Exclusive-Nestle chair's exit followed rising unease over direction, investors say
ZURICH/LONDON (Reuters) -Nestle's recent announcement that Chairman Paul Bulcke will step down followed rising investor unease over the food group's share price, the tenure of previous CEO Mark Schneider and concerns its corporate governance model was out of date, investors told Reuters.
Support for Bulcke, 70, was ebbing away due to doubts about Nestle's recovery after the pandemic, when sales volumes flagged in 2023 as the world's largest packaged food maker increased prices to offset rising raw material costs, four Nestle investors said.
There was also discontent over Bulcke's loyalty to Schneider during that tough period, as well as Nestle's practice of making former CEOs chairmen, they said. Schneider was eventually ousted last August and replaced by Nestle veteran Laurent Freixe.
The maker of Nescafe instant coffee and KitKat chocolate bars said on June 18 that Bulcke, CEO from 2008 to 2016, would step down as chair in April 2026 and be replaced by vice chairman Pablo Isla, a former chairman and CEO of Spanish fashion retailer Inditex.
"Nestle is not in crisis mode, but it's the right time for a change," said Ingo Speich, head of sustainability and corporate governance at Deka Investment, a top-30 Nestle investor which voted against Bulcke at this year's AGM on April 16.
"We are big supporters of independent chairmen, but after being on the board for more than a decade, Bulcke was no longer independent," added Speich. "Nestle has been too much like a closed shop in the past."
Bulcke was not available to comment on this story.
His departure will mark the end of a near 50-year career that saw him rise from marketing trainee to the very top.
Responding to a Reuters request for comment on this story, Nestle spokesperson Christoph Meier said Bulcke chose not to seek re-election at a time when Freixe was well established, and the company's strategic direction was clear and firm.
"This timing ensures a smooth transition, providing ample time and space for the new leadership team to settle in," Meier said, noting the firm had reviewed its succession plans in June.
But the timing of Bulcke's exit - announced soon after he was re-elected for another year, and a year before his mandatory retirement age - was unusual, analysts and investors say.
Bulcke, chairman since 2017, was due to retire in 2027 under Nestle's rules.
Several top-30 investors told Reuters they had been unhappy with Bulcke for years, with some seeking his departure either privately or at shareholder meetings.
"The time has been right for Mr. Bulcke to step aside for quite some time," said one, who declined to be named.
Bulcke's shareholder backing has been declining. In April, he won re-election with 84.8% shareholder support. While apparently substantial, it was well below the level chairs usually get in Switzerland. In 2017, he received almost 96%.
"This was a clear sign that many investors did not appreciate him anymore," the investor said. "He shouldn't have been chairman in the first place - we don't like a CEO becoming chairman without cooling off periods."
FRESH START
Two previous powerful Nestle chairmen, Peter Brabeck and Helmut Maucher, had also been CEO.
"Chairmen who are former CEOs can be resistant to change," said Kuno Schedler, a corporate governance expert at the University of St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Shareholders also criticised Bulcke's decision to retain Schneider when Nestle's performance struggled after 2022.
Adding to the disquiet were scandals such as Nestle's use of banned treatments to purify bottled water in France, and supply chain problems in the United States. Yet when Schneider was finally let go, it came as a shock.
"Safe haven companies like Nestle should never surprise the market," one shareholder said. "The former CEO was doing roadshows with investors shortly before he had to go."
Shareholders have also been concerned by the performance of the group's share price - which fell 42% between 2022 and 2024 - lagging rivals like Unilever and Danone which gained 15% and 19% respectively.
Investors were also worried about high debt which threatened future payouts. Net debt at the end of 2024 was 2.9 times adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and Amortization, up from 2.5 times at the end of 2023.
"Shareholders only want one thing: returns. And if they're not there, then people are unhappy," said one investor.
Investors and analysts said incoming chair Isla showed strong leadership at Zara-owner Inditex, cheering a potentially fresh approach to driving growth at Nestle.
One of Isla's first priorities will be to define the profile of the next CEO, said Vontobel analyst Jean-Philippe Bertschy. Freixe is 63, so questions have been raised about how long he will remain in the top job.
Other tasks will include deciding what to do with Nestle's roughly 40 billion euro ($47.11 billion) stake in French cosmetics giant L'Oreal, and whether to keep the company's struggling frozen foods business.
"We need better execution at Nestle," said Simon Jaeger, a portfolio manager at Nestle investor Flossbach von Storch. "That's why it's good to have a breath of fresh air in the position of chairman.
"Inditex is one of the best-managed companies in an ultra-competitive sector. Pablo Isla played a leading role in this. And because he already knows Nestle, he is a good solution."
