Amber Glass/Clear Glass Tubing: New values fixed on import of Blood Collection Tube from China, Europe
The ruling number 2016 of 2025 is related to the import of Amber Glass Tubing and Clear Glass Tubing of a kind used for the manufacture of ampoules from Europe and China, whereas, the ruling number (2017 of 2025) deals with the import of Blood Collection Tube from China.
According to first ruling (2017 of 2025), the customs values of Blood Collection Tube were determined under section 25A of the Customs Act, 1969. The valuation ruling was challenged before the Director General under section 25D of the Customs Act. 1969 and was remanded back to the Directorate vide Order in Revision No.18/2025 with instruction to undertake fresh exercise under section 25A of the Customs Act, 1969 and to conduct fresh exercise keeping in view the objection mentioned order in revision till then the valuation ruling shall hold in field.
A meeting was convened which was attended by both importers and a local manufacturer. During the meeting, importers submitted that international prices of the subject goods have come down due to advancement in technology. The local manufactures on the other hand, contended that the ruling of blood collection tubes should be increased, keeping in view prevalent market prices. To support his contentions, he submitted some quotations from Chinese suppliers.
The valuation methods specified in section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969, were duly considered in sequential order to arrive at the customs values of the subject goods. Accordingly, the customs values of the subject goods have been determined under Section 25(7) of the Customs Act, 1969.
Through another ruling (2016 of 2025), the directorate has also issued new valuation ruling on the import of Amber Glass Tubing and Clear Glass Tubing of a kind used for the manufacture of ampoules from Europe and China.
The Directorate had issued Valuation Ruling for Glass Tubing of a kind for manufacture of glass ampoules (Clear & Amber) and Glass Ampoules (Clear & Amber), which were subsequently challenged by the stakeholders before Director General, Valuation, Karachi under Section 25-D of the Customs Act, 1969. The Director General, Valuation vides its Order-in-Revision directed to revisit the impugned valuation ruling and undertake a fresh exercise. Accordingly, in pursuance of analysis of import data, current market trends, the difference in market prices and customs values, an exercise for the re-determination of customs values of subject goods was initiated.
Importers of glass tubing and ampoules (clear and amber) have requested rationalization of customs values, contending that the current values are higher than prevailing international prices. In contrast, local manufacturers and converters have raised concerns over the increasing import of finished glass tubing and glass ampoules, citing a decline in operational capacity to 20 percent due to uncompetitive pricing, with conversion costs from tubing to ampoules estimated at approximately 100 percent.
Despite being directed to submit cost break-up and evidence to substantiate their claim, no such documentation was provided by local manufacturers, the ruling added.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
13 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Values on import of 22 types of power tools revised
ISLAMABAD: The Directorate General of Customs Valuation, Karachi has revised customs values on the import of 22 different types of power tools from all origins. The Directorate has issued a valuation ruling (2021 of 2025) on Wednesday. The Directorate had issued Valuation Ruling No 1908/2024 dated 03.10.2024 for power tools which was subsequently challenged by the stakeholders before the Director General, Valuation, Karachi under Section 25-D of the Customs Act, 1969. The Director General, Valuation vide Order-in-Revision 6412024 dated 03.12.2024 rescinded valuation ruling under Section 25-D of the Customs Act, 1969. The Director, Customs Valuation, Karachi, was directed to undertake a fresh exercise under Section 25A, ensuring proper stakeholder consultation and application of valuation methodologies in sequence. Accordingly, in pursuance of analysis of import data, current market trends, the difference in market prices and customs values, an exercise for the re-determination of customs values of subject goods was initiated under Section 25 and 25A of the Customs Act, 1969. During the meeting, M/s MA Tools proposed that, as per CGO 05/2022, the unit of measurement be 'piece' and voltage/wattage be included as a classification criterion. Other importers recommended removing branding and categorisation of power tools except for 'A' category Japanese brands. They noted that the previous VR was based on Category B (C: B x 0.6, A: B ' 3) and raised concerns over the non-disclosure of QY Research, stressing that if it is used, lower values from the same source should also be accepted. They added that over 600 items fall under this category and highlighted the possibility of concealment if assessed on a per-unit basis. To determine the transaction values of the subject goods, the valuation methods prescribed under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969 were applied sequentially. The Transaction Value Method, as provided under subsection (l) of Section 25 was found inapplicable since the declared values did not align with prevailing market prices. Similarly, the methods based on the values of identical and similar goods under sub-sections (5) and (6) could not be exclusively relied upon due to the lack of evidence regarding the commercial level, quality, and quantity of the goods. Consequently, the Deductive Value Method, as outlined in sub-section (7) of Section 25, was employed to determine the customs values. In accordance with the procedure specified in Office Order No 1712014 dated 19.03.2014, a market inquiry was conducted. However, it could only yield results to some extent because of variations in market prices. In line with statutory sequential order of Section 25, computed value method, as provided in Section 25(8) of the Customs Act, 1969 was examined, but the same also could not be applied as the conversion cost from the constituent materials and allied expenses, in the country of export, were not available. Finally, the Customs values of the subject goods have been determined under Section 25(9), read with Section 25(7), of the Customs Act, 1969 and rule l2l of Customs Rules, 2001. In light of above, the customs values of power tools are determined and hereinafter specified shall be the customs value for assessment of duty/taxes given against therein, the FBR added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
