‘New Security Service' For Parliament Would Have More Powers
Parliament's security guards will receive training later this year to prepare for potential additional powers.
The Parliament Bill is up for a second reading and would give the guards statutory powers of 'consent search, denial of entry, temporary seizure of specified items, and temporary detention.'
Parliamentary Services chief executive Raf Gonzalez-Montero told the Governance and Administration scrutiny hearing yesterday they were taking that responsibility 'very seriously'.
Police and the Ministry of Justice were assisting with the training, which is expected to begin in December, with the first guards certified around March or April next year.
As part of the hearing – which allows MPs to scrutinise funding decisions – Gonzalez-Montero mentioned the Parliamentary Service focusing on embedding the 'new security service' for members.
During the election they trialled that service, which he said was 'well-received'.
It was now an established service and they will have staff that are able to travel with MPs when they have functions or gatherings 'just to keep them safe', Gonzalez-Montero said.
He said a review of the security system overall will also be taking place, with some gaps between 'when a member is a member, and when a member is a minister'.
'There are things that need to be tightened up in that ecosystem.'
Gonzalez-Montero told MPs the parliamentary service was also investigating options to increase the ability to monitor social media to address what had been seen this year, which was 'digital harm' against MPs.
He said he wanted to make sure whatever service was chosen to respond the issue was 'fit for purpose' for members.
Other issues in Parliament
Other questions in the hearing focused on the issue of infrastructure and accessibility, as well as Parliament's capacity to fulfil its democratic responsibilities.
The Greens' Lawrence Xu-Nan asked about a key lift in the Parliament building, which, when out of order, means a key route for wheelchairs is inaccessible.
Gonzalez-Montero said he agreed, if the lift was out of service, 'that would be a big problem for us.' He said he would love nothing more than to fix those things, but it required funding. He had a wish list to create a ramp for the entry to Parliament, rather than just having the stairs, or having to use different lifts.
'Unfortunately, those things are very expensive, and we haven't yet had the money to fix those things.
'We'll keep it on our radar, keep doing the things that we can within the budget that will allow us.'
He pointed out they'd received funding this year for the infrastructure of the buildings, 'so the sprinkler systems, things that fail, things like the lift.'
But he said last year was the lift's 'end of life' and it hadn't previously been budgeted as something that needed fixing, 'we were lucky this year we got funding.'
'That is the juggling we do all the time.
'So we've got a list of things that we focus on fixing, and then something pops up, and then we say, well, something's going to have to come out of that list for us to fix the lift.'
The funding the service had been receiving was at 2005 levels, he said, and things go up in price and 'every year we're able to do less.'
He said a lot more upgrades in terms of infrastructure will be needed in future. The Beehive needed a lot of work, 'it's a very old building,' he said.
'Pretty much all the buildings here are in in dire need of fixes, strengthening and upgrading.'
Clerk of the House of Representatives Dr David Wilson also fronted the committee and was asked by Labour's Glen Bennett about parliament's 'ability to operate'.
Bennett noted the Office of the Clerk had said there were 'a lot of challenges in terms of workload' and asked how that was being managed in order to provide MPs with what they needed, as well as the public when it came to 'scrutiny and transparency'.
Wilson said he was confident the Office of the Clerk would be able to do that. The increase in funding they'd received wasn't a 'vast sum of money' he said, but it did 'make a difference.'
'It enables us to retain the staff that are hard to attract, but also to take on additional staff when we need to, for example, when we have bills with large numbers of public submissions, we can temporarily embrace the workforce to deal with that.'
This was notable during the submissions to the Treaty Principles Bill, where the committee received 300,000 online submissions, half of which were received on the last day. Submissions were re-opened due to technical issues so people who had issues were able to submit.
Some complaints have been made during the submission process to the Regulatory Standards Bill this week. Wilson told RNZ they were aware of a technical issue with the Parliament website, which was being worked on.
