Diderot's Curse and the BNPL Trap: Why India's middle class may be walking into a debt crisis
In 1769, French philosopher Denis Diderot received a luxurious scarlet dressing gown. At first, it delighted him. But then he noticed that everything around it—his old chair, desk, and rug—seemed shabby in comparison. One by one, he replaced them until he was mired in debt. This story, known as the 'Diderot Effect," remains a parable for how one act of consumption can trigger a cascade of financial decisions, often with ruinous outcomes.
Fast forward to modern India, where a digital version of this effect is taking shape. This time, it's not scarlet robes but smartphones, kitchen renovations, weekend getaways, and online shopping sprees—all made seemingly affordable by Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) apps and instant small loans. These easy credit tools promise convenience and inclusion, especially to millennials and Gen Z professionals eager to live aspirational lives. Yet, behind the glitter of financial empowerment lies a troubling spiral of overleveraging, especially for India's burgeoning middle class, which lacks the structural safety nets that cushion such risks in the West. The growth numbers are staggering.
According to CRIF High Mark data, personal loans of ₹10,000- ₹50,000 value grew at an annualised rate of 19% for the 2021-2024 period. BNPL offerings by fintech firms like LazyPay, ZestMoney (now defunct), and Paytm Postpaid have exploded in reach. But this rapid expansion masks a darker reality: a growing chunk of borrowers are falling behind on payments.
Also Read: ITR 2025: Sahaj or Sugam — Which is the right income tax form for you?
RBI's Financial Stability Report Dec 2024 shows that 11% of the borrowers originating a personal loan under ₹50,000 had an overdue personal loan, and over 60% of them had taken out more than three loans during 2024-25 so far. Moreover, nearly three-fifths of customers who took out a personal loan in Q2: 2024-25 had more than three live loans at the time of origination.
Loan delinquency
TransUnion Cibil reports show that the rising delinquency rates for BNPL products rose to 4.8% from 3.6% within a year. Most of these defaults are concentrated among borrowers under 30—a demographic already grappling with underemployment, wage stagnation, and high rental costs in cities.
Unlike traditional credit cards or personal loans, BNPLs often fly under the radar. They don't always show up in credit reports immediately, and multiple platforms can extend concurrent credit to the same borrower without any central visibility. This creates a dangerous illusion of affordability. A consumer may think they're paying only ₹2,000 per month on a new iPhone—but when stacked with deferred payments on furniture, groceries, vacations, and even tuition, the monthly outflow quietly balloons.
This trend becomes even more alarming when paired with India's lack of universal healthcare and weak social protection. A 2022 report by Azim Premji University found that 68% of middle-class households had no health insurance, and over half would fall into poverty if faced with a major hospitalisation. In this vacuum, medical BNPL has emerged as a fast-growing segment, with platforms like QubeHealth and SaveIn offering deferred payment options at clinics and hospitals. For a family already juggling four EMIs, a sudden ₹60,000 emergency loan for surgery can push them into a tailspin.
Also Read: RBI repo rate cut: How home loan EMI, and bank FD return will change? EXPLAINED
The regulatory response has so far been cautious but piecemeal. RBI has cracked down on unregulated digital lending apps and discouraged pre-approved credit lines without user consent. But BNPL providers—many operating through NBFC partnerships—still operate in a regulatory grey area. With no unified reporting framework and lax income verification, users can easily borrow beyond their repayment capacity. The illusion of financial empowerment masks a systemic failure to track and contain household debt.
Moving ahead
So, what's the way forward? Structural fixes like universal healthcare, formal job creation, and large-scale financial literacy are imperative, but they take time. What India needs right now is a set of practical, near-term interventions, both by consumers and regulators, to curb the looming crisis.
On the consumer side, individuals must begin treating BNPL for what it is: a form of unsecured debt, not a lifestyle hack. Before clicking 'pay later," users should track their cumulative EMIs across platforms using credit aggregator tools like OneScore or CRED.
