logo
April US payrolls growth slows before full tariff impact felt

April US payrolls growth slows before full tariff impact felt

Yahoo02-05-2025

(Reuters) -U.S. job growth slowed marginally in April, but the outlook for the labor market is increasingly darkening as President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff policy heightens economic uncertainty.
Nonfarm payrolls increased by 177,000 jobs last month after rising by a downwardly revised 185,000 in March, the Labor Department said on Friday.
Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 130,000 jobs added last month after a previously reported 228,000 advance in March.
The unemployment rate held steady at 4.2%. It is too early for the labor market to show the impact of Trump's on-and-off again tariffs policy. Amid the uncertainty, the Federal Reserve is expected to keep benchmark interest rates in the 4.25%-4.50% range next week. Economists expect companies will reduce hours before resorting to mass layoffs.
MARKET REACTION:
STOCKS: S&P 500 E-minis added to gains and were up 0.85%, pointing to a solid open on Wall Street
BONDS: The yield on benchmark U.S. 10-year notesrose to 3.2676%, the two-year note yield rose to 3.744%FOREX: The dollar index pared a loss and was 0.30% lower, while the euro extended 0.27% higher
COMMENTS:
MARK MALEK, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, SIEBERT NXT, NEW YORK
'We are expecting a slow decline in a non-farm payroll growth and while it's not positive by any means it's better than could've been expected. I think there were whisper numbers around there that were significantly less and I think people were somewhat braced for a bigger potential drop. The unemployment rate remains the same that was pretty positive.'
ROBERT PAVLIK, SENIOR PORTFOLIO MANAGER, DAKOTA WEALTH, FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT
"The economy isn't collapsing as people were worried about. We came in better than expected, both on the nonfarm payrolls report itself, but then it didn't show any real increase to average hourly earnings and so that came in a little bit lighter than expected. So that takes the concerns of wage pressures a little bit out of the picture."
"The market likes the news. There'll be some out there that will point to a lagging indicator the fact that the Liberation Day sort of came and didn't necessarily get completely factored into non farm payrolls. But I really wouldn't worry too much about that yet. I would focus more on the positive aspect of this report -- the positivity that the US economy is continuing to move forward and still healthy enough, not gangbusters, but still healthy enough."
MARK MALEK, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER, SIEBERT NXT, NEW YORK
'The numbers are holding up: so obviously the survey was worth for 138,000 and we came in slightly higher but last month was revised significantly downward. I think it just reflects what the consensus is expecting. We are expecting a slow decline in a non-farm payroll growth and while it's not positive by any means it's better than could've been expected. I think there were whisper numbers around there that were significantly less and I think people were somewhat braced for a bigger potential drop. The unemployment rate remains the same that was pretty positive.'
SAMEER SAMANA, HEAD OF GLOBAL EQUITIES AND REAL ASSETS, WELLS FARGO INVESTMENT INSTITUTE, CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA
"We've reached a steady state for the labor market. We went from too hot to kind of just right in terms of job growth, in terms of wage growth, in terms of the unemployment rate. So again until something more meaningful changes with respect to the supply or demand for labor it's fair to say that it's going to just keep chugging along."
"Probably the big risk to the downside is that trade tensions flare up again. At least right now with the 90-day delay there's still some hope that things get worked out."
"Consumers are still spending and that's driving continued job growth. The number was better than expected for this time, but it was revised lower for last time so if you take the two of them together its basically kind of right in line. So, the labor market is almost acting exactly as expected. It's just settling into normal."
