logo
Founder of Inditex acquires 49 percent of UK's PD Ports

Founder of Inditex acquires 49 percent of UK's PD Ports

Fashion United23-07-2025
Madrid – Amancio Ortega, founder and majority shareholder of Inditex, the owner of Zara, continues to expand and diversify his investment portfolio. He has increased his list of logistics assets with the purchase of 49 percent of the British port company PD Ports. PD Ports is one of the UK's leading port groups and the statutory body for the River Tees.
According to the British port group's management, Pontegadea Inversiones, Amancio Ortega's investment and asset holding company, has agreed to purchase 49 percent of the company. Pontegadea Inversiones is where the renowned Galician businessman concentrates the bulk of his wealth and investments, including 50.01 percent of Inditex's share capital. The Canadian alternative asset manager Brookfield Asset Management previously controlled this share. The transaction, still subject to regulatory approval, will leave the founder of Inditex and Zara as a minority reference shareholder within the port company. This is Ortega and Pontegadea's first acquisition within this specific sector of logistics activity. They are entering this area with the purchase of this considerable percentage of PD Ports' share capital. PD Ports will continue to operate under the control of Brookfield Asset Management. Brookfield has committed to maintaining its investment in the company and its profile as a long-term shareholder through its 51 percent stake in PD Ports, held through its infrastructure asset subsidiary, Brookfield Infrastructure.
'This agreement marks the opening of a new and ambitious chapter for PD Ports, one that will continue to build on our proud legacy and set a solid course for our future,' said Frans Calje, chief executive officer of PD Ports. 'We look forward to working with our new shareholder to continue driving the growth of our business.' Calje also highlighted how 'PD Ports' ability to attract a high-quality investor' like Pontegadea 'represents strong support for the company, its team, and its long-term vision'. He added: 'Although we have successful operations throughout the UK, including Groveport, Felixstowe and the Isle of Wight, we remain firmly anchored in Teesside. We will continue to make targeted investments in our facilities and operations here, as well as in the rest of the UK.' Owner of Teesport and statutory port authority of the River Tees
Brookfield acquired PD Ports in 2009 for a symbolic one dollar as part of the liquidation process of the Australian investment firm Babcock&Brown. This was part of a complex financial operation that led the Canadian company to take control of the main assets of its subsidiary Babcock & Brown Infrastructure, which were used to form its own infrastructure subsidiary, Brookfield Infrastructure. PD Ports is one of the UK's main port groups. It operates from 11 port facilities across the country, including ports owned by PD Ports and those operated and managed by the company.
PD Ports' activity is currently concentrated around the ports and port facilities of Billingham; Hartpool; Teesport and Teesport Commerce Park; Groveport; Howden; Immingham; Keabdy; Felixtowe; the Isle of Wight; and on the River Thames, where it operates through equipment installed at the ports of Erith and Purfleet. This list includes some of the main ports in the UK, such as Teesport, which is owned and operated by PD Ports. PD Ports also acts as the statutory port authority of the River Tees. By law, the company is responsible for safety and ensuring the navigability of the river, contributing to the economic development of the area under its jurisdiction. This area covers some 12 miles, about 19 kilometres, inland from the Tees estuary, on the banks of which are the strategic facilities of PD Ports at the port of Teesport and its Teesport Commerce Park logistics park.
Although the financial details of the transaction have not been disclosed or confirmed by PD Ports, Pontegadea Inversiones, or Brookfield, according to the Financial Times, citing sources close to the deal, the purchase of 49 percent of the port company by Amancio Ortega was closed at a figure slightly below two billion pounds; about 2.31 billion euros at the current exchange rate.
In summary Amancio Ortega, through Pontegadea Inversiones, has acquired 49 percent of the British port company PD Ports.
PD Ports operates 11 port facilities in the UK and is the statutory port authority of the River Tees.
The transaction, subject to regulatory approval, values Ortega's stake at close to 2.31 billion euros. This article was translated to English using an AI tool.
FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@fashionunited.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Facebook must face DC attorney general's lawsuit tied to Cambridge Analytica scandal
Facebook must face DC attorney general's lawsuit tied to Cambridge Analytica scandal

