Police officer 'fighting for his life' after incident while on duty in Buckinghamshire
A police officer is in a life-threatening condition in hospital after being seriously injured in a road traffic incident while on duty, Thames Valley Police has said.
The incident took place in Stoke Poges, Buckinghamshire, at about 10.20 pm on Thursday.
Two men from Slough, aged 28 and 38, have been arrested on suspicion of attempted murder and causing serious injury by dangerous driving.
A 43-year-old man, also from Slough, has been arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender and perverting the course of justice.
Allen Horn, a 56-year-old local postman, said neighbours had heard a car, "but nobody saw anything as far as I know".
He added: "I came out in the morning, and the road is closed."
Matthew Barber, police and crime commissioner for Thames Valley, said: "My thoughts are with the officer, his family and his colleagues who will also be deeply affected.
"It is another stark reminder of the dangers that our police and emergency service colleagues face on a daily basis."
David Moore, Conservative councillor for Farnhams and Stoke Poges, said: "I am deeply shocked and saddened to learn that one of our brave police officers is fighting for his life following this horrific incident.
"My thoughts and prayers are with him and his loved ones at this incredibly difficult time, and I wish him a full and swift recovery."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
'Ordering a woman to be sexually exploited is as easy as ordering a takeaway': How trafficking victims are being sold online
*Sarah thought she was going to a job interview to become a waitress. Warning: This story includes graphic descriptions of sexual exploitation and abuse, including rape Instead, she was lured to a strange man's flat and held against her will for six months. "One of the very first things he did was ask for me to hand over my passport to check that I had the right to work," she says. "I remember him asking me kind of odd questions, like, 'do you like sex?' "I remember him taking me into another room within this flat and closing the door behind him, then locking the door. And then I was raped." She says her passport was used to create an online profile to advertise her for sex. She had no control over the adverts, no access to the accounts, and was repeatedly abused by her trafficker and the men who booked her through the website. "My abuser would say: 'This man would like to see you, he's booked you, but he's requested sloppy seconds. Okay? I am going to rape you again so that when you go and see this man, you will take that to that man'," she tells Sky News. Sarah says she was forced to take on different names to match her trafficker's rotating online personas. She ultimately escaped after threatening to scream unless her abuser let her go. "He just glared at me, furious," she recalls. "But he opened the door. That was the moment I had. That was the moment I took. I ran out and never saw him again." Sarah's abuser is now in prison. But the website that he used to facilitate her abuse is still operating. A Sky News investigation has uncovered thousands of potential indicators of sexual exploitation on two of the UK's most prominent adult service websites, raising serious concerns about how traffickers may be using these platforms to advertise and abuse victims like Sarah. Analysis of more than 50,000 adverts on AdultWork and Vivastreet - two of the country's largest escorting platforms - revealed a high concentration of red flags linked to organised exploitation, including repeated use of the same contact numbers, and/or duplicated advert text, across adverts for different women in different geographical locations. These patterns, highlighted by the Sex Trafficking Indication Matrix (STIM), a research tool used to identify signs of trafficking, suggest some profiles may be linked to coercive networks. In one case, the same phone number appeared in eight separate adverts for at least five different women, all listed with identical ages, nearly identical descriptions, but different photographs and spread across multiple UK regions. Neither platform is accused of criminal activity, but experts and campaigners say the scale and nature of these indicators are red flags for potential abuse. Prostitution is legal in England and Wales. But the controlling of prostitution for gain, sometimes called pimping, and the more severe crime of trafficking, are not. "These platforms make it as easy to order a woman to be sexually exploited as it is to order a takeaway," said Kat Banyard, director of campaign group UK Feminista. "There are big questions for national policing to answer about why it is that this important investigation has had to be done by Sky News, and why it wasn't national policing that was launching an investigation to uncover the scale of potential criminality on these sites." Over several months, Sky News used STIM indicators to assess escorting adverts across two platforms. On Vivastreet alone, more than 7,000 were linked to phone numbers that appeared multiple times - more than half the total number of listings at the time. On AdultWork, over 1,000 ads were found to contain duplicated descriptions. In one example on AdultWork, the same wording was used in 357 different listings - a sign that content may have been copied and pasted to cover for multiple individuals under a single operator. The websites told us duplication can reflect legitimate activity, such as touring sex workers using aliases. However, opponents say their structure allows abusers to hide in plain sight. Sky News can also reveal that officials at the Home Office met representatives from escorting websites 25 times between 2017 and 2024, under the previous Conservative government. Critics argue these discussions have failed to lead to meaningful safeguards or regulation. A Home Affairs Committee report in 2023 was highly critical of this kind of engagement. And in parliament, pressure is building to take stronger action. Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi has tabled an amendment to the Policing and Crime Bill that would seek to ban such websites altogether. "This is a thriving, multibillion-pound industry, and we're acting like there's nothing to see here," she says. "It's horrific, and I think more people need to be speaking out about it - this gives parliamentarians the opportunity to discuss and debate it on the floor of the house." In a statement, a Vivastreet spokesperson said: "Experts are clear that indicators that may suggest exploitation can have innocent explanations. "For example, it is a fact that many sex workers use different names and personas, and 'touring' - moving for short periods of time to different areas to take bookings - is a well-known practice. "We take safety extremely seriously and deploy industry-leading security measures to detect, report, and remove potentially exploitative content, including new requirements that all adult category advertisers must undergo age and ID verification." AdultWork said: "Sexual exploitation is not tolerated in any form. "We have strict internal policies in place to reinforce this and we are continually updating our internal systems for detecting accounts and requesting additional documents for evidence of legitimacy. "We make it a priority to fully cooperate and comply with all law enforcement requests. Additionally, any indications or reports of trafficking are fully reviewed and if we find them to be suspicious, we proactively contact law enforcement." Whether escorting platforms can be better regulated - or whether they should be outlawed entirely - remains a point of national debate. But with mounting evidence of potential exploitation and growing political scrutiny, campaigners say inaction is no longer an option. "These platforms are so poorly moderated and poorly regulated," Sarah says. "No one can sit behind a screen and know if someone's being coerced or is at the mercy of a predator."
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Brits who challenge train ticket inspectors or make silly mistakes when booking are at risk of getting a criminal RECORD, new report reveals
Train passengers who are caught travelling without a valid ticket could find themselves with an unexpected criminal record, it has emerged. A review published by the Office of Rail and Road revealed that even passengers who have mistakenly bought the wrong tickets for their journey could be prosecuted if their appeals against a penalty fare are rejected. Penalty fares are handed by inspectors to passengers without a valid ticket while travelling and on National Rail services typically cost around £100 plus the full cost of a single fare for the journey. They can be appealed within 21 days of receipt. But in some extreme cases, fines of up to £1000 can be brought forward if a person is convicted of travelling with the intent to avoid payment. The rule change comes in a bid to clamp down on fare-dodging and was ruled by a judgement from the Chief Magistrate Paul Goldspring earlier this year. An extract from the independent review reads: 'In February 2025, the Chief Magistrate ruled on whether an unsuccessful penalty fare appeal provided protection from prosecution for certain fare evasion offences. 'He ruled that criminal prosecutions can be brought following a penalty fare appeal being rejected.' Christian Waters, 47, from Leeds, was targeted for prosecution in 2022 after he had an appeal for a penalty fare rejected and told The Telegraph that the ruling, which was until now private, should have been made public. He said: 'Why was this ruling not published, given it affects the protection of that hundreds of thousands of passengers would assume they had from the regulations?' Mr Waters eventually had his case dropped after realising Northern Rail, a train company owned by the government, had broken their rules by trying to prosecute him at the time. He says his avoidance of prosecution now feels like he 'got off on a technicality' and still disputes that their ticket machine was not working at the time. The ruling at Westminster Magistrates' Court, which was allegedly seen by the newspaper, came after the also government-owned Southeastern asked the court if previous convictions it had brought were lawful. The newspaper last night reported that Judge Goldspring said: 'It is clearly irrational that a person who brought an unmeritorious appeal could not be prosecuted, whereas someone who did not could be.' Rules for commuters hit with penalty fares originally brought to the House of Commons had always sought to avoid seeing passengers criminalised. Conservative peer Lord Marshall told Parliament in 1988: 'If, however, a passenger on a train is not in possession of a ticket, he is not to be treated as a criminal under this bill. 'He is simply asked to pay a penalty fare which is a civil penalty and not a criminal one.' Regulation 11 (3) of the Railways (Penalty Fares) Regulations Act 2018 states that prosecution is only allowed where the penalty has been cancelled by the operator before the appeal panel has decided the outcome. Judge Goldspring allegedly said in February that prosecutors 'should not bring a prosecution if it is excluded' and that there is 'no obligation on the court to investigate whether the defendant has a defence'. Private company Appeal Services handle all penalty fare appeals, and are paid by train operating companies to do so. Its website reportedly says that four in five first-stage appeals were rejected in the last 28 days. A Department for Transport spokesperson told MailOnline: 'Deliberate fare-dodging costs the taxpayer up to £400 million annually – money which could be better spent on improving passenger experience. 'This must be dealt with in a balanced manner, which is why Great British Railways will bring operators together to establish oversight and better standardise practices, putting an end to inconsistent prosecutions and making sure passengers are treated fairly. 'We're working at pace to simplify ticketing as part of our rail reforms, to alleviate confusion and make it easier for people to buy the right fare.' They added that only a small number of prosecutions could see a person land a criminal record.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Police allowed convicted Neo-Nazi 'who groomed and radicalised British girl before she was found dead' to leave the UK