($1 = 0.8490 euros)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
23 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Panamanian President Backs Lawsuits That Threaten Sale of Panama Canal Ports
If successful, the lawsuits could pave the way for Panama to take over the two key ports. An aerial view shows containers at the Balboa Port, operated by Panama Ports Company, at the Panama Canal, in Panama City, Panama, on Feb. 1, 2025. An aerial view shows containers at the Balboa Port, operated by Panama Ports Company, at the Panama Canal, in Panama City, Panama, on Feb. 1, 2025. Enea Lebrun/Reuters Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino on Thursday signaled that the Central American nation may take control of two ports at either end of the Panama Canal, potentially threatening the $22.8 billion sale plans of the ports' current owner, Hong Kong-based conglomerate CK Hutchison, to a U.S.-based investment company. The announcement came after Panama's comptroller general, Anel Flores, filed two cases with the nation's highest court seeking to invalidate a contract extension with Panama Ports Company, which would then allow Panama to establish its own public-private partnerships for the two ports. Panama Ports Company, 90 percent owned by CK Hutchison, has operated the Balboa and Cristobal ports since 1997 and renewed a 25-year concession in 2021. Story continues below advertisement Flores on Thursday criticized the renewal as 'unfair' and 'abusive,' alleging that it was signed without proper authorization and failed to deliver adequate financial returns. His first lawsuit seeks to outright nullify the concession, while the other asks the court to declare it unconstitutional. 'The ports are ours; they belong to the Republic of Panama, and therefore to all Panamanians,' Flores declared at a press conference on Thursday. 'It doesn't seem right to me that other people, in other places, are negotiating the future of assets that belong to us, the Panamanians.' The lawsuits have the backing of Mulino, who also endorsed an April 7 audit of Panama Ports Company by Flores's office, citing alleged royalty underpayments and irregularities in the concession renewal. The results of that audit have yet to be released. 'The Court now has a decision in its hands regarding the Comptroller's well-founded claim. We will wait for the verdict,' Mulino said on the lawsuits at the press conference on Thursday. 'The country will be fully informed about the decisions when they are made,' he said. 'But at this moment, I don't see the continuation of that Panama Port [Company] contract, amended or not.' Story continues below advertisement Should the court rule in favor of Flores, it could complicate U.S. asset management giant BlackRock's bid to gain control of the strategic shipping lanes. In March, BlackRock, along with Switzerland-based Mediterranean Shipping Company, formed a buyer consortium to acquire Panama Ports Company as part of a broader deal involving 42 CK Hutchison-owned container terminals worldwide. The deal remains subject to approval from the Chinese regime. On July 28, CK Hutchison announced that it would add a 'major strategic investor from mainland China' to the consortium, in an effort to secure approval from 'all relevant regulatory authorities.' The inclusion of a Chinese partner is expected to ease political pressure from Beijing, which has perceived the proposed sale as a threat to its overseas interests, particularly the transfer of strategic terminals near the Panama Canal to a consortium backed by a major U.S. financial institution. Since the announcement of the deal, Chinese state-aligned media have launched a coordinated propaganda campaign targeting CK Hutchison and its founder, 96-year-old billionaire Li Ka-shing. Story continues below advertisement Ta Kung Pao, a Hong Kong-based newspaper linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), published a series of blistering commentaries accusing Li of 'betraying and selling out all the Chinese people' and urging him to 'think carefully about what position and which side to stand on.' Li, who officially retired in 2018, is personally involved in negotiating the port deal that's widely seen as an effort to offload assets caught in escalating geopolitical tensions between China and the United States. Since his reelection, U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly suggested that the United States should regain control of the Panama Canal, citing overcharges for its use on U.S. ships and the CCP's growing influence over the key waterway. 'Above all, China is operating the Panama Canal. And we didn't give it to China. We gave it to Panama, and we're taking it back,' Trump said in his second inaugural speech CK Hutchison and the White House did not respond to requests for comment by publication time. BlackRock declined to comment.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Shake Shack (SHAK) Drops 14.6% on Weak Outlook
We recently published . Shake Shack Inc. (NYSE:SHAK) is one of the worst-performing stocks on Thursday. Shake Shack saw its share prices drop by 14.6 percent on Thursday to close at $120.34 apiece as investors were said to have soured on its weaker-than-expected outlook for full year 2025, shunning its strong earnings performance during the second quarter of the year. In an earnings call, Shake Shack Inc. (NYSE:SHAK) announced targeting revenues of $1.4 billion to $1.5 billion, which would translate to a growth of 11 to 19.8 percent from the $1.252 billion revenues last year. In the second quarter of the year, Shake Shack Inc. (NYSE:SHAK) registered a 77-percent jump in attributable net income at $17.15 million from $9.67 million in the same period last year. Total revenues increased by 12.6 percent to $356 million from $316 million year-on-year. For the first half, attributable net income jumped by 83 percent to $21.4 million from $11.7 million, while revenues were higher by 11 percent to $677 million from $607 million. While we acknowledge the potential of SHAK as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Arm Holdings (ARM) Drops 13% on Disappointing Q2
We recently published . Arm Holdings plc (NASDAQ:ARM) is one of the worst-performing stocks on Thursday. Arm Holdings fell for a third straight day on Thursday, shedding 13.44 percent to close at $141.38 each as investors soured on its dismal earnings performance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2026. In its earnings release, Arm Holdings plc (NASDAQ:ARM) said net income during the period declined by 42 percent to $130 million from $223 million in the same period last year. Total revenues, however, were higher by 12 percent at $1.05 billion versus $939 million. Heading into the second quarter, Arm Holdings plc (NASDAQ:ARM) is targeting to hit a range of $1.01 billion to $1.11 billion in revenues, which could translate to a 19.67 percent to 31.5 percent jump from the $844 million registered in the same period last year. 'Arm is powering AI workloads everywhere with unmatched performance and energy efficiency,' Arm Holdings plc (NASDAQ:ARM) CEO Rene Haas said. 'Our Q1 FYE26 results exceeded $1 billion in revenue for the second straight quarter as royalties grew across all target end markets, demonstrating the strength of Arm as the AI platform of choice—from the cloud to the smallest edge devices,' he noted. While we acknowledge the potential of ARM as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the . Sign in to access your portfolio