
Chris Minns faces angry backlash from caucus over ‘risible' Sydney Harbour Bridge protest stance
Members of caucus are planning to move a motion in caucus condemning the conditions in Gaza and endorsing the right to protest.
The march for Palestine went ahead on Sunday after the NSW supreme court overturned a decision by NSW police to refuse a permit to march on the bridge on public safety grounds.
NSW police said initial estimates put the crowd at 90,000, while rally organisers Palestine Action Group estimated the figure was closer to 300,000.
Several NSW state MPs, including the deputy premier, Penny Sharpe, and frontbencher, Jihad Dib, joined the protest. Several other state MPs, including Stephen Lawrence, Lynda Voltz, and Sarah Kaine were at the front of the march, along with the former NSW premier Bob Carr.
Minns' stance on protests has drawn sharp criticism from members of his own right faction as well as from the soft left, who are increasingly dismayed that Minns appears to be more attuned to the News Corp media and talkback radio than his own party.
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
'There's a sense that our policy positions are at the most conservative end of the spectrum. The audience of 2GB are never, ever going to vote for us,' a member of the right faction told Guardian Australia, on the condition anonymity.
'I would just like a bit more Labor in my life,' they said.
Until now, parliamentary MPs from the hard left faction who backed Minns into the leadership have been largely silent over his clamp-down on protests and other law and order issues, such as changes to bail laws and children.
The divergent approaches within the factions are causing tensions within Minns' team.
'They've been completely missing in action,' said one right faction member of the left.
'They haven't come out on any progressive issues. It's been us, the right and some of the soft left that have been raising it, and now the base is really unhappy,' said another right faction MP.
Mark Morey, the Secretary of Unions NSW, said: 'When there's a strong public hunger to protest against violence and humanitarian crises, the government's role should be to facilitate peaceful expression, not obstruct it.'
'Yesterday's massive turnout shows that working people across Sydney are deeply concerned about Gaza, and political leaders should listen rather than look for ways to silence them,' he said.
'The premier's attempt to block this peaceful demonstration was a concerning overreach that the supreme court rightly rejected.'
Speaking on Monday, Minns said he did not regret his opposition to the protest march and it was his job to 'be on the side of public safety'.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'I accept that there's a huge groundswell … It's a difficult one for the government. We have to balance public safety and the public's right to protest … alongside running a big city like Sydney. Ultimately, my job is to be on the side of public safety,' he said.
The characterisation of his role drew a sharp response from NSW Labor's Lawrence.
'This protest was inevitable. The only way to protect public safety was to accept that and facilitate it,' he said.
'The idea of suppressing a mass protest in the name of public safety is just risible,' he said.
Lawrence said the protest organisers had offered to delay it until 24 August, but this had been rejected by a political-level refusal to accept the offer, which forced the NSW police into last-minute organisation to manage the huge crowd.
Minns also foreshadowed that the government may still appeal against the ruling by Justice Belinda Rigg on Saturday morning allowing the protest to proceed. He did not rule out legislation to restrict future protests on the bridge, although he said he would not rush any legislation.
'No one should believe that it's open season on the bridge,' he said.
Minns pointed out that in the past two years, the police had facilitated a hundred protests with the Palestinian Action Group, as well as scores of other demonstrations.
Greens MLC Sue Higginson said Minns was facing strong internal dissent over his stance and should start listening.
'Labor premier Chris Minns is acting strangely and is not listening. He has lost authority over his own caucus and on matters too significant to ignore,' she said.
'There are no current plans to march across the Harbour Bridge again, the moment has happened, it was yesterday, and the question now really has to be: where was the premier? What was more important for the premier, that he could not attend the march for humanity? There may be good reasons he did not attend, but the people do deserve to know,' she said.
