France says UN conference to work on post-war Gaza, Palestinian state recognition
France and Saudi Arabia had planned to host the conference in New York from June 17-20, aiming to lay out the parameters of a roadmap to a Palestinian state, while ensuring Israel's security.
"The aim is to sketch out post-war Gaza and prepare the recognition of a Palestinian state by France and countries that will engage in this approach," Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said in Brussels before a meeting of European Union foreign ministers.
The conference was postponed under U.S. pressure and after the 12-day Israel-Iran air war began, during which regional airspace was closed, making it hard for representatives of some Arab states to attend. Diplomats said on Friday it had been rescheduled for July 28-29.
French President Emmanuel Macron had been set to attend the conference and had suggested he could recognise a Palestinian state in Israeli-occupied territories at the conference, a move opposed by Israel.
Macron is no longer expected to attend, reducing the likelihood of any major announcements being made.
Diplomats say Macron has faced resistance from allies such as Britain and Canada over his push for the recognition of a Palestinian state.
Israel has been fighting Hamas in the Gaza Strip since the Palestinian militant group's deadly attack on Israel in October 2023. A U.S.-backed proposal for a 60-day ceasefire is being discussed at talks in Doha.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Lammy and counterparts accuse Israel of depriving Gazans of ‘human dignity'
David Lammy has joined other foreign ministers in condemning the Israeli government for depriving Gazans 'of human dignity' as they called on the war to 'end now'. The Foreign Secretary and counterparts from 24 other nations including Australia, Canada and France, plus the EU commissioner for equality, urged the Israeli government to 'immediately lift restrictions on the flow of aid'. They also described proposals to move 600,000 Palestinians to a so-called 'humanitarian city' in Rafah as 'completely unacceptable'. In a statement shared on Monday afternoon, the politicians said: 'The suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths. 'The Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazans of human dignity. We condemn the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food.' The suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths. Alongside 25 other partners, the UK message is clear: the war in Gaza must end now. We need an immediate ceasefire, release of all hostages and a full resumption of aid. — David Lammy (@DavidLammy) July 21, 2025 They said it is 'horrifying' that hundreds of Palestinians 'have been killed while seeking aid' and that the 'Israeli government's denial of essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable'. The foreign ministers reiterated calls for the remaining people being held hostage by Hamas to be released and asked for 'all parties to protect civilians and uphold the obligations of international humanitarian law'. Earlier this month Israeli defence minister Israel Katz laid out plans for the 'humanitarian city' in Rafah, Gaza's most southern city which has been heavily damaged through the war. He reportedly said that the military would initially move 600,000 Palestinians there, with the aim of eventually transferring the whole population to Rafah. 'Proposals to remove the Palestinian population into a 'humanitarian city' are completely unacceptable,' the foreign ministers said on Monday. 'Permanent forced displacement is a violation of international humanitarian law.' The signatories also pledged that they would be 'prepared to take further action to support an immediate ceasefire'. Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry have said dozens of people were killed trying to access food aid over the weekend. At the Commons Liaison Committee, Sir Keir Starmer restated his view that the situation in Gaza is 'intolerable'. He reiterated the UK's commitment to recognising a Palestinian state 'at a time most conducive to the prospects of peace' in the region. The Prime Minister told MPs: 'The situation on the ground in Gaza is intolerable on so many levels and we make that absolutely clear in all our exchanges with Israel and with other countries. 'Whether that's the deaths of those that are queuing for aid, whether it's the plans to force Palestinians to live in certain areas or be excluded from certain areas, they are all intolerable and absolutely wrong in principle.' Sir Keir's government faced criticism from the Labour chairwoman of the Commons International Development Committee over the continued supply of parts for the F-35 fighter jet to Israel. Sarah Champion said: 'Alongside 25 other countries, the UK has issued a statement condemning Israel's actions in Gaza and the West Bank but failed to provide concrete actions on how they will be held to account. 'The committee's recent report on upholding international law, and our challenge on F-35 components, both give the Government practical tools to compel Israel to meet its obligations as an occupying nation.'
