
US unveils world's first supersonic artillery shell that can hit targets 100 miles away at a blistering 2,700mph speeds
THE US has revealed the world's first supersonic artillery shell, capable of striking targets 100 miles away at speeds of a blistering 2,700mph.
Tiberius Aerospace, a UK-US defence firm, unveiled the Sceptre TrBM 155HG supersonic missile at the Future Artillery Conference in London.
6
THE US has unveiled the world's first supersonic artillery shell
Credit: Tiberius
6
The supersonic shell's fueling design boosts shelf life to over 20 years
Credit: Tiberius
6
The missile is equipped with AI technology, GPS, and a sensor system
Credit: Tiberius
The technological milestone can reach speeds of Mach 3.5 and soars to an altitude of 65,000 feet.
This makes it impervious to countermeasures and GPS jamming systems.
It uses a ramjet engine, enabling supersonic speeds and a range of up to 150km.
The missile is equipped with AI technology, GPS, and a sensor system that corrects errors in real-time.
read more on tech
An important feature is that the Sceptre TrBM 155HG can be powered by diesel, JP-4, or JP-8 fuel.
Unlike typical solid-fuel missiles, the supersonic shell's fueling design boosts shelf life to over 20 years and cuts storage risks.
The Sceptre's propulsion system also reduces reliance on niche energetics, letting the defence firm source fuel from established logistics networks and strengthening the supply chain.
Chad Steelberg, CEO and founder of Tiberius Aerospace, described the state-of-the-art missile as a "10X solution" in range precision, cost-effectiveness, survivability and operational adaptability.
Most read in Tech
He added: "This is a weapon designed for the future battlefield: fast, precise, and resilient in a denied environment."
It comes after Britain hit a major milestone in the race for hypersonic supremacy – with a powerful new missile engine tested 233 times and hailed as a game changer for UK defence.
Putin develops yet another secret new hypersonic missile - this time mini-sized - in bid to outdo West, as 6,100 mph Zircon to be tested next month
The new air-breathing propulsion system, designed to fire cruise missiles at speeds of over five times the speed of sound, is part of a £1billion push to build a British hypersonic weapon by 2030.
The breakthrough comes as military experts warn a British version of
Defence Secretary
'This milestone moment on hypersonics research, supported by British scientists and British small businesses, demonstrates another crucial area where we are working in lockstep with the United States to bolster our Armed Forces and strengthen our deterrence.'
The engine, developed through a joint effort between the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl), the US Air Force Research Laboratory, and UK industry players like Gas Dynamics Ltd, was successfully trialled at NASA's Langley Research Centre in Virginia.
Over six weeks, scientists carried out 233 static tests across a range of supersonic and hypersonic speeds, analysing real-time data to tweak designs and boost performance.
Paul Hollinshead, Chief Executive of Dstl, said: 'This milestone represents a critical advancement in the UK's defence capabilities and reinforces our standing in the AUKUS hypersonic weapon development collaboration.
"The success of these tests highlights the UK's commitment to technological leadership and innovation in this crucial area.'
What is the Iron Dome – and is it really effective?
ISRAEL'S Iron Dome is a high-tech, all-weather mobile air defence system designed to intercept and destroy short-range threats like rockets, missiles, mortars and drones.
The system is made up of at least 10 batteries placed strategically around the country.
Each battery includes a radar detection system, a control centre to assess threats, and truck-towed launchers that fire radar-guided Tamir interceptor missiles.
How does it work?
The radar detects incoming projectiles and sends data to a central command that decides if the threat will hit a populated or strategic area. If it will, the system fires interceptors to destroy it mid-air – ignoring rockets headed for open spaces.
Range & reach:
The Iron Dome can take out targets launched from up to
43 miles away
. Each launcher holds up to
20 interceptors
, and the batteries together can protect nearly
60 square miles
of land. Israel has worked on increasing the range to up to
155 miles
and enabling the system to handle multiple threats from different directions.
How effective is it?
