Hegseth orders the name of gay rights activist Harvey Milk scrubbed from Navy ship
It marks the latest move by Hegseth and the wider Trump administration to purge all programs, policies, books and social media mentions of references to diversity, equity and inclusion. And it comes during Pride Month — the same timing as the Pentagon's campaign to force transgender troops out of the U.S. military.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
The decision was first reported by Military.com. Phelan's office did not respond to a request for comment.
Advertisement
The USNS Harvey Milk was named in 2016 by then-Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, who said at the time that the John Lewis-class of oilers would be named after leaders who fought for civil and human rights.
Milk, who was portrayed by Sean Penn in an Oscar-winning 2008 movie, served for four years in the Navy before he was forced out for being gay. He later became one of the first openly gay candidates elected to public office. Milk served on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors and had sponsored a bill banning discrimination based on sexual orientation in public accommodations, housing and employment. It passed, and San Francisco Mayor George Moscone signed it into law.
Advertisement
On Nov. 27, 1978, Milk and Moscone were assassinated by Dan White, a disgruntled former city supervisor who cast the sole vote against Milk's bill.
The ship was christened in 2021, and during the ceremony, then-Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro said he wanted to be at the event 'not just to amend the wrongs of the past, but to give inspiration to all of our LGBTQ community leaders who served in the Navy, in uniform today and in the civilian workforce as well, too, and to tell them that we're committed to them in the future.'
The ship is operated by Military Sealift Command, with a crew of about 125 civilian mariners. The Navy says it conducted its first resupply mission at sea in fall 2024, while operating in the Virginia Capes. It continued to resupply Navy ships at sea off the East Coast until it began scheduled maintenance at Alabama Shipyard in Mobile, Alabama, earlier this year.
While the renaming is rare, the Biden administration also changed the names of two Navy ships in 2023 as part of the effort to remove Confederate names from U.S. military installations.
The USS Chancellorsville — named for the Civil War battle — was renamed the USS Robert Smalls after a sailor and former enslaved person. And the USNS Maury, an oceanographic survey ship originally named after a Confederate sailor, was renamed the USNS Marie Tharp after a geologist and oceanographic cartographer who created the first scientific maps of the Atlantic Ocean floor.
Advertisement
Maritime lore hints as to why renaming ships is so unusual, suggesting that changing a name is bad luck and tempts retribution from the sea gods.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As Pride Month Kicks Off, Ted Cruz Leads Anti-Abortion Push To Make June 'Life Month'
Sens. Todd Young (Ind.) and Ted Cruz (Texas) are leading Republican efforts to brand June as 'Life Month' during the already celebrated Pride Month, which honors the achievements and culture of the LGBTQ+ community. 'Every human life is worthy of protection, and it is especially incumbent upon Americans and lawmakers to protect the most vulnerable among us,' Cruz said in a statement on X, formerly Twitter. According to Young's statementintroducing the resolution, 'Life Month' is meant to 'recognize the dignity of human life, commends those who promote life, and encourages policymakers to continue providing resources to empower women and families to choose life.' While the senators did have 11 other months they could designate as 'Life Month,' they said the resolution marks June as the anniversary of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wadein June 2022. Cruz and Young's pitch rings similar to Illinois Congresswoman Mary Miller's resolution, which suggested fully replacing 'Pride Month' with 'Family Month.' 'By recognizing June as Family Month, we reject the lie of 'Pride' and instead honor God's timeless and perfect design,' Miller told right-wing news site The Daily Wire. Neither Cruz nor Young said they want to replace Pride Month, but their actions come at a time where the Trump administration has launched aggressive attacks against the LGBTQ+ community. Under his administration, President Donald Trump has erased or altered Centers for Disease Control and Prevention pages focused on the risks of suicide among LGBTQ children, school safety and health disparities. He has also signed executive orders that declared it official U.S. policy that there are only two sexes, male and female, and banned people with gender dysphoria from military service. Earlier this week, Trump's Department of Education also formally declared June as 'Title IX Month.'On Tuesday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered the Navy to rename the USNS Harvey Milk, which honors the slain LGBTQ+ rights icon. This move reportedly was intentionally made during Pride Month. A total of 26 Republican senators co-sponsored the resolution, including Alabama's Tommy Tuberville and South Carolina's Lindsey Graham. 'If we are going to dedicate entire months to recognizing every group under the sun, the least we can do is dedicate June to protecting unborn babies,' Tuberville said on X.
