Businesses in Farnham call for cheaper parking as works continue
Parking charges increased in parts of the borough of Waverley in May.Becky Dawkins, the owner of Farnham Family Butchers, told BBC Radio Surrey the increases had happened at the "wrong time" and were potentially "another deterrent" to stop people from coming into the town.She said "an hour of free car parking", or a discount if shoppers stayed a certain amount of time, would help businesses.
Steve Hamilton, from Hamilton's Tea House, said all the businesses were "feeling the effects" of lower footfall and reduced revenue.He said it would be "really nice if Waverley could join hands with us" and take a financial hit "rather than it just being the public".Ginny Young, from Wylde Thyme, said there had been "a lot of disruption" and that it would be good to have "some leeway with parking just to give people confidence" as Farnham had "so much to offer".
Mr Stafford has also urged WBC to "use its powers to give some kind of relief from business rates" to help businesses during the works."I don't want to give the impression at all that Farnham isn't thriving," he said. "It absolutely is. "It's a fantastic place to shop, to live, to work, but businesses are asking just to get a little bit of support during the disruption so that [they] can carry on because…if they were to go under because of this, that would be an absolute disaster."WBC councillor Tony Fairclough said the council recognised that "business is the lifeblood of Farnham"."We've been working with the business community in all four major settlements to develop a car park offer that will actually be effective in stimulating business revenue rather than merely bringing short stay traffic into our towns, and I'm delighted to say that they are extremely enthusiastic about the concept," he said.WBC councillor Liz Townsend added that the council only retained 6% of business rates."The rates are set by the Government's Valuation Office Agency, not the council, but we do help local businesses by actively supporting them to apply for available reliefs, including small business rate relief, retail discounts and hardship support," she said.SCC has been approached for comment about the impact of the works programme.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
10 hours ago
- Telegraph
Rural council tax to rise by £380 under Rayner plan
While helping to bolster coffers in cities, the group said this would lead to less money for local authorities in the country – despite their households facing higher council tax bills. The warning comes after Ms Rayner launched a consultation on the new funding formula in June. This closed on Friday, with changes expected to be introduced from next year. The CCN represents councils mainly covering rural towns, home to nearly half of England's population. As part of its research, it found that £1.6bn in council tax income from dozens of rural authorities would be effectively redistributed to other parts of the country, including major towns and cities in the North. Surrey County Council stands to be the biggest loser from the overhaul, according to the CCN. Tim Oliver, leader of the council and chairman of the CCN, said: 'Surrey county council will lose something in the region of £160m of funding over three years. 'Our residents will pay the highest level of council tax but we'll see no increase in our funding over the next three years. That is going to put real pressure on services. 'In the meantime, money is flowing out of Surrey to other parts of the country.' He added: 'Every year we look to make efficiencies. There is not a lot left to cut other than frontline services. So there is a very real risk that a number of councils across the country will either cut services or actually won't be able to balance their books and then will effectively declare bankruptcy.' Mr Oliver warned that the reforms would punish councils that could raise more council tax, which were typically those in 'more rural counties'. He said: 'They have bigger houses so they are in a higher tax band. It disproportionately affects higher value houses that already pay more council tax.' The reforms go some way to helping rural areas by factoring in that their public services are typically costlier to provide. But the CCN warned that they would place a 'disproportionate burden' on rural taxpayers. 'It's no surprise' Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, said: 'Yet again the Labour Government are showing utter contempt for people living in rural Britain. 'This latest spiteful change will steal more money out of the hands of county councils and send it straight into Labour-run urban areas. Only the Conservatives are serious about standing up for our rural communities.' Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform UK, added: 'It's no surprise that Ms Rayner's trying to gerrymander council tax but the truth is that councils across the country are spending money very badly and they don't need more money, they need to stop wasting it and get better value for money on what they're spending. 'The bottom line is governments can't keep foisting extra requirements and services on councils and expect people to just continue to pay regardless. You can only squeeze the pips to a certain point before they ping out of the fruit.' It comes as Rachel Reeves is mulling a property tax raid targeting wealthy households in the South as she scrambles to fill a black hole as large as £50bn in the public finances ahead of the autumn Budget. A spokesman for Ms Rayner's department said: 'We do not recognise this analysis. The current, outdated way in which local authorities are funded has left communities behind and damaged local services. 'This must change and is why we are taking decisive action as part of our Plan for Change to reform the funding system so we can improve public services, while maintaining the previous government's referendum threshold on council tax rises so taxpayers have the final say and are protected from excessive increases.'
