As Trump looks to net GOP seats through Texas redistricting, Democrats grasp for response
The Republican-controlled Texas Legislature is poised to consider a new set of congressional maps during a special session that kicks off next week. With their party locked out of power in Austin, Democrats from the state's congressional delegation said they expect the new districts to continue Texas' history of violating the federal Voting Rights Act by diluting the votes of racial minorities.
'The scheme of the Republicans has consistently been to make sure that they mute our voices so that they can go ahead and have an oversized say in this,' Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Dallas, said at a news conference with House Democratic leadership and most Texas Democrats. 'So I fully anticipate that's exactly where they're going with this map.'
Earlier Tuesday, Trump told Texas congressional Republicans that his political team is pursuing a map that would yield five new Republican seats, according to three people briefed on the call, which was first reported by Punchbowl News.
At the White House, Trump later told reporters that Republicans could get three to five more seats out of a new Texas map — and that other states could follow.
'Texas would be the biggest one,' he said. 'Just a very simple redrawing, we pick up five seats.'
Trump's political operatives have been floating the prospect of drawing new congressional district lines that would shift GOP voters from safely red districts into neighboring blue ones, in a bid to flip the seats and help Republicans hold their narrow House majority. Gov. Greg Abbott ended weeks of uncertainty by putting redistricting on the agenda for the upcoming special session, which begins Monday.
Democrats have very few tools at their disposal to stop or even mitigate the redistricting. Both chambers of the Legislature are under Republican control and overseen by leaders who are unlikely to stand in Trump's way.
This leaves Democrats fearful they could lose their jobs without a clearly defined offensive playbook. Their limited options to hit back include convincing blue states to redistrict in favor of Democrats to offset GOP gains in Texas, a move they hope would dissuade Republicans from going ahead with the plan.
They could also encourage state Democratic lawmakers to flee the state to deprive the Legislature of a quorum needed to approve the maps — the same maneuver Texas Democrats used in an unsuccessful attempt to thwart a 2021 GOP voting bill.
Amid those long odds, some Democrats alluded to another option: hoping Republicans spread their voters too thin and give Democrats a chance to win under a favorable national climate.
'Texas Republicans are likely going to continue to act like political punks and bend the knee to Donald Trump's extreme agenda,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-New York, said at Tuesday's news conference. 'In doing so, they will jeopardize their own electoral careers.'
Midterm elections historically favor the party out of power. Combining this trend and narrower Republican margins, Democrats see potential to flip some seats and widen their share of the Texas congressional delegation. Republicans currently control 25 of the state's 38 districts.
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, the party's campaign arm for House races, will use their deep coffers to target Texas Republicans who appear vulnerable under a new map, DCCC Chair Suzan DelBene said.
Jeffries echoed the sentiment, adding that Democrats would do 'everything that we can do in Texas and beyond to respond.'
The Democratic leader speculated that Texas Republicans could end up creating a 'dummymander' — a gerrymander that goes so far as to benefit the other party — because the current Texas map is already drawn to ensure current GOP members' seats are safe.
No maps have been publicly released. Trump's goal of netting five GOP seats would give Republicans control of nearly 80% of Texas' congressional districts in a state where Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris captured 42% last year.
Trump's team believes Republican voters could be more efficiently distributed throughout the state, given that every House Republican in Texas won in 2024 by double-digit margins or did not have a Democratic opponent. The closest GOP win was Edinburg Rep. Monica De La Cruz's 14-point victory.
Texas Republicans grew their vote share last year compared to recent cycles, creating what Trump's team sees as opportunities for new pickups. Sen. John Cornyn voiced support for the idea on Tuesday, pointing to Hispanic voters — who shifted to the right considerably last election — as a population that could deliver Republicans more seats.
And Republicans have successfully used mid-decade redistricting to make gains as recently as the 2024 cycle. In North Carolina, after the Republican-controlled Legislature redrew the map, Democrats lost three House seats.
But majorities fluctuate from election to election, and drawing maps based on old census data and electoral trends from one cycle can be risky.
Rep. Chip Roy, R-Austin, flagged the census as an area of 'query.'
'We have a whole lot of people [that have] come into the state since then,' he said. 'We're going to do this all based on 2020 census data?'