USA Today
23 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump welcomes Pride Month with a jolt of anti-LGBTQ+ 'bullying'
Trump welcomes Pride Month with a jolt of anti-LGBTQ+ 'bullying' The Trump administration kicked off Pride Month by launching a barrage of actions undermining the gains LGBTQ+ Americans have made in the past couple of decades. Show Caption Hide Caption Organizers say political pressure is motivation to continue celebrating Pride Organizers say political pressure is motivation to continue organizing and celebrating Pride, although some corporate support dwindles. The Trump administration kicked off Pride Month by launching a barrage of actions undermining the gains for LGBTQ+ Americans in the past couple of decades. The Defense Department said it would rename a ship honoring a gay rights icon. The National Park Service tried to fence off an iconic park in a gay neighborhood in Washington, D.C, the host city for WorldPride. The FBI solicited tips on providers offering gender affirming care. The president vowed to cut funds to California after it allowed a transgender athlete to compete in a high school track event. Pride celebrations happened long before they were recognized by the federal government, commemorating the Stonewall riots in June 1969, a seminal moment in the birth of a national gay rights movement. The federal government first honored Pride Month on the 30th anniversary of Stonewall in 1999 under President Bill Clinton. Under the next two Democratic administrations, the federal government recognized June as Pride Month, raising the rainbow flag at some government buildings and highlighting the contributions of LGBTQ+ people. Presidents George W. Bush and Donald Trump did not recognize it. But this year, the Trump administration stepped up its position, giving the month a new moniker and trumpeting policies that advocates see as 'bullying.' 'These attacks on our community as we gather, both in protest and joy and love, will only energize our community and allies to be more visible and engaged,' said Cathy Renna, communications director, National LGBTQ Task Force Action Fund. 'The country knows this is bullying – plain and simple.' More: Stonewall veterans sound alarm over Trump's attempt to erase trans history Trump, like the younger President Bush, declined to issue Pride Month proclamations. However, this term the president's rancor against policies that uplift LGBTQ+ rights appears amplified. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on June 3 that Trump had 'no plans' to recognize June as Pride Month. She added, 'The president is very proud to be a president for all Americans, regardless of race, religion or creed.' Here are some of the recent punitive actions the administration has taken in June, targeting LGBTQ+ Americans. Renaming Harvey Milk Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth directed the U.S. Navy to rename an oil tanker named for slain San Francisco leader Harvey Milk. Milk, a civil rights activist and Navy veteran, is frequently cited as the first openly gay elected official in the United States. Milk was pushed out of the Navy in the mid-1950s due to his sexual orientation. He won a seat on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1977. The following year, Milk was assassinated in City Hall along with the city's progressive mayor, George Moscone. Milk has been celebrated for decades as a gay rights icon. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told USA TODAY Hegseth "is committed to ensuring that the names attached to all DOD installations and assets are reflective of the Commander-in-Chief's priorities, our nation's history, and the warrior ethos." Stuart Milk, executive chair of Harvey Milk Foundation and nephew of Milk, said he was "heartbroken" to hear the Pentagon's recommendation. "Harvey Milk's legacy is certainly enhanced and celebrated by a U.S. Naval Ship, however, his legacy will not be silenced or diminished by the renaming of that Naval ship," he wrote. Jennifer Pike Bailey, government affairs director for the Human Rights Campaign, called the move political. 'At a time when this country faces national security threats from all angles, it's a disgrace that our Secretary of Defense is wasting time and taxpayer dollars on a desperate attempt to divide our country and politicize our military,' she said. Education Dept. announces 'Title IX Month' On June 2, the Education Department announced the administration would honor June as 'Title IX Month' as it seeks to 'reverse' the Biden Administration rule redefining sex to include 'gender identity' and enshrining protections of transgender people. Republican lawmakers roundly criticized the Biden rule when it was introduced last year, saying it would effectively force women to 'share bathrooms, locker rooms, and other private spaces with biological males' and allow people assigned male at birth to compete in women's sports, both arguments that have become prevalent among Trump administration officials. 