Facebook must face DC attorney general's lawsuit tied to Cambridge Analytica scandal
The District of Columbia Court of Appeals revived the District's lawsuit for now in a unanimous three-judge ruling, opens new tab, finding that a lower court judge applied the wrong legal standard in dismissing the case in 2022.
The District's lawsuit was part of a wave of court and regulatory actions stemming from revelations in 2018 that Facebook had allowed the now-defunct British political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica to access data from as many as 87 million users. The consultancy's clients included President Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign.
Facebook has denied any wrongdoing, and said that it made clear and appropriate disclosures to users about its privacy policies. It still can seek dismissal of the lawsuit.
In a statement, Facebook said it was weighing its options and remained confident it will prevail.
The District attorney general's office had no immediate comment on Thursday's ruling.
The District's lawsuit accused Facebook of duping users into thinking the company had strong enforcement measures to audit third-party applications. The lawsuit said Facebook allowed third parties like Cambridge Analytica to harvest user data without consent on a widespread basis.
In the lower court ruling, Judge Maurice Ross of the Superior Court for the District of Columbia concluded that "Facebook did not materially mislead consumers as to their response to Cambridge Analytica."
The appeals court said the attorney general should have a lower burden of proof in making renewed arguments that Facebook made unintentionally misleading claims to the platform's users about their control over their information shared on the site.
Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg and current and former directors and officers of the company this month agreed to settle claims seeking $8 billion for alleged damage caused by allowing repeated violations of Facebook users' privacy. The accord, filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery, did not disclose a settlement amount.
Facebook in 2022 said it would pay $725 million to resolve a class action in federal court in California over the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
In 2019, Facebook agreed to pay a record-breaking $5 billion fine to resolve a U.S. Federal Trade Commission probe into its privacy practices.
The case is District of Columbia v. Facebook, District of Columbia Court of Appeals, No. 23-CV-0550.
For plaintiff: Jeremy Girton of D.C. attorney general's office
For defendant: Joshua Lipshutz of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
29 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Barclays becomes second UK bank to quit industry's net zero group
The lender announced it would be leaving the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) on Friday after 'the departure of most of the global banks'. HSBC became the first British institution to leave the alliance earlier this month in the wake of several major US banks. Campaigners called Barclays' decision to step away 'incredibly disappointing' as it marks a fresh blow to international efforts to co-ordinate climate action. Assembled in 2021 by the UN Environment Programme's finance initiative but led by banks, the NBZA commits members to align their lending, investment and capital markets activities with cutting planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050. In a statement published online on Friday, Barclays said: 'After consideration, we have decided to withdraw from the Net Zero Banking Alliance. 'With the departure of most of the global banks, the organisation no longer has the membership to support our transition.' The bank said it remains committed to its ambition to be a net zero bank by 2050 as well as its targets to cut financed emissions, and to mobilise 1 trillion US dollars of sustainable and transition financing. 'We continue to work with our clients on their transition, finance the transition and scale climate tech, while helping to ensure energy security for our customers and clients,' the lender said. 'This is an important commercial opportunity for Barclays; in 2024, we generated approximately half a billion pounds in revenues from sustainable and transition-related activity.' The bank made the announcement three days after it published an update to its climate transition plans, which reiterated its green commitments. Jeanne Martin, co-director of corporate engagement at ShareAction, which campaigns for responsible investment, said Friday's announcement has therefore sent 'mixed signals' to governments and companies around the world. 'Barclays' decision to leave the NZBA is incredibly disappointing and a step in the wrong direction at a time when the dangers of climate change are rapidly mounting,' she said. 'As the financial risks of global heating multiply and climate impacts like heatwaves, floods and extreme weather events become more intense and frequent, we cannot afford half-measures. 'Responsible investors will be watching closely and raising the pressure on the bank to protect long-term economic prosperity and the livelihoods of people everywhere.' The corporate world's retreat from diversity policies and green commitments has accelerated since Donald Trump's return to the White House. Six of the largest US banks – JP Morgan, Citigroup, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs – all left the NZBA following his election in November. But UK banks had stuck with the alliance until HSBC announced its departure this month. With Barclays now leaving, British lenders listed as NBZA members as of Friday afternoon still include Lloyds, NatWest, Standard Chartered and Nationwide. The alliance said its members have been making 'important progress' with well over 100 banks setting individual and independent science-based targets for their financed emissions.
Rhyl Journal
29 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Barclays becomes second UK bank to quit industry's net zero group
The lender announced it would be leaving the Net Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) on Friday after 'the departure of most of the global banks'. HSBC became the first British institution to leave the alliance earlier this month in the wake of several major US banks. Campaigners called Barclays' decision to step away 'incredibly disappointing' as it marks a fresh blow to international efforts to co-ordinate climate action. Assembled in 2021 by the UN Environment Programme's finance initiative but led by banks, the NBZA commits members to align their lending, investment and capital markets activities with cutting planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050. In a statement published online on Friday, Barclays said: 'After consideration, we have decided to withdraw from the Net Zero Banking Alliance. 'With the departure of most of the global banks, the organisation no longer has the membership to support our transition.' The bank said it remains committed to its ambition to be a net zero bank by 2050 as well as its targets to cut financed emissions, and to mobilise 1 trillion US dollars of sustainable and transition financing. 'We continue to work with our clients on their transition, finance the transition and scale climate tech, while helping to ensure energy security for our customers and clients,' the lender said. 'This is an important commercial opportunity for Barclays; in 2024, we generated approximately half a billion pounds in revenues from sustainable and transition-related activity.' The bank made the announcement three days after it published an update to its climate transition plans, which reiterated its green commitments. Jeanne Martin, co-director of corporate engagement at ShareAction, which campaigns for responsible investment, said Friday's announcement has therefore sent 'mixed signals' to governments and companies around the world. 'Barclays' decision to leave the NZBA is incredibly disappointing and a step in the wrong direction at a time when the dangers of climate change are rapidly mounting,' she said. 'As the financial risks of global heating multiply and climate impacts like heatwaves, floods and extreme weather events become more intense and frequent, we cannot afford half-measures. 'Responsible investors will be watching closely and raising the pressure on the bank to protect long-term economic prosperity and the livelihoods of people everywhere.' The corporate world's retreat from diversity policies and green commitments has accelerated since Donald Trump's return to the White House. Six of the largest US banks – JP Morgan, Citigroup, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs – all left the NZBA following his election in November. But UK banks had stuck with the alliance until HSBC announced its departure this month. With Barclays now leaving, British lenders listed as NBZA members as of Friday afternoon still include Lloyds, NatWest, Standard Chartered and Nationwide. The alliance said its members have been making 'important progress' with well over 100 banks setting individual and independent science-based targets for their financed emissions.