Democrats homed in on their performance in the last Trump midterm — 2018 — as evidence that they can fight a new map solely on the strength of their performance at the ballot box. The party flipped two Texas congressional seats and 12 seats in the state House that year, while Democrat Beto O'Rourke came within 3 points of defeating GOP Sen. Ted Cruz.
A map attempting to pick up five seats, as Trump has suggested, would likely force some Republicans in safe seats to run in more competitive races.
'We're waiting to see how greedy they're trying to be,' said Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Farmers Branch. 'You know the old adage: A pig gets fat and a hog gets butchered. I think the Texas Republicans are pushing the limits on this one.'
Apart from recruiting candidates for newly competitive districts, some Democrats are also pushing for their party to get off the bench and fight.
House Democrats, Democratic leadership and representatives for blue state governors have been meeting to discuss a plan to redistrict their states to favor Democrats if the Texas plan goes through, The Texas Tribune previously reported.
People in Gov. Gavin Newsom's orbit signaled his willingness to go through with the plan during these discussions, and the California governor has been hinting at possible retaliation in recent days.
Two Democrats involved in the talks told the Tribune they are confident Democratic-controlled states will come to their aid, but none have done so.
Democratic state lawmakers could also flee the state during the special session — as they did to temporarily thwart GOP redistricting in 2003 — to prevent Republicans from reaching a quorum.
Rep. Marc Veasey told the Tribune that he would not just support a quorum break, 'I would do everything I can to help aid them in being able to pull it off.' The Fort Worth Democrat said it's time for his party to go on the offensive.
'If they're going to fight dirty and they're going to redraw these lines, then I would be supportive of Democratic state legislators doing whatever is necessary,' he said, adding that he was not concerned about his political prospects if his district is redrawn.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton cautioned against any such move on Tuesday, vowing to use law enforcement to compel 'the attendance of anyone who abandons their office and their constituents for cheap political theater.'
Democrats have also focused on a Department of Justice letter issued to Abbott and Paxton ordering the state to address the existence of coalition districts — where multiple racial minority groups combine to form a voting majority — in light of new court precedent. Abbott cited the letter as the impetus for including redistricting in his special session agenda.
Democrats and some legal experts see the letter as a fig leaf for the true political intent of the redistricting effort — but that has not stopped them from drawing attention to it. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Austin, said the notion that Texas Republicans had drawn a map that disadvantaged white voters was ludicrous.
'[That's] not a big problem that we've ever had down there in my lifetime,' he said.
Rep. Sylvia Garcia, D-Houston, who represents one of the districts the DOJ said constituted an illegal racial gerrymander, even sent out a fundraising blast to supporters the day the special session was ordered with a copy of the letter, calling it an 'attempt to silence the voices of communities of color who have powered progress in Texas for decades.'
Republicans, meanwhile, have been reluctant to discuss the redistricting effort, with many concerned about jeopardizing their seats and bringing heightened legal scrutiny. Texas maps have been routinely challenged in court, with at least one flagged for violating the Voting Rights Act in every decade since the law's 1965 passage.
The current map — drawn in 2021 — has been in litigation for four years, with a federal trial in El Paso concluding in May and a verdict yet to be reached. Whatever map emerges from the special session figures to be no different, giving Republicans further motivation to stay mum.
When asked about the redistricting effort, Rep. Keith Self of McKinney said, 'That's a state issue.' Rep. Pete Sessions demurred, saying it 'is up to the governor and up to the lieutenant governor and the speaker.'
This article originally appeared in The Texas Tribune at https://www.texastribune.org/2025/07/15/texas-democrats-redistricting-response-trump-republican-five-seats/.
