't just another institution like the state, a corporation or a non-profit organisation. Ideally, it's the democratic expression of the public interest in these things. An institutional approach may help us explore the structural issues democracies face (for example, critiquing the nature of media ownership). But it also generalises, and risks obscuring the specifics of the trust problem public interest journalism faces. Nor does it recognise the distinctiveness of the ' social contract of the press ' – the necessary bond of trust between journalism and its audiences, which is key to the success of the wider social contract between the public and its institutions. News is out of sync Our research shows trust in news has plummeted from 58% of New Zealanders agreeing they can trust 'most of the news most of the time' in 2020, to just 32% in 2025. Survey respondents tell us they perceive the news to be politically biased (both left and right), and because too much seems to be opinion masquerading as news. These seemed very different from the trust issues faced by government, business and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Declining trust in those institutions has been driven more by wars, financial crises, the rise of populism and the COVID pandemic. To differentiate journalism's trust issues, we explored whether falling trust in news was (or wasn't) linked to declines in trust in other social institutions. We looked at research from the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and the global Edelman Trust Barometer, as well as our own research. We found the trajectories of trust levels for other social institutions – governments, business, NGOs – showed clear links to each other as they rose and fell, more or less in sync, over time. Trust in news, however, has been in its own lane, perhaps influenced by the others, but clearly not tethered to them. A fall in trust in government and politics, in other words, is not a predictor of a fall in trust in news. Global levels of trust Globally, we found trust in government, business and NGOs fell and then rose, roughly together, from 2020 to 2024. While not tracking each other exactly, there's a clear grouping of data points. From 2020, trust in all of them (including media in general – television, internet, radio and movies) fell rapidly and levelled out in 2021 before rising again slightly by 2024. Trust in news itself, however, behaved in almost exactly opposite ways, rising from 2020 to 2021 before falling again and levelling out in 2023. Given its impact, the global pandemic is likely a cause for these changes in 2020. However, as trust in government fell, news media – to which the public has historically turned in a crisis – actually rose. Trust levels in Aotearoa New Zealand In Aotearoa New Zealand, things were very different. While it fell globally, trust in institutions in New Zealand rose from 2020, before falling in 2022. Trust in news, however, was not rising in the early days of the pandemic as it was elsewhere. It was falling. And it continued to fall steadily until 2023. (In 2024, it would fall even more dramatically, but that data was not captured by this study.) Both sets of data – global and local – show trust in news doing largely the opposite of what trust in government and other institutions has been doing, rising when they were falling and vice versa. When journalism does its job well and exposes failings in government, we would indeed expect one to rise and the other to fall. So, we can see there may well be links between changes in levels of trust. But we can also see trust levels are not responding in unison to external sociopolitical pressures. In focus groups, we explored if there were connections between trust in news and trust in government. Older New Zealanders who didn't trust the news told us there were institutions they mistrusted: banks, insurance companies and universities, some to very high levels, and mostly born from personal experience. But they did not particularly mistrust government as an institution. And we found no direct link between their mistrust of news and their mistrust of other social institutions. Which supports the evidence we found in the global and local trust data trends. It seems the trust problems democracies have with their news services need to be addressed on their own terms, not as part of an overall picture.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
This isn't a housing market meltdown, it's a full-blown crash
The average home value in New Zealand has fallen more than 13% from its Covid-era peak, according to the latest QV House Price Index. That average is flattered by the relative stability in Canterbury and few other Southern regions like Queenstown, Southland and the West Coast. Christchurch City's average home values are just 0.2% lower than the nationwide peak. Prices in those other regions are actually above the nationwide peak in 2022. Meanwhile, in Auckland and Wellington, there has been a wipeout on a scale that used to panic the Reserve Bank when it imagined catastrophic scenarios to stress test the financial system. Values in Auckland now sit 19.7% below the nationwide peak of January 2022. Home values in Wellington City are 27.3% below the nationwide market peak. This housing slump is certainly worse than the Global Financial Market Crisis in 2008. After the GFC the average national house price fell about 5%. Economists Arthur Grimes and Sean Hyland (from Motu Economic and Public Policy Research) did some work which showed that in real (inflation-adjusted) terms, house prices fell 15.3% between 2007 and 2011. On the same basis, the last three years in Auckland and Wellington would represent not just a slump, but a serious crash. Infometrics chief forecaster Gareth Kiernan noted this week that at the same stage of the last two major property cycles (13 quarters after the December 1997 and December 2007 peaks, respectively) house prices were only 2% and 5.5% below those respective peaks. Okay, we should acknowledge that the peak in 2022 was exaggerated and artificially inflated by Covid stimulus. Sure, you can call it a phoney boom. But that doesn't make it any less real for those who bought houses at peak and now find themselves in a worrying position of having negative equity – or worse – facing a mortgagee sale. Numbers out from property data firm Cotality last week showed the number of people making losses when they sell their homes is at the highest level since 2014, with Auckland sellers being hit particularly hard. Homeowners also have short memories. We should factor Covid stimulus gains into our maths when we consider our relative wealth. But we don't. The hit to consumer confidence and retail spending is all too real. And unfortunately, while some regions are recovering, I don't think the Wellington and Auckland markets are about to turn around. The REINZ house price index, which came out on Thursday, fell by 0.5% in seasonally adjusted terms in July. That was led by a chunky 1.2% fall in Auckland. Looking at those numbers, Westpac senior economist Michael Gordon noted that Auckland's stock of unsold homes on the market has been rising again in recent months (in contrast to the rest of the country). A slump of this size used to be the stuff of nightmares for the Reserve Bank (RBNZ). A decade ago, when