"If anything, it probably reinforces the Fed's stance of being on hold for longer because continued steadiness in the labor market is what they're pointing to as the reason why it might take them some time to cut."
CHRIS ZACCARELLI, CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER FOR NORTHLIGHT ASSET MANAGEMENT IN CHARLOTTE (by email)
"Markets breathed a sigh of relief this morning as the jobs data came in better than expected. While recession fears are still simmering on the back burner, the buy-the-dip dynamic can continue – at least until the tariff pause runs out. We've already seen how financial markets will react if the administration moves forward with their initial tariff plan, so unless they take a different tack in July when the 90-day pause expires, we will see market action similar to the first week of April.
"If adjustments can be made and the new approach is more nuanced, with exemptions for activity that leads to the administration's ultimate goals and more reasonable tariff levels, then the real economy can re-adjust and markets will take it in stride, however, we aren't out of the woods yet, because it's unclear how much different the US trade approach will be in the second half of 2025 versus what we've seen year-to-date."
MELISSA BROWN, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF INVESTMENT DECISION RESEARCH, SIMCORP, NEW YORK
" This is good employment data which suggests that the economy remains strong. The one thing it suggests is that, even though everybody has been so worried about stagflation, maybe we managed to continue to grow without growing so much that we ignite inflation.
I don't know if this is necessarily going to change anything (interest rate cut bets) because we're still looking at a strong economy at least for now. We could see these numbers go down as the impact of tariffs really starts to make its way through the economy, but it's not there yet."
PETER CARDILLO, CHIEF MARKET ECONOMIST, SPARTAN CAPITAL SECURITIES, NEW YORK
'This trend remains positive. Basically, (this report) indicates you know that the labor market is stable for now.'
'(March's downward revision) makes this report even stronger.'
'Hourly wages are positive, you know, and that gives the Fed more time to assess the inflationary impact of tariffs.'
'The participation rate ticking up is probably not significant and probably due to the fact that total unemployment is still at 4.2%.'
'The bottom line is this was stronger than we expected and that it probably means that the economy is still not in recession.'
'The takeaway is this report supports the Fed staying on course at the next week's meeting and the Fed will likely continue to stay on hold.'
'So that puts the June meeting in question again.'
BRIAN JACOBSEN, CHIEF ECONOMIST, ANNEX WEALTH MANAGEMENT, MENOMONEE FALLS, WISCONSIN
"Employment is holding in there, but manufacturing is feeling the pinch. The diffusion index for manufacturing - related to how many industries are growing versus shrinking - has dropped to 42. It's back to the muddy recessionary conditions for manufacturing. In April there was a big jump in hours worked in retail and transportation as people made their last ditch efforts to buy goods before prices adjusted."
LINDSAY ROSNER, HEAD OF MULTI SECTOR FIXED INCOME INVESTING, GOLDMAN SACHS ASSET MANAGEMENT (emailed comments)
'Strong jobs data puts a spring in the Fed's step. Despite an increasingly uncertain economic backdrop, the US labor market remained resilient in April with employment surprising to the upside and the unemployment rate remaining steady. In the here and now, solid labor market data provides the Fed with scope for patience. With the forward-looking outlook having deteriorated, however, today's data feels somewhat backward looking and the risks remain that a weakening economy could see the Fed resume its easing cycle later in the year.'
(Compiled by the Global Finance & Markets Breaking News team)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans' stunning flip flops on ‘national emergencies'
Republicans' stunning flip flops on ‘national emergencies'

