
Need a home mortgage? Here's how climate change could hit your credit score
Anyone shopping for a mortgage knows how far into your finances lenders like to dive in order to determine your credit-worthiness. But here's a new factor: climate change.
Given how quickly climate disasters are increasing, both in frequency and in resulting costs, lenders are paying far more attention now to how those costs could hit them. Insurers are also struggling to keep up and more often pulling out of the most risk-prone areas, making the losses even steeper. Add to that, FEMA is in a state of flux under the Trump administration, with both cuts to staff and potential disaster funding.
Climate has therefore become an increasingly important consideration in assessing credit score risk, right along with a consumer's debt, income and collateral in the home, according to a new report from First Street, a climate risk assessment firm. The risks includes flood, wildfire and wind.
In a severe-weather year, projected annualized climate-driven foreclosures could result in $1.21 billion in bank losses this year, or 6.7% of all foreclosure credit losses, according to the report. Just 10 years from now, as weather events grow more frequent and more destructive, those credit losses could increase to $5.36 billion, representing nearly 30% of foreclosure losses.
If lenders start factoring climate into their underwriting, then a consumer's credit score could fall or even rise depending on the risk to their property. The former would result in higher borrowing costs. The study notes that lender losses today are primarily in just three states: California, Florida and Louisiana.
"Mortgage markets are now on the front lines of climate risk," said Jeremy Porter, head of climate implications at First Street. "Our modeling demonstrates that physical hazards are already eroding foundational assumptions of loan underwriting, property valuation, and credit servicing—introducing systemic financial risk."
When a property is flooded in an extreme weather event, it has a higher foreclosure rate than its unflooded neighbors. That historically translates to an average 40% surge in post-flood foreclosures among damaged homes, according to the report.
Consumers in high-risk areas, like the Florida coasts, are already seeing huge jumps in insurance premiums due to recent storms. The First Street report was able to link those increases to a rise in foreclosures. Some homeowners simply can't afford the increases and are walking away, again, leaving lenders on the hook.
Some lenders may require flood insurance on homes that are in government-designated flood plains, but overall lenders do not factor the effects of future climate change into their underwriting models. Fannie Mae, which is not a lender but funds much of the mortgage market, was looking at doing this two years ago, but has yet to announce any changes.
The annual costs of climate-related disasters have jumped 1,580% over the last four decades, according to the First Street report, which looked at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's billion-dollar weather and climate disaster database. That resource will no longer be updated, due to staffing cuts by the Trump administration.
The increase in cost is due not only to greater storm severity, but also to inflation, as well as higher populations and more real estate development in riskier areas. Americans love the coasts and, in most areas, are increasingly paying a premium to live there.
But the jump in those climate-related costs, and the consequent risk, is affecting households, financial institutions and investment portfolios alike.
"There is a significant amount of credit loss risk related to climate that is currently hidden from traditional credit loss models. This reports the systemic effect weather disasters are having in the mortgage market from both direct damages, but also indirect impacts like increasing insurance costs," Porter added.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk just humiliated Trump, the bromance is over & the internet is roasting
ALLISON ROBBERT/AFP via Getty Images;President Donald Trump and Elon Musk's bromance may finally be over. The bromance between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk may finally be over. Not only has Musk announced he was stepping away from his position with DOGE (the Department of Government Efficiency), but now he's openly criticizing the mega spending bill that will fund the Trump administration's legislative agenda, calling it a "disgusting abomination" in an extremely public post on X (formerly Twitter). "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk wrote. "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' This came amid a flurry of posts from Musk, where he openly admonished Republicans for voting for the 'One Beautiful Bill Act,' which the Trump administration claims will decrease the federal deficit, but Democrats have said will only serve to raise it while cutting social services like Medicaid. Musk spent $288 million on Trump's election campaign, and until recently, the two men have been joined at the hip as Musk helped him campaign, attended his inauguration (where he rallied the crowd with a, and held court alongside Trump at the White House as the head of DOGE. But now Musk has written on X that "Congress is making America bankrupt' and the spending bill 'will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden American citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' Although Musk hasn't posted anything about Trump specifically, he doesn't have to as the meaning is clear. The president has spent weeks whipping the vote and making veiled threats against any Republican congresspeople who oppose it. This public break from Trump is likely bothering the president bigly, and it's causing people across the internet to roast the MAGA president and Musk for a divorce that seemingly is in the air. Gay Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia tagged Musk in a post where he pointed out that 'the only people who voted for this bill were House Republicans.' Someone else quipped that "Elon's just mad because Trump's spending bill doesn't cut enough food aid for starving little Ethiopian children,' while other people joked that 'the breakup is complete.' Keep scrolling for the funniest reactions to the end of Trump and Musk being besties! "OMG the breakup is complete." "Hey @elonmusk, the only people who voted for this bill were House Republicans." "Trump is a failure and even Elon Musk knows it" "Elon's just mad because Trump's spending bill doesn't cut enough food aid for starving little Ethiopian children" "Elon Musk just went OFF on Donald Trump and the Republicans. Seems like their divorce is happening ASAP!" "Elon today." "Two things can be true at once: Elon is correct; and also no one cares what he thinks, least of all Trump." "ICYMI: Elon Muskrat just tweeted: "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." Only the GOP voted for it" "Elon Musk has gone woke" "Schumer: If even Elon Musk—who is Trump's buddy—says the bill is bad, you can imagine how bad this bill is." "The girls are fightingggg" "So in the elon musk and donald trump divorce who gets custody of MAGAts???' "As the child of divorce I know how hard it must be for Republicans in Congress to watch their daddies fight. But like a broken clock, Elon 'K-Hole' Musk is right." "'I don't know an Elon Musk, I take a lot of pictures with people. He may have brought me ketamine once or twice.' - DJT"