A convicted American neo-Nazi was permitted to leave the UK by police despite being known for 'grooming and radicalising' Britain's youngest ever girl to be charged with terror offences. Dax Mallaburn was questioned by counter-terrorism officers at Heathrow Airport having been suspected of encouraging 16-year-old Rhianan Rudd to look at violent material online. Despite such suspicions, the decision was still taken to allow Mallaburn to leave the UK without any further action, the Daily Telegraph has reported. He boarded a flight to the US, where he then travelled on to Mexico, in October 2020. Having been assessed as a 'medium risk of radicalisation' by experts, Rudd was nonetheless later charged by the CPS with six counts of terrorism in April 2021, the youngest individual in British history to ever receive such charges. However, in December 2022, the charges against the vulnerable and autistic schoolgirl were dropped with the Home Office ruling that she had been a victim of grooming. Rudd downloaded guides on how to make a pipe bomb, homemade weapons and guerilla warfare and also scratched a swastika into her forehead. Just five months later, on May 19 2022, she was found dead at a children's home by her carer in Nottinghamshire. During an inquest into the circumstances surrounding Rudd's death, Chesterfield Coroners Court heard that she had began to show signs of far-Right radicalisation after Mallaburn moved into the family home in Bolsover, Derbyshire, with her mother, Emily Carter, in 2017. Mallaburn, who met Ms Carter through an inmate pen-pal scheme, had previously been found by a US Supreme Court ruling to be a member of a neo-Nazi group and had also served prison time in the US for possession of weapons. In 2019, Rudd, then aged 14, complained to Derbyshire County Council social workers, who themselves had suspicions that she was being groomed, that Mallaburn had touched her sexually. However, when police later visited Rudd at her home address, she retracted the allegations. Just days before she took her own life, the teen told a counter-terrorism official that Mallaburn, who she described as a 'literal Nazi' was explaining to her what 'really happened' during the Second World War. Mallaburn also introduced the impressionable teenager to fellow US white supremacist Chris Cook, who provided her with clear instructions on how to make homemade bombs and weapons. In September 2020, Ms Carter reported her concerns about her daughter to anti-radicalisation programme Prevent. The inquest heard that she had been unaware of Mallaburn's influence on her young teenager. In a letter addressed to counter-terrorism police, Ms Carter said that Rudd had developed an 'unhealthy outlook on fascism' and harboured a 'massive dislike for certain races and creeds.' When the youngster was visited by local police at her school, she confirmed her interest in the extreme right and told police she had met an American 'neo-Nazi' over the online gaming platform, Discord. Classmates told school leaders that Rudd had revealed her intention to 'kill someone in school or blow up a Jewish place of worship', counsel to the inquest Edward Pleeth said. 'She said she doesn't care who she kills and nothing matters any more,' a school log shown at the hearing stated. Drawings found in her school bag included sketches of a man giving a Nazi salute. A child protection team from Derbyshire County Council later found that both Mallaburn and Cook had encouraged the young teen to 'look at violent material'. 'Suspicions of radicalisation' related to Rudd were then passed on by counter-terrorism police by MI5. On October 21 2020, just two weeks after Mallaburn had been allowed to board his flight from Heathrow, Rhianan was arrested by East Midlands counter-terror police. Bailed as a terror suspect, she was removed from school and placed in a children's home. While the charges were later dropped, Rudd's mother believed that the pressure of the investigation ultimately took its toll on her young daughter who she said should have been treated 'as a victim rather than a terrorist'. A close friend of the teen's family, Ann, had begun an affair with Mallaburn by the time Rhianan had been arrested. Having later relocated to Mexico to be with him, she told the Daily Telegraph that while he had been 'interviewed by the FBI about Rhianan and her online relationship with a man in Ohio', she firmly believed that he had 'never been charged with any race crime'. Whitehall sources told the publication that the Home Office had put 'robust safeguards in place to ensure that those who intend to sow hatred and division can be refused entry to our country'. Adding that it is a 'police decision' to decide whether an individual is unable to leave the country, they added: 'They make the call on whether it is possible and appropriate to confiscate an individual's passport to prevent their departure'. East Midlands counter-terror police refused to comment ahead of the coroner's findings.
