The Night Boeing's 747 Secrets Walked Out Of A Paris Restaurant Tucked In Napkins
This wasn't some back-alley deal, either. The U.S. Department of State itself had asked Boeing to trade technical information with its primary global nemesis of the time. The whole thing was a government-sanctioned summit held on the neutral ground of a Parisian restaurant. It begs the question, why on Earth would Uncle Sam ask one of its most important companies to hand over tech to the competition? The answer, it turns out, involved a high-stakes exchange, a desperate need for a rare metal, and a whole lot of vodka.
Read more: These Are The Cars You'd Buy If They Were $20,000 Cheaper
A Calculated Gambit
The dinner in Paris wasn't about fostering international goodwill; it was born from mutual nail-biting desperation. In the late '60s, Boeing was juggling two gargantuan projects threatening to bankrupt the company. First was the 747, a moonshot-level gamble to build the world's largest passenger jet in a 28-month timeframe. The other was the doomed supersonic Boeing 2707, the United States' planned answer to the French-British Concorde and the Soviet Tu-144 transport.
America's supersonic transport (SST) program had hit a massive issue with the 2707. To fly at its target speed of Mach 2.7, its airframe needed to be made of titanium to withstand the intense heat from air friction. The problem? Boeing didn't have the expertise to fabricate titanium on that scale, but guess who did? Yup, the Soviet Union. Thanks to its vast reserves and advanced space program, it was the world leader in titanium manufacturing at the time.
Meanwhile, the Soviets had their own jumbo-jet-sized problem. Their initial designs of a 747-dupe were conservative, but they were particularly stumped by one thing: why Boeing mounted its engines on pylons under the wings while Soviet designs favored putting them on the rear fuselage. This was the question they brought to Paris. The stage was set for a classic quid pro quo, with Boeing's president, Thornton "T" Wilson, orchestrating the trade.
Quid Pro Quo And Some Linens
The dinner began with a targeted intelligence operation, as Boeing's SST expert Bob Withington grilled the Soviet engineers on the intricate art of titanium fabrication. The Soviets enthusiastically answered every question openly and in detail. With Boeing's team getting what it needed, Wilson gave Sutter a direct order to not hold anything back. What followed was an impromptu masterclass in airliner design, sketched out on cloth napkins and the tablecloth itself because no paper was handy. A critical oversight if we're being honest, but perhaps both parties thought it too on the nose to bring notebooks.
Sutter explained the genius of the wing-mounted pylon design: it provided bending relief and made the engines safer and easier to maintain. As the dinner ended, the Soviet delegation carefully rolled up the inked linens, taking home a paradigm shift in aviation philosophy.
The impact was obvious. The Ilyushin Il-86, the Soviets' jumbo jet, underwent a radical redesign shortly after, ditching its rear-engine layout for a four-engine underwing configuration. It did look suspiciously like a 747. It wasn't a direct copy, though — the Il-86 was ultimately ruined by its horribly inefficient, outdated engines, showing that all the know-how in the room doesn't guarantee success. However, its fundamental design was a direct result of the secrets that walked out of a Paris restaurant, tucked away in a handful of napkins.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Eli Lilly Taps High-Grade Market With Rare 40-Year Paper
(Bloomberg) -- Eli Lilly & Co. is tapping the US investment-grade debt market with a deal that's expected to include a 40-year bond, a rarity in a market characterized by high borrowing costs. The drugmaker is selling debt in as many as seven parts, with 40-year tranche set to yield 0.73 percentage point above Treasuries, according to a person familiar with the matter. Initial price discussions called for a yield in the area of 1.05 percentage points above the benchmark. A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds The deal is also expected to include a 30-year portion, as well as maturities ranging from 3 years to 10 years, the person said, asking not to be identified discussing private information. The offering comes amid a dearth of supply of long-dated corporate bonds: Just 11% of high-grade debt sold this year had a maturity of 30 years or more, down from 15% in 2024, as companies have been reticent to lock in elevated borrowing costs for long periods of time. Eli Lilly is one of nine companies selling US high-grade debt on Monday, with McDonald's