This article originally appeared on Corpus Christi Caller Times: Texas Democrats decry GOP efforts to gain seats through redistricting
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Starmer to raise Gaza ceasefire and UK steel tariffs in Trump meeting
Sir Keir Starmer is expected to raise the prospect of reviving ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas and the future of tariffs on British steel as he meets Donald Trump in Scotland. The Prime Minister will travel to Ayrshire, where the US president is staying at his Turnberry golf resort, for wide-ranging discussions on trade and the Middle East as international alarm grows over starvation in Gaza. The two leaders have built a rapport on the world stage despite their differing political backgrounds, with Mr Trump praising Sir Keir for doing a 'very good job' in office ahead of their talks on Monday. But humanitarian conditions in Gaza and uncertainty over US import taxes on key British goods in America threaten to complicate their bilateral meeting. Peace talks in the Middle East came to a standstill last week after Washington and Israel recalled negotiating teams from Qatar, with White House special envoy Steve Witkoff blaming Hamas for a 'lack of desire' to reach an agreement. Since then, Israel has promised military pauses in three populated areas of Gaza to allow designated UN convoys of aid to reach desperate Palestinians. But the UK, which is joining efforts to airdrop aid into the enclave and evacuate children in need of medical assistance, has said that access to supplies must be 'urgently' widened. In his talks with Mr Trump, Sir Keir will 'welcome the President's administration working with partners in Qatar and Egypt to bring about a ceasefire in Gaza', Number 10 said. 'He will discuss further with him what more can be done to secure the ceasefire urgently, bring an end to the unspeakable suffering and starvation in Gaza and free the hostages who have been held so cruelly for so long.' The leaders will also talk 'one-on-one about advancing implementation of the landmark Economic Prosperity Deal so that Brits and Americans can benefit from boosted trade links between their two countries', it said. The agreement signed at the G7 summit last month slashed trade barriers on goods from both countries. But tariffs for the steel industry, which is of key economic importance to the UK, were left to stand at 25% rather than falling to zero as originally agreed. Concerns had previously been raised that the sector could face a levy of up to 50% – the US's global rate – unless a further agreement was made by July 9, when Mr Trump said he would start implementing import taxes on America's trading partners. But that deadline has been and gone without any concrete update on the status of UK steel. Downing Street said that both sides are working 'at pace' to 'go further to deliver benefits to working people on both sides of the Atlantic' and to give UK industry 'the security it needs'. The two leaders are also expected to discuss the war in Ukraine, which Number 10 said would include 'applying pressure' on Vladimir Putin to end the invasion, before travelling on together for a private engagement in Aberdeen. It comes after Mr Trump announced he had agreed 'the biggest deal ever made' between the US and the European Union after meeting Ursula von der Leyen for high-stakes talks at Turnberry on Sunday. After a day playing golf, the US leader met the President of the EU Commission to hammer out the broad terms of an agreement that will subject the bloc to 15% tariffs on most of its goods entering America. This is lower than a 30% levy previously threatened by the US president. The agreement will include 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals, as well as EU purchases of US energy worth 750 billion dollars (£558 billion) over three years. Speaking to journalists on Sunday about his meeting with Sir Keir, Mr Trump said: 'We're meeting about a lot of things. We have our trade deal and it's been a great deal. 'It's good for us. It's good for them and good for us. I think the UK is very happy, they've been trying for 12 years to get it and they got it, and it's a great trade deal for both, works out very well. 'We'll be discussing that. I think we're going to be discussing a lot about Israel. 'They're very much involved in terms of wanting something to happen. 'He's doing a very good job, by the way.' Mr Trump's private trip to the UK comes ahead of a planned state visit in September.


The Hill
6 minutes ago
- The Hill
Mace teases decision on S.C. governor bid: ‘Couple of days'
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) said Sunday she plans to decide in the coming days whether to launch a bid for South Carolina governor. In an interview on Fox News's 'Fox Report Weekend,' Mace hinted that she 'may be forced' to enter the race. 'I will be making a decision over the next couple of days about my future,' Mace said. 'I believe I may be forced to run for governor because I can't watch my beautiful red state of South Carolina go woke. It's gone woke over the last couple of years.' The congresswoman was asked about local coverage of her Friday event in New Hampshire, which anchor Jon Scott said that the local paper reported, 'all but confirms a run for South Carolina governor.' Mace would enter a crowded GOP primary race, with candidates including state Attorney General Alan Wilson, state Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette and Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), who launched his campaign in recent days. But Mace, in the Sunday interview, sought to present the election as a two-person race against Wilson. 'This is a two-man race, if I get in, between me and Alan Wilson, the South Carolina Attorney General, who likes to put pedophiles on trial and give them one day in jail serve,' she said. 'And so I don't believe that the South Carolina people will go for that,' she continued, 'but we'll be making a decision about my future over the next couple of days, and we're excited about it.'


