logo
As Govt decides to legally contest Sonia Gandhi's claim to Nehru's papers, a key question: what are Private Papers of public figures, and who can see them?

As Govt decides to legally contest Sonia Gandhi's claim to Nehru's papers, a key question: what are Private Papers of public figures, and who can see them?

Indian Express24-06-2025
The annual general meeting (AGM) of the Prime Ministers' Museum and Library (PMML) Society has decided to take legal action to ensure that Congress leader Sonia Gandhi returns the Private Papers of Jawaharlal Nehru that she took away from the museum in 2008.
Last year's PMML AGM had discussed in detail the reclaiming by Sonia of 51 cartons of donated Nehru Papers when the UPA was in power and she was chairperson of what was at the time known as the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library (NMML) Society.
These papers, part of the Private Collection of India's first Prime Minister, had been donated to the museum by his family earlier. In 2008, Sonia had also barred access to several sets of these papers.
Sources told The Indian Express that a broad consensus had emerged in Monday's (June 23) AGM chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi that Nehru's papers were a 'national treasure and should be handed back to the museum as its rightful place to preserve his legacy'.
Last year, the PMML had decided that it would not permit future donors of Private Papers of eminent personalities to impose indefinite conditions on the declassification of such material.
How private are the 'Private Collections' of eminent public personalities? What rules govern the declassification of correspondence involving occupants of high government office? Who is responsible for declassifying access to such papers?
The Jawaharlal Nehru Papers were the first set of Private Papers obtained by NMML, which was set up in memory of the first Prime Minister.
These papers, relating to both the pre-Independence and post-Independence periods, were transferred to NMML in several batches from 1971 onward. The transfer was facilitated by the Jawaharlal Nehru Memorial Fund (JNMF) on behalf of Nehru's legal heir, Indira Gandhi, who apparently remained the owner of these documents until her death in October 1984.
Subsequently, a substantial collection of Nehru's Papers from the post-1946 period were handed over to NMML by Sonia Gandhi.
Yes. The PMML has the largest collection of Private Papers in the country, which originally belonged to some 1,000 personalities of modern India, encompassing the entire spectrum of its leadership.
In this priceless collection are the papers of Mahatma Gandhi, B R Ambedkar, Rajkumari Amrit Kaur, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, Bhikaji Cama, Chaudhary Charan Singh, and many others.
Among its recent acquisitions are papers of former Himachal Pradesh Chief Minister Shanta Kumar, which include letters written by him to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on One Nation, One Election, the abrogation of Article 370, and Indo-Pak relations, according to the PMML.
There are also the papers of the legendary environmental activist Sundarlal Bahuguna, which were donated to PMML by his wife, Vimla Bahuguna, and papers pertaining to Hindi writer and author Yashpal, comprising correspondence pertaining to his revolutionary activities during the freedom struggle.
The individual collections have come to PMML from families, institutions, universities, and other private donors. The papers are invaluable for an accurate appraisal of the lives and times of these personalities, and essential for an understanding of India's modern history and its landmark moments. This is what lies at the heart of repeated efforts to make them available to scholars and researchers.
The custodians of the archives say there are essential differences between papers and correspondence that can be deemed personal, as opposed to Private Collections, even if they pertain to the same person.
For instance, the correspondence of a President or a Prime Minister with other eminent personalities of the time, or with institutions, can be part of that person's Private Collection by virtue of these papers being owned by the person's family or other private individuals.
However, correspondence and documents held in personal capacity are excluded from this set.
Another set of papers can be classified as Official Records — these are held by various government departments and ministries, and could comprise letters, records, or file notings, etc. pertaining to the working of various central and state governments.
When donors hand over Private Collections in their ownership to archives and museums, they do sometimes reach an understanding with the recipient institution, imposing conditions for their declassification and public access.
Many of those who donated Private Collections to PMML set unspecified embargo conditions on public access to these papers — consequently, the institution holds these papers and conserves them, but it cannot make them public, and researchers cannot access them.
It is in this context that the museum — which functions under the Ministry of Culture — decided that it will, under normal circumstances, permit only a five-year embargo from the date of receipt of any new papers. In rare cases, this window can remain shut for up to 10 years at most.
PMML has also decided to open up several sets of Private Papers that have been lying in its custody for decades, pertaining to the first Speaker of Lok Sabha G D Mavalankar, Nehru's niece Nayantara Sahgal, and as many as 2.80 lakh pages pertaining to Nehru that were not claimed by Sonia Gandhi in 2008.
The other organisation that acquires Private Collections in the country, the National Archives of India — which too, operates under the Culture Ministry — says it acquires only those papers which the donors agree to declassify.
It is the norm to put all records in the public domain, unless in very rare cases, where the concerns may be pressing and pertain to security or sensitivity.
The National Archives' Private Archives Section has in its custody a rich collection of private papers of eminent persons who have contributed in various fields of public life. These papers have been acquired mainly through donations and gifts from individuals and institutions around the world.
The National Archives has papers pertaining to Mahatma Gandhi, Dr Rajendra Prasad, Dadabhai Naoroji, Purushottam Das Tandon, Maulana Azad, Minoo Masani, Sardar Patel and Keshav Dev Malviya among others.
In the United States, the Library of Congress Manuscript Division holds Personal Papers and organizational records that are significant in American history. The National Archives and Records Administration is the official depository for US government records, like the National Archives of India here.
In India, The Public Records Rules, 1997, cover the declassification of all kinds of records and correspondence. For official records, the Rules say that the responsibility for declassification rests with the respective organisations, and that records should ordinarily be declassified after 25 years.
The definition of Public Records encompasses any records in relation to the central government, and any Ministry, department or office of the government — including the PMO and the President's Office.
However, the 1997 Rules don't lay down sweeping powers for papers owned by private individuals and families, access to which is voluntary in nature — either by means of donation or sale of these documents in some cases.
Several of these issues could be contested legally if the government does take the matter of the Nehru papers to court.
This is an updated and edited version of an explainer that was first published on June 27, 2024.
Divya A reports on travel, tourism, culture and social issues - not necessarily in that order - for The Indian Express. She's been a journalist for over a decade now, working with Khaleej Times and The Times of India, before settling down at Express. Besides writing/ editing news reports, she indulges her pen to write short stories. As Sanskriti Prabha Dutt Fellow for Excellence in Journalism, she is researching on the lives of the children of sex workers in India. ... Read More
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I have the right to question Nehru's deeds: BJP's Nishikant Dubey
I have the right to question Nehru's deeds: BJP's Nishikant Dubey