Reuters

time19 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Facebook must face DC attorney general's lawsuit tied to Cambridge Analytica scandal

July 31 (Reuters) - Meta's Facebook must face a consumer protection lawsuit brought by the District of Columbia's attorney general accusing the social media giant of misleading consumers about its data-privacy practices, an appeals court ruled on Thursday. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals revived the District's lawsuit for now in a unanimous three-judge ruling, opens new tab, finding that a lower court judge applied the wrong legal standard in dismissing the case in 2022. The District's lawsuit was part of a wave of court and regulatory actions stemming from revelations in 2018 that Facebook had allowed the now-defunct British political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica to access data from as many as 87 million users. The consultancy's clients included President Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign. Facebook has denied any wrongdoing, and said that it made clear and appropriate disclosures to users about its privacy policies. It still can seek dismissal of the lawsuit. In a statement, Facebook said it was weighing its options and remained confident it will prevail. The District attorney general's office had no immediate comment on Thursday's ruling. The District's lawsuit accused Facebook of duping users into thinking the company had strong enforcement measures to audit third-party applications. The lawsuit said Facebook allowed third parties like Cambridge Analytica to harvest user data without consent on a widespread basis. In the lower court ruling, Judge Maurice Ross of the Superior Court for the District of Columbia concluded that "Facebook did not materially mislead consumers as to their response to Cambridge Analytica." The appeals court said the attorney general should have a lower burden of proof in making renewed arguments that Facebook made unintentionally misleading claims to the platform's users about their control over their information shared on the site. Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg and current and former directors and officers of the company this month agreed to settle claims seeking $8 billion for alleged damage caused by allowing repeated violations of Facebook users' privacy. The accord, filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery, did not disclose a settlement amount. Facebook in 2022 said it would pay $725 million to resolve a class action in federal court in California over the Cambridge Analytica scandal. In 2019, Facebook agreed to pay a record-breaking $5 billion fine to resolve a U.S. Federal Trade Commission probe into its privacy practices. The case is District of Columbia v. Facebook, District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 23-CV-0550. For plaintiff: Jeremy Girton of D.C. attorney general's office For defendant: Joshua Lipshutz of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher

Alexander Isak training at former club Real Sociedad amid transfer speculation
Alexander Isak training at former club Real Sociedad amid transfer speculation

South Wales Guardian

timean hour ago

  • South Wales Guardian

Alexander Isak training at former club Real Sociedad amid transfer speculation

The Sweden international, who is reported to have asked Newcastle executives to explore a move away from St James' Park, has been heavily linked with Liverpool. His former club Sociedad confirmed on Thursday he was 'working with his trainers' at the club's Zubieta facility. Newcastle have been approached for comment. The player did not travel with the rest of the Newcastle squad earlier this month for their pre-season tour of Asia amid speculation over his future, with the club saying at the time he was absent due to a minor thigh injury. The decision to train at his old club rather than his current one will heighten speculation that Isak sees his future away from Newcastle. No offer has been submitted by Liverpool as yet to Newcastle, who would almost certainly be looking for a British record transfer fee for the player. Should Newcastle price Isak out of a move or simply refuse to listen to offers, one option Isak and his representatives might consider would be to unilaterally terminate his contract with three years remaining. A European Court of Justice ruling in favour of former Chelsea midfielder Lassana Diarra last year means players can now terminate their deals 'without unnecessary fears', according to the lawyer who led Diarra's case. The ruling appears to have given players greater leeway to terminate a contract without just cause. The court found some of FIFA's transfer rules were contrary to European law because they restricted freedom of movement and were anti-competitive. Jean-Louis Dupont, who led Diarra's challenge and who was also at the centre of the landmark Bosman case which granted players free agency at the end of their contracts, believes last year's ruling lifts the threat of significant sanctions for players who choose to terminate their deals. Dupont, speaking in general rather than specifically about Isak's case, told the PA news agency: 'In its Diarra judgement, the court ruled that players have a right to termination without just cause and that it is for the ex-employer to establish the existence and the quantum of damages, knowing that losing the opportunity to transfer the player is NOT a damage. 'According to the court, such termination cannot entail disciplinary sanctions (when effected in between seasons). 'FIFA has, imperfectly, amended its rules to abide by the court ruling. But the bottom line is that players have the right to terminate without unnecessary fears.' Asked whether he thought players would now be free from the threat of sporting sanctions such as a ban for terminating their deals, Dupont added: 'Yes. If not, the right to terminate, as granted by the court, would just be theoretical. But, apparently, FIFA is still resisting on this point.' Following the ECJ ruling, FIFA opened a global dialogue on its transfer rules and issued amended, interim rules just before Christmas last year. The world players' union FIFPRO immediately pushed back on the amendments, saying they did not 'provide legal certainty' to players. FIFPRO issued guidance to players in May stating that following the ruling, a player's transfer fee or transfer value could no longer be used in the calculation of any compensation due to the club where the player had been contracted, and advised that the compensation paid should be 'limited to the residual value of the contract, with a possible further reduction or increase on the basis of the national law'. A presumption that a player's new club had induced the termination of contract was removed in the amended rules issued by FIFA last December. Now, a player's old club must prove the new club induced the player to break contract.