A good rule of thumb is to ensure no more than 30% of monthly income is locked into repayments. Stacking credit across apps may feel manageable initially, but when salaries are delayed or unexpected expenses arise, this house of cards collapses swiftly. Regulators, too, must move decisively. The RBI should mandate real-time reporting of BNPL loans to credit bureaus and enforce a central dashboard where consumers can view all liabilities. Income-based eligibility limits—particularly for first-time or subprime borrowers—must be imposed to prevent overleveraging. Most urgently, coercive collection practices—already on the rise via WhatsApp threats and public shaming—must be met with heavy penalties.
Also Read: Health insurance vs medical corpus: What should senior citizens prioritize?
India's middle class today is not buying goods—it's buying identities, dreams, and status symbols in instalments. But as Diderot discovered, the cost of one indulgence can quickly multiply when there are no checks. If we don't build those guardrails now, a generation of Indians may find themselves trapped, dressed in aspiration, and drowning in debt.
Kiran J Mahasuar is assistant professor, co-chairperson – Strategy, Innovation & Entrepreneurship Area, IMT Ghaziabad
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fibre2Fashion
4 minutes ago
- Fibre2Fashion
Confidence in UK economy drops from 45% in 2015 to 28% now: Barclays
Confidence in the strength of the UK economy has dropped from 45 per cent in May 2015 to 28 per cent now following Brexit, the COVID-19 pandemic-induced lockdowns, a cost-of-living crisis, rise of Gen Z and geopolitical issues, according to Barclays '10 Years of Spend' survey report. But confidence in non-essential spending has been strong, at an average of 53 per cent from 2015 to now, the report revealed. Confidence in UK economic strength has dropped from 45 per cent in May 2015 to 28 per cent now following Brexit, the pandemic, a cost-of-living crisis, rise of Gen Z and geopolitical issues, a Barclays survey found. But confidence in non-essential spending has been strong, averaging 53 per cent from 2015 to now. Confidence in household finances has been resilient, never dipping below 52 per cent. Despite financial pressure, households' discretionary spending has grown by 9.2 per cent annually on an average between 2021 and 2024, outpacing essential spending's 5-per cent growth. Confidence in household finances has remained resilient, never dipping below 52 per cent, and averaging 69 per cent in the last 12 months. Therefore, confidence in household finances has proven to be more resilient than confidence in the wider UK economy. Consumers are becoming increasingly savvy, paying more attention to their budgets, value for money and pricing tactics than ever before, a release from Barclays noted. Spending priorities are shifting; growth in discretionary purchases has outpaced essential spend since 2021, led by beauty, entertainment and travel. British adults' confidence in their ability to live within their means has held strong, reaching 74 per cent in May 2025, on par with 2019's figure of 73 per cent, when Barclays started tracking this measure, potentially due to more prudent budgeting. Sixty-six per cent pay more attention to their budget than they did a decade ago, while 45 per cent say they don't feel better off than they did 10 years ago. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DS)
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Why the office needs to embrace Gen Z's work attitude
A couple of months ago, I was conducting a workshop on behavioural skills with a multigenerational workforce at a Delhi-based organisation, when the conversation turned to Gen Z and their work ethic. Given the diversity of the cohort in terms of age, tenure and experience, the overall tone of the discussion was respectful, though not without a certain edge. People counted as Gen Z are, broadly speaking, those born between 1997 and 2012. The stereotype of an employee from this generation in white-collar jobs is someone who puts a premium on mental health over ruthless productivity; prefers to work remotely, or as a digital nomad, instead of going into office five-six days a week to collaborate with their colleagues in person; and is transparent, often to a fault, about their demands and views. Versions of these