Corp., Marriott International Inc. and Charter Communications Inc. among the others. Borrowers are piling in ahead of a seasonal slowdown later this month. They're also taking advantage of more favorable funding conditions: Yields this month are sitting consistently below 5% for the first time this year, yet demand continues to be robust. Most recently, investment-grade order books grew to more than five times the size of fresh supply on Wednesday, while borrowers paid just two basis points in new-issue concessions — both better than average so far this year. Citigroup Inc., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Mizuho Financial Group Inc. and Morgan Stanley are managing Eli Lilly's sale, with proceeds earmarked for general corporate purposes. The bonds are expected to be rated Aa3 by Moody's Ratings and A+ by S&P Global Ratings. Issuer Profile Debt distribution: LLY US Equity DDIS Capital structure: LLY US Equity CAST Related securities: LLY US Equity RELS Ratings history: LLY US Equity CRPR --With assistance from Michael Gambale and Boris Korby. (Updates with guidance numbers in second paragraph.) Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Living With 12 Strangers to Ease a Housing Crunch Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
What to know about Crimea, the Black Sea peninsula seized by Russia from Ukraine over a decade ago
What to know about Crimea, the Black Sea peninsula seized by Russia from Ukraine over a decade ago Russia's illegal seizure of the Crimean Peninsula from Ukraine in March 2014 was quick and bloodless, and it sent Moscow's relations with the West into a downward spiral unseen since the Cold War. It also paved the way for Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, during which Moscow illegally annexed more land from its neighbor. A look at the diamond-shaped peninsula in the Black Sea, coveted by both Russia and Ukraine for its naval bases and beaches: How did Russia seize Crimea? In 2013-14, a massive popular uprising gripped Ukraine for weeks, eventually forcing pro-Moscow President Victor Yanukovych from office. Amid the turmoil, Russian President Vladimir Putin pounced, sending armed troops without insignia to overrun Crimea. Putin later called a referendum in Crimea to join Russia that Ukraine and the West dismissed as illegal. Russia's relations with the West plummeted to new lows. The United States, the European Union and other countries imposed sanctions on Moscow and its officials. Moscow's illegal annexation of Crimea on March 18, 2014, was recognized only by countries such as North Korea and Sudan. In Russia, it touched off a wave of patriotism, and 'Krym nash!' — 'Crimea is ours!' — became a rallying cry. The move sent Putin's popularity soaring. His approval rating, which had declined to 65% in January 2014, shot to 86% in June, according to the Levada Center, an independent Russian pollster. Putin has called the peninsula 'a sacred place' and has prosecuted those who publicly argue it is part of Ukraine — particularly the Crimean Tatars, who strongly opposed the annexation. What happened after the annexation? After the annexation, fighting broke out in eastern Ukraine between pro-Kremlin militias and Kyiv's forces. Moscow threw its weight behind the insurgents, even though it denied supporting them with troops and weapons. There was abundant evidence to the contrary, including a Dutch court's finding that a Russia-supplied air defense system shot down a Malaysia Airlines passenger jet over eastern Ukraine in July 2014, killing all 298 people aboard. Russian hard-liners later criticized Putin for failing to capture all of Ukraine that year, arguing it was easily possible at a time when the government in Kyiv was in disarray and its military in shambles. The fighting in eastern Ukraine continued, on and off, until February 2022, when Putin launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Why is Crimea important? Crimea's unique location makes it a strategically important asset, and Russia has spent centuries fighting for it. The peninsula was home to Turkic-speaking Tatars when the Russian empire first annexed it in the 18th century. It briefly regained independence two centuries later before being swallowed by the Soviet Union. Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev transferred Crimea from Russia to Ukraine in 1954, when both were part of the USSR, to commemorate the 300th anniversary of the unification of Moscow and Kyiv. In 1991, when the Soviet Union collapsed, the peninsula became part of newly independent Ukraine. Russia kept a foot in the door, however: Its Black Sea Fleet had a base in the city of Sevastopol, and Crimea — as part of Ukraine — continued to host it. By the time Russia annexed it in 2014, it had been within Ukraine for 60 years and was part of the country's identity. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has vowed to retake it and said Russia 'won't be able to steal' the peninsula. For either side, possession of Crimea is key to control over activities in the Black Sea — a critical corridor for the world's grain, among other goods. What role does Crimea play in Russia's war in Ukraine? Ahead of its full-scale invasion, Moscow deployed troops and weapons to Crimea, allowing Russian forces to quickly seize large parts of southern Ukraine early in the war. A top Russian military official later said that securing a land corridor from Russia to Crimea by holding the occupied parts of Ukraine's Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions was among the key goals of what the Kremlin called its 'special military operation' in Ukraine. Before the invasion, Zelenskyy focused on diplomatic efforts to get Crimea back, but after Russian troops poured across the border, Kyiv began publicly contemplating retaking the peninsula by force. The peninsula soon became a battleground, with Ukraine launching drone attacks and bombing it to try to dislodge Moscow's hold on the territory. The attacks targeted the Russian Black Sea Fleet there, as well as ammunition depots, air fields and Putin's prized asset — the Kerch Bridge linking Crimea to Russia, which was struck in October 2022, in July 2023 and in June 2025. How does Crimea factor into peace efforts? Putin listed Ukraine's recognition of Crimea as part of Russia among Moscow's demands for peace in 2024. Those also include Ukraine ceding the four regions illegally annexed by Russia in 2022, dropping its bid to join NATO, keeping the country's nonnuclear status, restricting its military force and protecting the interests of the Russian-speaking population. Kyiv has rejected ceding any territory. Russia currently holds roughly 20% of Ukrainian land, including Crimea, so any deal that freezes the lines more or less where they are would benefit Moscow. The Associated Press
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump says Zelenskyy can end Russia war 'almost immediately' before White House meet
LONDON -- President Donald Trump on Sunday teased what he said would be a "big day" as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and a host of European leaders prepared for a White House meeting that Trump said can end Russia's invasion of Ukraine "almost immediately." Monday's Washington, D.C., summit follows Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. Since that meeting, Trump appears to have dropped his demand for Russia to agree to an immediate ceasefire and is now pressuring Kyiv to accept territorial concessions to secure a peace deal. On Sunday, Trump explicitly said Ukraine will not regain Crimea -- occupied by Russia in 2014. The president also repeated that Ukraine will not be allowed to join NATO, though White House special envoy Steve Witkoff and Zelenskyy have hinted at alternative security guarantees involving the U.S. "President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight," Trump wrote on social media on Sunday. The president has previously incorrectly framed Ukraine as the initiator of the conflict, which began with Russia's full-scale invasion in February 2022. That invasion followed Moscow's cross-border aggression in 2014, which saw Russia seize Crimea and parts of the eastern Donbas region. "Big day at the White House tomorrow," Trump added. "I've never had so many European leaders at one time. It's my great honor to host them!!!" "NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE," Trump added. "Some things never change!!!" Trump is expected to greet Zelenskyy outside the West Wing at 1 p.m. ET, according to a schedule published by the White House, after which they will hold a bilateral meeting. The president is scheduled to take photos with European leaders at around 2:30 p.m. ET and hold a multilateral meeting with them at 3 p.m. Vice President JD Vance will also attend the Trump-Zelenskyy meeting, a source familiar with the plans confirmed to ABC News. Vance was part of the dramatic Oval Office meeting in February during which the vice president publicly berated Zelenskyy over his alleged ingratitude for U.S. wartime support. Zelenskyy said in a post to social media that he had arrived in Washington on Sunday night, expressing his gratitude to Trump for hosting the planned meeting. "We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably," Zelenskyy wrote. "And peace must be lasting," he added, noting Moscow's 2014 aggression plus the failure of the