'The issue is affecting the whole website.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
Government 'revising' pay offer to teachers but says union must compromise too
Teachers strike outside Parliament on Wednesday. Photo: JOHN GERRITSEN / RNZ The government is revising its pay offer for secondary teachers, following a nationwide strike, but the union would need to compromise too, Public Service Commissioner Sir Brian Roche said. Thousands of members of the Post Primary Teachers Association (PPTA) walked off the job to protest their pay talks , forcing the closure of many secondary schools. Teachers on picket lines told RNZ the government's offer of a one percent pay rise every year for three years was "despicable, insulting and terrible". The Public Service Commission, which was overseeing the government's side of the pay talks, had been at pains to note that teachers in the first 10 years of their career get annual pay rises of about 13 percent a year as they progress up the pay scale. But teachers said most of them were at the top of the scale and the one percent increases would be all they received. Roche told RNZ in a statement: "This was always going to be a difficult bargaining round - the strike is evidence of that. Now that has happened, we have to find a way forward - we owe that to the students, parents and teachers." "Our initial offer clearly hasn't hit the mark, and we are doing work on a revised offer." He said the union's claim was not realistic. "The PPTA's current set of claims would cost taxpayers $1.7 billion over four years. That's equivalent to an extra $67,000 for every full-time secondary teacher. It's unaffordable, unreasonable and unrealistic. Sir Brian Roche is the Public Service Commissioner. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone "Bargaining is about compromise and to date, and somewhat regrettably, the PPTA has refused to offer any real compromise on these claims. The government is committed to working with the PPTA to get a resolution." Education Minister, Erica Stanford, said the union should have called today's strike off because it had agreed to further talks. But PPTA president Chris Abercrombie said: "The government knew it had an opportunity yesterday to make a reasonable offer to us which could have encouraged us to reconsider our action. Unfortunately, no such offer was forthcoming." Meanwhile, on picket lines, teachers said they were frustrated that they had to strike to try to force a better offer from the government. Wellington teacher Catharine de Montalk said she and her colleagues would be losing money if they accepted the offer. "I don't particularly want to be here. I feel like since my career started 20 years ago that I've been doing this every single pay round and it does get tired, it does get old but one percent is actually the lowest... it is an insult," she said. A teacher outside Parliament during the strike. Photo: RNZ / John Gerritsen Outside Parliament, maths teacher Jennifer Crisp said the government's offer was not reasonable. "We think that's entirely incorrect. It's not a reasonable offer in this economy. Not when MPs have been given more than double that," she said. In Christchurch, teacher Richard Allen said the government's offer was never going to fly. "The knew that that wasn't going to be acceptable right from the start and so it's a shame that it's come to this. To be fair we all want to teach so give us something more reasonable that we can work towards," he said. Several Wellington commuters said they supported the striking teachers. Christian Shaw said the picket at Wellington Railway Station prompted him to do some online research which showed politicians were getting much better annual pay rises than what teachers were being offered. "They're willing to line their own pockets, more than happy, year after year, but they don't want to give our teachers, our nurses... they just cut pay equity which is so important to so many people and they're just taking the absolute piss," he said. His mate Jack Dyer said teachers were not paid enough - and he'd know, having abandoned the profession because of the pay rates for new teachers. "I studied to become a teacher. I got my diploma of teaching for secondary schools and the starting rate there is just atrocious. Like after four years of study, a bachelor's and a diploma, you're coming out and making less than the median wage in Wellington, which is just bizarre," he said. Meanwhile, primary school teachers, support staff and principals belonging to the Educational Institute, Te Riu Roa, were holding stop-work meetings this week and next to discuss their pay talks. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
Saplings, stalking, and spying: Government bills this week
A harvesting site in the Waimata Valley near Gisborne. Photo: RNZ / Alexa Cook This week in Parliament is a Members' Week, with Wednesday evening dedicated to debating non-government legislation. Members' Days cut into government time for lawmaking, so they have now added Wednesday morning to the schedule (rather than the usual 2pm start time for a sitting day) to maintain momentum. This week's bills are a mixture of unfinished business from last week and other bills plucked from the Order Paper that area waiting their respective next stages. Of particular interest are; The Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Scheme-Forestry Conversion) Amendment Bill is back in the House after truncated consideration by the Environment Committee. The bill seeks to address growing concerns about the conversion of farms into "exotic" forestry land, under the auspices of the Emissions Trading Scheme. The word exotic may evoke visions of coconut palms or banana trees, but it is the mass planting of pine trees that has largely been at the centre of the issue. Obviously not all farmland is the same, and New Zealand employs the Land Use Capability (LUC) scale to distinguish highly productive, arable land (LUC class 1) from very unproductive land (LUC class 8). This bill would determine a farm's eligibility for ETS registration based on its LUC rating and restrict the amount of exotic forestry conversion on farmland with an LUC rating between 1 and 6. "The current settings in the emissions trading scheme have tipped the scales too far," said the minister in charge of the bill, Todd Mclay, during the first reading. "We're seeing entire farms converted into exotic forests under the ETS from Invercargill to Ruatōria. These are not marginal lands; these are productive farms supporting families, communities, and local economies. Once they are planted into exotic carbon forests, they are, effectively, lost to food