'The premier also needs to understand that he has absolutely no legal power to block protests, as the courts have confirmed and nor should he.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
26 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Gaza before and after: fresh video shows extent of Israel's destruction
Footage taken by the Guardian's international correspondent, Lorenzo Tondo, shows the extent of the destruction of Gaza. The Guardian traveled on a Jordanian plane delivering aid as starvation worsens in the territory


Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
Netanyahu meets security officials as Israel considers full Gaza takeover
TEL AVIV/CAIRO, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met senior security officials to finalise a new strategy for the 22-month war in Gaza, his office said on Tuesday, with media reporting he favoured a complete military takeover of the Strip. Despite intense international pressure for a ceasefire to ease hunger and appalling conditions in the besieged Palestinian enclave, efforts to mediate a truce between Israel and Palestinian militant group Hamas have collapsed. Eight more people died of starvation or malnutrition in the past 24 hours, Gaza's health ministry said, while another 79 died in the latest Israeli firing. The prime minister's office said in statement that Netanyahu had held a "limited security discussion" lasting about three hours during which military Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir "presented the options for continuing the campaign in Gaza". An Israeli official had earlier told Reuters that Defence Minister Israel Katz and Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, a confidant of Netanyahu, would also attend the meeting to decide on a strategy to take to cabinet this week. Israel's Channel 12, citing an official from Netanyahu's office, had said the prime minister was leaning towards taking control of the entire territory. That would reverse a 2005 decision to withdraw from Gaza, while retaining control over its borders, a move right-wing parties blame for Hamas gaining power there. It was unclear, however, whether Netanyahu was foreseeing a prolonged occupation or a short-term operation aimed at dismantling Hamas and freeing Israeli hostages. The prime minister's office declined to comment on the Channel 12 report. "It is still necessary to complete the defeat of the enemy in Gaza, release our hostages and ensure that Gaza never again constitutes a threat to Israel," Netanyahu told new recruits at a military base. "We are not giving up on any of these missions." On Saturday, Hamas released a video of Evyatar David, one of 50 hostages still held in Gaza, appearing emaciated in what seemed to be an underground tunnel. The images shocked Israelis and sparked international condemnation. Throughout the war, there has been sustained international pressure on Hamas to release the remaining hostages, of whom Israeli officials estimate 20 are still alive. Most hostages have been released during ceasefires following diplomatic negotiations. Israel broke the last ceasefire. A Palestinian official said the suggestion of a full takeover of Gaza may be a tactic to pressure Hamas into concessions, while the Palestinian Foreign Ministry urged foreign nations to take heed of the reports. "The ministry urges countries and the international community to treat these leaks with utmost seriousness and to intervene urgently to prevent their implementation, whether these leaks are meant to exert pressure, test international reactions, or are genuine and serious," it said. Israel's coalition government, the most right-wing and religiously conservative in its history, includes far-right politicians who advocate the annexation of both Gaza and the West Bank and encourage Palestinians to leave their homeland. Nearly two years of fighting in Gaza has strained the military, which has a small standing army and has had to repeatedly mobilise reservists. It has throughout the war pushed back against the idea of Israel fully occupying Gaza. In a sign of differences between some members of Israel's ruling coalition and the military, far-right National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir on X challenged military head Zamir to state he would comply with government directives even if a decision was made to take all of Gaza. The statement from Netanyahu's office said the Israeli Defence Forces were "prepared to implement any decision that will be made by the Political-Security Cabinet". The war was triggered when Hamas-led militants attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and capturing 251 hostages. Israel's military response has devastated the tiny, crowded enclave, killing more than 61,000 people - mostly civilians - according to Palestinian health authorities. Israel's campaign has forced nearly all of Gaza's more than 2 million people from their homes and caused what a global hunger monitor called last week an unfolding famine. Some 188 Palestinians, including 94 children, have died from hunger since the war began, according to Gaza authorities. An Israeli security official, in a briefing to reporters, acknowledged there may be hunger in some parts of Gaza but rejected reports of famine or starvation. On Tuesday, Israeli tanks pushed into central Gaza but it was not clear if the move was part of a larger ground offensive. Palestinians living in the last quarter of territory where Israel has not yet taken military control - via ground incursions or orders for civilians to leave - said any new push would be catastrophic. "If the tanks pushed through, where would we go, into the sea? This will be like a death sentence to the entire population," said Abu Jehad, a Gaza wood merchant.


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Full Israeli occupation of Gaza would bring major strategic and moral risks and could massively backfire
One thing is now painfully clear: Israel's war in Gaza is sliding into a forever war. With ceasefire negotiations having collapsed, multiple reports in the Israeli media suggest that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is now seeking cabinet approval to fully occupy the Gaza Strip. Currently, the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) operates across 88% of the territory, which is either under Israeli displacement orders or is a designated militarised zone. But under the new plan, the military would advance into the remaining areas. It is a move that's reportedly opposed by senior military leaders who fear the long-term costs of total occupation. We already have a sense of what such an occupation would look like. The Gaza Strip would be further chopped and sliced into militarised zones, patrolled by Israeli forces. Palestinians would be confined to tightly controlled enclaves, with limited movement, constant surveillance, and highly restricted access to humanitarian aid. For Mr Netanyahu, the political logic may seem compelling. Public outrage over images of skeletal Israeli hostages has presented an opportunity to reassert his security credentials, which were significantly damaged after the catastrophic events of 7 October 2023, that occurred under his watch. 3:21 With elections on the horizon - not imminent but soon enough - Mr Netanyahu is under pressure. A dramatic military move may offer him a short-term narrative of strength and control. But full occupation of Gaza brings major strategic and moral risks and could massively backfire. There's no guarantee it will create new leverage in stalled negotiations, nor is it likely to advance what's now being floated as a comprehensive peace deal. 1:17 In fact, the opposite is more probable. The occupation could entrench the conflict even further, triggering a long-term insurgency in which Gazans suffer even more and Israeli soldiers become perpetual targets of guerrilla attacks. Protracted urban warfare amid Gaza's ruins would require tens of thousands of troops and carry the likelihood of significant Israeli casualties. The military is already stretched thin. An expanded operation would only deepen reservist fatigue and public weariness. 1:33 Then there's the grave risk to hostages. Military operations in areas where they may be held could endanger their lives even further. And this would likely sharpen the deep divides in Israeli society. Protests against the war are already widespread and appear to be growing The unity that existed in the war's early days has been replaced by distrust and outrage. Internationally, Israel faces mounting criticism and increasing diplomatic isolation. Mr Netanyahu may be in denial about how his actions are perceived globally, but the optics of a full occupation, built on the rubble of the already staggering destruction and displacement in Gaza, will only intensify global condemnation.