'June will now be dedicated to commemorating women and celebrating their struggle for, and achievement of, equal educational opportunity,' the U.S. Department of Education announced in a statement. The department also directed its Office of Civil Rights to launch investigations into the University of Wyoming and Jefferson County Public Schools in Colorado for 'allegedly allowing males to join and live in female-only intimate and communal spaces.' The government appeared to be referencing transgender women and girls in both instances. 'Title IX provides women protections on the basis of sex in all educational activities, which include their rights to equal opportunity in sports and sex-segregated intimate spaces, including sororities and living accommodations,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in a statement. Renna, of the National LGBTQ Task Force Action Fund, said renaming the month 'simply reinforces" the administration's "anti-trans agenda.' DOJ threatens fines after CA lets transgender athlete compete On May 31, a 16-year-old transgender athlete competed and placed first in two events at the California State Track & Field Championship. Trump responded to the news with threats of 'large scale' fines in a post on Truth Social. The event had two first-place finishers due to a new rule adopted by the California Interscholastic Federation, the state's governing body for high school athletics. The rule allows girls assigned female at birth to receive medals based on where they would have finished if a transgender girl had not competed in the same event. The rule only applies to young women. "Biological Male competed in California Girls State Finals, WINNING BIG, despite the fact that they were warned by me not to do so," Trump wrote. "As Governor Gavin Newscum fully understands, large scale fines will be imposed!!!" he added, mocking Gov. Gavin Newsom's name. Trump's Justice Department followed up, threatening legal action, saying that allowing the girl to compete was unconstitutional. "Knowingly depriving female students of athletic opportunities and benefits on the basis of their sex would constitute unconstitutional sex discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause," the letter said. FBI looking for tipsters on gender-affirming care The administration's attacks have also targeted health care for LGBTQ+ youth. On June 2, the FBI posted on X, asking the public for tips about providers who offer gender-affirming care to minors. 'Help the FBI protect children. As the Attorney General has made clear, we will protect our children and hold accountable those who mutilate them under the guise of gender-affirming care,' the post says. 'Report tips of any hospitals, clinics, or practitioners performing these surgical procedures on children.' This outreach follows Trump's Jan. 28 executive order directing federal agencies to take action against hospitals that continue to provide care such as puberty blockers and hormone therapy. The order characterizes gender-affirming care for minors as 'chemical and surgical mutilation" and 'sterilizing' children. Several hospitals, such as Denver Health in Colorado, said they had stopped performing gender-affirming surgeries for patients under 19, in the wake of this policy. Other facilities, such as the Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, said they were reevaluating their gender-affirming care programs for patients under 19. 'Health care for trans youth is just that – it's health care,' said Laurel Powell, director of communications at Human Rights Campaign. 'Threatening to weaponize the FBI against American doctors who are following medical best practice would undermine parents who just want their children to thrive.' U.S. Park Service orders Dupont Circle closed, then rescinds decision The U.S. Park Service announced on June 2 that it would close Dupont Circle park during the final weekend of WorldPride 2025 D.C. to prevent 'destructive and disorderly behavior." WorldPride is a series of international LGBT+ Pride events to promote visibility and awareness. The event is hosted in different cities each year. 'This decision was based on a history and pattern of destructive and disorderly behavior from unpermitted activities happening in the park during past D.C. Pride weekends, including vandalism in 2023 that resulted in approximately $175,000 in damage to the historic Dupont Circle fountain," the Washington Blade reported. The day after this announcement, Washington, D.C. Council member Zachary Parker posted on X that, at his request, Police Chief Pamela Smith asked the Park Service to retract its plan. The Park Service agreed to rescind its request, he said. Ongoing focus on transgender youth A recurring target of the president's policies on Pride Month – and a steady drumbeat throughout his second term– is curbing young people from being out as transgender (preventing participation in high school track) and deterring adults from supporting them (investigating providers who offer gender affirming care). He emphasized this on day one in the Oval Office, in an order declaring there are just two genders, male and female. He repeated it at a White House gathering for Women's History Month, saying, "No matter