Very. Iron Dome has a reported success rate of around 90 per cent, according to its developer Rafael Advanced Defence Systems. It has intercepted thousands of rockets since its first combat use in 2011. During the 2021 conflict with Gaza, it stopped roughly 90 per cent of over 4,000 rockets fired into populated areas. In the October 2024 Iranian missile barrage, the system again proved its mettle, downing most of the 180 missiles fired.
Limits under pressure:
The system isn't invincible. On October 7, 2023, when Hamas fired thousands of rockets at once, it overwhelmed the system. Experts say there's a limit to how many incoming projectiles the Iron Dome can handle at once – and anything above that threshold can get through.
Part of a trio:
The Iron Dome is just one part of Israel's multi-layered defence network, alongside David's Sling (for medium-range missiles) and Arrow 2/3 (for long-range ballistic missiles), creating overlapping protection against a variety of aerial threats.
Bottom line:
Iron Dome is a battlefield game changer – incredibly effective against limited rocket fire, but not a silver bullet against massed missile barrages.
6
The Sceptre TrBM 155HG can be powered by diesel, JP-4, or JP-8 fuel
Credit: Tiberius
6
It uses a ramjet engine, enabling supersonic speeds
Credit: Tiberius
6
Chad Steelberg, CEO and founder of Tiberius Aerospace, described the state-of-the-art missile as a '10X solution'
Credit: Tiberius
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Irish abroad: ‘One local called me a potato eater . . . ironically, he was eating cheesy fries at the time'
When I first moved to the UK , I said I'd give it six months. Now it's been six years and I'm starting to wonder if I'll ever leave. Last year I was fortunate enough to buy my first home. The elation of the achievement was tempered by the fright of having done so in London. I don't remember making a conscious choice to stay here permanently, but maybe this is it. Milestones like these hammer home the reality of living abroad. Detached from my support network, out on my own. Back in Ireland , I'd have had an instinct for the property market in terms of location and what an area might be like to live in. My parents might have popped along to a viewing and offered an opinion on how much they felt the apartment was worth. READ MORE Buying over here left me at the mercy of English estate agents. With their severe haircuts and ill-fitting suits, they look like they're running late for an Andrew Tate seminar. It starts with an oily handshake, then the lies start. 'The sellers have turned down multiple offers already.' 'The neighbours are all really lovely.' 'I kissed a girl at the weekend. No, you don't know her. She goes to a different school.' Cillian Murphy moved his family to Cork when his kids started speaking with posh English accents. I can only imagine the pain. Of course, I wouldn't abandon my child if they spoke like that, but I'd probably love them 10 per cent less. 'Papa, take Poppy and I to Waitrose to buy hummus. I'm ever so hungry.' My real fear is staying in the UK so long that I go full Pierce Brosnan The urge to put him or her in a basket and leave them on the steps of a church would be overpowering. The lilt of our voices is the birthright of any Irish baby. How we sound is our only natural advantage when we move away. Without it, we're just freckled alcoholics with translucent skin, doomed to walk the earth for eternity in a state of bleary-eyed shame. Nosferatu in an Aran jumper. Murphy was right to take his children home. It was the humane thing to do. The accent is our superpower. Meandering, dull stories become charming. Incoherent mumbling is mistaken for poetry. Birthing a baby with an Irish head but denying them the accent is an act of child cruelty. This is not universally true. There are those who hear the gentle rhythm of our speech and are overcome with a poisonous envy. Years ago, I was standing outside a kebab shop in Western Australia when a local turned to me and called me a 'potato eater'. The irony was that he was eating cheesy fries at the time. Who knows if I'll have a child or not. My real fear is staying in the UK so long that I go full Pierce Brosnan. So far removed from my origin that I become an awkward facsimile of myself. Half-remembered visions of my childhood blurring with drunken fever dreams. Perched on a barstool in a silk cravat, waxing lyrical about the old country to anyone who will listen. 'I do miss Éire,' I'd slur. 'My father built our family home from clay and sticks on the banks of the River Liffey. I often wonder if it's still standing.' Perhaps I should reflect less on what I might be losing and consider what it is that I've gained by leaving Ireland. [ The Irish diaspora setting up and running businesses abroad Opens in new window ] [ The New York island that is the final resting place for thousands of Irish emigrants Opens in new window ] Living in a foreign country gives you the chance to look at yourself a little differently, to try doing things another way. Part of it might just be a function of getting older. But, since living in London, I've definitely taken chances that I never did back home. Starting a new life is hard. Emigrating forces you to get comfortable with being uncomfortable. It's challenging, but you might just surprise yourself with how much you can handle. When things feel like too much and you feel like going home, that is actually the very moment that you should stay. Unless, of course, your kids start sounding like they're in Downton Abbey. Then it's probably time to go. Sign up to The Irish Times Abroad newsletter for Irish-connected people around the world. Here you'll find readers' stories of their lives overseas, plus news, business, sports, opinion, culture and lifestyle journalism relevant to Irish people around the world If you live overseas and would like to share your experience with Irish Times Abroad, you can use the form below, or email abroad@ with a little information about you and what you do. Thank you


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘No timewasters please': is setting boundaries necessary or plain rude?
