Jio breaks ranks with peers over 6 GHz waves for WiFi
People aware of the details told ET that
Reliance Jio
, the country's top telecom operator, has reconciled its demands and joined the technology industry in seeking a higher power limit for Wi-Fi devices that can be used under the delicensed spectrum.
Bharti Airtel
and
Vodafone Idea
(Vi) are, however, pushing the government for more deliberations and to form a committee before taking a final decision on spectrum delicensing, they added.
The delicensing will pave the way for deployment of next-generation technologies such as
WiFi
6E and 7 in India and is seen as a big win for tech companies such as Meta, Google, Amazon and Qualcomm, experts said. This was a key demand of the tech industry to meet surging bandwidth needs at affordable rates.
While Jio too was initially against delicensing of the 6 GHz band, it has decided against opposing the government move as the same spectrum can be used for offering fixed wireless services (FWA) using equipment developed in-house. Airtel and Vi however currently do not possess such equipment.
Jio, Airtel and Vi did not respond to queries.
For the past few months, Jio has been using unlicensed band radio (UBR) equipment for providing 5G FWA services utilising the WiFi spectrum. If the Centre agrees to increase the power limits for 6 GHz, the spectrum can be used for FWA as well as WiFi services.
The technology industry wants the power levels permitted for WiFi and other devices to be used under the 6 GHz spectrum band to be reviewed and aligned with global standards, so that users can get the best performances and devices remain affordable.
As per experts, the current power levels proposed by the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) may limit the range and throughput of very low power devices. The DoT has proposed a maximum power spectral density (PSD) level of -5 dBm/MHz and total transmit power of 14 dBm for such devices.
The tech industry wants it to be raised to 1 dBm/MHz for very low power indoor and outdoor devices, otherwise it could have a major impact on the performance of Wi-Fi advanced applications such as augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and mixed reality (MR) collectively, which demand high throughput and latency performance.
Experts say that if the power limits are not increased, it may not allow full utilisation of spectrum. They added that the 6 GHz band can offer data speeds of up to 9.6 gigabits per second (Gbps), against 1.3 Gbps in the 5 GHz band and 600 Mbps in the 2.4 GHz band. Over 84 countries, including the US, UK and South Korea, have already delicensed the 6 GHz band for Wi-Fi services.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
15th Finance Commission's tax share rejig boosts Bihar, Maharashtra; Karnataka hit
New Delhi: Seven states have seen their share of the divisible tax pool shrink, while 21 have gained under the 15th Finance Commission's 2021–26 award compared with the previous allocation, finance ministry data showed. Karnataka faced one of the sharpest cuts, with its share dropping from 4.713% in the 14th Finance Commission (2015-20) to 3.647%. The divisible pool is that portion of gross tax revenue that is distributed between the Centre and the states. The divisible pool consists of all taxes, except surcharges and cess levied for specific purpose, net of collection charges. Kerala's allocation fell from 2.5% to 1.925%, and Andhra Pradesh's from 4.305% to 4.047%. Assam, Odisha, Telangana, and the country's most populous state Uttar Pradesh also saw reductions. However, Uttar Pradesh's dip, from 17.959% to 17.939%, was marginal. In contrast, 21 states gained. Bihar's share rose from 9.665% to 10.058%, Maharashtra's from 5.521% to 6.317%, Rajasthan's from 5.495% to 6.026%, and West Bengal's from 7.324% to 7.523%. Smaller states such as Arunachal Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Sikkim, and Tripura, also recorded the largest proportional increases. To be sure, the Finance Commission determines each state's share of tax devolution by evaluating factors such as population, income, area and demographic performance, assigning specific weights to these criteria to calculate the final percentage allocation. 'It is the prerogative of the Finance Commission to decide the criteria for recommending inter se tax shares from overall tax devolution for each State. This power of the Commission is given in Article 280(3)(a) of the Constitution of India,' the ministry of finance recently said in a written response to a question in the Rajya Sabha. 'Depending upon the parameters chosen by the Finance Commission and the weightages assigned, the percentage share of the taxes received by the states varies from one Finance Commission period to another,' it added. Meanwhile, the Arvind Panagariya-led 16th Finance Commission is currently reviewing detailed submissions from states and central ministries to finalize its 2026–31 recommendations by 31 October, a verdict that will shape the fiscal landscape for the next five years (2027-31), deciding which states enjoy greater spending room and which must operate under tighter constraints. The 16th Finance Commission, like its predecessors, is tasked with recommending how central tax revenues should be divided between the Centre and the states (vertical devolution), and how that share should be distributed among states (horizontal devolution). It will also assess funding needs for disaster management and for strengthening local governments. Speaking to Mint, in an interview last month, Manoj Panda, a member of the 16th Finance Commission, said that the commission has just completed several rounds of state visits, and may have to go "a bit beyond" the standard parameters while computing the share of the country's revenue kitty between states and the Centre. He added that the states' tax-to-GSDP (gross state domestic product) ratios have remained stuck at 6-7% levels and that future tax collections will primarily hinge on GSDP growth. To be sure, there is a growing demand from wealthier Indian states, typically bunched around the western and southern regions, to be given a bigger share of the revenue.