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Switzerland, the land of luxury brands, could see prices skyrocket from Trump's 39% tariffs
Prices for the eponymous Swiss watches, Swiss chocolate and Swiss cheese could skyrocket in a week as a result of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war. Switzerland, home to some the world's most recognizable luxury brands, now faces an upcoming 39% tariff from the U.S. Industry groups on Friday warned that both Swiss companies and American consumers could pay the price. Trump signed an executive order Thursday placing tariffs on many U.S. trade partners — the next step in his trade agenda that will test the global economy and alliances — that's set to take effect next Thursday. The order applies to 66 countries, the European Union, Taiwan and the Falkland Islands. In Switzerland, officials failed to reach a final agreement with the U.S. after Trump initially threatened a 31% tariff in April. Swiss companies will now have one of the steepest export duties — only Laos, Myanmar and Syria had higher figures, at 40-41%. The 27-member EU bloc and Britain, meanwhile, negotiated 15% and 10% tariffs, respectively. Figure came as a surprise The Swiss government spent Friday — the country's National Day — reeling from the news. Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter said that the 39% figure was a surprise, because negotiators had hashed out a deal last month with the Trump administration that apparently wasn't approved by the American leader himself. 'We will now analyze the situation and try to find a solution," Keller-Sutter told reporters. 'I can't say what the outcome will be, but it will certainly damage the economy.' The U.S. goods trade deficit with Switzerland was $38.5 billion last year, a 56.9% increase over 2023, according to the Office of the United States Trade Representative. Keller-Sutter said that she believes Trump ultimately chose the 39% tariff, because the figure rounded up from the $38.5 billion goods trade deficit. 'It was clear that the president was focused on the trade deficit and only this issue,' she said. Time is ticking for watch companies For Swiss watch companies, whose products already come with price tags in the tens of thousands — if not the hundreds of thousands — of euros, a timepiece for an arm could cost a leg, too, come next week. The 39% figure was especially galling to the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry, because Switzerland in 2024 got rid of import tariffs on all industrial goods. 'As Switzerland has eliminated all custom duties on imported industrial products, there is no problem with reciprocity between Switzerland and the U.S.,' the federation said in a statement. 'The tariffs constitute a severe problem for our bilateral relations.' Swiss watch exports were already facing a prolonged slowdown, with significant declines in the United States, Japan and Hong Kong, according to the federation's June figures, the most recent available. Swatch and Rolex declined to comment Friday. Representatives for Patek Philippe, IWC and Breitling didn't respond to requests for comment. Sour taste for Swiss chocolatiers Multinational chocolatiers Nestlé and Lindt & Sprüngli said they have production lines in the U.S. for American customers. But small- and medium-sized Swiss companies are predicted to suffer under the tariffs. Roger Wehrli, chief executive of the Association of Swiss Chocolate Manufacturers. also known as Chocosuisse, said Switzerland exports 7% of its chocolate production to the U.S. It's not just the 39% tariff that's the issue. Once the manufacturers factor in the exchange rate between U.S. dollars and Swiss francs ($1 to 1.23 francs on Friday), Wehrli said, it's close to a 50% increase in costs for the Swiss companies. And that's a big number to pass on to American consumers, if the already-slim margins aren't further reduced. 'I expect that our industry will lose customers in the United States, and that sales volumes will decrease heavily,' he told The Associated Press. Wehrli said that he wants Swiss chocolatiers to sell to other markets around the globe to make up the difference. Still, he hopes American customers remember that Swiss quality beats cheaper quantity. 'I think even if prices for Swiss chocolate increase due to the very high tariffs, I think it's worth (it) to buy Swiss chocolate," he said. 'It's worth (it) to really eat it consciously and to really enjoy it instead of eating a lot.' Tough pill for Swiss pharmaceuticals Swiss pharmaceuticals powerhouse Roche says that it's working to ensure its patients and customers worldwide have access to their medications and diagnostics amid the Trump tariff war. 'While we believe pharmaceuticals and diagnostics should be exempt from tariffs to protect patient access, supply chains and ultimately future innovation, we are prepared for potential tariffs being implemented and confident in managing any impacts,' the statement said. The company in April announced that it plans to invest $50 billion in the United States over the next five years, creating 12,000 jobs. The company already employs more than 25,000 people in the U.S. Meanwhile, Novartis, another major Swiss pharmaceutical firm, said in a statement that it was reviewing Trump's executive order. 'We remain committed to finding ways to improve access and affordability for patients,' it said. ___ Pietro De Cristofaro in Berlin, and David McHugh in Frankfurt, Germany, contributed to this report.