In the early days of my obsession with eBay , a comically aggressive message was often added to the description of items offered for sale: no timewasters please. What's that all about? I said to myself. Sounds a bit strung out. Back then, I was less knackered and overstretched. 'Chillax mate!' muttered the old me, perplexed at the defensive, irascible tone of these harassed sellers. Around the same time, during a busy afternoon in the FT newsroom, I was equally taken aback by a colleague doing something similar in person. Faced with the conversational advances of a fellow hack telling him about some problem, he simply rejected the approach. 'I just don't have the bandwidth,' he firmly stated. He actually held up a hand to ward them off and got on with his own work. Wow, I thought. Ruthless but effective – and probably quite male, too. READ MORE Lately, I've been thinking about how the Miranda of yesteryear reacted. I was noticing how others set boundaries assertively. It struck me as rude. But I failed to see it was addressing a phenomenon that it is wise to protect yourself against: things that take up your time when you don't have enough of it. Now it's different. Emails and SMS messages have, since those innocent times, been joined by WhatsApp groups and social media notifications that make keeping on top of work messages a round-the-clock marathon. Looking after elderly parents has created a tsunami of admin, to which my kids' school has piled on a hefty serving of mad apps to communicate, separately, everything from homework assignments to vaccinations and absences. Simply do what's urgent. Learn how to discern the things that actually need your attention, and deal with them straight away. I would recommend this over the tyranny of to-do lists, where medium-term tasks become dreadful psychological burdens It's all a colossal faff. And I'm not alone. A recent poll found that Britons spend 1.52 billion hours as a nation on admin every year and it's burning a big ole hole in our productive time – not to mention speeding us to digital burnout as well. The worst affected are women in middle age – probably because we are taking care of admin on behalf of the young and the old. Does it make me feel better to know my overwhelm is typical? Possibly not – I'm not sure there is safety in numbers if they denote the hours of time spent on this nonsense. To quote Peter Finch in Network: I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take this any more. What's the solution? According to Cal Newport and other prophets of reclaiming your resources for what matters, it's best to turn it all off. Just opt out – of emails, social media and the whole digital enchilada. Maybe set a bounceback message, but don't promise to read any of it. Life is out there waiting for you to live it, and work also needs you to get properly stuck in, with no distractions. Most of us, however, don't have the luxury of disappearing even for a day. The impossibility of truly logging off gives rise to droll suggestions on social media for how to manage a bulging email inbox. How about a weekly ballot to choose one that gets a reply, the rest get deleted? If only! But there is a better approach. It even worked for me for a few years, until the digital onslaught gathered force. Simply do what's urgent. Learn how to discern the things that actually need your attention, and deal with them straight away. I would recommend this over the tyranny of to-do lists, where medium-term tasks become dreadful psychological burdens. In the news industry, this is the norm. Follow up right now, make that phone call, write the damn thing down, find the information and pass it on. Then you move on to the next task. When people dither in a newsroom, it's unusually irritating. More than that, it seems a bit of an affront – hence my colleague's refusal to engage all those years ago. And who had the worse manners in that exchange, really? This is something I've returned to. Now, I think setting boundaries is entirely necessary. That doesn't mean I would dare tell a coworker I don't have the bandwidth, not least because women are expected to be nicer. But I'll certainly be less thoughtless about other people's time. No more expecting a response to pointless messages, such as the one I sent to the editor of this column with the silly joke about email ballots. There's nothing wrong with sharing a bit of levity in the working day. But neither is there anything wrong with ignoring it. As she wisely did. 'No timewasters please!' – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025