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Counting on bumper crop, sugar industry pins hopes on exports, ethanol push
After a tumultuous 2024-25 season, marked by early flowering and red rot that hit production, India's sugar industry is counting on a bumper crop this year, with hopes pinned on exports and increased ethanol production. While normal sugar production hovers around 280-290 lakh tonnes, industry sources are projecting a higher output of 355 lakh tonnes in the 2025-26 season. With a carry forward of 55 lakh tonnes from the previous season, Dilip Patil, the co-chairman of Indian Federation of Green Energy (IFGE), said the total availability of sugar would be around the 400 lakh tonnes mark. 'Around 50 lakh tonnes will be diverted for production of ethanol and another 20 lakh tonnes, we hope, will be shipped out through exports,' Pati said. He further estimated that of the 330 lakh tonnes stock, 275 lakh tonnes would account for domestic consumption, and the rest would be carried forward for the 2026-27 season. 'As of now, the season looks good,' he said. Though sugar prices are currently in the comfortable range of Rs 3,900-Rs 3,950/quintal, sources said the industry was counting on an early decision on sugar exports. While production figures have been strong, the economics of sugar mills mainly depend n export quotas granted by the government—a sensitive issue with the Centre adopting a cautious approach last season. In the 2024-25 sugar marketing year (October -September), India only exported 6.44 lakh tonnes of sugar against the allowed quota of 10 lakh tonnes. Trade bodies and industry associations have started lobbying for an early declaration of export quotas, sources said. This oil marketing season, the government is eyeing grain-based feedstock for ethanol production, a move that has left most sugar mills uneasy. The government has pushed for double feedstock systems for the sugar sector, but most mill owners have expressed their inability to go for the same, citing financial non-viability. In Maharashtra, the standing crop is in good condition, but much will depend on how the monsoon plays out. Most of July has been dry in the state, with August promising to be good in terms of rainfall. But if the withdrawal phase of the monsoon stretches longer than expected, it could impact sugarcane crushing schedules and adversely impact production.
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
15th Finance Commission's tax share rejig boosts Bihar, Maha; Karnataka hit
New Delhi: Seven states have seen their share of the divisible tax pool shrink, while 21 have gained under the 15th Finance Commission's 2021–26 award compared with the previous allocation, finance ministry data showed. Karnataka faced one of the sharpest cuts, with its share dropping from 4.713% in the 14th Finance Commission (2015-20) to 3.647%. The divisible pool is that portion of gross tax revenue that is distributed between the Centre and the states. The divisible pool consists of all taxes, except surcharges and cess levied for specific purpose, net of collection charges. Kerala's allocation fell from 2.5% to 1.925%, and Andhra Pradesh's from 4.305% to 4.047%. Assam, Odisha, Telangana, and the country's most populous state Uttar Pradesh also saw reductions. However, Uttar Pradesh's dip, from 17.959% to 17.939%, was marginal. In contrast, 21 states gained. Bihar's share rose from 9.665% to 10.058%, Maharashtra's from 5.521% to 6.317%, Rajasthan's from 5.495% to 6.026%, and West Bengal's from 7.324% to 7.523%. Smaller states such as Arunachal Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Sikkim, and Tripura, also recorded the largest proportional increases. To be sure, the Finance Commission determines each state's share of tax devolution by evaluating factors such as population, income, area and demographic performance, assigning specific weights to these criteria to calculate the final percentage allocation. 'It is the prerogative of the Finance Commission to decide the criteria for recommending inter se tax shares from overall tax devolution for each State. This power of the Commission is given in Article 280(3)(a) of the Constitution of India,' the ministry of finance recently said in a written response to a question in the Rajya Sabha. 'Depending upon the parameters chosen by the Finance Commission and the weightages assigned, the percentage share of the taxes received by the states varies from one Finance Commission period to another,' it added. Meanwhile, the Arvind Panagariya-led 16th Finance Commission is currently reviewing detailed submissions from states and central ministries to finalize its 2026–31 recommendations by 31 October, a verdict that will shape the fiscal landscape for the next five years (2027-31), deciding which states enjoy greater spending room and which must operate under tighter constraints. The 16th Finance Commission, like its predecessors, is tasked with recommending how central tax revenues should be divided between the Centre and the states (vertical devolution), and how that share should be distributed among states (horizontal devolution). It will also assess funding needs for disaster management and for strengthening local governments. Speaking to Mint, in an interview last month, Manoj Panda, a member of the 16th Finance Commission, said that the commission has just completed several rounds of state visits, and may have to go "a bit beyond" the standard parameters while computing the share of the country's revenue kitty between states and the Centre. He added that the states' tax-to-GSDP (gross state domestic product) ratios have remained stuck at 6-7% levels and that future tax collections will primarily hinge on GSDP growth. To be sure, there is a growing demand from wealthier Indian states, typically bunched around the western and southern regions, to be given a bigger share of the revenue. Richer states have pressed the 16th Finance Commission to factor in their outsized contribution to national growth and tax revenues when determining horizontal allocations, arguing that the current formula fails to adequately reward their stronger economic performance despite their disproportionate share in GDP and tax collections.