UK stocks mixed; FTSE 100 marks best month in six
UK stocks mixed; FTSE 100 marks best month in six

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

UK stocks mixed; FTSE 100 marks best month in six

July 31 (Reuters) - British equities closed mixed on Thursday, as investors assessed a spate of corporate earnings and looked for potential trade deals before the August 1 tariff deadline expires. The blue-chip FTSE 100 (.FTSE), opens new tab fell 0.05%. However the index posted its best month in six. The domestically focused midcap FTSE 250 index (.FTMC), opens new tab rose 0.9% and logged its fourth consecutive monthly gain. Over the past month, investors have digested a flurry of trade headlines from Washington and are still assessing the impact of U.S. tariffs on corporate earnings, although attention is now turning to hopes of a Bank of England rate cut next week. In the market, aerospace and defence stocks (.FTNMX502010), opens new tab gained the most among sectors, up 5.1%, after Rolls-Royce (RR.L), opens new tab raised its full-year operating profit and free cash flow outlook. Shares of the British aero-engineer hit a record high with 8.5% rise. Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab gained 1.2%. The oil major's second-quarter net profit tumbled by almost a third, but exceeded analysts' forecasts. On trade, Trump released fresh levies ranging from updates on copper tariffs, goods from Brazil, South Korea and India, as well as ending exemptions for small-value overseas shipments, ahead of his August 1 tariff deadline. Industrial miners (.FTNMX551020), opens new tab slipped 2.6% tracking lower copper prices. Glencore (GLEN.L), opens new tab, Anglo American (AAL.L), opens new tab and Antofagasta (ANTO.L), opens new tab fell between 2.2% to 5.9%. Among other corporate updates, St James's Place (SJP.L), opens new tab was the top gainer in the FTSE 100, up 11.9%, after the wealth manager's half-yearly net inflows doubled and it launched a new share buyback. Rentokil (RTO.L), opens new tab soared 9.5% after the pest control company kept its full-year outlook unchanged and posted half-yearly revenue growth of 3.1%. British American Tobacco (BATS.L), opens new tab rose 1.3% after the company exceeded its first-half profit estimates. Conversely, Mondi (MNDI.L), opens new tab fell the most in the FTSE 100, down 12.1%, after the packaging firm posted a near 17% fall in first-half pretax profit. A slowdown in the London Stock Exchange Group's (LSEG.L), opens new tab recurring revenue growth sent the company's shares down nearly 8%. Just Group (JUSTJ.L), opens new tab surged 67.5% to top the FTSE 250 midcap index, after Canada's Brookfield Wealth Solutions (BNT.N), opens new tab agreed to acquire the insurer for 2.4 billion pounds ($3.18 billion). On the radar next week, the Bank of England is expected to cut borrowing costs for the fifth time since last August.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store