13 hours ago
- Business Recorder
New customs values on import of iron & steel scrap fixed
ISLAMABAD: Directorate General of Customs Valuation Karachi has fixed new customs values on the import of Iron & Steel Scrap (Re-meltable/ HMS/ Shredded/Re-Rollable Scrap from all origins. According to a valuation ruling issued by the directorate on Wednesday, the customs values of Iron & Steel Scrap (Re-meltable/ HMS/Shredded/Re-Rollable Scrap determined vide Publication Valuation Ruling No. 5612025 dated 8.02.2025. The Chamber of Commerce & Industry, Quetta (QCCI), M/s Mehmoob Re-rolling Mills and M/s Amir Asim Steel Re-rolling Mills (Pvt) Ltd, filed a review appeal under Section 25D of the Customs Act, 1969 before the Director General, Directorate General of Customs Valuation. The Director General vide its Order-in-Revision No. 3112025 dated 24.04.2025 remanded back the case with directions that the Directorate, reconsider the percentage of freight discount. The matter requires re-examination, taking into account all relevant documentary evidence and after affording ample opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, so as to address and resolve the issue appropriately. The Directorate initiated the exercise for re-determination of the customs values of the afore-stated items under Section 25-A of the Customs Act, 1969. A meeting was held with key stakeholders, including the Pakistan Ship Breakers' Association, Pakistan Association of Large Steel Producers and QCCI, to discuss the valuation of imported goods. The QCCI President argued that Iranian-origin goods are cheaper due to lower quality and land-route transportation, and therefore merit a higher freight discount. However, other stakeholders maintained that the existing discount is fair, and cautioned that increasing it beyond seven percent would adversely impact importers using sea ports, leading to market distortion and competitive imbalance. The Directorate assured that all concerns will be reviewed in light of documentary evidence and after affording a fair hearing to all parties. The ruling said the valuation methods given in section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969 were applied sequentially to address the valuation issue at hand. The transaction value method as provided in sub-section (1) of Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969, was found inapplicable as declared values do not correspond to market prices. The values of identical and similar goods as per sections 25 (5) & (6) ibid could not be solely relied upon due to absence of absolute demonstrable evidence of qualities and quantities of commercial level etc. Market enquiry as envisaged under sub-section (7) of Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969 was conducted but could yield no results as prices varied according to selling point in the market. Computed value method as provided in Section 25(8) could not be applied for valuation of the aforesaid goods, because the manufacturing cost of originating countries are not available. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
5 days ago
- Business Recorder
Amber Glass/Clear Glass Tubing: New values fixed on import of Blood Collection Tube from China, Europe
ISLAMABAD: Directorate General of Customs Valuation Karachi has fixed new customs values on the import of Blood Collection Tube (Glass/PET) from China and import of Amber Glass Tubing/Clear Glass Tubing used for the manufacture of ampoules from China and Europe. The directorate has issued two valuation rulings here on Saturday. The ruling number 2016 of 2025 is related to the import of Amber Glass Tubing and Clear Glass Tubing of a kind used for the manufacture of ampoules from Europe and China, whereas, the ruling number (2017 of 2025) deals with the import of Blood Collection Tube from China. According to first ruling (2017 of 2025), the customs values of Blood Collection Tube were determined under section 25A of the Customs Act, 1969. The valuation ruling was challenged before the Director General under section 25D of the Customs Act. 1969 and was remanded back to the Directorate vide Order in Revision No.18/2025 with instruction to undertake fresh exercise under section 25A of the Customs Act, 1969 and to conduct fresh exercise keeping in view the objection mentioned order in revision till then the valuation ruling shall hold in field. A meeting was convened which was attended by both importers and a local manufacturer. During the meeting, importers submitted that international prices of the subject goods have come down due to advancement in technology. The local manufactures on the other hand, contended that the ruling of blood collection tubes should be increased, keeping in view prevalent market prices. To support his contentions, he submitted some quotations from Chinese suppliers. The valuation methods specified in section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969, were duly considered in sequential order to arrive at the customs values of the subject goods. Accordingly, the customs values of the subject goods have been determined under Section 25(7) of the Customs Act, 1969. Through another ruling (2016 of 2025), the directorate has also issued new valuation ruling on the import of Amber Glass Tubing and Clear Glass Tubing of a kind used for the manufacture of ampoules from Europe and China. The Directorate had issued Valuation Ruling for Glass Tubing of a kind for manufacture of glass ampoules (Clear & Amber) and Glass Ampoules (Clear & Amber), which were subsequently challenged by the stakeholders before Director General, Valuation, Karachi under Section 25-D of the Customs Act, 1969. The Director General, Valuation vides its Order-in-Revision directed to revisit the impugned valuation ruling and undertake a fresh exercise. Accordingly, in pursuance of analysis of import data, current market trends, the difference in market prices and customs values, an exercise for the re-determination of customs values of subject goods was initiated. Importers of glass tubing and ampoules (clear and amber) have requested rationalization of customs values, contending that the current values are higher than prevailing international prices. In contrast, local manufacturers and converters have raised concerns over the increasing import of finished glass tubing and glass ampoules, citing a decline in operational capacity to 20 percent due to uncompetitive pricing, with conversion costs from tubing to ampoules estimated at approximately 100 percent. Despite being directed to submit cost break-up and evidence to substantiate their claim, no such documentation was provided by local manufacturers, the ruling added. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