India Today

time36 minutes ago

  • India Today

I have the right to question Nehru's deeds: BJP's Nishikant Dubey

BJP MP Nishikant Dubey launched a blistering attack on the Congress and the Nehru-Gandhi family in the Lok Sabha. Responding to Priyanka Gandhi's remarks, Dubey asserted that a society that forgets its history is ruined. He stated that while Jawaharlal Nehru might be Rahul and Priyanka Gandhi's grandfather, he was India's first Prime Minister, and his actions are open to scrutiny. Citing Nehru's book 'Glimpses of World History', Dubey claimed Nehru downplayed Mahmud Ghazni's atrocities. He blamed the partition on 'dynasty politics', alleging that Nehru's appointment of his sister as an ambassador upset Liaquat Ali, prompting him to move to Pakistan. Dubey also held the Nehru-Gandhi family responsible for the Kashmir issue, the 1962 war with China, and neglecting military heroes like Field Marshal Sam Manekshaw, who he claimed was denied his pension for years.

From Nehru's ‘blunders' to Trump claims: PM address in Lok Sabha on Operation Sindoor
From Nehru's ‘blunders' to Trump claims: PM address in Lok Sabha on Operation Sindoor

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

From Nehru's ‘blunders' to Trump claims: PM address in Lok Sabha on Operation Sindoor

