logo
Pakistan living in a turbulent world

Pakistan living in a turbulent world

Express Tribune09-03-2025
Listen to article
Pakistan is located in a region that is near-total collapse. Could the country escape some of the gathering storm or would it follow the nations that have succumbed to various kinds of internal and external tensions? The answer to this important question depends on how aware are Islamabad's policymakers of the difficulties they are their neighbours face in the near – and long-term. The article today is to provide an overview of the difficulties a nation, such as Pakistan, situated as it is, should factor into its view of the changing world.
There are several sources of possible tensions in the region that Islamabad must contend with as it gets engaged in making both domestic and external policies. The most serious of these is the confusion created in international affairs by the Donald Trump-Elon Musk team that governs from Washington.
The team arrived in Washington with the intention of making America great again. This was translated into a slogan – MAGA – that adorned their red headwear well as those of the large legions of their followers. If they carry out what they have promised in their statements and speeches, we will see a significant change in the way America works with the world. Pakistan will be one of the most affected countries.
The Trump-Musk team is in the process of dismantling the world order constructed under the leadership of the United States in the post Second World War era. This order had several important features aimed at creating global stability. This, as the economist John Maynard Keynes was to point out, was not the aim of the victors in the First World War (1914-1919).
One of the more important elements in the global order introduced in 1945 was Washington's willingness to let democracy prevail in the way the world nations conducted their dealings with one another. Size and wealth were not the most important elements in world affairs. This has been abandoned by the Trump-Musk team.
For the governing team, the most important feature of the programme they are busy implementing is to reduce the debt their government carries. To accomplish this, they are working hard to reduce deficits in both internal and external accounts. The sharp fall in the New York stock market on the morning of February 6 was a good indication of the way people were reacting to the moves made by the rulers in Washington.
The other big shock delivered by the ruling Trump-Musk team is a part of the way it is dealing with the developing world, now generally called the Global South. Washington is now in the process of dismantling the United States Agency for International Development, the USAID. The large resources managed by the Agency come from government budget.
Anxious to reduce the government deficit, the team has drastically cut the amount dispersed to the countries of the Global South as grants-in-aid. Several countries across the globe that had large USAID offices have seen the Americans pack their bags and head back home. The offices in Islamabad and the provincial capitals have seen both staff reductions and, in the amounts, available for the programmes that aimed to reduce the incidence of poverty in the country. These programmes were especially important in the tribal areas that straddle the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. The timing of this reduction comes when Pakistan has seen a sharp rise in the incidence of terrorism in the tribal areas. This could not possibly be the aim of the Trump-Musk team.
The next big Trump-Musk team move is to openly woo Putin and Russia. They delivered the message via the way they dealt with Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian President whose country had been invaded in February 2022 by the Russian forces under the overall command of the Russian president. While the meetings in Washington's White House are usually limited to principal participants attending the discussions in the Oval Office, the one attended by Zelensky, Trump and Musk was open to the press. "This is going to be great television – I will say that," said Trump who had made a name for himself after being the lead in the popular TV programme, The Apprentice.
Wrote Maureen Dowd of The New York Times, "It looked like a setup. JD Vance, a malign presence who has said he does not care a fig about Ukraine, chided Zelensky for not being grateful enough to America, i.e. Trump. 'Have you said Thank you once this entire meeting?' he asked Zelensky who has thanked America over and over. Trump barked at Zelensky, you're gambling with World War III and wagged a finger at him. You're going to be more thankful because, let me tell you, you don't have the cards. With us you have the cards, but without us you don't have the cards."
When a reporter asked what would happen if Russia broke the ceasefire again, Trump snapped, "What if anything? What if a bomb drops on your head right now?" It was clear from these exchanges received on the televisions that Trump was looking for TV drama which he got.
With Trump in the White House and with Musk standing behind him most of the time, it had become clear to analysts that there was now a sharp difference between pretense and reality. Henry Kissinger remarked in 2018 at the beginning of the president's first term in office that "Trump may be one of those figures in history who appear from time to time to mark the end of an era and to force it to give up its old pretenses. The old pretense was that America was fully capable of playing the hegemonic role it played 20 years ago, fully involved in reshaping the world, fully supporting democratic allies in all world regions, prepared to fight wars across the world, and refusing any accommodation with authoritarianism in all parts of the world, in particular in Moscow and Beijing. America's European partners are strong nations able and willing to protect themselves from all adversaries."
But in the Trump-Musk era, reality is much different. America is overstretched. A more multipolar world requires working with unpleasant regimes that have carved out space for themselves in various regions. This means that Washington will have to recalibrate and retrench in manners that would require much more from its allies. Europeans in particular have responded by seeking greater self-sufficiency in the world marked by Trump and Musk.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-Putin summit
Trump-Putin summit

