![[Robert J. Fouser] Comparing Seoul and Tokyo](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F05%2F15%2Fnews-p.v1.20250515.4d5ae30850fd4746a274e3030155457d_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
[Robert J. Fouser] Comparing Seoul and Tokyo
Both cities are not only the capital of their respective nations, but also the most dominant cities of their respective countries in nearly all areas of human activity. Despite this basic similarity, several significant differences emerge that affect the vibe of each.
City populations vary depending on how 'city' is defined. The most common definition is the 'city proper,' but this leaves out suburbs and nearby cities that make up the larger urban area. By city proper, the two cities are about the same, with Seoul having 9,605,000 people and Tokyo 9,878,000 people, according to 2024 estimates. The area of each city is also similar at 605 square kilometers for Seoul and 627 square kilometers for Tokyo.
Both cities sit at the center of a large urban area containing vast suburbs and other large cities. The population of the Seoul area is 25.5 million, whereas the Tokyo area is substantially larger at 37.3 million. Tokyo became the world's most populous urban area in 1955 and still holds the title. The Seoul area ranks fourth and contains just over 50 percent of the population of South Korea, whereas the Tokyo area has only 30 percent of the population of Japan.
Politicians and pundits in both countries have long complained about the dominance of the capital over the rest of the country. With about half of the national population, the Seoul area is far more dominant than the Tokyo area at under a third. Seoul is easily accessible from most major cities in the country, whereas Tokyo feels more remote to people living in Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku and Okinawa.
The different histories of the cities helps explain the difference in dominance. Seoul was founded in 1394 as the new capital for the Joseon Kingdom, which was founded by Yi Seong-gye in 1392, and it has remained the center of political power and most dominant city ever since.
Founded in 1603 by Tokugawa Ieyasu, Tokyo is some two centuries younger than Seoul. During the Edo Period (1603-1868), the Tokugawa bakufu centered on what is now Tokyo held political power, but the emperor, who had lived in Kyoto since 794, retained symbolic power. Several regions in Japan retained substantial levels of autonomy and charted their own course. It was only after the Meiji Restoration in 1868 that the emperor moved to Tokyo as power was centralized in a state modeled on European powers of the time. Tokyo's dominance is thus more recent and has shallower historical roots than that of Seoul.
Another interesting difference is the topography. The historic center of Seoul sits between mountains, with Cheonggye Stream flowing through the center. The current city contains many mountains and hills as well as the wide Han River. This means that most neighborhoods in Seoul have slopes, some of which are quite steep. It also means the city has substantial greenery and natural landmarks that break up the concrete cityscape.
Tokyo, by contrast, sits on the southern edge of Kanto Plain, the largest expanse of flat space in Japan. The city has many hills but no mountains or other natural landmarks. Instead of natural landmarks, the city's constructed landmarks, such as Tokyo Tower, stand out. Compared to Seoul, the city feels like an endless stretch of concrete with a few green spots dotted around. Tokyo ranks ninth among world cities for skyscrapers, defined as buildings taller than 150 meters, whereas Seoul ranks 21st. This makes the city feel larger than Seoul.
Both cities have vast subway networks, but Tokyo has a much larger network of private railways that converge on commuter hubs in the western part of the city. Seoul, by contrast, lacks commuter hubs with people changing trains as at many busy subway stations instead. The busiest stations in Seoul are mainly for intercity travel by KTX. The commuter hubs and their commercial activity also help make Tokyo feel larger than Seoul.
Despite the differences, both cities are becoming increasingly multicultural as their foreign-born populations rise. Tokyo passed the 5 percent mark recently and Seoul looks to do so this year. Crossing the 5 percent mark meets the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's definition of a multicultural society. This gives both cities the opportunity, if not the responsibility, to develop models to help other cities with the transition toward a multicultural society.