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday addressed the Lok Sabha during the debate on Operation Sindoor and lauded the armed forces and the people of the country for their support. PM Modi spoke on the military action under Operation Sindoor, and the international support for India during that time. (Sansad TV/ANI Grab) The Prime Minister addressed United States President Donald Trump's claims that he brokered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan, a key concern raised by Opposition parties. PM Modi also spoke on the military action under Operation Sindoor, and the international support for the country during that time. Here are the top quotes from Prime Minister Narendra Modi's speech on Operation Sindoor: 📌"On the intervening night of May 6-7, India undertook military action just as decided. Pakistan could not do anything. Our armed forces avenged April 22 within 22 minutes with precision attacks." 📌"Yesterday, our armed forces killed Pahalgam attackers under Operation Mahadev. But I'm astonished that people here laughed and asked 'Why did this only happen yesterday?' Was 'saawan ka somvaar' sought for the operation? What is wrong with these people? A disappointment to this extent? For the past many weeks, there were questions like 'What about Pahalgam terrorists', but now, they are questioning the timing of the operation." 📌"After April 22, I said that it was our commitment, we will eliminate the terrorists, and I said it publicly that their orchestrators would also be their imagination. We are proud that terrorists were given such punishment that even today, their sponsors face sleepless nights." 📌"India showed its technological prowess by targeting Pakistan. We dealt a huge blow to Pakistan's assets and airbases, and many of their airbases are still kept in ICUs." 📌"Today, those asking why we haven't taken back PoK yet ... I ask them in return: whose government allowed Pakistan to occupy PoK in the first place?...Indus Water Treaty was entered into by Nehru. ..Nehru agreed to give 80 per cent water to Pakistan from rivers originating in India, leaving just 20 per cent for a large country like ours. Who was behind the Indus Waters Treaty? Nehru was. The treaty was a betrayal to the country." 📌"The world has seen the scale of our military action – from Sindoor to Sindhu. Operation Sindoor established three things – first, if India faces a terror attack, we will respond in our time, our manner and on our terms. Second, nuclear blackmail will not work. Thirdly, terrorists and the government sponsoring them will not be seen separately." 📌"No country in the world has stopped India from exercising its right to self-defence. Out of 193 countries, only 3 supported Pakistan. Whether it be Quad, BRICS, France, Germany, Russia, the whole world supported India. While we received international support, it is unfortunate that my country's heroes did not get the backing of the Congress party." 📌"After the attacks, Pakistan made a a request in front of the DGMO, 'Bas karo... bahut maara (Stop have hit enough), now we don't have the strength to take any more beating, please stop the attack." 📌"US Vice President (JD Vance) tried to contact me 3-4 times, but I was busy with meetings with the armed forces. When I returned the call, the US Vice President warned me of a big attack from Pakistan. I told him that if Pakistan attacks India, our attack would be much bigger. 'Hum goli ja jawab gole se denge (We will respond to bullets with missiles).'" 📌"Today, Pakistan knows well that India's response gets stronger each time. It knows that if such incidents recur, India is prepared to do anything. And therefore I want to repeat in the temple of democracy, Operation Sindoor continues. If Pakistan tries to misbehave, we will give them a befitting response."

"Whenever I Speak Of Nehru...": PM Modi, Amit Shah's Twin Jabs At Congress
"Whenever I Speak Of Nehru...": PM Modi, Amit Shah's Twin Jabs At Congress

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

"Whenever I Speak Of Nehru...": PM Modi, Amit Shah's Twin Jabs At Congress

New Delhi: The Congress - and its former Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru - was tag-teamed by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah Tuesday evening at the end of a vociferous two-day Lok Sabha debate on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. After Mr Shah ripped into the Congress (and Mr Nehru) - blaming them for Pakistan's illegal occupation of Kashmir and the ceding of territory in Aksai Chin to China - the Prime Minister fired jabs of his own, accusing them of also giving away territory in Punjab and Tamil Nadu. The reference was to Kartarpur and Kachchatheevu Island, which were given over to Pakistan (in 1947, as part of the British boundary-drawing) and Sri Lanka (by Indira Gandhi in 1974). "The people who have been asking us why we don't take back Pakistan-occupied Kashmir... I want to ask, 'whose government let the enemy capture PoK'? The answer is clear..." the Prime Minister said. "They also said Aksai Chin was barren and gave it away." Aksai Chin in eastern Ladakh was illegally occupied by China during the 1962 war. The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party has repeatedly accused the Congress government of the time of having surrendered over 30,000 sq km of Indian territory to China. The accusation usually comes around when the Congress attacks the Modi administration of having surrendered around 4,000 sq km in Ladakh after the violent clashes of May-June 2020. "Congress has always compromised national security. But whenever I speak of Nehru, the Congress and its ecosystem get jittery," the PM responded, adding, "' Lamhon ne khata ki, sadiyon ne saza paayi ' (a mistake was committed in that moment, and the punishment lasted years')." "To date, India is suffering the punishment of decisions taken since independence." Mr Modi also took aim at the Congress for a 'lack of support' after Pahalgam and during Operation Sindoor. He accused, as Amit Shah did, the party of having given Pak a 'clean chit'. The world supported India after Pahalgam and Op Sindoor but the Congress did not, he said. Rahul Gandhi's Deterrance Jibe The Nehru jabs followed sharp questions by Rahul Gandhi about the Op Sindoor timeline and the government's handling of the armed forces. In a combative speech the Congress leader wanted to know what stopped the BJP from extending military action to recapture PoK. Amit Shah's Nehru Jabs Hours earlier Mr Shah set the tone for the Prime Minister's speech, accusing Jawaharlal Nehru of having dismissively surrendered Aksai Chin because "not even a blade of grass grows there". "They (the Congress) asked us why we agreed to a ceasefire (in Op Sindoor) when we were in such a good position? I want to ask them... in 1948 our soldiers had the upper hand but Nehru stopped the war and the PoK problem was created. Pakistan is Congress' mistake... The blame lies with Nehru."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store