logo
A reason for hope, at a time of deep division

A reason for hope, at a time of deep division

The Hill11-07-2025
As we approach America's 250th birthday, our country faces complex challenges. A 2025 Marist survey found that Americans are concerned — 77 percent say the issues that divide us are a serious threat to the future of our democracy.
Yet our common humanity is much deeper and more powerful than our differences.
It's important to recognize that, as a nation, we are stronger because we are able to express and debate different points of view respectfully.
As the executive directors of two presidential centers — one Republican, one Democratic — we have found inspiration through hundreds of leaders who have come together, across partisan lines, to learn from each other and make a difference in their communities.
Ten years ago, Presidents George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and George H.W. Bush teamed up with the LBJ Foundation to create the Presidential Leadership Scholars — a program aimed at developing leaders who work with, not against, those with different perspectives and beliefs to make a positive, lasting impact in the United States and around the world.
Throughout the program, scholars encounter bold examples of presidential collaboration: President Johnson uniting an unlikely coalition to pass landmark civil rights legislation. President George H.W. Bush bringing together both parties to end discrimination through the Americans with Disabilities Act. President Clinton working across the aisle to balance the budget for the first time in a generation — reducing the national debt and leaving the country with a record surplus. President George W. Bush rallying bipartisan support for the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, which has saved more than 26 million lives.
These examples give scholars insights into how, even amidst division and disagreement, we can work together to create something better.
A decade later, the program has nearly 600 alumni. While they are of different political affiliations, work across different sectors, and are from various parts of the country, these leaders share a common trait: their desire to work across divides to make positive change.
The most critical piece of this program is a charge for these leaders to develop personal leadership projects that address a challenge and make a difference in their communities.
Jon Bennion, a 2018 alum of the scholars program, built a program that brings Republicans and Democrats from the Montana state Legislature together for a literal 'sausage-making' event — creating an opportunity to build trust and relationships that can help elected leaders reach consensus on divisive issues.
Steve Lopez, a 2023 Scholar, discovered the shortage of mechanics was threatening Dallas Fire-Rescue's ability to quickly respond to emergency situations. Inspired by a program started by a fellow Scholar, Lopez led an overhaul of the mechanic recruitment and training process and is building a school-to-work pipeline to bring students into the field.
From last year's class of scholars, Keely Cat-Wells developed a talent acquisition and learning platform for disabled professionals. Cat-Wells became disabled at age 17, and through her new platform, she has already supported more than 3,000 disabled people and connected employers with a highly qualified and often-overlooked talent pool.
President Johnson once said, 'There are no problems we cannot solve together, and very few that we can solve by ourselves.' At a time of great division, the Presidential Leadership Scholars program gives us hope and inspiration that our common humanity can prevail, and the next generation can come together to solve problems in ways that will bring us together, not tear us apart.
David J. Kramer is executive director of the George W. Bush Institute and Stephanie S. Streett is executive director of the Clinton Foundation.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump turns against right-wing media and his own supporters over Epstein
Trump turns against right-wing media and his own supporters over Epstein

The Hill

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump turns against right-wing media and his own supporters over Epstein