house price rises were in overdrive, the RBNZ ran stress tests that looked at the impact of house price falls of both 20% and 30% on the banking system. The concerns it had about banking industry risk led to the development of stricter lending criteria – devices like loan-to-value ratios (which limit the amount of lending banks can do to customers with low levels of equity) and debt-to-income ratios (which limit lending based on the ability to service payments). It's fair to say they did the job. Banks have survived this historic downturn unscathed. Hooray, thank goodness all those Aussie shareholders aren't suffering, I hear you say. Sarcasm (and big profits) aside, it is good for all of us that the financial system has stayed strong. We all know who'd be doing the bailing out if the banks started collapsing. The bad news is that the wider economy hasn't coped as well as the banks. We are clearly, as the RBNZ and many others (including myself) warned, overly reliant on the property market to bolster our economic growth. Aucklanders in particular have lived on the sugar high of rising property prices for too long. Now we're going cold turkey. Property values have become the biggest driver of consumer confidence. And so much of Auckland's small business economy is built around property-related services: building, renovation, driveways, roofing, pools, sheds, landscaping, and interior decorating and more. The city doesn't have the manufacturing sector it once did, and the tourism sector is still struggling to get back to pre-Covid levels. If there is an upside to this long, painful process, it is that it may drive a much-needed cultural shift around property in Auckland. The city needs to push harder to develop other drivers for economic growth. We do have a growing tech sector, and there's a movie and video games industry. But as much as we want to be a smart, innovative economy, these sectors aren't coming to the rescue fast enough. The idea of an extended property sector downturn that helps revitalise the productive is nice in theory. But in the real world it may involve too much pain and risks long-term damage to the economy. We should be hoping to find some sort of middle ground. We don't want to see a bungy-like bounce from bust to boom and then another bust. But we need some growth back in the property sector. There needs to be some motivation for construction companies to keep building, and we need the economic shot in the arm that housing market confidence can deliver. I'm optimistic that we might find the sweet spot this time. We are yet to see the full benefits flow through from the Official Cash Rate cuts we've already had. We can also expect rates to go lower. Another 25 basis point cut is looking like a dead cert when the RBNZ meets next Wednesday. After that, economists are divided between optimists who think that will be it and pessimists who think we'll need another one or even two cuts by the end of the year. Growth will eventually return as borrowing costs fall. But the prospects of another housing market boom in Auckland look very distant. Liam Dann is business editor at large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, as well as presenting and producing videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Shane Te Pou: 6 ways Christopher Luxon can save his Prime Ministership
Luxon spent enough time in corporate management to know that a CEO delivering numbers like that is in danger of getting the chop. He also likes to boast of his credentials in doing 'turnaround jobs'. Well, he needs one now. So, how can Luxon get his Prime Ministership 'back on track'? It's the economy, stupid New Zealand's economy isn't just bad – it's one of the worst in the developed world. We had a deep recession last year; other countries did not. And we're looking at round two. Partly, that's due to the Government suddenly cancelling, delaying or scaling back a bunch of infrastructure work, which contributed to the large loss of construction jobs. Partially, it's soaring energy prices killing our manufacturing sector. You can launch all the policies with energetic names like Investment Boost and Going for Growth you like; it doesn't matter if none of them move the needle. You spend your time trying to blame Labour for spending during a pandemic, while borrowing even more yourself for tax cuts; it doesn't create a single job. You can't spin away a crisis. It's time to take this seriously. Increase government investment and fix the energy shortage. Talk to us like adults You can practically hear the groans across the suburbs each Monday morning as Luxon whines 'well, what I would just say to you is' before repeating the same old talking points on his weekly media round. You're not trying to sell us soap, Mr Luxon. Show us you have a brain and treat us like we have brains, too. Give us genuine, considered thoughts and answers on the issues facing New Zealand. Is Christopher Luxon looking likely to be the first National Prime Minister to last only one term? Photo / Mark Mitchell Have a heart Before the National Party conference, party president Sylvia Wood said the problem is voters aren't seeing Luxon's 'humanity'. I agree. It's hard to see the humanity when he labels poor New Zealanders as 'bottom-feeders', scraps the pay equity process for 180,000 low-income workers and restricts access to emergency housing. If he is a humane guy, it's time to show it. As a Christian, Luxon must know Matthew 7:16: 'By their deeds you will know them.' Spend more time at home When Luxon said he was going to be a Prime Minister who didn't spend a lot of time inside the Wellington beltway, I don't think many of us realised just how far away he planned to be. I'm a man who likes to travel, but Luxon is taking it too far. At least one overseas trip a month, often on some pretty thin premises (what was he doing in Papua New Guinea the other week?) and with very little to show for it in diplomatic outcomes. Spend less time in the Koru Club and more time at the desk. Don't be afraid to change direction No one could accuse Luxon and his ministers of lacking self-confidence. They've ripped up ferry contracts, water reforms, light rail plans, the state house building programme, the RMA Act, the NCEA and more – all with the blithe assumption that they'll come up with something better. It's not exactly working out great, eh? Maybe it's time to revisit some of those impulsive decisions. Maybe it wasn't a great idea to borrow $14 billion for tax cuts and increase the Government's debt. Maybe, it's time to have the humility to adopt some of the Opposition's ideas, rather than reflexively scoffing at them. Pull the minor parties into line Luxon failed from the start to exert any authority over Act and New Zealand First's ministers. Casey Costello's dealings with tobacco companies should've seen her sacked. Karen Chhour's bootcamps disgrace would normally see the portfolio taken off her. Luxon's done nothing. Yeah, Winston Peters and David Seymour can threaten to pull down the Government if Luxon disciplines their ministers. But would they? It would cost them more than him. Have some guts – look them in the eye and see who blinks first. All is not lost for Luxon. But he's looking more and more likely to be the first National PM to last only one term, or less, unless he changes his ways.