international community to enforce the 1994 Budapest Memorandum -- which was also signed by Russia -- that offered Ukraine "security assurances" in exchange for Kyiv surrendering its Cold War-era nuclear arsenal. "Ukrainians are fighting for their land, for their independence," Zelenskyy wrote. "Russia must end this war, which it itself started. And I hope that our joint strength with America, with our European friends, will force Russia into a real peace." MORE: Russia ceasefire refusal 'complicates' talks, Zelenskyy says before White House visit Friday's summit in Alaska ended with Russia demanding that Ukraine cede the entirety of its contested and fortified eastern Donetsk region in exchange for an end to the fighting, two sources told ABC News. Trump then challenged Kyiv to "make the deal" and lavished praise on Putin. "Look, Russia is a very big power, and they're not," Trump told Fox News after the meeting. Putin, he added, is a "strong guy" and "tough as hell." A host of European leaders will accompany Zelenskyy at the White House meeting. European leaders have backed Zelenskyy and Ukraine's positions during the Trump administration's pressure campaign on Kyiv. Those confirmed as attending are European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, French President Emmanuel Macron, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Finnish President Alexander Stubb. Ahead of last week's summit in Alaska, European leaders echoed Zelenskyy's position that a ceasefire must precede peace negotiations, that security guarantees for Kyiv must be put in place and that only Ukraine can make the final decision on any territorial concessions. On Sunday, French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters that he and his fellow European leaders will be traveling to Washington both to support Zelenskyy and "to defend European interests" at a "very serious" moment for the continent's security. "If we are weak today with Russia, we prepare the wars of tomorrow," Macron said, adding that Moscow had "never" respected past "promises of non-aggression." The nature of Western security guarantees for Ukraine will be a key topic for discussion, Macron said, explaining to journalists a two-pronged approach by which Ukraine's military would be bolstered and a Western "reassurance force" would be deployed to Ukraine to act as a deterrent against renewed Russian attacks. Any concessions will spark intense debate within Ukraine. The country's constitution dictates that any changes to the national borders must be approved by an all-Ukraine referendum. Kyiv's ambitions to join both NATO and the European Union are also enshrined in the constitution, meaning it may need to be amended for Ukraine to accept exclusion from either bloc. MORE: Ukrainian soldiers focus on daily battles as Trump and Putin prepare to meet "Territorial concessions are impossible," Oleksandr Mrezhko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament and chair of the body's foreign affairs committee, told ABC News. "Under the present circumstances, we need a ceasefire and security guarantees to prevent Putin from violating the ceasefire." "In my opinion, Putin's idea about a 'peace treaty' instead of a ceasefire is extremely dangerous and unacceptable for both Ukraine and the U.S.," he added. "That the U.S. offers to be engaged in security guarantees is great news for us, but we don't know yet what it will be in practice," Merezhko said. "I personally continue to believe that the best option for all -- Ukraine, the U.S. and the EU -- is NATO membership for Ukraine." "Putin is afraid of only one thing -- NATO," Merezhko added. "That's why it's the most reliable and effective security guarantee for us." MORE: Why Ukraine's ex-foreign minister believes Putin won't go for peace as Trump summit approaches Meanwhile, both Russia and Ukraine continued long-range attacks overnight into Monday. Ukraine's air force said Russia launched 140 drones and four missiles in the country, of which 88 drones were shot down or suppressed. Missile and drone impacts were reported across 25 locations in Donetsk, Kharkiv, Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk, Odesa and Kyiv regions, the air force said. At least seven people, including a child, were killed when a Russian drone impacted an apartment complex in Kharkiv, local officials said. Zaporizhzhia Gov. Ivan Fedorov said in a post to Telegram that at least three people were killed and at least 23 people injured by missile strikes in the southern region. Russia's Defense Ministry said its forces downed at least 24 Ukrainian drones overnight. ABC News' Tom Soufi Burridge, Kelsey Walsh and Hannah Demissie contributed to this report.