Express Tribune

time30 minutes ago

  • Express Tribune

Trump-Putin summit

Presidents of two great powers are meeting in Alaska. This is after a lapse of six years that a Russian and an American President will have a one-on-one summit, with the war on Ukraine being the sole agenda item. One of the presidents seeks peace in Ukraine, while the other brings to the negotiating table the conditions that must be met before any peace agreement is reached. Let there be no mistake that nothing substantial will come out of this summit. I say this because of the pre-summit positions that all four stakeholders — the United States, Russia, Ukraine as well as Europe — have taken on the conflict. The key question that President Vladimir Putin brings to the summit, scheduled in Alaska, is, what does President Donald Trump think about the Russian demands? Putin has not taken one step backwards, which indicates that he may be willing to strike a compromise. Ukraine cannot become part of NATO; NATO must stop encroaching eastwards; Ukraine must demilitarise the oblasts; the Russian language should be declared the official language in the oblasts; and Ukraine's post-war neutrality must be guaranteed. These are the Russian demands that Putin is in no mood to side-step from. The Summit also comes on the heels of President Trump's 50-day and later 10-day ultimatum to Russia. The fact that the US special envoy to Russia, Steve Witkoff, met President Putin on the termination of the second ultimatum suggests that Trump was looking for a way out of the foreign policy tangle he got himself into. He was to take some harsh action after the ultimatum was over; instead, he is landing in Alaska for a summit. Putin might just have provided his American counterpart some face-saving by agreeing to meet him in Alaska. The fact that Putin is travelling to America to meet Trump is already being seen as a diplomatic victory for the former. A president who has been called "a dictator, a mass murderer and a political leader who cannot be trusted to keep his promises" will be shaking hands with the President of the country on its soil that leads such accusations against him. The second stakeholder is Ukraine, which will be absent from the summit. President Volodymyr Zelensky's pre-summit remarks reflect the prospects of the upcoming summit. He says that Ukraine must be discussed with Ukraine, and he only supports the three-sided format of negotiations. He wants a ceasefire and security guarantees from Russia, both of which President Putin is not willing to give. Russia first wants all its demands met before any talk of a ceasefire. Given the state of military operations on the ground, Russia finds no incentive in backing down from its demands because Russian military operations on the ground continue to gain weight and are now increasingly exploiting the Ukrainian vulnerabilities due to the lack of men and material. President Trump is already talking about the second meeting and says that it is in the second meeting that any deal may take place. He says this because he cannot discuss his much-boasted 'land swaps' without the presence of the Ukrainian chair at the table. Anybody who is closely following the run-up to the Alaska summit would observe that the United States has failed to give any clear objective about the summit. Maybe that is deliberate, as the failure to achieve a given objective would determine the success or failure of the summit itself. So the objective has conveniently been kept in the dark. Europeans, the fourth stakeholder in the conflict, are also very explicit in their demands. They want a ceasefire before anything else. They support Ukraine's right to join NATO and demand withdrawal of all Russian forces not only from the occupied oblasts but also from Crimea. The European position also seems non-negotiable. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, in his pre-summit speech, said that President Trump must begin by asking for a ceasefire. President Emmanuel Macron of France has said that the Ukrainian territory should be discussed only with Ukraine at the negotiating table. President Putin will end the special military operations in Ukraine only if his demands are met at the negotiating table. Will those conditions be acceptable to President Trump and his European allies? It is understandable that without President Zelensky's participation, President Trump cannot concede anything to Russia on Ukraine's behalf. So, there are all the chances of the first meeting being used to convey to the world that the war in Ukraine has come to the negotiating table, and it is in the second meeting that any deal or swap over of the land or territorial settlement will be discussed. President Putin is coming to Alaska with non-negotiable demands. President Zelensky is not ready to concede Ukrainian land. Europeans want a ceasefire and give no weight to the Russian demands. So, if President Trump has nothing to offer to the Russian president, then the key question here is, why President Putin has agreed to come to Alaska for a summit? President Putin will take this opportunity to present himself as a great diplomat to the world — someone who is ready to negotiate the end of the war. With the world focusing on him, he will also get an opportunity to present the Russian case to the world. If there is a post-summit joint statement or exposure to the media for a question-and-answer session, then President Putin will be more at peace to get such an opportunity to lay bare in front of the world the existential threat that Russia considers it faces and which the world continues to ignore. A ceasefire can end hostilities, but only a peace settlement can ensure that hostilities don't resume. Ukraine's security concerns will only be addressed if it agrees to become a neutral state. Withdrawal of Russian forces from any of the Ukrainian land without the Russian demands being met is not a bet that the world should be ready to make. Russia controls the land in Ukraine, and the military conditions on the ground support the strong negotiating position that President Putin is all set to take in Alaska. By the time this goes to print, whatever happens in the summit in Alaska will be pretty clear. Yet, my analysis is based on the pre-summit positions of the four stakeholders in the conflict, and also the superior military position that Russia holds on the ground in the conflict. There may be promises, but nothing substantial will come out of this summit.