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Musk's X accuses Macron ally of politically motivated inquiry
A key ally of French president Emmanuel Macron has been accused of orchestrating a war on Elon Musk's social media platform over claims it promotes far-Right content. Criminal prosecutors this month accused X, formerly known as Twitter, of being an 'organised gang' and engaging in political interference by manipulating its algorithm and carrying out data harvesting. But on Monday, X accused Eric Bothorel, a senior figure in Mr Macron's Renaissance party, of instigating a 'politically motivated' campaign and pushing French prosecutors to file a criminal case against the site. 'French authorities have launched a politically motivated criminal investigation into X over the alleged manipulation of its algorithm and alleged 'fraudulent data extraction',' it said. 'X categorically denies these allegations. This investigation, instigated by French politician Eric Bothorel, egregiously undermines X's fundamental right to due process and threatens our users' rights to privacy and free speech.' Mr Musk's business claimed the 'gang' designation – which is said normally applied to 'drug cartels or mafia groups' – would allow police to wiretap X employees. The data harvesting claims can carry up to 10 years in prison under French cyber security laws. Mr Bothorel wrote to French prosecutors earlier this year warning over Mr Musk's 'personal involvement' in X and interference in European elections 'represents a real danger and threat to our democracies'. French authorities also suspect X of promoting posts from far-Right political figures in this year's European elections, local press has reported. Mr Musk has backed several Right-wing European leaders in recent months, throwing his support behind Alice Weidel, the leader of Germany's far-Right Alternative for Germany (AfD), as well as Marine Le Pen, the leader of France's National Rally. The investigation into X comes after French police arrested Pavel Durov, the founder of private messaging app Telegram, in a crackdown on online safety last year. Mr Durov was charged in August with failing to stop the spread of illegal content online, including child abuse and drug trafficking. He has denied the charges and the case remains ongoing. 'X believes that this investigation is distorting French law in order to serve a political agenda and, ultimately, restrict free speech,' the company said in a statement. X said it had received demands for information on its recommendation algorithm and posts by users, which it had refused to comply with. It claimed the experts in France who had been appointed to examine the data had a record of 'open hostility' against X. 'X is committed to defending its fundamental rights, protecting user data and resisting political censorship,' it said. Responding to X's claims, Mr Bothorel said the French police were not 'taking orders' from him. Writing on X, he questioned whether the site's algorithm had become 'doped with ketamine'.
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Sausage King Starmer's bad afternoon on the grill
Sir Keir Starmer has a sausage problem. Stop sniggering at the back. Not only was there his infamous slip demanding that Hamas 'return the sausages', but there is also the fact that he increasingly resembles a great British banger: pink-skinned, spitting and whistling when grilled and filled with all kinds of rubbish. Sir Keir has become the Sausage King of Westminster and today – at the House of Commons liaison committee – he was due a spell on the barbecue. Part of the problem for the Sausage King is that he's managed to wind up a fair few of the select committee chairs who make up the grilling committee: quite an achievement given that almost all of them are his own MPs. Emily Thornberry was there, looking extraordinarily jolly for one who'd been passed over for attorney-general in favour of one of Starmer's lawyer mates. Dame Meg Hillier spearheaded the rebellion that forced his humiliating climb-down on welfare, while Florence Esholami led much of the resistance to the assisted suicide legislation, a bill which purports to be the brain-child (which in this case is unfair on both brains and children) of Kim Leadbeater but which Westminster insiders know has the Sausage King's porky fingerprints all over it. There's also the small matter of how badly things are going. The first few minutes were relatively uneventful; not so much a grilling as a quick go on the sunbed. But soon both Dame Meg and Ms Esholami rounded on him over the housing crisis. Eshalomi pointed out that councils were currently being forced to bid for the same housing stock for multiple uses – thus pitching homeless children against asylum seekers. Did the Sausage King plan to do anything about this? 'I'm furious', he said in a voice that betrayed all the emotion of the announcement of a rail replacement bus service. Hillier tried again; 'precisely' what accommodation would the government be taking over to house asylum seekers at the expense of local residents, she asked? The PM replied that there was 'lots of housing' going spare, 'and many local authorities that can be used'. With a look of real exasperation Hillier asked whether he could provide just a single example. 'No, but I'll write in and give you details', came the inevitable reply. Someone who actually was furious was Debbie Abrahams who launched into a remarkable broadside over the government's botched welfare reforms. 'This was poor legislation, so far removed from Labour values that I felt ashamed,' she said, and I promise this is not hyperbole, bristling with contempt. 'We must do better, Prime Minister'. The Sausage King opened his nostrils and shot Mrs Abrahams a look of genuine venom. The grilling was getting hotter. Sizzle sizzle! Even possible allies turned on him; Liam Byrne asked about potential tax cuts. 'No Prime Minister can set a budget six months in advance', stammered the PM. The sausage turned pinker and pinker. Dame Caroline Dinenage asked what the PM was doing to support charities forced to cut their staff due to NIC increases. The Prime Minister belched out an answer of purest word vomit; 'We are looking at what we can do on – sort of, business rates for charities and, sort of, putting in the support they need'. 'That's it?', replied Dame Caroline, raising a quizzical eyebrow. She accused him of 'balancing the books on the backs of charities like children's hospices'. By now, the Banger looked like he was actually going to go bang. Dame Caroline went one further when she asked him why his constituents were so mean when it came to charitable giving. After all, she observed, 'you and your colleagues aren't averse to being on the receiving end of a bit of philanthropic giving yourselves'. Finally, the grilling came to its end. In everything from the economy to migration to welfare it had revealed a litany of failures. Dame Meg ended proceedings with a softer tone: 'What's been your best moment in the last 12 months?' The Sausage King said it was walking into Downing Street. On that it was very hard to take issue with him; it's certainly been downhill from there!
