logo
US Nuclear Weapons 'Deployed' to UK for First Time in 17 Years

US Nuclear Weapons 'Deployed' to UK for First Time in 17 Years

Newsweek22-07-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The United States military has moved nuclear weapons to British soil for the first time in close to two decades, new analysis indicates.
Open-source analysts identified an aircraft taking off from the Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico, bound for the United Kingdom's Royal Air Force (RAF) base at Lakenheath, in the east of England. Kirtland Air Force Base is the headquarters of the U.S. Air Force (USAF) Nuclear Weapons Center, a main storage site for nuclear weapons.
A U.S. defense official told Newsweek the U.S. did not comment on the "status or location of strategic weapons." A spokesperson for the British Defense Ministry said: "It remains a long-standing UK and NATO policy to neither confirm nor deny the presence of nuclear weapons at a given location."
Why It Matters
Speculation has long surrounded whether the East England RAF base could once again host U.S. nuclear weapons. RAF Lakenheath hosted American nuclear weapons for several decades until 2008.
The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) said in 2023 that U.S. military budget documents "strongly" implied the Air Force intended to re-establish its nuclear weapons mission in the U.K. RAF Lakenheath—the home of the 48th Fighter Wing, dubbed "Liberty Wing"—has been upgraded in recent years.
If Washington moves nuclear weapons back into the U.K., "it would break with decades of policy and planning and reverse the southern focus of the European nuclear deployment that emerged after the end of the Cold War," the FAS said in updated analysis earlier this year.
A USAF C-17 Globemaster III from the 97th Air Mobility Wing participates in the Miami Beach Air and Sea Show on May 25, 2024.
A USAF C-17 Globemaster III from the 97th Air Mobility Wing participates in the Miami Beach Air and Sea Show on May 25, 2024.
AP/NewsBase
What To Know
Flight tracking data shows that a USAF C-17 cargo plane departed from Albuquerque for a flight of just over 10 hours to Lakenheath on July 16 and left the U.K. two days later.
"It looks like it went to England, dropped off those weapons and then it went back to regular operations in the U.S.," William Alberque, a former head of NATO's nuclear non-proliferation center, told Britain's The Times.
The U.K. government announced last month it would buy at least 12 F-35A fifth-generation aircraft, which, unlike the F-35B jets the country's RAF already operates, are certified to carry nuclear weapons. The jets will be stationed at RAF Marham, a base north of Lakenheath.
The purchase "reintroduces a nuclear role for the Royal Air Force for the first time since the UK retired its sovereign air-launched nuclear weapons following the end of the Cold War," the British government said in a statement.
The U.K. has Trident, its own nuclear weapons program made up of four Vanguard-class submarines able to fire nuclear missiles.
The U.S. has both strategic and nonstrategic nuclear weapons. Nonstrategic nuclear weapons, which in the U.S. case are variants of the B61 gravity bomb, are also known as tactical nuclear weapons. The U.S. announced at the start of the year that it had completed a long-running program to upgrade the B61 to the B61-12.
Strategic nuclear weapons are deployed on intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles, and those fired from bomber aircraft. They are thought of as the missiles that could level entire cities and threaten major global superpowers.
Unlike strategic weapons, tactical nuclear weapons are designed for use on the battlefield or in what is known as a specific theater. They have a smaller yield and are designed to be used against different targets than strategic nuclear weapons, which are limited under the New START Treaty that is due to expire in 2026.
The U.S. has an estimated 200 tactical nuclear weapons, with roughly half deployed at European bases. The U.S. is believed to have around 100 tactical bombs deployed in five NATO countries on the continent, including in Turkey, Germany and Belgium.
What People Are Saying
Sidharth Kaushal, a senior research fellow with the British think tank, the Royal United Services Institute, told The Times that the C-17 flight "could be the transport of B61s for potential use on RAF F-35As in due course.
Kaushal added, "It represents a move towards the use of tactical nuclear weapons. It reintroduces a bit of flexibility in terms of how nuclear weapons are used."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Allies To Plead With Trump, FTSE CEO Pay Record, Apollo's Wizardry
Allies To Plead With Trump, FTSE CEO Pay Record, Apollo's Wizardry

Bloomberg

time26 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Allies To Plead With Trump, FTSE CEO Pay Record, Apollo's Wizardry

Your morning briefing, the business news you need in just 15 minutes. On today's podcast: (1) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and his European allies arrive in Washington on Monday anxious to find out what Donald Trump committed to at his summit with Vladimir Putin and apprehensive that he'll force Kyiv into making unpalatable concessions. (2) UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer declared at a Jaguar Land Rover factory in May that his world-leading trade deal with President Donald Trump included a cut in US tariffs on British steel to zero. (3) Israel's economy slumped in the second quarter as the country's 12-day war with Iran imposed a total shutdown on many businesses. (4) Annual pay for bosses of FTSE 100 companies hit a record high for the third consecutive year. (5) In 1981, the year Airbus SE announced it would build a new single-aisle jetliner to take on Boeing the 737 ruled the roost. (6) Advanced Credit Solutions is a tiny finance firm based in Luxembourg that was founded by a Belgian and works with insurers. Despite its outwardly bland appearance, the business it does is anything but.