The Hill

time35 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Republicans' stunning flip flops on ‘national emergencies'

In February, President Trump issued executive orders raising tariffs on China, Canada and Mexico. In April, he slapped a 50 percent tariff on countries that the U.S. has a trade deficit with and a minimum 10 percent tariff on all others. The administration claimed that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1997 gives the president the authority to declare a national emergency and take immediate action to protect the country. Illicit trafficking in fentanyl along with threats to border security allegedly justified the tariffs imposed on China, Canada and Mexico. America's large trade deficit was the justification for the 'Liberation Day' tariffs imposed on countries throughout the world. Trump's actions marked the first time the International Emergency Economic Powers Act has been used to increase tariffs. Last month, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court on International Trade (comprised of Reagan, Obama and Trump appointees) declared that Trump had overstepped his authority. The tariffs, the judges noted, were not relevant to reducing fentanyl trafficking or illegal immigration. And since the U.S. has had a trade deficit for each of the last 47 years, it is difficult to argue that it constitutes a national emergency. A few days later, an appeals court allowed the administration to continue to collect tariffs while litigation moves through the courts. In the meantime, the silence from Republican members of Congress — the body which, according to Article I of the Constitution, alone has the authority to raise and spend revenue — is deafening. It is worth noting that before Jan. 20, 2025, many of congressional Republicans endorsed a proposal limiting the president's power to act unilaterally by declaring national emergencies. In 2019, Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) introduced the 'Article One Act.' The bill would have terminated all national emergency declarations after 30 days unless both houses of Congress voted to extend them. Calling for 'real action, as opposed to symbolic show votes that don't address the root of the problem,' Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) signed on as a cosponsor. Fifteen senators, including nine Republicans, signed a bipartisan letter urging Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) to have the full Senate consider the Article One Act. The aim of the legislation, the letter indicated, 'is simple but fundamental: Congress cannot continue to cede its powers to another branch, regardless of who is president, and which party holds a majority.' Members of Congress 'who are troubled by emergency declarations,' Lee emphasized, 'only have themselves to blame.' Nothing happened. In 2023, Lee reintroduced the Article One Act. 'Law-making by proclamation,' he asserted, 'runs directly counter to the vision of our Founders and undermines the safeguards protecting our freedom. It is high time that Congress reclaimed the legislative power and restored constitutional balance to our system.' Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), as he endorsed the Article One Act in the House, reminded his colleagues that 'the presidency was never meant to have monarchical power over the American people.' The legislation did not get a floor vote in either chamber. Executive orders and national emergency declarations — used all too frequently by Obama, Trump and Biden to bypass Congress — pose a clear and present danger to the system of checks and balances that has served this country well for over 200 years. And the problem of executive overreach is getting worse. In the first 100 days of his second term, Trump has issued executive orders and declared national emergencies at a faster pace than any president in modern history. But Republicans in Congress no longer seem troubled by executive orders based on emergency declarations. In March, Lee introduced a bill that differed dramatically in substance and tone from the Article One Act. The 'Restraining Judicial Insurrectionists Act of 2025' mandated that a three-judge panel review all lower court injunctions against the president and grants of declaratory relief, followed by an expedited appeal to the Supreme Court. 'American government cannot function if the legitimate orders of our commander-in-chief can be overruled at the whim of a single district judge,' Lee declared. In April, House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) refused to permit a floor vote to repeal Trump's 'reciprocal tariffs.' Every president, 'no matter the party,' Johnson opined, has 'a broad degree of latitude' over trade. The Senate rejected a similar measure with a 49-49 vote; neither Lee, Grassley nor any other Republican who signed onto the 2019 Article One Act letter supported the legislation. Justice Anthony Kennedy warned in Clinton v. City of New York (1998), the case declaring the line-item veto to be unconstitutional, that the separation of powers is violated and liberty is threatened when spending is 'determined by the executive alone' and the president has the power 'to reward one group and punish another, help one set of taxpayers and hurt another, favor one State and ignore another.' Clearly, many congressional Republicans agree. But if they continue to choose partisan self-interest over principle, voters will have good reason to blame them — and the Trump administration — for the weakening of our democratic institutions. Glenn C. Altschuler is the Thomas and Dorothy Litwin Emeritus Professor of American Studies at Cornell University.

I'm a Financial Expert: This Is the No. 1 Mistake Americans Make When Investing in Crypto
I'm a Financial Expert: This Is the No. 1 Mistake Americans Make When Investing in Crypto

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

I'm a Financial Expert: This Is the No. 1 Mistake Americans Make When Investing in Crypto