Trump told Zelenskiy after summit that Putin wants more of Ukraine, source says
Trump told Zelenskiy after summit that Putin wants more of Ukraine, source says

Express Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Trump told Zelenskiy after summit that Putin wants more of Ukraine, source says

Russia has been gradually advancing for months. The war - the deadliest in Europe for 80 years - has killed or wounded well over a million people from both US President Donald Trump said on Saturday Ukraine should make a deal to end the war with Russia because "Russia is a very big power, and they're not", after hosting a summit where Vladimir Putin was reported to have demanded more Ukrainian land. In a subsequent briefing with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, a source familiar with the discussion cited Trump as saying the Russian leader had offered to freeze most front lines if Kyiv's forces ceded all of Donetsk, the industrial region that is one of Moscow's main targets. Zelenskiy rejected the demand, the source said. Russia already controls a fifth of Ukraine, including about three-quarters of Donetsk province, which it first entered in 2014. Trump also said he had agreed with Putin that a peace deal should be sought without the prior ceasefire that Ukraine and its European allies, until now with US support, have demanded. Zelenskiy said he would meet Trump in Washington on Monday, while Kyiv's European allies welcomed Trump's efforts but vowed to back Ukraine and tighten sanctions on Russia. The source said European leaders had also been invited to attend those talks. Read More: Zelenskiy to visit Washington after Trump-Putin talks yield no result on Ukraine Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska on Friday, the first US-Russia summit since Moscow launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, lasted just three hours. "It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up," Trump posted on Truth Social. Russia likely to welcome Trump's comments His various comments on the meeting mostly aligned with the public positions of Moscow, which says it wants a full settlement - not a pause - but that this will be complex because positions are "diametrically opposed". Russia has been gradually advancing for months. The war - the deadliest in Europe for 80 years - has killed or wounded well over a million people from both sides, including thousands of mostly Ukrainian civilians, according to analysts. Before the summit, Trump had said he would not be happy unless a ceasefire was agreed on. But afterwards he said that, after Monday's talks with Zelenskiy, "if all works out, we will then schedule a meeting with President Putin". Those talks will evoke memories of a meeting in the White House Oval Office in February, where Trump and Vice President JD Vance gave Zelenskiy a brutal public dressing-down. Zelenskiy said he was willing to meet Putin. But Putin signalled no movement in Russia's long-held demands, which also include a veto on membership of the NATO alliance, and made no mention in public of meeting Zelenskiy. His aide Yuri Ushakov said a three-way summit had not been discussed. In an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity, Trump signalled that he and Putin had discussed land transfers and security guarantees for Ukraine, and had "largely agreed". "I think we're pretty close to a deal," he said, adding: "Ukraine has to agree to it. Maybe they'll say 'no'." Asked what he would advise Zelenskiy to do, Trump said: "Gotta make a deal." "Look, Russia is a very big power, and they're not," he added. Graphic: Map of Ukraine shows the eastern oblasts and the areas under Russian control Graphic: Map of Ukraine shows the eastern oblasts and the areas under Russian control Need for security guarantees for Ukraine Zelenskiy has consistently said he cannot concede territory without changes to Ukraine's constitution, and Kyiv sees Donetsk's "fortress cities" such as Sloviansk and Kramatorsk as a bulwark against Russian advances into even more regions. Read More: Ukraine peace at stake as Trump hosts Putin Zelenskiy has also insisted on security guarantees, to deter Russia from invading again in the future. He said he and Trump had discussed "positive signals from the American side" on taking part, and that Ukraine needed a lasting peace, not "just another pause" between Russian invasions. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said the most interesting developments concerned security guarantees - inspired by NATO's Article 5. "The starting point of the proposal is the definition of a collective security clause that would allow Ukraine to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the USA, ready to take action in case it is attacked again," she said. Putin, who has hitherto opposed involving foreign ground forces, said he agreed with Trump that Ukraine's security must be "ensured". "I would like to hope that the understanding we have reached will allow us to get closer to that goal and open the way to peace in Ukraine," Putin told a briefing where neither leader took questions. "We expect that Kyiv and the European capitals ... will not attempt to disrupt the emerging progress..." For Putin, the very fact of sitting down with Trump represented a victory. He had been ostracised by Western leaders since the start of the war, and just a week earlier had faced a threat of new sanctions from Trump. '1-0 for Putin' Trump also spoke to European leaders after returning to Washington. Several stressed the need to keep pressure on Russia. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said an end to the war was closer than ever, thanks to Trump, but added: "... until (Putin) stops his barbaric assault, we will keep tightening the screws on his war machine with even more sanctions." A statement from European leaders said "Ukraine must have ironclad security guarantees" and that no limits should be placed on its armed forces or right to seek NATO membership - key Russian demands. Some European politicians and commentators were scathing. "Putin got his red carpet treatment with Trump, while Trump got nothing. As feared: no ceasefire, no peace," Wolfgang Ischinger, former German ambassador to Washington, posted on X. "No real progress – a clear 1-0 for Putin – no new sanctions. For the Ukrainians: nothing. For Europe: deeply disappointing." Both Russia and Ukraine carried out overnight air attacks, a daily occurrence, while fighting raged on the front. Trump told Fox he would postpone imposing tariffs on China for buying Russian oil, but that he might have to "think about it" in two or three weeks. He ended his remarks after the summit by telling Putin: "We'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon." "Next time in Moscow," a smiling Putin responded in English. Trump said he might "get a little heat on that one" but that he could "possibly see it happening".