The Night Boeing's 747 Secrets Walked Out Of A Paris Restaurant Tucked In Napkins
The Night Boeing's 747 Secrets Walked Out Of A Paris Restaurant Tucked In Napkins

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Night Boeing's 747 Secrets Walked Out Of A Paris Restaurant Tucked In Napkins

Picture this: Paris, late 1960s. The Cold War is anything but cold, and the air is thick with smoke from a cool, weird Citroën DS and Chanel No. 5. Joe Sutter, chief engineer of the now nearly vanished Boeing 747, is heading to a dinner meeting that feels more like a scene from a Bond movie than a business trip. His dining companions aren't airline execs or aluminum suppliers; they're a delegation of aeronautical engineers from the Soviet Union. This wasn't some back-alley deal, either. The U.S. Department of State itself had asked Boeing to trade technical information with its primary global nemesis of the time. The whole thing was a government-sanctioned summit held on the neutral ground of a Parisian restaurant. It begs the question, why on Earth would Uncle Sam ask one of its most important companies to hand over tech to the competition? The answer, it turns out, involved a high-stakes exchange, a desperate need for a rare metal, and a whole lot of vodka. Read more: These Are The Cars You'd Buy If They Were $20,000 Cheaper A Calculated Gambit The dinner in Paris wasn't about fostering international goodwill; it was born from mutual nail-biting desperation. In the late '60s, Boeing was juggling two gargantuan projects threatening to bankrupt the company. First was the 747, a moonshot-level gamble to build the world's largest passenger jet in a 28-month timeframe. The other was the doomed supersonic Boeing 2707, the United States' planned answer to the French-British Concorde and the Soviet Tu-144 transport. America's supersonic transport (SST) program had hit a massive issue with the 2707. To fly at its target speed of Mach 2.7, its airframe needed to be made of titanium to withstand the intense heat from air friction. The problem? Boeing didn't have the expertise to fabricate titanium on that scale, but guess who did? Yup, the Soviet Union. Thanks to its vast reserves and advanced space program, it was the world leader in titanium manufacturing at the time. Meanwhile, the Soviets had their own jumbo-jet-sized problem. Their initial designs of a 747-dupe were conservative, but they were particularly stumped by one thing: why Boeing mounted its engines on pylons under the wings while Soviet designs favored putting them on the rear fuselage. This was the question they brought to Paris. The stage was set for a classic quid pro quo, with Boeing's president, Thornton "T" Wilson, orchestrating the trade. Quid Pro Quo And Some Linens The dinner began with a targeted intelligence operation, as Boeing's SST expert Bob Withington grilled the Soviet engineers on the intricate art of titanium fabrication. The Soviets enthusiastically answered every question openly and in detail. With Boeing's team getting what it needed, Wilson gave Sutter a direct order to not hold anything back. What followed was an impromptu masterclass in airliner design, sketched out on cloth napkins and the tablecloth itself because no paper was handy. A critical oversight if we're being honest, but perhaps both parties thought it too on the nose to bring notebooks. Sutter explained the genius of the wing-mounted pylon design: it provided bending relief and made the engines safer and easier to maintain. As the dinner ended, the Soviet delegation carefully rolled up the inked linens, taking home a paradigm shift in aviation philosophy. The impact was obvious. The Ilyushin Il-86, the Soviets' jumbo jet, underwent a radical redesign shortly after, ditching its rear-engine layout for a four-engine underwing configuration. It did look suspiciously like a 747. It wasn't a direct copy, though — the Il-86 was ultimately ruined by its horribly inefficient, outdated engines, showing that all the know-how in the room doesn't guarantee success. However, its fundamental design was a direct result of the secrets that walked out of a Paris restaurant, tucked away in a handful of napkins. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.

Hong Kong pro-democracy activists granted asylum in Australia and Britain
Hong Kong pro-democracy activists granted asylum in Australia and Britain

CNN

timean hour ago

  • CNN

Hong Kong pro-democracy activists granted asylum in Australia and Britain

Immigration Asia China UKFacebookTweetLink Follow A Hong Kong pro-democracy activist and a former lawmaker who are wanted by the city's authorities have been granted asylum in Great Britain and Australia, respectively. Tony Chung, an activist who was imprisoned under Hong Kong's sweeping national security law, and Ted Hui, a former lawmaker who was facing trial for his role in anti-government protests in 2019, both announced over the weekend that they have received asylum in the countries where they now live. They are among dozens of activists on the run from Hong Kong authorities. Civil liberties in the city have been greatly eroded since Beijing in 2020 imposed a national security law essentially criminalizing dissent in the former British colony. Both Beijing and Hong Kong have hailed the security law as bringing stability to the financial hub. Hui, who fled Hong Kong in December 2020, is part of a group of overseas activists who are targeted by police bounties of up to 1 million Hong Kong dollars ($127,800). The former lawmaker is now working as a lawyer in Adelaide. He announced on Facebook on Saturday that he and his family have been granted protection visas. 'I express my sincere gratitude to the Government of Australia – both present and former – for recognising our need for asylum and granting us this protection,' Hui wrote. 'This decision reflects values of freedom, justice, and compassion that my family will never take for granted.' While in Hong Kong, Hui had been an outspoken pro-democracy lawmaker. He was also known for disrupting a legislative session after he threw a rotten plant in the chamber to stop a debate of the national anthem bill — controversial legislation making it illegal to insult the Chinese national anthem. He was subsequently fined 52,000 Hong Kong dollars ($6,600) for the act. Chung, who had advocated for Hong Kong's independence, was sentenced to almost four years in prison for secession and money laundering in 2020. He was released on a supervision order, during which he traveled to Japan, from where he fled to Britain seeking asylum. In a post on social media platform Threads on Sunday, he expressed his excitement at receiving refugee status in Britain along with a five-year resident permit. He said that despite his challenges over the past few years, including persistent mental health problems, he remains committed to his activism. British and Australian authorities didn't immediately comment on the activists' statuses. Hong Kong's government did not comment directly on the cases but issued a statement on Saturday condemning 'the harbouring of criminals in any form by any country.' 'Any country that harbours Hong Kong criminals in any form shows contempt for the rule of law, grossly disrespects Hong Kong's legal systems and barbarically interferes in the affairs of Hong Kong,' the statement read.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store