ideas were aired by the cohort, too—and they were not unique in harbouring them. In my experience of training hundreds of professionals from enterprises across India in the past few years, opinion gets invariably divided in the room about the decorum of Gen Z behaviour. Also read: Is there a good way to deliver bad news in the office? As a Gen X-er with the mindset of a Gen Z, I tend to find the parameters of employee behaviour, internalised and perpetuated in the corporate world for decades, disturbing, even absurd. How can good mental health be seen as a bad thing in any framework of employee welfare? Why should work-life balance be an opposing binary to toxic productivity, an either-or scenario? Going by the benchmark of success set by those who normalise 70-hour work weeks, the level of stress experienced by an employee seems to be their only key performance indicator (KPI). The harder employees toil at the expense of their health and happiness, the more deserving they become of promotions and rewards. On the contrary, if they achieve their targets and outcomes by working smart—be it by using artificial intelligence (AI) or in flexible hours—there must be something fundamentally insincere about their attitude. Change is in the Air The recently published Workforce 2025: Power Shifts report by global organisational consulting firm Korn Ferry debunks some of the toxic myths that continue to set the bar for excellence at multigenerational workplaces. Based on a survey conducted with 15,000 professionals across the world, from entry-level positions to chief executive officers s in 10 major markets (the US, UK, France, Germany, Brazil, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Australia, Japan and India), the report offers critical insights into changing dynamics in the workplace in the next decade. Here are some key takeaways: By 2026, 27% of the global workforce will have Gen Z employees (in the Middle East, roughly 70% of the workforce is currently under 40); three out of four managers say that Gen Z is the most difficult generation to work with; eight out of 10 managers criticised Gen Z for lacking critical soft skills to succeed in the workplace; and last but not the least, four out of five Gen Zs argue that such behavioural cues can only be learned by observing tenured leaders at work. Also read: Instead of setting SMART goals, why not make a PACT? Chicken-and-egg blame games such as this one aren't new. But the repercussions of a generational conflict in the workplace can set organisations back by miles, both in terms of culture as well as growth. The chief levers of this clash are poor communication skills, lack of mutual respect, and different work styles at play. As public-relations professional and marketeer Mark Beal, who has written extensively on Gen Z in the workplace, puts it in a podcast, 'Gen X lives to work, Gen Z works to live." The former typically derives a sense of self from the job they do; for the latter, a job is just a means to embrace their purpose and make an impact. A cross-section of Gen Z completed college or joined the workforce during the covid-19 pandemic. It's hardly surprising they are 'blind to the physical-digital fluidity," as Amanda Schneider, founder of ThinkLab, a market research firm focused on the design industry, puts it. As the return-to-office trend continues to gain currency, going 'phygital" (a term believed to have been coined by adman Chris Weil long before the era of hybrid work) may meet the demands of both Gen X and Gen Z halfway. In fact, the Korn Ferry report validates the fact that Gen Z isn't averse to hybrid work; they do want human interaction but not in-person apprenticeship. The hard truth remains that Gen Z is eventually going to inherit the workplace. It's the law of nature. Once upon a time, Gen X was the new kid on the corporate block, they set their own rules into play, created a system that served their needs, and superseded the ethos of the Boomers before them. In about a decade, Gen Z will come to rule the roost. The sooner the rest of us learn to grapple with this shift, as well as some of the positive values that our younger colleagues are bringing to the table, the better it will be for the workforce overall. Work Vibes is a fortnightly column on ideas to help you thrive at what you do. Also read: Do Gen Z workers need etiquette training?
