Thousands of retirees may see Social Security checks docked by 15% if Trump admin resumes collections
For millions of older Americans relying on Social Security to cover their bills, another financial gut punch may be on the way — and it's coming from their own student debt.
The Trump administration has threatened, then revoked threats, to resume collections on federal student loans. A higher education expert, Mark Kantrowitz, told CNBC that if the administration proceeded with their initial plans, borrowers in default could see their Social Security benefits docked by as much as 15%.
Don't miss
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
You don't have to be a millionaire to gain access to this $1B private real estate fund. In fact, you can get started with as little as $10 — here's how
There are approximately 452,000 borrowers aged 62 or older with defaulted loans, some of whom are likely receiving Social Security benefits, according to a report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Why your benefits could be garnished
The government has long had the power to garnish, or claw back, a portion of Social Security benefits to repay defaulted federal student loans.
But those collections were paused during the COVID-19 pandemic, and remained paused under the Biden administration. Now, the Trump administration has threatened to resume collections.
In May, the Department of Education announced it would soon resume involuntary collections, only to walk back the decision in June, when department spokeswoman Ellen Keast told CBS News it had 'put a pause on any future Social Security offsets.'
It remains to be seen whether that pause will be indefinite.
What you need to know about the Social Security offset
If you're in default on loans, the federal government could theoretically withhold up to 15% of your monthly Social Security benefit without your permission. But that would be the worst case scenario, and at least part of your benefits would remain.
Federal law protects the first $750 per month of Social Security income from garnishment. But for seniors already scraping by, even a small deduction can have a devastating impact. Of the 1.3 million Social Security beneficiaries with student loans, about 37% rely on an average monthly benefit payment of $1,523 for 90% of their income, according to the same Consumer Financial Protection Bureau report.
Regardless of whether the administration ultimately goes ahead with its collections, the threat should serve as a crucial wake-up call for anyone struggling with debt repayment.
Read more: Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market —
How else to fight back, or at least prepare
If you're in default or nearing default, there are steps you can take now to reduce the risk of garnishment.
First, you may be able to ask for a hearing or file a request to stop or reduce the offset. If you're facing medical issues, supporting dependents or already living below the poverty line, you can submit documentation proving financial hardship to the Treasury Department or its debt collection agency.
Second, you may be able to reenter good standing through loan rehabilitation or consolidation. Loan rehabilitation typically requires nine monthly payments, and the process can take several months. Both processes can stop wage or benefit garnishments.
Credible can help with loan consolidation by letting you shop around for lower interest rates with just a few clicks of your mouse. In just two minutes you can compare and contrast lenders willing to consolidate your loans into one easy-to-manage payment.
Even if you're just curious about your options, checking rates on Credible could be a good idea. It won't hurt your credit score, it's totally free and it could save you a bundle.
Other options for retirement
If you're still working and planning to retire soon, retiring while in student loan default might now be riskier than it once was. If your retirement income plan was built around a full Social Security check, you may need to take a two-pronged approach and rethink your savings and spending strategies.
With Wealthfront's automated investing platform, the power of compound interest works for you. Their sophisticated "set it and forget it" approach means your money is professionally managed and automatically rebalanced, allowing your wealth to grow steadily over time.
Start investing for the long term with globally diversified portfolios or go for a higher yield than a traditional savings account with an automated bond portfolio.
Open your account today and receive a $50 bonus to jumpstart your investment journey. Whether you're saving for retirement, a home, or building generational wealth, Wealthfront's low-cost, automated investment strategy can help you achieve your financial goals.
As for spending, it can pay to cut monthly expenses where you can. One of the biggest line-items over time is insurance. Like with loans, shopping around for home and auto insurance rates can also help you cut costs.
With OfficialHomeInsurance.com it takes just two minutes to comb through over 200 insurers for free and find the best deal for you in your area. The process can also be done entirely online.
The best part? OfficialHomeInsurance.com users can save an average of $482 per year.
Similarly, OfficialCarInsurance.com can help you switch to a more affordable auto insurance option within minutes.
After answering a few questions about yourself, your vehicle and driving history, you can compare quotes from trusted brands like Progressive, Allstate and GEICO. Depending on factors like the make and model of your car, you can find rates as low as $29 per month.
What to read next
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
Accredited investors can now buy into this $22 trillion asset class once reserved for elites – and become the landlord of Walmart, Whole Foods or Kroger without lifting a finger. Here's how
Car insurance in America now costs a stunning $2,329/year on average — but here's how 2 minutes can save you more than $600 in 2025
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free.