The Irish Sun
8 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
UK cities with slowest charging times and lowest number of EVs revealed – don't get caught out when driving your motor
THE BRITISH cities with the worst availability and speed of electric vehicle charging have been revealed in new research. More and more people are 3 Cost, speed and access to EV chargers can vary vastly from region to region Credit: Getty 3 Electric car plugged in outside house on street with a sunset Credit: Getty 3 Researchers looked at the number of charging points per 10,000 people within a five mile radius of city centres Credit: Getty Cost, speed and access to EV chargers can vary vastly from region to region across the country. But new data from Available Car has shed light on exactly which cities are the Researchers looked at the number of charging points per 10,000 people within a five mile radius of city centres. They also noted the average cost and time it takes to charge half an EV battery. read more in motors The data examines 53 major cities across the UK, excluding London. Liverpool was found to be the city with the lowest number of chargers, with just two chargers per 100,000 people within a five mile radius of the city centre. Newcastle barely did better at 2.4 chargers per 100,000, while Bradford and Leeds followed up with 2.6 each. 10 cities with the fewest EV chargers The following 10 cities have the fewest number of EV chargers per 100,000 people within a five mile radius of the city centre according to Available Car: Liverpool - 2.0 Newcastle-upon-Tyne - 2.4 Bradford - 2.6 Leeds - 2.6 Sheffield - 3.0 Bristol - 3.4 Birmingham - 3.5 Southend-on-sea - 3.8 Durham - 4.0 Canterbury - 4.5 Smaller cities boasted far better numbers in the EV charging accessibility ranking. Most read in Motors Ripon was the city with the highest number of chargers per 100,000 at 63.1 - far ahead of second placed Salisbury at 43.7. But simply finding a charger isn't the only issue EV owners face. Available Car's data also highlighted a major regional disparity in the time it takes to charge half a battery. Leicester is the city found to have the slowest EV charging times - taking an average of 8.25 hours to get to half charge. Available Car's report reads: "The city's slower charging infrastructure highlights the need for investment in faster chargers to support the growing demand for electric vehicles. "Without quicker charging options, Leicester may face challenges in encouraging more drivers to switch to electric." But Leicester EV drivers have some solace - as the survey also found it to cheapest city to charge your car, where a half full battery would cost an average of £12.60. 10 cities with the slowest EV charging time The following cities have the slowest average time to charge an EV according to Available Car: Leicester - 8.25 hours Brighton & Hove - 6.24 hours Portsmouth - 5.67 hours Coventry - 5.45 hours Oxford - 4.65 hours York - 4.58 hours Bath - 4.54 hours Leeds - 4.51 hours Manchester - 4.46 hours Norwich - 4.28 hours Brighton & Hove and next slowest for charging, 6.24 and 5.67 hours respectively. Wakefield recorded the speediest charge of the cities surveyed, taking an average of just 0.8 hours. The researchers used a Tesla Model Y as the benchmark vehicle when gathering the data. Their report adds: "Making the switch to an electric vehicle (EV) should be an exciting step towards greener, more sustainable driving. "However, one of the biggest barriers preventing drivers from switching from petrol or diesel to electric vehicles is having to rely on their local charging infrastructure, particularly the time it takes to charge and the cost involved. "Unlike petrol and diesel drivers, EV owners must navigate the UK's charging network, where charging speeds and costs vary significantly based on location and charger type."