CNN
6 minutes ago
- CNN
In a deal with Trump, Europe gets an elusive agreement. But everyone's a little annoyed
Tariffs European Union Prescription drugsFacebookTweetLink Follow The United States and the European Union avoided the worst-case scenario: a damaging, all-out trade war between allies that threatened to raise prices on a large number of goods and slow two of the world's largest economies. The framework delivered a sense of relief for both sides – but few are cheering the arrangement itself. The agreement, which sets a 15% tariff on most European goods entering the United States, is higher than the 10% tariff Trump put in place on April 2 and significantly higher than the average of around 2% from before Trump's presidency. But it's significantly less than the enormous numbers Trump had been threatening if an agreement wasn't reached. A deal with the United States felt like an impossibility in late May. Frustrated by a lack of progress in negotiations with the 27-member European Union, Trump on May 24 told the world he was done talking to some of America's strongest allies. 'Our discussions with them are going nowhere!' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'I'm not looking for a deal,' he said later that day in the Oval Office. 'We've set the deal — it's at 50%.' The statement — and the shockingly high tariff threat — stunned European trade negotiators and rallied Europe's leaders into action. They quickly agreed to kick talks into high gear. Trump, who has taken a particular liking to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, was swayed after she called him to say the EU would commit to moving 'swiftly and decisively.' Trump soon backed off his threat and said negotiations would continue. But a deal between the United States and the European Union, one of America's top trading partners, had remained elusive for months. The two sides squabbled over America's insistence on high tariffs for steel and aluminum, looming tariffs on pharmaceuticals and the tariff floor for virtually all goods that the Trump administration appears set to raise to 15%. Negotiators were unable to come up with a resolution before the initial July 9 deadline — one of the reasons the Trump administration postponed the effective day for its 'reciprocal' tariffs to August 1. With just days to go before the extended deadline, while Trump was visiting Scotland, he met with van der Leyen and finalized a framework for an agreement — one that was thin on details, heavy on caveats, but was nevertheless a hard-sought relief for both sides. With the agreement in place, two of the world's largest economies avoided a potential economically crippling trade war. The United States held a 50% tariff threat over Europe's head, and Europe threatened America with strategic retaliatory tariffs that threatened to damage key US industries. Both sides appeared to embrace the fact that a deal was in place more than they celebrated it. 'We made it,' Trump said while announcing the deal with von der Leyen. 'It's going to work out really well.' 'I think we hit exactly the point we wanted to find,' von der Leyen said. 'Rebalance but enable trade on both sides. Which means good jobs on both sides of the Atlantic, means prosperity on both sides of the Atlantic and that was important for us.' Markets cheered, somewhat: Dow futures rose 150 points, or 0.3%, poised to open near record territory. S&P 500 futures gained 0.3% and Nasdaq futures were 0.4% higher. The United States and Europe 'seem to have avoided a self-destructive trade war for now in the biggest and deepest commercial and investment relationship the global economy knows,' said Jörn Fleck, senior director of the Atlantic Council's Europe Center. Nevertheless, the details remain murky. Europe will increase its investment in the United States by $600 billion and commit to buying $750 billion worth of US energy products. It eliminates tariffs on a variety of items, including aircraft and plane parts, semiconductors, generic drugs and some chemicals and agricultural products. Industries in the zero-tariff arrangement cheered. 'The zero-for-zero tariff regime will grow jobs, strengthen our economic security and provide a framework for U.S. leadership in manufacturing and safety,' Airlines for America said in a statement. But the 15% baseline tariff applies to most goods, so the EU member states – and American importers — will have to come to terms with the fact that higher tariffs will raise prices for European goods in America. 'Higher tariffs mean higher prices for US consumers—and that will seriously dent EU companies' bottom lines,' said Alex Altmann, vice president of the British Chamber of Commerce in Germany. 'EU companies aiming to stay competitive in the US market will think twice when deciding where to produce or assemble.' The agreement also deals another blow to Detroit automakers, which objected to a similar deal the Trump administration reached with Japan. The 15% auto tariff on EU cars imported to the United States undercuts the 25% tariff American automakers pay if their cars are built in Mexico. Although von der Leyen said pharmaceuticals were included in the early framework, she acknowledged that Trump may ultimately place higher tariffs on drugs imported to the United States, undercutting the agreement. Still, in the eyes of the hard-working negotiators — and for the sake of the global economy — a deal is better than no deal. Now comes the hard part: figuring out the details.