production for decades, if not permanently so." In that same debate, Labour offered what they have called very cautious support for the bill, citing the need to carefully work through issues in select committee. Meanwhile, the Green Party, who are against the bill, have said the real issue is that the whole concept of carbon offsetting is inherently flawed. "The fiction of offsetting has the same practical impact as an alcoholic paying somebody to drink water and thinking that they have solved their drinking problem", said Steve Abel. "That is the distortion that we have in this country to this day, and what's more, the person who's drinking all the water's making a lot of money and thinking that they're doing something about alcoholism, but they're not at all." There have been a number of bills this parliament relating to infrastructure, consenting, and public works, and getting those things done fast. This week's bill aims to speed up the acquisition of private land that is desired for projects listed in the Fast Track Approvals law, or under the Roads of National Significance programme. The Public Works debate was one of the three (Government Bill) committee stages this week. In the committee stage, debate is not time-limited, so it took a while, but was eventually wrapped up by midday Wednesday, before the House moved onto the second committee stage - the Hauraki Gulf / Tikapa Moana Marine Protection Bill , which was interrupted part of the way through its third and final part. The third planned committee stage was for a new stalking law (though the slow pace of debating makes progress on this bill this week unlikely). The last time this bill was in the House was for its second reading, when it received unanimous support from all parties after a robust select committee stage, during which several amendments were adopted. "The committee recommended a broader definition for the pattern of behaviour," National's Erica Stanford explained. "The offence will now require two specified acts within two years, rather than three specified acts within one year. This broadens the pattern of behaviour by capturing fewer acts across a longer time frame. I agree that this change will better address strategies such as anniversary-based stalking. It will also make it harder for stalkers to work around the law." Ginny Andersen is Labour's spokesperson on this. She applauded the adopted amendments but was worried that a remaining aspect might make prosecution difficult - intent. "Currently, it must be proven that the stalker acted knowingly, that their behaviour is likely to cause fear or distress to their target, so it means that the stalker has to know that their behaviour is likely to cause fear or distress. Proving that intent of someone who is lying or is genuinely deluded about how another person feels about them may well be extremely difficult to prove in a court of law and this is concerning." Minister of Justice Paul Goldsmith has a second key bill up this week - The Crimes (Countering Foreign Interference) Amendment Bill , which may resume its second reading (interrupted last week), probably on Thursday afternoon (but only if the pace of debating is brisk). It intends to fill gaps in criminal law concerning clandestine actions made on behalf of foreign actors intending to harm New Zealand, which the Government has said there has been an increased risk of. This law change would introduce treason, inciting mutiny or espionage - all on behalf of foreign actors - as new offences. Only the Green Party voted against the Bill at its first reading, although Te Pāti Māori were absent for the vote. Finally, among Thursday's bills is a brand new government bill, the recently announced bill to prohibit mounting protests outside someone's private residence. You can listen to the audio version of this story by clicking the link near the top of the page. RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, its legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk.
Scoop
18 hours ago
- Scoop
World Vision Hosts Parliamentary Breakfast Honouring Humanitarians And Urging Renewed Commitment To Global Aid
This morning, on World Humanitarian Day, World Vision New Zealand hosted a breakfast at Parliament in Wellington to honour the sacrifice and service of humanitarian workers worldwide and to call on the New Zealand Government to reaffirm its commitment to global aid amid growing needs and declining funding. Attended by more than 100 guests, including Members of Parliament, diplomats, NGOs, and faith leaders, the event paid tribute to the humanitarians who have lost their lives in service. It also highlighted the need for increased funding to support humanitarian efforts and emphasised the critical role New Zealand plays in responding to global crises. "We need the New Zealand Government to prioritise children who make up nearly half of those in need, yet we receive just 5% of aid funding," said TJ Grant, Acting National Director of World Vision New Zealand. "We are urging the Government to commit to a roadmap to reach 0.5% of Gross National Income for Official Development Assistance by 2030." Drawing on his own recent experiences spearheading humanitarian projects, Grant highlighted the human face of global crises and the power of sustained investment. "Being born in the right place shouldn't determine whether a child eats, learns, or lives in safety," he said. "With the right support, we're seeing communities overcome immense challenges with dignity, resilience, and hope. Aid is not charity - it's solidarity in action." The event featured reflections from humanitarian leaders and faith-based organisations, reinforcing the human cost of crisis and the power of compassion. Stories shared on the day illustrated the growing challenges humanitarian workers face, and the impact of New Zealand's support through initiatives like the Disaster Response Partnership. In 2025, more than 305 million people across 72 countries are projected to require humanitarian assistance. Yet global funding remains critically short, and attacks on aid workers are rising. In closing, Grant reminded attendees of New Zealand's legacy as a principled, compassionate nation. "New Zealand has a proud history of stepping up when it matters most. Now is one of those times," he said. "Humanitarian needs are growing - and so must our response. Together, we can help ensure that hope, safety, and opportunity are not limited by geography or circumstance." World Vision New Zealand and its partners urge Parliamentarians to stand with humanitarians, increase investment in Official Development Assistance, and ensure New Zealand continues to be a leader in global compassion.