Business Upturn
10 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Donald Trump makes big statement, says extremely hard to make a deal with China's President XI
U.S. President Donald Trump described Chinese President Xi Jinping as 'very tough, and extremely hard to make a deal with,' in a new post on Truth Social on April 6, 2025. The comment comes amid renewed speculation over a potential high-stakes phone conversation between the two leaders later this week. 'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!' Trump wrote, emphasizing his long-standing rapport with Xi while also acknowledging the complexities of negotiating with him. This statement arrives at a crucial moment. A senior White House official, speaking on condition of anonymity, recently told CNBC that Trump and Xi are likely to speak 'very soon,' though probably not on Monday. The call, if it takes place, would come amid escalating tensions between Washington and Beijing, threatening to unravel a tentative trade agreement the two nations had reached just weeks ago. The Trump-Xi dynamic remains a critical piece in the puzzle of U.S.-China relations, particularly as both sides weigh economic interests, strategic posturing, and ongoing tariff standoffs. Analysts say any dialogue between the two leaders could be pivotal in determining the future of bilateral trade and global market sentiment. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Steel industry welcomes 25% tariffs but warns ‘uncertainty remains'
Industry has welcomed Donald Trump's decision to keep tariffs at 25% on British steel and aluminium for now, but warned that 'uncertainty remains' over the final tax rate. The US President has decided to 'provide different treatment' to the UK after a deal that was struck between Washington and London last month, as he doubled tariffs on imports from elsewhere to 50%. Levies will remain at 25% for imports of steel from the UK into America, however Britain could still be subject to the higher 50% rate from July, or the quotas in the agreement could come into force, effectively eradicating the tax. The 50% tariff rate for imports of steel and aluminium from other nations came into force at 12.01am Washington DC time on Wednesday, shortly after 5am in the UK. The Government said on Tuesday night they were 'pleased' that the industry 'will not be subject to these additional tariffs'. Gareth Stace, the director general of UK Steel, said that Mr Trump's decision is a 'welcome pause'. He added: 'Continued 25% tariffs will benefit shipments already on the water that we were concerned would fall under a tax hike. 'However, uncertainty remains over timings and final tariff rates, and now US customers will be dubious over whether they should even risk making UK orders. 'The US and UK must urgently turn the May deal into reality to remove the tariffs completely.' Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's trade deal with the US, struck last month, included relief on the steel and aluminium tariffs, but it has not yet come into force. Officials have been working to try and finalise the details of the agreement. According to the text of the order, published by a White House X account on Tuesday, Mr Trump has 'further determined that it is necessary and appropriate to allow for the implementation of the U.S.-UK Economic Prosperity Deal of May 8, 2025 (EPD), and to accordingly provide different treatment, as described below, for imports of steel and aluminium articles, and their derivatives, from the United Kingdom'. The order later says that rates will for now stay at 25% and adds: 'On or after July 9, 2025, the Secretary may adjust the applicable rates of duty and construct import quotas for steel and aluminium consistent with the terms of the EPD, or he may increase the applicable rates of duty to 50 percent if he determines that the United Kingdom has not complied with relevant aspects of the EPD'. The Government has pledged to keep working with the US to get the agreement up and running, and the 25% tariff rate 'removed'. A spokesperson said: 'The UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US earlier this month and we remain committed to protecting British business and jobs across key sectors, including steel as part of our Plan for Change. 'We're pleased that as a result of our agreement with the US, UK steel will not be subject to these additional tariffs. We will continue to work with the US to implement our agreement, which will see the 25% US tariffs on steel removed.' The Conservatives have said that Labour's 'botched negotiations have left businesses in limbo'. Shadow business and trade secretary Andrew Griffith said: 'Keir Starmer stood in front of the nation and insisted to the British public that his Labour government had achieved a trade deal with the US – and now one month later our industries face a fresh tariffs blow. 'So once again it seems that Keir Starmer's promise was just like the rest: hollow and broken. Labour's botched negotiations have left businesses in limbo and this country simply cannot afford their continuing failure.' Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds met White House trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday. According to the Department for Business and Trade, Mr Reynolds and Mr Greer discussed a desire to implement the deal struck between London and Washington as soon as possible, and committed to working closely to make it happen. The general terms for the agreement between the UK and US were published in May when the deal was announced, and outline the intended plans. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked if there was a text of the full deal ready to be released, and told reporters on Tuesday: 'There 's most definitely text with this deal, there is language that this side has seen. 'You'll have to ask the UK Parliament why they haven't seen it from their own Government, I obviously can't answer that question.' Sign in to access your portfolio