Cryptocurrencies are one of the most exciting asset classes due to their novelty and high returns. Bitcoin has crushed the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite over the past decade, with altcoins having varying levels of success. Read More: Find Out: The pro-crypto policies of the Trump Administration have only put more spotlight on cryptocurrencies, but jumping in without enough knowledge can result in substantial losses. While there are several mistakes you can avoid when investing in crypto, one mistake stands out. This guide will uncover mistakes to avoid and what you can do to put yourself in a better position when you buy crypto. Alena Afanaseva, CEO and founder of BeInCrypto, believes it's important for investors to treat cryptocurrency differently from stocks. Having no distinctions between the two asset classes can result in excessive losses if you take too much risk. 'The biggest mistake is to think that cryptocurrencies follow the same rules as traditional assets. When we analyze the dynamics of fiat, commodities, or stocks, we always have a two-way approach: looking at the macro environment, digging deeper into fundamentals, and adding technical analyses on top of that,' Afanaseva explained. 'In general, you know that during the easy monetary policy cycle, we are gonna see the growth of stock prices. Unfortunately, these rules do not always apply to cryptocurrencies.' She also took some time to mention how risky cryptocurrencies are. Stocks are risky, too, but crypto is in an entirely different category. 'Fundamental analysis is very scarce [for crypto], and the future path of any new project is highly unpredictable, and the whole industry is not mature enough. So, you need to keep in mind that crypto investments are much riskier than any traditional world investment.' Discover Next: Chances are, you've heard of someone who made a fortune with bitcoin, whether it's a friend or some guy on the internet. Afanaseva shared some hard numbers that explain the risk of this approach and how much money people lose with cryptocurrency. 'Very relevant stats coming from data compiled by BeInCrypto on Dune Analytics: there are around 5,000 addresses turning a profit of over $100,000, and about 311 wallets exceeding $1 million in gains. However, more than 60% of addresses engaging with the Solana-based token launchpad have incurred substantial losses. Nearly 1,700 addresses lost more than $100,000, and 46 wallets suffered losses exceeding $1 million.' Crypto is risky, and jumping into the asset out of fear of missing out based on past successes can set you up for a dangerous future. Afanaseva shared a good mindset that can help you avoid this common crypto mistake. 'I think the key here is to understand the risk you take, to properly assess how your loss is going to influence your budget. Try to make a reasonable decision. Don't go all-in; try to diversify — the rule of all eggs in the basket does apply here. And I would strongly recommend avoiding any leverage trading — the volatility in the cryptocurrency market is enormous, so it is very easy to get into [the] red zone.' Knowing your financial situation and diversifying your portfolio can help you make better decisions with crypto and other investments. You'll also become a more confident investor as you learn more about these assets. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 This article originally appeared on I'm a Financial Expert: This Is the No. 1 Mistake Americans Make When Investing in Crypto

How Much the Average Middle-Class American Has Gained in the Stock Market Since Trump Announced His Tariffs
How Much the Average Middle-Class American Has Gained in the Stock Market Since Trump Announced His Tariffs

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How Much the Average Middle-Class American Has Gained in the Stock Market Since Trump Announced His Tariffs

According to Gallup, 71% of middle-income Americans are invested in the stock market, and they've watched their fortunes rise and fall repeatedly during the volatile period since President Donald Trump announced his trade tariffs on April 2. But as the official start of summer approaches, those who resisted the urge to panic-sell during the frightening declines have largely seen their discipline pay off. Check Out: Read Next: It's impossible to gauge what the average middle-class investor might have gained or lost because the concept is a construct, regardless of the investor's socioeconomic class. Even if it were possible to put a dollar amount on the mean middle-class earner's stock investments, that would ignore critical variables like that investor's: Type, size and number of stock or fund holdings Portfolio makeup Portfolio diversity Degree of leverage from options trading or margin borrowing Trade frequency Fees and expenses Discover More: For context on just how differently two otherwise similar middle-class investors can perform, consider that Warner Bros Discovery Inc. (WBD) cratered on April 2 and retained a 24% overall loss through June 10. Conversely, Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has been one of the top performers in the post-tariff era, adding most of its 74% year-to-date gains since April 2. Two middle-class stock pickers with identical incomes and backgrounds who rolled the anti-diversification dice by purchasing identical amounts in either stock on April 1 would have had radically different outcomes between then and mid-June. A more reliable metric might be the major indices that so many middle-class households invest in through their 401(k)s, IRAs, index funds and ETFs. Between April 2 and June 10: The S&P 500, the benchmark index for the U.S. stock market, gained 6.16%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, which tracks the blue chips, gained 1.31%. The tech-heavy and more volatile Nasdaq gained 11.57%. The FTSE All Cap Index, which includes much of the global stock market with 10,000 small-, mid- and large-cap companies in both developed and emerging markets, gained 7.22%. The average among all four is 6.57%, which is roughly what typical middle-class earners might have gained since April 2 if they followed the conventional advice of diversifying their portfolios with a blend of blue chips, growth stocks and foreign equities, and holding their positions regardless of market behavior. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 Here's the Minimum Salary Required To Be Considered Upper Class in 2025 10 Unreliable SUVs To Stay Away From Buying This article originally appeared on How Much the Average Middle-Class American Has Gained in the Stock Market Since Trump Announced His Tariffs Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store