BBC News
14 hours ago
- BBC News
Town centre parking spaces in Camberley could be lost to developer
Hundreds of town centre parking spaces could be lost to a developer as part of plans to revamp a railway redevelopment of the station in Camberley, Surrey, will include a new concourse as well as housing and commercial space, but a lack of parking provision could potentially hold up the a result, developers hope to rent up to 210 spaces in the town's Main Square car park – more than a quarter of its 770 capacity. Kel Finan-Cooke, Surrey Heath Borough Council's portfolio holder for property and economic development, said the move would "deliver much-needed income to the council and may unlock part of the borough's future housing supply". "It could also facilitate improvements to the station itself," he added."Analysis of the demand for car parking spaces in Camberley town centre has shown that, if this scheme went ahead, it would still only be on very rare occasions that drivers who want to use Main Square would have to park in Knoll Road or elsewhere."If approved, the developer would take up the top two floors over three stages, between 2029 and 2037, in line with any future development of the site, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service. Jonny Cope, Conservative councillor for St Paul's who chairs the audit, standards and risk committee, said: "It's not a surprise because it's in the local plan but it shows the way things are going in Camberley with the expectation on housing provision under this Labour government."Leasing car parking spaces to a developer is mildly concerning to what is coming in the town."The council is in a difficult position because we are in a climate where places like Surrey Heath are expected to provide a lot more housing than they were two years ago."A decision on the car park's future will be made at Surrey Heath's executive committee meeting on 19 August.
Telegraph
2 days ago
- Telegraph
Former Citibank boss sues builders over ‘botched' construction of £3m home
A former Citibank executive and her husband are suing builders for allegedly botching the construction of their £3m home. Lisa Klaver and her husband Tim are taking North Downs Construction to the High Court claiming the property has so many issues it cannot be lived in, according to the Daily Mail. The building firm had agreed to construct the couple's property near Farnham, Surrey, next to an existing property, which was set to be knocked down once their new home was built. They now claim to have found 69 defects including to timber cladding, the terrace, balcony, and lower ground floor roof, external walls, windows and doors, basement tanking, internal and external work, and structural steelwork. Other builders told the couple they will not be able to finish the work unless they knock the new property down and start from scratch, which would cost around £3.4m. The couple are suing for more than £3m as well as damages for distress, inconvenience and loss of amenity. Work on the project began in July 2021 and the couple moved in a year later. After they moved in, their architect spotted defects but they had already paid £836,000 towards the builders' bill at this point, it was said. The architect asked the builders to fix a problem with the exterior timber cladding, which did not conform to the contract or good building practice. 'Inadequate remedial action' Further issues led to the couple withholding a payment of the July 2022 invoice, High Court documents said. Vernon Blake, of North Downs Construction, said the firm would withdraw from the site immediately unless it was paid immediately, and then did so. No further work has taken place since then. The couple claim the builders did not take adequate remedial action and terminated the contract in April last year. They say the firm was responsible for the work until the contract ended and the builders did not finish the job within the agreed 50 weeks, or ask for a time extension. Rain and floodwater got into the house in late 2022. While the firm came to accept some of the defects, and put forward proposals for fixing them, it did not address more serious ones in the structural steelwork, according to the claim. The couple claim redesigning the new house to fix the defective work is not their job and that the building firm has refused to meet any of the costs of doing so. The couple and North Downs Construction did not comment when approached by the Daily Mail.