Air Canada workers picket airports after flight attendants strike over wages
Air Canada workers picket airports after flight attendants strike over wages

Express Tribune

time4 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Air Canada workers picket airports after flight attendants strike over wages

People hold placards as a strike begins after the union representing Air Canada's 10,000 flight attendants failed to reach an agreement with the airline, at Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport in Dorval, Quebec, Canada August 16, REUTERS Hundreds of Air Canada employees formed picket lines outside major Canadian airports and business leaders sought government intervention on Saturday, hours after unionized flight attendants walked off the job over a wage contract dispute. The strike, which started just before 1 a.m. EDT (0500 GMT), forced Canada's largest airline to cancel all of its 700 daily flights, affecting more than 100,000 travelers who had to find alternative flights or stay put. The airline said in a statement on Saturday that it has started locking out thousands of flight attendants in response to the strike action. The carrier had offered a 38% increase in total compensation for flight attendants over four years, with a 25% raise in the first year, which the Canadian Union of Public Employees said was insufficient. CUPE, representing more than 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants, confirmed the work stoppage in a social media post. It is the first strike by Air Canada flight attendants since 1985. Wesley Lesosky, president of the Air Canada component of CUPE, said in a press conference in Toronto that, as of Saturday morning, there were no bargaining sessions scheduled between the two sides, which have held on-and-off negotiations for months. Read More: Canada sheds 40,800 jobs as tariffs dent hiring "We are here because Air Canada forces us to work for free for hours and hours every day, and we are here because we are not going to accept it anymore," he said. Outside Toronto Pearson International Airport - the country's busiest - hundreds of cabin crew waved flags, banners and picket signs. Union officials called on members to assemble outside all of the country's major airports, including in Toronto, Montreal, Calgary and Vancouver. Montreal-based Air Canada said the suspended flights included those operated by its budget arm, Air Canada Rouge. The stoppage would affect about 130,000 customers a day, the carrier said in a statement. Flights by Air Canada's regional affiliates - Air Canada Jazz and PAL Airlines - will operate as usual. Wage dispute The dispute between the union and the airline centers on wages. Attendants are currently paid only when their plane is moving. The union is seeking compensation for time spent on the ground between flights and when helping passengers board. A US judge kept his block on President Donald Trump's buyout plan for federal employees in place on Monday. The union has said Air Canada offered to compensate flight attendants for some work that is now unpaid but only at 50% of their hourly rate. A source close to the negotiations told Reuters the union is looking for parity on wages with Canadian leisure carrier Air Transat, where flight attendants approved a contract last year that provided for total compounded increases of 30% over five years, making them the highest paid in the industry in Canada. Air Canada did not confirm if such a proposal had been put forth by the union. "What we're asking for is not unreasonable. It is not a high demand. It is not that far off other competitors such as Air Transat. It is realistic and it is deserved," Lesosky from CUPE said. The impact of a strike will ripple far beyond Canada. Air Canada is the busiest foreign carrier servicing the U.S. by number of scheduled flights.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store