Swiss take aim at proud claim
Invercargill town crier Lynley McKerrow in front of a Strang's Coffee mural shows what she thinks of Swiss coffee. PHOTO: TONI MCDONALD
The Aussies claimed Phar Lap, the Yanks reckoned they came up with pavlova. Now those cunning Swiss are talking about how they invented instant coffee.
But what has become a staple for many was in fact first made in the jewel of the south - Invercargill.
The spurious Swiss claim was made on stage at the Eurovision Song Contest 2025 semifinals this week as a couple of Swiss presenters delivered a song titled Made in Switzerland.
The duo sang about all the items made in the land-locked country and first on the list was instant coffee.
But the presenters were wrong.
Instant coffee was first made in 1889 and patented a year later by David Strang, of Invercargill. It was sold under the trading name Strang's Coffee citing the patented ''dry hot-air'' process.
Coffee may have changed markedly since then but Mr Strang and Invercargill still have pioneer status.
Proud Southlander Lindsay Beer was appalled at the claim but expected the Swiss would prefer to stay in its neutral corner, as ''the Swiss don't really like a fight''.
''It's sacrilege - they can keep their Swiss army knives but it's sacrilege to pinch our coffee.''
He wondered if Southland should enter the contest next year to set the record right.
''We've got a huge amount of musical talent in the South.''
Invercargill MP Penny Simmonds was gobsmacked that Switzerland was trying to claim Invercargill's proud history as the birthplace of instant coffee.
''I will definitely be taking this major diplomatic incident further,'' Ms Simmonds said.
Town crier Lynley McKerrow believed the claim rightly belonged to the South.
''The only thing the Swiss invented was the holes in the cheese.
''We might be small, but we're fierce and we fiercely stand by the truth and the truth is - instant coffee was from Southland.
''The Swiss can keep their milk chocolate, cheese, meringues and army knives, but keep their hands off our claim to instant coffee.''
Invercargill Mayor Nobby Clark said he did not mind if the Swiss song made a claim instant coffee belonged to them if they were open to paying the city royalties on the song.
''We won't be greedy if 10% of the Spotify sales can come our way. We won't mention our early inventions around watches and chocolate as well.''
The Swiss Embassy declined to comment on the erroneous claim.
- By Toni McDonald
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
27-05-2025
- Newsroom
Climate solution all but buried before it begins
It is sold as a bold step into the future, a technological fix to one of the world's dirtiest problems. But is New Zealand's climate solution, its first carbon-capture and storage project, over before it begins? 'Having read the submissions from the various companies on the Government's regulatory plans, it just doesn't seem like it's going to happen in the next four-and-a-half years before 2030,' RNZ's climate correspondent Eloise Gibson tells The Detail. 'Maybe after that, but I can't see it happening at a scale that's going to take the pressure off, in terms of having to cut our emissions. It's going to be one of the things in the Swiss army knife, I hope, but we are not going to be putting it out in the next couple of years.' The project, led by Todd Energy and backed by the Government, aims to capture carbon dioxide from industrial processes and inject it deep underground in Taranaki, at the Kapuni gas field, locking it away for centuries. The start date has been pencilled in for around 2027, and from then until 2030 it is expected to store a million tonnes of CO₂, with a further almost million tonnes stored over the following five years. It's a big part of the Government's broader plan to meet its legal obligations to cut emissions by 2030 – about a third of the carbon savings needed. But Gibson tells The Detail the project's future is now uncertain unless Todd Energy gets 'more money or less liability or a combination [of both]'. 'There is a whole raft of things that have changed, one is the carbon price is low compared to other countries … then there is the issue of the liability regime, so if there is a leak 15 years after you have filled up a field and closed it off, who is responsible for that … so there is wrangling going on around the rules.' Globally, carbon capture and storage has a mixed track record. Some projects, like Norway's Sleipner, have stored CO₂ safely for decades. Others have failed spectacularly, costing billions and storing less than promised. New Zealand's unique geology – riddled with seismic faults – adds a layer of risk. And if CO₂ does leak, it could undo years of emissions gains and pose unknown threats to groundwater and ecosystems. Then there is the fear that the method becomes a get-out-of-jail-free card for polluters. But putting that aside, if the project does not go ahead in New Zealand, what replaces it so the Government can meet its emissions targets? 'I approached the climate minister, and he did stress that the Government takes an 'adaptive approach' with their emissions budget, which I guess means they can pivot if something doesn't pan out,' Gibson says. 'But given they have cut a bunch of Labour-era policies that could have given them about a million tonnes of savings – which is what they need if this falls over – they are not likely to start these up again and there's absolutely nothing on the table that I have seen that would fill that gap, that this Government would support, so it does give them a problem.' Ultimately, Gibson says she wants the Government to use 'everything in the toolbox'. 'I don't think this is a time to be ruling out solutions. But it's also not a time to be distracted by expensive solutions, when we have other stuff that we know works, right there.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
Scoop
22-05-2025
- Scoop
Bruno Manser Fonds Denies Baseless Allegations By Sarawak Minister Over ITTO Project Failure