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump rips ‘second tier' Sen. Josh Hawley over his PELOSI Act congressional stock trading ban
President Trump lashed out at Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) Wednesday for forging ahead with his proposed ban on congressional stock trading, accusing the senator of enabling Democrats to target him. Hawley's Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments (PELOSI) Act cleared the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee in an 8–7 vote, with the Missouri Republican joining all Democrats. 'Very much like SABOTAGE! The Democrats, because of our tremendous ACHIEVEMENTS and SUCCESS, have been trying to 'Target' me for a long period of time, and they're using Josh Hawley, who I got elected TWICE, as a pawn to help them,' Trump groused on Truth Social. Advertisement 'I don't think real Republicans want to see their President, who has had unprecedented success, TARGETED, because of the 'whims' of a second-tier Senator named Josh Hawley!' Hawley chafed with Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.), a key Trump ally during the committee's hearing earlier in the day Wednesday. 4 Sen. Josh Hawley banded together with Democrats to advance the PELOSI Act out of committee without the chairman's blessing. AP Advertisement 4 President Trump accused Sen. Josh Hawley of backstabbing him with the PELOSI Act. x/Acyn 'This idea that we are going to attack people because they make money is absolutely wrong,' Scott, the wealthiest member of the Senate, argued during the hearing. 'I think it's disgusting what's going on here. But I completely agree with you, we've got to stop people from trading stocks but this [bill] is way different.' Scott also asked how one could sell an illiquid asset under the Hawley proposal. Advertisement 'You're concerned about the illiquid asset provision? It's the same one you voted for last year,' Hawley shot back. The PELOSI Act restricts lawmakers from owning individual stocks or trading them. Due to opposition from Committee Chairman Rand Paul (R-Ky.), Hawley needed to get Democrats on board and reportedly agreed to tack on language ensuring that the president and vice president would face the ban as well. 4 Sen. Rick Scott publicly tangled with Sen. Josh Hawley over the bill to ban congressional stock trading. Getty Images Advertisement Trump seemingly caught wind of that. 'I wonder why Hawley would pass a Bill that Nancy Pelosi is in absolute love with — He is playing right into the dirty hands of the Democrats. It's a great Bill for her, and her 'husband,' but so bad for our Country!' the president fumed on Truth Social. 'Why would one 'Republican,' Senator Josh Hawley from the Great State of Missouri, join with all of the Democrats to block a Review, sponsored by Senator Rick Scott, and with the support of almost all other Republicans, of Nancy Pelosi's Stock Trading over the last 25 years.' Hours before the Truth Social post, Trump conveyed open-mindedness to the proposal but cautioned that he would need to dive deeper into the details of it. 'I like it conceptually and you know Nancy Pelosi became rich by having inside information. She made a fortune with her husband, and I think that's disgraceful,' he told reporters Wednesday. 'I study these things really carefully, and this just happened. So I'll take a look at it.' 'What I do think is Nancy Pelosi should be investigated.' Paul Pelosi, the California Democrat's venture capitalist husband, has amassed a fortune through investments he's made over the decades. Pelosi's estimated net worth is $262 million, according to Quiver Quantitative. Advertisement Critics, particularly Republicans, have argued that Paul's activities pose conflict of interest concerns given that his wife is one of the most influential Democrats on Capitol Hill. 4 Rep. Nancy Pelosi has been dogged by concerns for years about her husband's stock trading. Bryan Dozier/NurPhoto/Shutterstock 'Speaker Pelosi does not own any stocks, and she has no prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,' Pelosi spokesperson Ian Krager told The Post when asked about Trump's comments. The Post reached out to a Hawley spokesperson for comment.


The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump goes off on Josh Hawley over insider trading bill
President Trump on Wednesday went off on one his closest allies in Congress, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) over voting in committee on a bill that would ban stock trading by lawmakers, presidents and vice presidents, arguing that Hawley teamed up with Democrats to advance the measure. The bill would ban congressional lawmakers and their spouses from trading stocks as well as presidents and vice presidents, but the latter would only apply to future administrations. Still, Trump, in a social media post, went off on Hawley claiming that he was being used by Democrats to target the president. He also questioned Hawley being the lone Republican on the panel to vote with Democrats 8-7 to advance the bill out of committee. 'Why would one 'Republican,' Senator Josh Hawley from the Great State of Missouri, join with all of the Democrats to block a Review, sponsored by Senator Rick Scott, and with the support of almost all other Republicans, of Nancy Pelosi's Stock Trading over the last 25 years. The information was inappropriately released just minutes before the Vote — Very much like SABOTAGE!' Trump said on Truth Social. It was a change of tune from earlier in the day when Trump was asked what he thought of the bill, to which he replied he liked it 'conceptually' before launching into an attack on former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) over unfounded claims of insider trading. 'I'll take a look at it. But conceptually I like it,' Trump said. 'And what I do think is Nancy Pelosi should be investigated because what she has the highest return of anybody practically in the history of Wall Street save a few. And how did that happen?' Pelosi has come under attack from Republicans for stock trading done by her husband, though there is no evidence of wrongdoing. The former Speaker shortly after Trump's remarks and the Senate Committee vote was taken expressed support for the measure. Before the vote, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) pressed Hawley to work with him to improve the bill. But, Hawley and Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) expanded the ban to apply to the president and vice president for future administration before the vote, while also opting to drop the name that referred to Pelosi from the bill name. Trump, in lashing out at Hawley, said the Missouri Republican was playing into Democrats' 'dirty hands.' 'The Democrats, because of our tremendous ACHIEVEMENTS and SUCCESS, have been trying to 'Target' me for a long period of time, and they're using Josh Hawley, who I got elected TWICE, as a pawn to help them,' he said. 'I wonder why Hawley would pass a Bill that Nancy Pelosi is in absolute love with — He is playing right into the dirty hands of the Democrats. It's a great Bill for her, and her 'husband,' but so bad for our Country!' 'I don't think real Republicans want to see their President, who has had unprecedented success, TARGETED, because of the 'whims' of a second-tier Senator named Josh Hawley!' he said.


The Hill
20 minutes ago
- The Hill
EPA delays methane restrictions for oil and gas
The Biden administration rule in question was expected to cut down on methane emissions and also to reduce releases of toxic air pollutants. This week, the Trump administration released an interim final rule that pushes back the policy's compliance deadlines. It said it was doing so 'to address legitimate concerns … that certain regulatory provisions are not currently workable or contain problematic regulatory language that frustrates compliance.' Under the interim final rule, companies will have 18 months before they need to install certain pollution controls. Critics called it a corporate giveaway. 'Delaying implementation will simply give a handout to the worst actors who would be able to continue their polluting ways with zero consequences or accountability to neighboring communities,' said Mahyar Sorour, director of the Sierra Club's Beyond Fossil Fuels Policy, in a written statement. The Trump administration has also put the regulation in question on a hit list of Biden-era rules that it may reverse.