President Trump is a 79-year-old lame-duck president, approaching a difficult midterm in which he is likely to lose his Republican House majority. To add to that is the hardball political reality behind his failing effort to hush the scandal surrounding the decased sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein: The right-wing talking heads with the biggest audiences are starting to turn on him. Perhaps they are having pangs of conscience. Perhaps they are starting to think about their paychecks, their influence and their future livelihoods once Trump exits the stage. Whatever their motives, those top voices in the Trump media echo chamber deserve credit for keeping their spotlight on the Epstein case. And it is a good-faith effort, because the central truth is that countless young women were abused. It is deeply troubling that the justice system failed those young women. The plea deal given to Epstein in 2008, which allowed him to plead guilty to prostitution and not more serious charges of sex-trafficking, can only be politely described as 'suspicious.' Even Epstein's death by suicide prompted reasonable doubt and questions about possible foul play. Huge payments to Epstein by several of the nation's richest men remain unexplained to this day. And both Trump and former President Bill Clinton had close personal ties to Epstein. Since World War II, the U.S. media has had to fight the government to learn the truth about the Kennedy assassination, President Nixon's role in the Watergate scandal and bogus claims that weapons of mass destruction were secretly held in Iraq. Americans searching for hidden truths kept digging while most big newspapers and broadcast networks played the whole thing down as a kooky preoccupation for weirdos. Without strong investigative reporting, a hothouse culture of conspiracy theories grew on supermarket scandal sheets and extremist radio shows. With the rise of the internet, the conspiracy culture also took root on websites and podcasts. Beyond new technology, the rise of conservative media is tied to its 'free-for-all' embrace of conspiracy theories that generated click-bait and created cults of true believers. Today, the biggest papers and networks are in the background. They follow stories from conservative media as the authentic voice of the right-wing base that allows Trump to dominate the Republican Party. Even if those stories are false, they are now news. They gained in strength when Trump's supporters believed the lie that the 2020 election had been stolen and some attacked police officers as they stormed the U.S. Capitol. The Epstein case is an earthquake for Trump and his base because the man now keeping secrets is the one who was previously advertised by conservative media as their dragon-slayer. He was elevated as a counterforce to the big newspapers and the elite, highly educated people who dismissed the common man's search for truth. Now Trump is busy attacking his own followers as foolish for buying 'into this 'bulls—', hook, line and sinker' and called them 'weaklings.' He is also trying to distract his fans by releasing new files on Dr. Martin Luther King's assassination and sending out minions to make baseless, long-dismissed charges of treason against former President Barack Obama. Trump has also filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the Wall Street Journal and its owner Rupert Murdoch for reporting that Trump once sent a 'bawdy birthday card' to Epstein. (Full disclosure: Murdoch's News Corp also owns the New York Post and Fox News Media, where I have served as a political analyst for nearly three decades.) Trump's strategy of distraction is nothing new. Fifty-five years ago, Republican Vice President Spiro Agnew tried to deflect attention from his own corruption scandal by attacking the media, calling them 'the nattering nabobs of negativism.' It didn't work. Agnew ultimately resigned the vice presidency in disgrace rather than face prosecution for his crimes. Thirty-three years ago, Republican President George H.W. Bush attempted to revive his reelection campaign in the face of indictments tied to the Iran-Contra scandal. He handed out bumper stickers at rallies with the slogan, ' Annoy the Media, Re-Elect Bush.' The conservative-slanted media was still in its infancy when Agnew and Bush made their feeble attempts at distraction. Now, Trump is aiming his fire and fury at a full-grown conservative media ecosystem. These are the very loud voices that elevated him, elected him and re-elected him. One of the MAGA media universe's core narratives is that Epstein ran an underage sex trafficking ring for the richest and most powerful people in the country — and that the government was covering it up. Two of the loudest voices promoting this theory were Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, now serving as director and deputy director of the FBI, respectively. 'I say this to my Republican colleagues who are defending the indefensible: There will come a day when Donald Trump is gone, but your dishonor will remain,' former Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) famously said during hearings on the Capitol riot of Jan. 6, 2021. She is looking like a prophet. In a striking exchange last week, MAGA-friendly podcast host Tim Dillon revealed that Vice President JD Vance invited him to a private dinner to spin him on the Epstein story. When the vice president is deployed to sway a podcaster, it only reinforces the perception that the Trump administration is involved in a cover-up. Right-wing voices are right to keep the Epstein story alive. Even if it is only to keep the clicks coming, it must also be said that they are heeding Cheney's warning about 'dishonor.'

Who's the most influential person in Arizona history?
Who's the most influential person in Arizona history?

Axios

time10 minutes ago

  • Axios

Who's the most influential person in Arizona history?

Arizona history nerds unite! Help us decide the most influential figure in state history, and let's have some fun along the way. State of play: We're constructing a March Madness-style bracket with 32 entries. There will be five rounds of voting over five days. Each morning, we'll reveal the prior day's winners and ask you to vote for who advances. 🗣 You tell us: Axios Phoenix needs your help. Who should be on the list, and why? Zoom in: Any list of influential people from Arizona history will be heavy on politicians and business figures, but we don't want the entire bracket filled with them. We want influential Arizonans from all walks of life — arts and culture, religion, sports, and anything else you can think of. Think of folks who may not be traditional historical figures but were nonetheless influential in Arizona, like Linda Ronstadt, Frank Kush, and Wallace and Ladmo. Many people haven't received the credit they deserve, so make sure to include important women, Latinos, Native Americans and others who have been underrepresented in Arizona history. Between the lines: Here are a few things to keep in mind as you consider the bracket. I'm trying to steer clear of people who may be from Arizona, but didn't have any significant influence on the state. For example, Steven Spielberg grew up in Phoenix, but he had no impact specific to Arizona and didn't make his mark until after he left. Be mindful of recency bias. We tend to think of people who are still around today, or were active in recent memory, as more significant than those who have been gone for decades. It's OK to pick someone who predates statehood or even the United States' acquisition of the region. Between the lines: This idea was inspired by a bracket about the most influential Americans who never became president, compiled by Columbia University political science professor Michael G. Miller.

Fox News reporter: Trump FCC targeting ‘The View' could impact network some day
Fox News reporter: Trump FCC targeting ‘The View' could impact network some day

The Hill

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Fox News reporter: Trump FCC targeting ‘The View' could impact network some day

Fox News reporter Alicia Acuna over the weekend warned that President Trump's criticism of networks and shows such as ABC and 'The View' could eventually hit conservative media outlets under a Democratic presidential administration. 'As much as it would be nice to think about, like, 'Oh, The View's gonna go away. Whew, that sounds nice.' We also have to consider this isn't the only administration that's going to be there forever,' Acuna said during an appearance on 'The Big Weekend Show'. 'A tool that can be used by this administration can very well be used by the next. And if they were able to do away with 'The View,' they could very well, the next administration that comes in that doesn't like Fox, could do the same.' The reporter's comments w ere first highlighted by Mediaite. Trump has repeatedly ridiculed ABC News over its coverage of his administration, and threatened to use the power of his FCC to scrutinize the network's broadcast license. FCC chair Brendan Carr, during a recent interview on Fox, suggested 'The View,' the network's table talk news and debate program, could face 'consequences' over panelists criticisms of Trump.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store