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Diderot's Curse and the BNPL Trap: Why India's middle class may be walking into a debt crisis
In 1769, French philosopher Denis Diderot received a luxurious scarlet dressing gown. At first, it delighted him. But then he noticed that everything around it—his old chair, desk, and rug—seemed shabby in comparison. One by one, he replaced them until he was mired in debt. This story, known as the 'Diderot Effect," remains a parable for how one act of consumption can trigger a cascade of financial decisions, often with ruinous outcomes. Fast forward to modern India, where a digital version of this effect is taking shape. This time, it's not scarlet robes but smartphones, kitchen renovations, weekend getaways, and online shopping sprees—all made seemingly affordable by Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) apps and instant small loans. These easy credit tools promise convenience and inclusion, especially to millennials and Gen Z professionals eager to live aspirational lives. Yet, behind the glitter of financial empowerment lies a troubling spiral of overleveraging, especially for India's burgeoning middle class, which lacks the structural safety nets that cushion such risks in the West. The growth numbers are staggering. According to CRIF High Mark data, personal loans of ₹10,000- ₹50,000 value grew at an annualised rate of 19% for the 2021-2024 period. BNPL offerings by fintech firms like LazyPay, ZestMoney (now defunct), and Paytm Postpaid have exploded in reach. But this rapid expansion masks a darker reality: a growing chunk of borrowers are falling behind on payments. Also Read: ITR 2025: Sahaj or Sugam — Which is the right income tax form for you? RBI's Financial Stability Report Dec 2024 shows that 11% of the borrowers originating a personal loan under ₹50,000 had an overdue personal loan, and over 60% of them had taken out more than three loans during 2024-25 so far. Moreover, nearly three-fifths of customers who took out a personal loan in Q2: 2024-25 had more than three live loans at the time of origination. Loan delinquency TransUnion Cibil reports show that the rising delinquency rates for BNPL products rose to 4.8% from 3.6% within a year. Most of these defaults are concentrated among borrowers under 30—a demographic already grappling with underemployment, wage stagnation, and high rental costs in cities. Unlike traditional credit cards or personal loans, BNPLs often fly under the radar. They don't always show up in credit reports immediately, and multiple platforms can extend concurrent credit to the same borrower without any central visibility. This creates a dangerous illusion of affordability. A consumer may think they're paying only ₹2,000 per month on a new iPhone—but when stacked with deferred payments on furniture, groceries, vacations, and even tuition, the monthly outflow quietly balloons. This trend becomes even more alarming when paired with India's lack of universal healthcare and weak social protection. A 2022 report by Azim Premji University found that 68% of middle-class households had no health insurance, and over half would fall into poverty if faced with a major hospitalisation. In this vacuum, medical BNPL has emerged as a fast-growing segment, with platforms like QubeHealth and SaveIn offering deferred payment options at clinics and hospitals. For a family already juggling four EMIs, a sudden ₹60,000 emergency loan for surgery can push them into a tailspin. Also Read: RBI repo rate cut: How home loan EMI, and bank FD return will change? EXPLAINED The regulatory response has so far been cautious but piecemeal. RBI has cracked down on unregulated digital lending apps and discouraged pre-approved credit lines without user consent. But BNPL providers—many operating through NBFC partnerships—still operate in a regulatory grey area. With no unified reporting framework and lax income verification, users can easily borrow beyond their repayment capacity. The illusion of financial empowerment masks a systemic failure to track and contain household debt. Moving ahead So, what's the way forward? Structural fixes like universal healthcare, formal job creation, and large-scale financial literacy are imperative, but they take time. What India needs right now is a set of practical, near-term interventions, both by consumers and regulators, to curb the looming crisis. On the consumer side, individuals must begin treating BNPL for what it is: a form of unsecured debt, not a lifestyle hack. Before clicking 'pay later," users should track their cumulative EMIs across platforms using credit aggregator tools like OneScore or CRED. A good rule of thumb is to ensure no more than 30% of monthly income is locked into repayments. Stacking credit across apps may feel manageable initially, but when salaries are delayed or unexpected expenses arise, this house of cards collapses swiftly. Regulators, too, must move decisively. The RBI should mandate real-time reporting of BNPL loans to credit bureaus and enforce a central dashboard where consumers can view all liabilities. Income-based eligibility limits—particularly for first-time or subprime borrowers—must be imposed to prevent overleveraging. Most urgently, coercive collection practices—already on the rise via WhatsApp threats and public shaming—must be met with heavy penalties. Also Read: Health insurance vs medical corpus: What should senior citizens prioritize? India's middle class today is not buying goods—it's buying identities, dreams, and status symbols in instalments. But as Diderot discovered, the cost of one indulgence can quickly multiply when there are no checks. If we don't build those guardrails now, a generation of Indians may find themselves trapped, dressed in aspiration, and drowning in debt. Kiran J Mahasuar is assistant professor, co-chairperson – Strategy, Innovation & Entrepreneurship Area, IMT Ghaziabad