Government policy change over logging core protection zone is the real reason for the termination of the ITTO-supported Upper Baram Forest Area (UBFA) in Malaysian Borneo Swiss NGO Bruno Manser Fonds (BMF) today denied allegations made by Sarawak Deputy Minister Len Talif Salleh in the Sarawak State Assembly (DUN) yesterday over the reasons for the termination of a flagship sustainability project 'We are not willing to take the blame for a dodgy policy change by the Sarawak government', BMF director Lukas Straumann said. 'Len should be honest and acknowledge that Sarawak dropped the late Chief Minister Adenan Satem's plan of protecting the UBFA's core zone of 79,000 hectares of primary forest – Sarawak's last primary forest outside the totally protected areas.' Celine Lim, Managing Director of Sarawak-based NGO SAVE Rivers said:' We work with non-Penan communities and were part of the UBFA Project Steering Committee (PSC). So, it is not true that the overall communities were not well represented via the NGOs coalition. The response by YB Datuk Haji Len is intentionally divisive and incomplete to villainise the role of the NGOs, when we were only inquiring public information as per our role as rightholders in the PSC.' In 2020, Malaysia submitted a proposal to the International Tropical Timber Organization for the conservation and sustainable development of a 283,500 hectare area in Sarawak's Upper Baram region. The proposal was drafted by the renowned late botanist Dr Paul Chai and endorsed by then Forest Director Sapuan Ahmad. A key element of the proposal was the conservation of a 79,000 hectare core zone of primary forest in Upper Baram. After international funding was secured, the Sarawak authorities unilaterally changed the project design. The 79,000 hectares were no longer to be excised from the logging concessions but became part of a timber licence granted to Borneoland Timber Resources, a company controlled by the politically-linked timber tycoon Hii King Chiong. Currently, massive logging activities on the western flank of the iconic Gunung Murud Kecil are threatening this habitat of extraordinary biodiversity in the core zone of the former ITTO project. Neither ITTO nor the Sarawak state government answered NGO letters questioning the reasons for the policy change and highlightling governance failures in the ITTO project. The Swiss City of Basel, the Bruno Manser Fonds and the Japanese government had pledged to support the project with a total amount of USD 556,000.
Scoop
22-05-2025
- Scoop
Sarawak Natives File Court Action To Stop Logging In Protected Forest
21 May 2025 - for immediate release Penan communities from Malaysian Borneo challenge large-scale logging operation in Sarawak's Upper Baram region Indigenous representatives from 11 communities in Sarawak's Upper Baram region have gone to court to protest the issuance of a logging licence to a politically-linked timber company. In a claim for judicial review filed in the High Court of Sarawak and Sabah, Penan community representatives call for the recall of a 170,000 hectare timber licence granted to Borneoland Timber Resources Sdn Bhd («Borneoland»), a private company based in Miri, Sarawak. Borneoland is controlled by Hii King Chiong, a local timber tycoon who has appeared in public with Sarawak Premier Abang Johari. Hii's company was awarded the timber concession in 2024 behind closed doors and without public tender. The area was formerly held by Sarawak timber giant Samling. It remains unclear why Hii's company was chosen, or whether his company made any payments for the timber licence, believed to be worth millions of dollars. Timber licence granted in violation of Free Prior Informed Consent (FPIC) principle In their lawsuit, a group of Penan elders led by Nilson Deng of Ba Data Bila state that the issuance of the timber licence, which encompasses their native customary territory, was made without their free, prior, and informed consent. They also argue that they have been deprived of their rights to object and to be heard. They also claim that the licence was granted without proper environmental and social impact assessments. The Penan accuse Borneoland of destroying Sarawak's last primary forests outside the state's totally protected areas. The company has already caused significant damage to forest areas used by the Penan for hunting, fishing and for collecting jungle produce. Part of the licence covers the 55,000 hectare Suling-Selaan Protected Forest which was gazetted in 2002. Protected forest is being destroyed instead of preserved In reply to the court action, Sarawak forest director Hamden Mohammad admitted that 'the primary purpose of a protected forest is to preserve and safeguard the ecological integrity of the land, ensure environmental protection of soils and water, and in some cases, support productive forest activities.' Satellite imagery however shows the heavy footprint of Borneoland's operations, even in areas that were defined as 'protection zone'. In particular, the west flank of the iconic Gunung Murud Kecil is under attack by the loggers. Lack of transparency inviting abuse and corruption Though the litigation that has been ongoing since January 2025, the Sarawak state government has so far failed to produce key documents such as environmental or social impact assessments, timber harvesting plans, and the timber licence granted to Borneoland. These documents are being withheld from the public in what Swiss environmental group Bruno Manser Fonds calls a 'scandalous lack of transparency that is inviting abuse and corruption'. ' My clients are calling on the court to quash the Director of Forest's decision to issue forest timber licence, and to stop the unlawful logging operation', said Miri-based lawyer Roland Engan. 'I will officially apply to court for all relevant documents pertaining to the logging operation. However, in the end this is a political problem. The Sarawak state government under Premier Abang Johari should never have issued this timber licence. It is high time for the Sarawak government to stop this kind of destructive logging that reminds us of the 1990s.'