Robert J. Fouser, a former associate professor of Korean language education at Seoul National University, writes on Korea from Providence, Rhode Island. He can be reached at robertjfouser@gmail.com. The views expressed here are the writer's own. -- Ed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
No deal to end Russia's war in Ukraine after Trump rolls out red carpet for Putin
Alaska (AP) — President Donald Trump failed to secure an agreement from Vladimir Putin on Friday to end Russia's war in Ukraine, falling short in his most significant move yet to stop the bloodshed, even after rolling out the red carpet for the man who started it. They were expected to give a joint news conference at the end of their talks, but took no questions from reporters and offered scant details. Instead, Putin said they had hammered out an 'understanding' on Ukraine and warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' Trump said they had made 'great progress' at their summit, but there were still sticking points. 'There's no deal until there's a deal,' the US president said. He said he would call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders to brief them on the talks, which lasted about two hours. Trump, who for years has balked at American support for Ukraine and expressed admiration for Putin, had pledged confidently to bring about an end to the war on his first day back in the White House. Seven months later, after berating Zelenskyy in the Oval Office and stanching the flow of some US military assistance to Kyiv, Trump could not bring Putin even to pause the fighting, as his forces made gains on the battlefield. Trump had offered Putin both a carrot and a stick, issuing threats of punishing economic sanctions on Russia while also extending a warm welcome at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, but he appeared to walk away without any concrete result on ending the war in Ukraine, now in its fourth year. The US president had wanted to show off his deal-making skills, while Putin had the opportunity to try to negotiate a deal that would cement Russia's gains, block Kyiv's bid to join the NATO military alliance and eventually pull Ukraine back into Moscow's orbit. 'We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to,' Trump said. 'And there are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there.' He continued: 'We didn't get there.' Zelenskyy and European leaders were excluded from Trump and Putin's discussions, and Ukraine's president was left posting a video address before the meeting in which he expressed his hope for a 'strong position from the US' For Putin, just being on US soil for the first time in more than a decade was validation after his ostracization following his invasion of Ukraine. His meeting with Trump may stall the economic sanctions that the US president had promised unless Moscow works harder to bring the fighting to a close. It may now simply lead to more meetings, giving his forces more time to make progress on the battlefield. Putin thanked Trump for the 'friendly' tone of their conversation and said Russia and the United States should 'turn the page and go back to cooperation.' He praised Trump as someone who 'has a clear idea of what he wants to achieve and sincerely cares about the prosperity of his country, and at the same time shows understanding that Russia has its own national interests.' 'I expect that today's agreements will become a reference point not only for solving the Ukrainian problem, but will also mark the beginning of the restoration of businesslike, pragmatic relations between Russia and the US,' Putin said. Despite not reaching any major breakthrough, Trump ended his remarks by thanking Putin and saying, 'We will speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon.' When Putin smiled and offered, 'next time in Moscow,' Trump said 'That's an interesting one,' and said he might face criticism, but 'I could see it possibly happening.' Trump and Putin had greeted each other with a warm handshake, chatting almost like they were old friends, and gripped hands for an extended period of time on a red carpet rolled out at the military base. As they chatted, Putin grinned and pointed skyward, where B-2s and F-22s — military aircraft designed to oppose Russia during the Cold War — flew overhead. The two then shared the U.S. presidential limo known as 'The Beast' for a short ride to their meeting site, with Putin offering a broad smile as the vehicle rolled past the cameras. It was the kind of reception typically reserved for close US allies and belied the bloodshed and suffering in the war Putin started in Ukraine. Although not altogether surprising considering their longtime friendly relationship, such outward friendliness before hours of closed-door meetings likely raised concerns from Zelenskyy and European leaders, who fear that Trump is primarily focusing on furthering U.S. interests and not pressing hard enough for Ukraine's. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said shortly before Air Force One touched down that the previously planned one-on-one meeting between Trump and Putin would be a three-on-three discussion, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff. Putin was joined by Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov. The change seemed to indicate that the White House was taking a more guarded approach than it did during a 2018 meeting in Helsinki, where Trump and Putin met privately with their interpreters and Trump then shocked the world by siding with the Russian leader over US intelligence officials on whether Russia meddled in the 2016 campaign. Zelenskyy's exclusion was also a heavy blow to the West's policy of 'nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine' and invites the possibility that Trump could agree to a deal that Ukraine does not want. Russia and Ukraine remain far apart in their demands for peace. Putin has long resisted any temporary ceasefire, linking it to a halt in Western arms supplies and a freeze on Ukraine's mobilization efforts, which are conditions rejected by Kyiv and its Western allies. The meeting comes as the war has caused heavy losses on both sides and drained resources. Ukraine has held on far longer than some initially expected since the February 2022 invasion, but it is straining to hold off Russia's much larger army, grappling with bombardments of its cities and fighting for every inch on the over 600-mile (1,000-kilometer) front line. Alaska is separated from Russia at its closest point by just 3 miles (less than 5 kilometers) and the international date line. Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson was crucial to countering the Soviet Union during the Cold War. It continues to play a role today, as planes from the base still intercept Russian aircraft that regularly fly into US airspace.


Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Hanwha's K9 Howitzers break new ground with Vietnam export
Korea's leading defense company Hanwha Aerospace exported its flagship K9 self-propelled howitzers to Vietnam, expanding its export markets to Southeast Asia. The deal also marks the company's entry into a country that maintains a socialist political system. According to industry sources Thursday, Korea signed a contract to supply 20 units of K9 howitzers to Vietnam for $245 million as part of a government-to-government agreement reached in July. The howitzers will be delivered from Hanwha through the Korea Trade-Investment Promotion Agency, a state-run trade support organization, by the end of 2025. With Vietnam's adoption, Hanwha Aerospace has now supplied the K9 to 11 countries. The howitzer is already in service in India, Australia, Romania, Poland, Finland, Turkey, Egypt, Estonia, Norway and Korea, with more than 1,300 units sold worldwide since its debut in 1999. Many buyers are US allies, particularly members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which value the system's compatibility with US and European-made weapons. This is the first time the K9 has been adopted by a country with longstanding ties to the Russian defense industry, rooted in historical cooperation during the Cold War. Vietnam sourced more than 80 percent of weapons from Russia between 2000 and 2023, according to data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. However, Vietnam has shown interest in the K9 for years, attracted by its strong firepower and mobility at a relatively competitive price of around $12 million compared with similar-performance howitzers. In 2024, Major General Nguyen Hong Phong, commander of Vietnam's artillery corps, told Korea's Ministry of National Defense that the K9 could be deployed to Artillery Brigade 204 near Hanoi. His remarks were made during a visit to the brigade by then–Vice Minister Kim Seon-ho. That same year, Vietnamese personnel joined soldiers from six countries in the Korea Army International Course program to study the strategic operation of Korean artillery, including the K9 howitzer and K2 tank, both already in service or under consideration for purchase. 'Exports of weapon systems are generally made to allies or friendly nations, as they lead to high-level security cooperation such as interoperability and joint operations beyond the simple transfer of arms,' said Ban Kil-joo, director of the Center for Geopolitical Studies at the Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security. 'Vietnam is a communist country, which makes that level of security cooperation difficult. However, we have found that standalone weapon systems with low interoperability requirements, such as the K9, can still be exported.' Korea and Vietnam are planning to further collaborate in the defense industry. On Monday, President Lee Jae Myung and To Lam, the general secretary of Vietnam's Communist Party, released a joint statement saying that the two countries will resume the Korea–Vietnam Defense and Military Cooperation Committee — which had been inactive for 17 years — and strengthen connections between their defense companies. 'The export of K9 carries symbolic significance, as it reflects the overcoming of historical divisions between former adversaries in defense trade,' said Choi Ki-il, professor of military studies at Sangji University. 'It seems to be a starting point for Korea to pursue broader and more routine arms exports worldwide.'


Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
US pharma tariffs likely weeks away as Trump plans for Alaska, sources say
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The announcement by President Donald Trump's administration of the results of a probe into pharmaceutical imports and new sector-specific US tariffs likely remains weeks away, four official and industry sources said, later than initially promised as he focuses on other matters. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had said in April when the review of whether reliance on foreign drug production threatens US national security was launched that he anticipated that it would conclude between mid-May and mid-June. Global pharmaceutical companies are bracing for the outcome of the investigation, which will usher in sector-specific tariffs that Trump has said could start small and eventually rise to 250 percent. The Republican president said as recently as last week that his plan relies on phased-in tariffs, giving drugmakers time to increase manufacturing in the US he pushes to alter what he says are global trade distortions in many industries. One government official in Europe and a source with knowledge of the White House process, as well as two sources at European drug firms familiar with the process, told Reuters that the report and tariffs announcement was not imminent and likely weeks away. These sources spoke on condition of anonymity. A White House spokesperson, asked about media reporting indicating that the results of the probe could be several weeks away, cautioned that such reports were pure speculation unless confirmed by the White House. The spokesperson declined to give further details about the timing of the pharma probe or one involving semiconductors. The investigation is examining pharmaceutical imports ranging from finished prescription drugs to active pharmaceutical ingredients, called APIs, and other raw materials, with the results to be disclosed in a Commerce Department report. Lutnick said last month the tariff plan that will be based on the report would be completed by the end of July. Lutnick then said on July 29 it would be two more weeks. The investigation was launched under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. While the investigation is ongoing, the pharmaceutical sector has been exempted from the sweeping tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. The US reached bilateral trade deals with the UK, Japan, South Korea and the European Union that promised more favorable terms for their pharma exports than those expected to be levied on the sector globally. A European government official said that an announcement before the end of August appears unlikely but cautioned that the timeline could shift depending on other developments. A source at a European drugmaker said the Trump administration is focused on the US-Russia summit in Alaska on Friday and therefore no announcement is expected this week. The source familiar with the White House process said that announcement is unlikely to come this week given other priorities. That source and one other source said that they expect the Trump administration to announce the results of its national security investigation into semiconductors first, followed by the pharma announcement, putting it a few weeks away. The Section 232 provision authorizes the president to adjust imports -- including imposing tariffs -- if a category of goods is being imported into the US in quantities that "threaten or impair the national security." Medical goods historically have been spared from trade wars due to the potential harm to patient access, and drugmakers have said tariffs could undercut other health policy goals outlined by the Trump administration, including lowering drug prices. US tariffs on imported pharmaceutical products would mark the latest in a series of sectoral tariffs announced by the administration, following metals and cars, that some economists have predicted will drive up costs for American consumers.