how many surgeries you have, or chemicals you inject, if you are born with male DNA in every cell of your body, you can never become a woman, you are not a woman." A report from the Williams Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles law school looked at the fallout from another early executive order of Trump's that imposed restrictions on transgender students in K-12 schools. According to the report, Trump's policy restricts: Use of preferred names and pronouns: Federal agencies can cut funding to schools that recognize trans students' preferred names and pronouns. Access to shared restrooms in schools: The government can halt funding for schools that allow them. Participation in sports: Schools can lose funding if they let transgender students play on teams consistent with their gender identities. Privacy: Schools that don't out kids to their parents can lose funding. LGBTQ+ education: Schools may be penalized if they teach about gender identity. Punitive social and policy measures are associated with poor mental and physical health outcomes for LGBTQ+ people, the report says. The report highlights research on young adults that shows that trans students who participate in collegiate sports are less likely to experience distress, self-harm and suicidal thoughts. Repeating history Trump is not an outlier historically, said John D'Emilio, a professor emeritus of history and women's and gender studies at the University of Illinois at Chicago and author of books in the field. "This isn't the first time there has been a hostile attacking response to the LGBTQ community," he said. In the early 50s, the federal government prohibited LGBTQ+ people from working for the federal government. The FBI investigated them and the military discharged them. In the 80s, amid the growing AIDS epidemic, President Ronald Reagan told reporters that gay men were a threat to the general population. In the 90s, under Clinton, Congress passed the Defense of Marriage Act and many states banned same sex marriage. In every era, D'Emilio said, "These hostile, oppressive actions sparked a response from the LGBTQ community." "It is too early to tell what the response to the Trump administration's actions will be," he said. "But history suggests that it will motivate and provoke a high level of organizing in response, mobilizing not only the community but its allies as well." Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House correspondent for USA TODAY. You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Supreme Court sides with Ohio woman in 'reverse discrimination' case
The US Supreme Court has sided with an Ohio woman who alleged she was discriminated against at her job because she was heterosexual. The justices voted unanimously in a ruling focused on evidence standards that could make it easier to file similar "reverse discrimination" cases. Marlean Ames said that despite working for the Ohio Department of Youth Services for more than 20 years, she was denied a promotion and then demoted. She had appealed to the court to challenge the standards required to prove her case. The decision effectively lowers the burden of proof required for people who are members of a majority group - such as white or heterosexual people - to make discrimination claims. US court precedent covering some states, including Ohio, had required that members of majority groups show additional "background circumstances" to prove their case or evidence showing a pattern of discrimination. The court has now ruled that the standard of evidence for a discrimination claim should be the same, regardless of a person's identity. Justice Kentaji Brown Jackson, one of the court's liberals, wrote the official opinion, with concurring opinions from conservatives Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Neil Gorsuch. The court concluded that anti-discrimination and equal protection laws were meant to apply to all Americans. "By establishing the same protections for every 'individual'—without regard to that individual's membership in a minority or majority group—Congress left no room for courts to impose special requirements on majority-group plaintiffs alone," she wrote. The court did not consider Ms Ames' original discrimination suit. The justices said it was up to lower courts that had initially ruled against her to evaluate the case under the clarified evidence standards. Legal experts say employment discrimination and bias cases can be difficult to demonstrate, regardless of the burden of proof. Ms Ames had said she had positive performance reviews, but a promotion she sought was given to a lesbian. She was then demoted and her job was given to a gay man. In a lawsuit, she argued her employer had a preference for LGBTQ staff members and denied her opportunities because she identifies as straight. Lower courts ruled that she had failed to provide sufficient evidence of her claim, propelling the burden of proof question to the Supreme Court. At a February hearing, justices on both sides ideologically appeared sympathetic to her argument. US Supreme Court hears arguments in 'straight discrimination' case
